Research Article
Formulation and Evaluation of Floating Oral In Situ Gelling System of Amoxicillin
Table 4
Summary of results of regression analysis.
| | | | | | | |
| For FLT |
| Response (FLT) | | | | | | | FM | 14.77 | −1.16 | −3.5 | −3.4*10−16 | −1.16 | 0.83 | RM | 14.56 | — | −3.5 | — | — | — |
| For |
| Response () | | | | | | | FM | 44.11 | −2.12 | −1.29 | 0.53 | 1.09 | −0.69 | RM | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| For |
| Response () | | | | | | | FM | 77.95 | −6.14 | −3.34 | −2.02 | −2.42 | 1.70 | RM | 77.47 | −6.14 | — | — | — | — |
| For |
| Response () | | | | | | | FM | 97.79 | −5.66 | −2.53 | −3.31 | −4.6 | 1.97 | RM | 96.04 | −5.66 | — | — | — | — |
|
|
FM= Full model, RM= Reduced model; , , and indicate percentage of drug released after 1, 6, and 10 h, respectively; FLT indicates floating lag time.
|