Table of Contents
ISRN Veterinary Science
Volume 2011, Article ID 257627, 4 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/257627
Research Article

Time Exposure Period of Bovine Oocytes to Sperm in Relation to Embryo Development Rate and Quality

1Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, Veterinary School, Faculty of Natural Resources, Catholic University of Temuco, P.O. Box 4780000, Temuco, Chile
2Department of Animal Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences, Southern University of Chile, P.O. Box 5090000, Valdivia, Chile

Received 24 November 2010; Accepted 4 January 2011

Academic Editor: R. Gamble

Copyright © 2011 Marco Berland et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. F. Ward, B. Enright, D. Rizos, M. Boland, and P. Lonergan, “Optimization of in vitro bovine embryo production: effect of duration of maturation, length of gamete co-incubation, sperm concentration and sire,” Theriogenology, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 2105–2117, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. N. Rehman, A. R. Collins, T. K. Suh, and R. W. Wright, “Effect of sperm exposure time on in vitro fertilization and embryo development of bovine oocytes matured in vitro,” Theriogenology, vol. 41, no. 7, pp. 1447–1452, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. C. R. Long, P. Damiani, C. Pinto-Correia, R. A. MacLean, R. T. Duby, and J. M. Robl, “Morphology and subsequent development in culture of bovine oocytes matured in vitro under various conditions of fertilization,” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 361–369, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. T. L. Nedambale, F. Du, J. Xu et al., “Prolonging bovine sperm-oocyte incubation in modified medium 199 improves embryo development rate and the viability of vitrified blastocysts,” Theriogenology, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 1951–1960, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. B. G. Brackett and G. Oliphant, “Capacitation of rabbit spermatozoa in vitro,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 260–274, 1975. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Kattera and C. Chen, “Short coincubation of gametes in in vitro fertilization improves implantation and pregnancy rates: a prospective, randomized, controlled study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 1017–1021, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. L. Gianaroli, M. C. Magli, A. P. Ferraretti et al., “Reducing the time of sperm-oocyte interaction in human in vitro fertilization improves the implantation rate,” Human Reproduction, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 166–171, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. O. J. D'Cruz, “Adhesion molecules in human sperm-oocyte interaction: relevance to infertility,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 1, pp. d161–176, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. D. Enkhmaa, T. Kasai, and K. Hoshi, “Long-time exposure of mouse embryos to the sperm produces high levels of reactive oxygen species in culture medium and relates to poor embryo development,” Reproduction in Domestic Animals, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 634–637, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. G. Grupen and M. B. Nottle, “A simple modification of the in vitro fertilization procedure improves the efficiency of in vitro pig embryo production,” Theriogenology, vol. 53, p. 422, abstract, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  11. C. Almiñana, M. A. Gil, C. Cuello et al., “Adjustments in IVF system for individual boars: value of additives and time of sperm-oocyte co-incubation,” Theriogenology, vol. 64, no. 8, pp. 1783–1796, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. M. A. Gil, C. Almiñana, C. Cuello et al., “Brief coincubation of gametes in porcine in vitro fertilization: role of sperm:oocyte ratio and post-coincubation medium,” Theriogenology, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 620–626, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. E. Gómez and C. Díez, “Spermatozoa affecting bovine embryo development in vitro attach to matured cumulus-oocyte complexes within two hours of co-culture,” Theriogenology, vol. 53, p. 421, abstract, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  14. H. S. Kochhar, K. P. Kochhar, P. K. Basrur, and W. A. King, “Influence of the duration of gamete interaction on cleavage, growth rate and sex distribution of in vitro produced bovine embryos,” Animal Reproduction Science, vol. 76, no. 1-2, pp. 33–49, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Dirnfeld, D. Bider, M. Koifman, I. Calderon, and H. Abramovici, “Shortened exposure of oocytes to spermatozoa improves in vitro fertilization outcome: a prospective, randomized, controlled study,” Human Reproduction, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 2562–2564, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. J. Parrish, A. Krogenaes, and J. L. Susko-Parrish, “Effect of bovine sperm separation by either swim-up or Percoll method on success of in vitro fertilization and early embryonic development,” Theriogenology, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 859–869, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. K. P. Xu, B. R. Yadav, R. W. Rorie, L. Plante, K. J. Betteridge, and W. A. King, “Development and viability of bovine embryos derived from oocytes matured and fertilized in vitro and co-cultured with bovine oviducal epithelial cells,” Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, vol. 94, no. 1, pp. 33–43, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. C. Sumantri, A. Boediono, M. Ooe, M. Murakami, S. Saha, and T. Suzuki, “The effect of sperm-oocyte incubation time on in vitro embryo development using sperm from a tetraparental chimeric bull,” Animal Reproduction Science, vol. 48, no. 2-4, pp. 187–195, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. S. Lopes, M. Lane, and J. G. Thompson, “Oxygen consumption and ROS production are increased at the time of fertilization and cell cleavage in bovine zygotes,” Human Reproduction, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 2762–2773, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. P. Guérin, S. El Mouatassim, and Y. Ménézo, “Oxidative stress and protection against reactive oxygen species in the pre-implantation embryo and its surroundings,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 175–189, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. A. Bedaiwy, T. Falcone, M. S. Mohamed et al., “Differential growth of human embryos in vitro: role of reactive oxygen species,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 593–600, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. M. Takahashi, T. Nagai, N. Okamura, H. Takahashi, and A. Okano, “Promoting effect of β-mercaptoethanol on in vitro development under oxidative stress and cystine uptake of bovine embryos,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 562–567, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  23. S. E. Olson and G. E. Seidel Jr., “Culture of in vitro-produced bovine embryos with vitamin E improves development in vitro and after transfer to recipients,” Biology of Reproduction, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 248–252, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  24. T. L. Nedambale, A. Dinnyés, W. Groen, J. R. Dobrinsky, X. C. Tian, and X. Yang, “Comparison on in vitro fertilized bovine embryos cultured in KSOM or SOF and cryopreserved by slow freezing or vitrification,” Theriogenology, vol. 62, no. 3-4, pp. 437–449, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar