Abstract
We present the results of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) performed in three patients with severe influenza A/H1N1 pneumonia complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Light microscopy analysis of BAL cytocentrifugates showed the presence of characteristic large, mononuclear, plasmoblastic/plasmocytoid-like cells never described before. Via transmission electron microscopy, these cells were classified as atypical type II pneumocytes and some of them showed cytoplasmic vesicles and inclusions. We concluded that plasmoblastic/plasmocytoid-like type II pneumocytes might represent a morphologic marker of A/H1N1 influenza virus infection as well as reparative cellular activation after diffuse alveolar damage.
1. Introduction
Several studies reported histophatological observations during influenza A/H1N1 2009 pneumonia: the major finding was diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) [1–4]. Type II pneumocytes were considered the main target of influenza A/H1N1 infection [5]. A limited number of observations described in vivo samples, such as bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) [6–8]. BAL may be useful for cytological analysis in influenza virus pneumonias. Therefore, it may play a role in further understanding the pathogenesis of new viral strains.
In this case series we present the results of BAL performed in three patients with severe influenza A/H1N1 2009 pneumonia complicated by acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).
2. Materials and Methods
Between August and December 2009 we performed a bronchoscopy-guided BAL of three patients admitted to the San Gerardo Hospital, Monza, Italy, for influenza A/H1N1 virus pneumonia with subsequent development of ARDS. All three patients required intensive care unit (ICU) admission and received mechanical ventilation (MV) and extracorporeal respiratory support (ECMO). Influenza A/H1N1 diagnosis was confirmed by A/H1N1 virus RNA detection on nasal swab samples using Influenza A/H1N1 2009 rRT-PCR (real-time Reverse-Transcriptase-Polymerase-Chain-Reaction) assay (Genexpert).
BAL differential cell count on cytocentrifugate was performed in the light microscopy (LM) by counting about 300 cells in random fields at 400x magnification. Morphological characteristics of cells were registered after May Grunwald Giemsa and Papanicolau staining. Additional immunocytochemical analyses were performed on two samples using CD20 and CD138. Semithin sections were prepared for transmission electron microscopy (EM) observations.
3. Results
Demographics, comorbidities, severity on admission, microbiological isolations, and outcome for each patient are described in Table 1.
Antiviral therapy with Oseltamivir (150 mg twice daily) was started at hospital admission simultaneously with rRT-PCR assay and was continued until rRT-PCR assay on nasal swab turned negative.
BAL cytocentrifugates analyses are summarized in Table 2. Large, atypical cells with plasmocytoid appearance were observed in all three specimens with similar percentages (8, 9, and 6%, resp.). At LM, they appeared as large, plasmoblastic/plasmocytoid-like cells with eccentric nuclei and paranuclear vacuoles, high ratio nucleus/cytoplasm, and intensely basophilic cytoplasm. No clear viral cytopathic effect was observed (Figure 1). Immunocytochemical analysis on cytocentrifugate showed that these cells were negative for CD20 (B lymphocyte marker) and CD138 (plasma cell marker).
Ultrastructural examinations at transmission EM allowed us to observe multilamellar osmiophilic bodies in the cytoplasm of plasmoblastic/plasmocytoid-like cells. Osmiophilic bodies produce surfactant and are specific for type II pneumocytes. Therefore, these cells were classified as atypical type II pneumocytes. EM showed in these cells small round cytoplasmic inclusions with irregular surface and a diameter around 60 nm (Figure 2). They also showed cytoplasmic vesicles with a diameter around 100 nm and an irregular electron-dense core (Figure 3). These aspects were suspected to be viral inclusions.
4. Discussion
The main characteristic of the BAL of our patients with influenza A/H1N1 pneumonia associated with ARDS was the presence of large cells with a plasmoblastic/plasmocytoid-like appearance, identified at EM as atypical type II pneumocytes.
We postulate two possible explanations for the presence of these atypical cells.
The first hypothesis regards the reparative action that type II pneumocytes may have in DAD. In our cases, type II pneumocytes activation would be justified by viral damage to alveolar epithelium. Reactive hyperplasia of type II pneumocytes is typical of the organizing stage of ARDS. Stanley described morphological atypias, such as increased nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio, in type II pneumocytes found in BALs during ARDS [10]. These atypical pneumocytes are usually aggregated in clusters and are supposed to have a reparative role.
All our patients developed ARDS and we observed pneumocytes aggregated in clusters in the BALs performed earlier (cases numbers 2 and 3). According to this first hypothesis, the atypical cells we observed could be described as reactive immature type II pneumocytes.
The second hypothesis regards influenza A/H1N1 virus cytopathic effect. Type II pneumocytes have been described as the main target of influenza A/H1N1 2009 infection [5]. Nakajima et al. in 2012 described four autopsy cases of influenza A/H1N1 with a histopathological pattern of acute DAD who presented with influenza virus antigen-positive type II pneumocytes, perhaps indicating a direct role of the virus-infected cells in the acute alveolar damage [11]. No specific cytophatic effect or viral inclusion has been described so far at LM in lung tissue specimens during influenza pneumonia [1].
Several observations have been performed via EM on autopsy specimens. During the recent influenza pandemic, Mauad et al. found type II pneumocytes with vesicles, approximately 100 nm in diameter, with an electron-dense center [2]. Bal and colleagues described cytoplasmic inclusions in pneumocytes, which ranged in diameter from 74 to 82 nm and showed surface spikes characteristic of influenza virus [12].
EM observations of our specimens revealed some atypical pneumocytes showing both small round cytoplasmic inclusions with an irregular surface and small vesicles (similar to those described by Bal and Mauad). According to this second hypothesis, atypical type II pneumocytes could be a specific morphological marker of influenza virus infection.
From the data collected so far, we cannot favor one explanation; in fact, they could coexist in cases of severe influenza A/H1N1 pneumonia associated with ARDS.
Limitations of the present study include the following: first, the paucity of cases analyzed; second, we did not perform immunohistochemical staining for H1N1 antigens on BAL samples.
The description of BAL in a control group of patients with ARDS not associated with H1N1 pneumonia is beyond the scope of this case series. However, other authors described BAL cytology in non-H1N1 ARDS, and although they reported morphological atypias in type II pneumocytes, they did not describe these peculiar plasmoblastic/plasmocytoid-like cells [10, 12, 13].
The collection of the airway specimens of patients number 2 and number 3, in which the nosocomial pathogens were isolated, took place after BAL was performed. Therefore, these pathogens most likely did not affect the cellularity in BAL.
In conclusion, plasmoblastic/plasmocytoid-like type II pneumocytes characterize the BAL of our patients with influenza A/H1N1 2009 pneumonia associated with ARDS. They could represent a pathognomonic marker of influenza virus pneumonia as well as reparative cellular activation after DAD. More observations of BAL cytology in patients with influenza pneumonia are needed to understand their characteristics and role.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Consorzio M.I.A. (Microscopy and Image Analysis of University of Milan-Bicocca) for assistance with electron microscopy images.