Table of Contents
ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2011, Article ID 160467, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/160467
Clinical Study

Fallopian Tube Sperm Perfusion in Treatment of Nontubal Subfertility: Is It Crucial Step prior to ART?

Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Egypt

Received 15 September 2011; Accepted 10 October 2011

Academic Editors: J. M. Goldberg and W. Yeung

Copyright © 2011 Maher Shams eldeen Hassan. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. S. Guzick, S. A. Carson, C. Coutifaris et al., “Efficacy of superovulation and intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 340, no. 3, pp. 177–183, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. R. J. Aitken and J. S. Clarkson, “Significance of reactive oxygen species and antioxidants in defining the efficacy of sperm preparation techniques,” Journal of Andrology, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 367–376, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. A. J. Goverde, J. McDonnell, J. P. W. Vermeiden, R. Schats, F. F. Rutten, and J. Schoemaker, “Intrauterine insemination or in-vitro fertilisation in idiopathic subfertility and male subfertility: a randomised trial and cost-effectiveness analysis,” The Lancet, vol. 355, no. 9197, pp. 13–18, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. K. M. Silverberg, J. V. Johnson, D. L. Olive, W. N. Burns, and R. S. Schenken, “A prospective, randomized trial comparing two different intrauterine insemination regimens in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 57, no. 2, pp. 357–361, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. G. Ragni, P. Maggioni, E. Guermandi et al., “Efficacy of double intrauterine insemination in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation cycles,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 72, no. 4, pp. 619–622, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. J. A. Kahn, A. Sunde, A. Koskemies et al., “Fallopian tube sperm perfusion (FSP) versus intra-uterine insemination (IUI) in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study,” Human Reproduction, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 890–894, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  7. R. Fanchin, F. Olivennes, C. Righini, A. Hazout, B. Schwab, and R. Frydman, “A new system for fallopian tube sperm perfusion leads to pregnancy rates twice as high as standard intrauterine insemination,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 505–510, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. E. Cantineau, M. J. Heineman, H. Al-Inany, and B. J. Cohlen, “Intrauterine insemination versus Fallopian tube sperm perfusion in non-tubal subfertility: a systematic review based on a Cochrane review,” Human Reproduction, vol. 19, no. 12, pp. 2721–2729, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. World Health Organization, WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Semen and Sperm-Cervical Mucus Interaction, Cambridge University Press, 3rd edition, 1992.
  10. A. E. P. Cantineau, B. J. Cohlen, and M. J. Heineman, “Intra-uterine insemination versus fallopian tube sperm perfusion for non-tubal infertility,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 2, Article ID CD001502, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  11. M. X. Ransom, M. B. Blotner, M. Bohrer, G. Corsan, and E. Kemmann, “Does increasing frequency of intrauterine insemination improve pregnancy rates significantly during superovulation cycles?” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 303–307, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  12. E. H. Y. Ng, G. Makkar, W. S. B. Yeung, and P. C. Ho, “A randomized comparison of three insemination methods in an artificial insemination program using husbands' semen,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 542–546, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  13. J. A. Kahn, V. Von During, A. Sunde, T. Sordal, and K. Molne, “Fallopian tube sperm perfusion: first clinical experience,” Human Reproduction, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 19–24, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  14. L. Mamas, “Higher pregnancy rates with a simple method for Fallopian tube sperm perfusion, using the cervical clamp double nut bivalve speculum in the treatment of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study,” Human Reproduction, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 2618–2622, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Nuojua-Huttunen, C. Tomás, L. Tuomivaara, H. Martikainen, and K. Juntunen, “Comparison of fallopian tube sperm perfusion with intrauterine insemination in the treatment of infertility,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 939–942, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. A. Maheshwari, K. Jain, and N. Agarwal, “Fallopian sperm perfusion (FSP) using Foley's balloon system versus intrauterine insemination (IUI) in the treatment of infertility,” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 313–315, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar