Table of Contents
ISRN Materials Science
Volume 2011, Article ID 305312, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/305312
Research Article

Skewness and Kurtosis: Important Parameters in the Characterization of Dental Implant Surface Roughness—A Computer Simulation

1Research & Development, Litcon AB, Kastellgatan 21, 413 07 Göteborg, Sweden
2Research & Development, Astra Tech AB, P.O. Box 14, 431 21 Mölndal, Sweden

Received 6 July 2011; Accepted 26 July 2011

Academic Editors: Z. Jiang, M. Schnabelrauch, and N. Uekawa

Copyright © 2011 Karl Niklas Hansson and Stig Hansson. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Wennerberg and T. Albrektsson, “Suggested guidelines for the topographic evaluation of implant surfaces,” International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 331–344, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. Hansson and K. N. Hansson, “The effect of limited lateral resolution in the measurement of implant surface roughness: a computer simulation,” Journal of Biomedical Materials Research A, vol. 75, no. 2, pp. 472–477, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  3. S. Hansson and M. Norton, “The relation between surface roughness and interfacial shear strength for bone-anchored implants. A mathematical model,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 32, no. 8, pp. 829–836, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. S. Hansson, “Surface roughness parameters as predictors of anchorage strength in bone: a critical analysis,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1297–1303, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. T. R. Thomas, “Characterization of surface roughness,” Precision Engineering, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 97–104, 1981. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. P. Timoshenko and J. N. Goodier, Theory of Elasticity, McGraw Hill, Singapore, 1984.
  7. S. Hansson and M. Werke, “The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: the effect of thread size and thread profile: a finite element study,” Journal of Biomechanics, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 1247–1258, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. S. J. Hoshaw, J. B. Brunski, and G. V. B. Cochran, “Mechanical loading of Brånemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodelling,” The International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants, vol. 9, pp. 345–360, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  9. F. Isidor, “Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants. A clinical and radiographic study in monkeys,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 143–152, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. T. Albrektsson and A. Wennerberg, “Oral implant surfaces: part 1—review focusing on topographic and chemical properties of different surfaces and in vivo responses to them,” International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 536–543, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. T. Albrektsson and A. Wennerberg, “Oral implant surfaces: part 2—review focusing on clinical knowledge of different surfaces,” International Journal of Prosthodontics, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 544–564, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. J. Whitehouse, Handbook of Surface Metrology, IOP Publishers, Bristol, UK, 1994.
  13. T. Albrektsson, H.-A. Hansson, B. Kasemo et al., “The interface of inorganic implants in vivo: titanium implants in bone,” Annals of Biomedical Engineering, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–27, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar