Table of Contents
ISRN Cardiology
Volume 2011, Article ID 146062, 3 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/146062
Case Report

Inappropriate Asystole Detection in Early Postoperative Phase after Loop Recorder Implantation

Cardiology Division, Azienda Ospedaliera Maggiore della Carità, 28100 Novara, Italy

Received 18 February 2011; Accepted 8 April 2011

Academic Editor: J. S. Steinberg

Copyright © 2011 Miriam Bortnik et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. M. Brignole, P. Alboni, D. G. Benditt et al., “Task Force on Syncope, European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope-Update 2004,” Europace, vol. 6, pp. 467–537, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  2. F. Giada, M. Gulizia, M. Francese et al., “Recurrent unexplained palpitation (RUP) study-comparison of implantable loop recorder versus conventional diagnostic strategy,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 49, no. 19, pp. 1951–1956, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  3. E. Ng, P. J. Stafford, and G. A. Ng, “Arrhythmia detection by patients and auto-activation in implantable loop recorders,” Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 147–152, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  4. C. C. De Cock, H. J. Spruijt, L. M. C. Van Campen, A. W. Plu, and C. A. Visser, “Electromagnetic interference of an implantable loop recorder by commonly encountered electronic devices,” PACE—Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, vol. 23, no. 10 I, pp. 1516–1518, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. J. R. Gimbel, J. Zarghami, C. Machado, and B. L. Wilkoff, “Safe scanning, but frequent artifacts mimicking bradycardia and tachycardia during magnetic resonance imaging (RMI) in patients with an implantable loop recorder (ILR),” Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 404–408, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  6. A. Trigano, O. Blandeau, and S. Levy, “Interference by cellular telephone with an implantable loop recorder,” Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 237–240, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  7. J. P. Thaker, M. B. Patel, A. J. Shah, V. V. Liepa, K. Jongnarangsin, and R. K. Thakur, “A media player causes clinically significant telemetry interference with implantable loop recorders,” Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 99–103, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. J. F. Iglesias, D. Graf, P. Pascale, and E. Pruvot, “The implantable loop recorder: a critical review,” Kardiovaskuläre Medizinv, vol. 12, pp. 85–93, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  9. M. Brignole, C. L. Bellardine Black, P. E. B. Thomsen et al., “Improved arrhythmia detection in implantable loop recorders,” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 928–934, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  10. C. M. Yu, LI. Wang, E. Chau et al., “Intrathoracic impedance monitoring in patients with heart failure: correlation with fluid status and feasibility of early warning preceding hospitalization,” Circulation, vol. 112, no. 6, pp. 841–848, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus