Review Article
Pathway Profiling and Rational Trial Design for Studies in Advanced Stage Cervical Carcinoma: A Review and a Perspective
Table 2
Potential biomarkers according to pathway.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*PIK3 amplification or mutational activation or PTEN loss. Activation of the PIK3/AKT/mTOR pathway was associated with a worse prognosis and chemoresistance in cervical cancers [78]. β?β means not validated. **Ras/raf pathway alterations in colon cancer render these tumours resistant to an EGFR inhibitor. Ras inhibitors such as Tipifanib or lonafanib did not show relevant clinical activity in phase II and III studies in various tumour types [79] and may be worth assessing again in single and dual targeting in selected preclinical models. ***E6 mediated inactivation of p53 upregulates VEGF and angiogenesis. ****Retinoic acid and topotecan may be useful in tumours with checkpoint activation [80]. *****There is evidence that human papillomavirus infection enhances phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein and decreases apoptosis in a particularly aggressive type of squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix [20β23]. ******Wnt/ Catenin inhibition: by antibodies [81β83], AINS, [84β86], VitD3 [87], or small molecules [88β90] or oncolytic viruses [91]. Also antisense, molecule to end product c-myce [92]. |