Table of Contents Author Guidelines Submit a Manuscript
Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases
Volume 2016, Article ID 5854285, 7 pages
Research Article

Ulcerative Colitis and Its Association with Salmonella Species

1Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
2Department of Microbiology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
3Department of Community Medicine, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India

Received 25 September 2015; Accepted 21 December 2015

Academic Editor: Dinesh Mondal

Copyright © 2016 Manish Kumar Tripathi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Ulcerative colitis (UC) is characterized by presence of ulcer in colon and bloody diarrhea. The present study explores the possibility of association between Salmonella and ulcerative colitis. The present study comprised 59 cases of UC, 28 of colon cancer (CC), 127 of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), and 190 of healthy control. The serological study was done by Widal and Indirect Haemagglutination Assay (IHA) for ViAb. Nested PCR was performed targeting fliC, staA, and stkG gene for Typhi and Paratyphi A, respectively. A total of 15.3% patients were positive for Salmonella “O” antigen among them 18.6% UC, 35.5% CC, 12.6% IBS, and 15.3% healthy control. A total of 36.9% patients were positive for “H” antigen including 39.0%, 57.1%, and 67.7% UC, CC, and IBS, respectively. About 1.73% show positive agglutination for AH antigen including 3.4%, 3.6%, and 1.6%, UC, CC, and IBS. A total of 10.89% were positive for ViAb. While 6.8% of UC, 10.7% of CC, 11.0% of IBS, and 12.1% of healthy subjects were positive for the antibody, the PCR positivity rates for Salmonella specific sequences were 79.7% in UC, 53.6% in CC, 66.1% in IBS, and 16.3% in healthy controls. The present study suggested that higher prevalence of Salmonella might play important role in etiopathogenesis of UC, IBS, and CC.

1. Introduction

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is defined as chronic idiopathic inflammatory condition of gastrointestinal tract characterized by presence of blood in diarrhoeal stool [1]. UC is an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The other diseases included under IBD, that is, Crohn’s disease (CD) and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), are also of unknown aetiology [2]. Efforts are being made for last few decades to find out specific pathogen/s causing UC but without any success [3]. The incidence of UC has been observed to be varying with socioeconomic and geographical conditions. While UC is more prevalent in developing tropical countries, prevalence of CD dominates in developed temperate climate countries [4, 5]. Recent trends indicate that in Western Europe and North America (with better hygiene) the figure for incidence of UC is either stabilized or decreasing, and developing countries are now being reported to have very high prevalence of UC [4]. However, CD remains almost an insignificant problem of underdeveloped world. It is very well known that many of the enteric pathogens, that is, Salmonella spp., Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli, Shigella spp., Yersinia enterocolitica, Listeria monocytogenes, Mycobacterium species, Clostridium difficile, and so forth, and several of parasitic, viral, and fungal agents are highly prevalent in countries with poor sanitary conditions [611]. Further, very recently a study from North India has reported that low hygiene and exposure to infections may be associated with increased risk of UC [12]. The predominance of UC over CD in underdeveloped countries along with the reports showing increased short- and long-term risk of inflammatory bowel diseases after Salmonella and Campylobacter enteritis infections [911] suggests possible role of infectious agents causing UC. Therefore, we can say that a specific pathogen has not been detected yet in IBD cases. However, we can say that failure in detection of such pathogens may be due to inadequacy of methods or complexity of gastrointestinal microbial flora [3]. As far as inadequacy of methods is concerned, bacteria implicated may be in viable but not cultivable form as happens in most of the chronic infections. Further, less sensitive conventional methods of detection may be the reason for the nondetection of specific pathogen/s in UC cases. However, in the recent past extremely sensitive molecular method, nested PCR in particular has been found to detect as low as 3 microbes per clinical specimen [13]. Nested PCR takes care of PCR inhibitors present in the biological samples. Therefore, we decided to see the presence of Salmonella species in antral biopsy and stool specimens collected from UC, IBS, colon cancer, and healthy control to explore the possibility of its association with UC in the Eastern part of Northern India.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Population

A total of 404 samples having mean age 36.21 (±13.639) were taken among which 59 cases of ulcerative colitis, 28 of colon cancer, 127 of irritable bowel syndrome, and 190 cases of apparently healthy controls were included in the present study conducted from July 2009 to February 2015 from inpatients and outpatient department of S. S. Hospital, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi. The diagnosis of the patients with UC and colon cancer was done by lower gastrointestinal endoscopy, histopathology of rectal biopsy, and CT scan. Diagnosis of IBS was done by lower gastrointestinal endoscopy and Rome III classification/criteria. All the patients included were having clinical history of the disease. Patients having comorbid systemic illness, HIV, and mental and emotional disorders were excluded from the study.

2.2. Sample Collection and Processing

Rectal biopsies of the patients having positive endoscopic finding and stool samples from healthy control were taken after well informed written consent. Two to three rectal biopsies were taken from the same site of infection. About 5 mL of blood was collected by venipuncture aseptically in a sterile clot activator vial. Serum was separated and subjected for Widal and Indirect Haemagglutination Assay (IHA) and specimens were preserved at −80°C for further use.

2.3. Serological Studies

Widal test was performed by using standard protocol given by manufacturer’s guideline (Span Diagnostics, India). The antibodies titre ≥1 : 160 against TO, TH, and AH antigen was considered significant in the present study. For the IHA test, antibodies against Vi antigen (ViAb) were measured following the method described by Barrett [14] and a titer of ≥160 was considered as significant to diagnose chronic typhoid carriers.

2.4. Molecular Studies
2.4.1. Extraction of Genomic DNA from Clinical Specimens

Extraction of genomic DNA from rectal biopsies and stool samples was done using modified phenol-chloroform and proteinase-K method described by Sambrook and Russell and Van Zwet et al. [15, 16].

2.4.2. Detection of Salmonella Typhi and Paratyphi A Targeting Specific Gene Sequences

In the PCR reaction, about 100 ng quantity of extracted genomic DNA from rectal biopsy and stool specimens were subjected to specific gene sequences amplification of Typhi and Paratyphi A. The primers used in this study were designed by Song et al. [17] which was further modified by Frankel [18]. However, for staA gene of S. Typhi and stkG gene of . Paratyphi A, primers used were taken from the previous studies [19, 20] (Table 1).

Table 1: Primers used for amplification of S. Typhi and S. Paratyphi A serotypes in clinical specimens.

2.4.3. PCR Assay

The reaction mixture for the first-round PCR contained 2.5 μL of 10x PCR buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 50 mM KCl) (Genei, India), 10 pmol of each primer (staA F1, staA R1 and ST1, ST2 for S. Typhi; stkG F1, stkG F2 for S. Paratyphi A) (SBS Genetech Co., Ltd., China), 2 μL (2.5 mM each) of dNTPs mix (Genei, India), 0.33 μL (1 unit) of Taq DNA polymerase (Genei, India), and 5 μL of DNA template (100 ng), and final volume of 25 μL was adjusted with HPLC-grade sterile water. The amplification reaction was performed in a thermal cycler (Biometra, Germany). The nested PCR master mix was the same as that of the first-round PCR, except that it contained 10 pmol of each of the primers staA F2, staA R2 (ST1 and ST2) for S. Typhi and stkG F2 and stkG R2 for S. Paratyphi A and 2 μL of DNA template (1 : 5-diluted product of the primary cycle). Thermal cycling was carried out as described for first-round PCR, except that the annealing temperature was set to 65°C (63°C for ST3 and ST4) and 61°C, respectively (Table 1). The amplification was repeated 2-3 times to ensure that the amplification obtained with the primers is reproducible and consistent.

The amplified DNA fragments were resolved through electrophoresis in 1.5% agarose gel prepared in TBE buffer and visualized in a gel documentation system (Alfa Imager 2200, Alfa Innotech Corporation, USA).

2.4.4. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was done by using -test to analyze the level of significance between two proportions, that is, nested PCR and serological test in the diseases of ulcerative colitis, colon cancer, and irritable bowel syndrome and healthy controls.

3. Results and Discussion

Ulcerative colitis (UC) patients were found to have highest PCR positivity (79.7%) for the Salmonella enterica serotypes (Typhi and Paratyphi A both) followed by IBS (66.1%), CC (53.6%), and HC (16.3%) in descending order. While the positivity rates for the Salmonella serotypes were statistically comparable, UC had significantly higher prevalence () when comparing positivity rates in IBS, CC, and HC groups (Table 2, Figures 1 and 2). The positivity by PCR in healthy individuals shows 16.3% due to asymptomatic infection of the organism because PCR and serological based detection of Salmonella bacteria, the antibody titre, and positivity rate by molecular methods increase simultaneously in healthy individuals living in this endemic area.

Table 2: Positivity for Salmonella Typhi and Paratyphi A by Widal test, Vi antibody, and nested PCR methods in the study population.
Figure 1: Gel picture showing the nested PCR amplification targeting flagellin (fliC) gene of S. Typhi in clinical specimens. Lane M, 100 bp DNA ladder; lane 1, negative control; lane 2, positive control (S. Typhi MTCC 3216); lanes 3–14, positive nested PCR amplification in different clinical samples.
Figure 2: Gel picture showing the nested PCR amplification targeting putative fimbrial protein (stkG) gene of S. Paratyphi A in clinical specimens. Lane M, 100 bp DNA ladder; lane 1, negative control; lane 2, positive control (S. Paratyphi A ATCC9150); lanes 3–14, positive nested PCR amplification in clinical samples.

Antibody titre (≥1 : 160) against Vi antigen usually showing chronic carrier state was lowest in UC (6.8%) compared to HC (12.1%) and this difference was statistically significant () (Table 2). Antibody response at the titres (≥1 : 160) against somatic (TO), flagellar antigens of serotypes Typhi (TH) and Paratyphi A either in combination or alone was observed to be lowest again in UC patients (54.2%) in comparison with IBS (70.1%) and CC (71.4%). Healthy controls had the lowest percentage of individuals with positive Widal test (15.2%) (Table 3). On statistical analysis, it was observed that all the 3 diseases groups had significantly higher () positivity rates as compared to healthy controls (HC). When antibody titre against TO was taken into account, 35.5% of patients with CC were observed with titre of ≥1 : 160 followed by UC (18.7%), HC (15.3%), and IBS (12.6%). On statistical analysis, the positivity percentage of CC was significantly higher than IBS (). Contrary to this the antibody titre at ≥1 : 160 against TH, IBS group had highest positivity rate (67.7%) followed by CC (57.0%), UC (39.0%), and HC (12.6%). UC patients were observed with significantly lower percentage of patients with significant titre against TH () when compared with IBS. While UC and CC had comparable proportions of the patients with significant titre against TH, all the diseased groups showed significant titre () (Table 2). The antibody titre against AH was observed at very low levels in all the 3 diseased groups and HC and these positivity percentages were comparable. The higher titers in diseased group indicate that these patients are more susceptible to either Salmonella infection or more responses to the Salmonella antigens resulting in autoimmune type of injury. In the previous report from our centre we have already established that PCR based detection of Salmonella bacteria and antibody responses including against ViAb go parallel in healthy individuals living in this endemic area [21].

Table 3: Positivity for antibody in the study population against S. Typhi and Paratyphi A by Widal test when cut-off titre was taken >1 : 160 against any of the antigens TO, TH, and AH either isolated or in combination.

The age-old definition of UC includes the phrase “presence of bloody diarrhea and mucous associated with negative stool culture for bacteria, ova, or parasites” with the diagnostic facilities available at that time. In the recent time with the advent of extremely sensitive and specific tools this definition may not be true. In the present study, efforts were made to look for Salmonella enterica serotypes Typhi and Paratyphi A (known causative agents of enteric fever) in patients with chronic gut diseases like UC, IBS, and CC, a malignant condition. By using nested PCR for detection of S. Typhi and Paratyphi A serotypes in stool samples, almost 80% of the UC patients were found to have the DNA of the bacterium which was significantly higher than the IBS and CC. It is well established that, due to lacunae in our isolation techniques and ignorance about growth triggering factors, the isolation rate from any clinical specimens including stool and colonic biopsies usually remains <40% [22, 23]. Such a high level of association with UC indicates two possibilities; that is, firstly Salmonella either is an aetiological agent or may be associated with this disease due to increased susceptibility to the infection due to loss of mucosal integrity. The possibility of Salmonella being one of the causative agents seems to be quite likely. This hypothesis is well supported by the observation that antibody titre against Vi antigen was lowest in UC patients (6.8%) suggesting active infection rather than chronic carrier state as Vi antibody response is usually more pronounced in chronic typhoid carriage. The possibility of the specific immunosuppression against Salmonella in UC patients cannot be ignored on the basis of this observation. The later speculation is further supported by quite low Widal positivity in UC cases (54.2%) as compared to IBS (70.1) and CC (71.4%). It is interesting to note that, despite the highest positivity rate for the presence of Salmonella DNA in UC, the antibody titre against somatic antigen (TO) of Salmonella was simply comparable to CC and IBS. Somatic antigen of the Salmonella is known to induce short lasting IgM response usually in acute infections. Following similar pattern, the antibody titre against flagellar antigen (TH) which is known to induce prolonged IgG response in UC patients was observed to be minimum (39.0%) amongst the diseased groups when compared with IBS (67.7%) and CC (57.0%). Therefore, the significantly higher positivity rate for Salmonella nucleic acid along with relatively poor immune response strongly suggests the aetiological role of the enteric pathogens in UC. These observations were supported by previous studies reporting the higher prevalence of enteric pathogens and UC in developing countries [611]. Further, there is report from North India showing association between poor hygiene and UC [24]. There are many reports implicating Salmonella and Campylobacter enteritis with increased short- and long-term risk for inflammatory bowel diseases including UC enteritis [9, 10]. There are few case reports published in 70s showing the isolation of Salmonella serotypes (Typhi, Typhimurium, and Agona) from patients who were initially admitted to infectious disease hospital during acute attacks of UC [11]. But the question that may be asked is why not is it merely an association rather than a causation which is quite likely in population with poor hygiene as is in the present study subjects? The point goes in favor of this speculation: why antibiotics alone are not giving the remission? It is anti-inflammatory drugs which include corticosteroids bringing remission. Therefore, UC may be an inflammatory bowel disease due to autoimmune aetiology. However, the autoimmunity might have been induced by some facultative/obligate intracellular microbial agent/s causing chronic infection and Salmonella spp. may be one such agent. We cannot deny the inadequacy of diagnostic methods and shooting in dark as far as UC is concerned. Nested PCR based technique is known for its sensitivity and specificity, though sensitivity also brings in the risk of PCR contamination. However, if we analyze the data regarding IBS, it may be appreciated that this entity is more likely due to immunological reaction rather than bacterial invasion itself as immune response follows closely with the rate of detection of Salmonella serotypes by PCR in this group. Chronic typhoid carriage is sometimes implicated in causation of CC apart from cancer of gallbladder and PCR based detection and immunological response might be the reflection of Typhoid carriage itself.

4. Conclusions

This is the preliminary study and further exploration is required. However, we hypothesize that direct invasion by some microbial agents is associated with hypersensitive state of immunological response in ulcerative colitis at least.

Ethical Approval

The study designed was approved by Institute Ethical Committee of Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, and the proper written consent was obtained from the patients/guardian.

Conflict of Interests

There is no any conflict of interests.

Authors’ Contribution

In this study, Dr. Gopal Nath and Dr. Ashok K. Jain were responsible for genesis of hypothesis, analysis of data, and shaping of paper. Dr. Vinod K. Dixit and Dr. Sunit K. Shukla have contributed by providing the clinical materials. The designing of experiment, performing experimental work, and paper preparation were carried out by Mr. Manish Kumar Tripathi and Mr. Chandra Bhan Pratap and Dr. Tej Bali Singh did statistical analysis. Manish Kumar Tripathi and Chandra Bhan Pratap contributed equally.


The part of this work was financially supported by University Grant Commission (UGC), New Delhi, India, in the form of a Junior Research Fellowship awarded to Mr. Manish Kumar Tripathi and UGC-Post Doctoral Fellowship to Chandra Bhan Pratap.


  1. S. Danese and C. Fiocchi, “Etiopathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 12, no. 30, pp. 4807–4812, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. V. Loftus Jr., “Clinical epidemiology of inflammatory bowel disease: incidence, prevalence, and environmental influences,” Gastroenterology, vol. 126, no. 6, pp. 1504–1517, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Campieri and P. Gionchetti, “Bacteria as the cause of ulcerative colitis,” Gut, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 132–135, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. L. Lakatos and P. L. Lakatos, “Is the incidence and prevalence of inflammatory bowel diseases increasing in Eastern Europe?” Postgraduate Medical Journal, vol. 82, no. 967, pp. 332–337, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. M. Adams and P. H. Bornemann, “Ulcerative colitis,” American Family Physician, vol. 10, no. 87, pp. 699–705, 2013. View at Google Scholar
  6. T. Jess, J. Simonsen, N. M. Nielsen et al., “Enteric Salmonella or Campylobacter infections and the risk of inflammatory bowel disease,” Gut, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 318–324, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. B. Chassaing and A. Darfeuille-Michaud, “The commensal microbiota and enteropathogens in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases,” Gastroenterology, vol. 140, no. 6, pp. 1720–1728, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. R. B. R. Ferreira, N. Gill, B. P. Willing et al., “The intestinal microbiota plays a role in Salmonella-induced colitis independent of pathogen colonization,” PLoS ONE, vol. 6, no. 5, Article ID e20338, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. A. Ternhag, A. Törner, Å. Svensson, K. Ekdahl, and J. Giesecke, “Short- and long-term effects of bacterial gastrointestinal infections,” Emerging Infectious Diseases, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 143–148, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. K. O. Gradel, H. L. Nielsen, H. C. Schønheyder, T. Ejlertsen, B. Kristensen, and H. Nielsen, “Increased short- and long term risk of inflammatory bowel disease after Salmonella or Campylobacter gastroenteritis,” Gastroenterology, vol. 137, no. 2, pp. 495–501, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. M. W. Dronfield, J. Fletcher, and M. J. S. Langman, “Coincident Salmonella infections and ulcerative colitis: problems of recognition and management,” British Medical Journal, vol. 1, no. 5898, p. 99, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. A. Sood, D. Amre, V. Midha et al., “Low hygiene and exposure to infections may be associated with increased risk for ulcerative colitis in a North Indian population,” Annals of Gastroenterology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 219–223, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  13. P. Prakash, O. P. Mishra, A. K. Singh, A. K. Gulati, and G. Nath, “Evaluation of nested PCR in diagnosis of typhoid fever,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 431–432, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. T. J. Barrett, “Improvement of the indirect hemagglutination assay for Salmonella typhi Vi antibodies by use of glutaraldehyde-fixed erythrocytes,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 662–663, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. J. Sambrook and D. W. Russell, Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA, 3rd edition, 2001.
  16. A. A. Van Zwet, J. C. Thijs, A. M. D. Kooistra-Smid, J. Schirm, and J. A. M. Snijder, “Use of PCR with feces for detection of Helicobacter pylori infections in patients,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1346–1348, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. J.-H. Song, H. Cho, M. Y. Park, D. S. Na, H. B. Moon, and C. H. Pai, “Detection of Salmonella typhi in the blood of patients with typhoid fever by polymerase chain reaction,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1439–1443, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Frankel, “Detection of Salmonella typhi by PCR,” Journal of Clinical Microbiology, vol. 32, no. 5, p. 1415, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  19. C. B. Pratap, G. Kumar, S. K. Patel et al., “Targeting of putative fimbrial gene for detection of S. typhi in typhoid fever and chronic typhoid carriers by nested PCR,” Journal of Infection in Developing Countries, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 520–527, 2013. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. C. B. Pratap, G. Kumar, S. K. Patel et al., “Mix-infection of S. Typhi and ParaTyphi A in typhoid fever and chronic typhoid carriers: a nested PCR based study in North India,” Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 9–14, 2014. View at Google Scholar
  21. G. Nath, P. Maurya, A. K. Gulati et al., “Comparison of Vi serology and nested PCR in diagnosis of chronic typhoid carriers in two different study populations in typhoid endemic area of India,” Southeast Asian Journal of Tropical Medicine and Public Health, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 636–640, 2010. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. Y. Ueda, N. Suzuki, K. Miyagi et al., “Studies on bacillary dysentery cases of overseas travellers—during 1979 to 1995,” Nippon Saikingaku Zasshi, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 735–746, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. F. Barbut, L. Beaugerie, N. Delas, S. Fossati-Marchal, P. Aygalenq, and J.-C. Petit, “Comparative value of colonic biopsy and intraluminal fluid culture for diagnosis of bacterial acute colitis in immunocompetent patients,” Clinical Infectious Diseases, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 356–360, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. S. N. Khosla, N. K. Girdhar, S. Lal, and D. S. Mishra, “Epidemiology of ulcerative colitis in hospital and select general population of northern India,” The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 405–407, 1986. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus