Genetic Polymorphisms as Risk Stratification Tool in Primary Preventive ICD Therapy

Laszlo, Roman; Busch, Mathias C.; Schreieck, Jüergen

doi:https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/457247

International Scholarly Research Notices

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusion References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2011 | Article ID 457247 | https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/457247

Genetic Polymorphisms as Risk Stratification Tool in Primary Preventive ICD Therapy

Roman Laszlo,¹Mathias C. Busch,²and Jüergen Schreieck¹

Academic Editor: M. Fito Colomer, L. Liaudet, P. Meier

Received20 Feb 2011

Accepted08 Apr 2011

Published18 Apr 2011

Abstract

More and more implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are implanted as primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD). However, major problem in practice is to identify high-risk patients for SCD. Different methods for noninvasive risk stratification do not have a sufficient positive or negative predictive value. Since current approaches lead to implantation of ICDs in a large number of patients who will never suffer an arrhythmic event and simultaneously patients still die of SCD who currently did not seem eligible for primary preventive ICD implantation, there is a need for additional tools for risk stratification. Epidemiological studies point to a hereditary risk of SCD. Different susceptibility of each person concerning arrhythmogenic events might be explained by genetic polymorphisms. By obtaining an individual “pattern” of polymorphisms of genes encoding for proteins which are important in arrhythmogenesis in one patient, risk stratification in primary prevention of SCD might by improved.

1. Introduction

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is one of the most frequent causes of death [1]. Since 1980, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) are available as an effective, continuously improved therapy option [2]. Within the last thirty years, initially sole secondary preventive indications for implantation of an ICD have been expanded: more and more ICDs are implanted as primary prevention of SCD [3]. However, major problem in clinical practice is to identify high-risk patients for SCD. Since—on the one hand—evidence actually available [3] leads to implantation of ICDs in a large number of patients who will never suffer an arrhythmic event and—on the other hand—patients still die of SCD who did not seem eligible for ICD implantation, there is a profound need for additional tools for risk stratification.

2. Epidemiology of Sudden Cardiac Death

Epidemiologic studies report of more than 300000 SCDs/annum in the United States [1]. SCD is defined as unexpected death of cardiac cause within one hour after onset of any symptoms [4]. SCD occurs in newborn to 6-month old children (“sudden infant death syndrome”), and incidence of the disease peaks again in 45-to-75-year olds [1, 5].

In one third of all patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), SCD is the first clinical manifestation of the disease. 80% of all SCDs are caused by CHD, 20% by cardiomyopathies (dilated or hypertrophic) and, respectively, electrical diseases of the heart (long QT, short QT, Brugada-syndrome). 75% of patients with SCD are male [1].

Contrary to common assumptions, acute myocardial infarction can be found in only 20% of all patients with SCD. However, SCD is mostly caused by an electrical instability of ventricular myocardium which in turn is often generated by chronic ventricular ischemia [6].

Compared to normal population, risk of SCD is increased 2–4 times in patients with a high risk for CHD, 4–6 times in patients with apparent CHD and rises up to 6–9 if these patients develop congestive heart failure (CHF) [4].

3. Pathophysiology of Sudden Cardiac Death

Electrical instability of ventricular myocardium and consecutive arrhythmias leading to SCD is a result of complex interactions between triggering events and an arrhythmogenic substrate (often diseased myocardium) [7]. In most patients with SCD, ventricular fibrillation degenerated from precedent ventricular tachycardia can be found as terminal arrhythmia [8].

Lethal arrhythmia can be triggered by acute myocardial ischemia. Ventricular scar caused by previous myocardial infarction can either act as a trigger without manifest ischemia [7, 9] or as a substrate due to isolated regions of myocytes with slow conduction properties (e.g., endocardial cells which survived myocardial infarction due to nutrition and oxygenation from intracavitary blood) therefore predisposing re-entry circuits for sustained ventricular tachycardias [7].

Besides focal autonomy and triggered activity due to afterdepolarisations, re-entry is considered as the main mechanism for ventricular tachycardia in patients with CHD [10, 11].

SCD due to bradycardia, asystole, or pulseless electrical activity can be found more often in patients with severe structural heart disease [12].

4. Therapy of Sudden Cardiac Death

In the 1980s, antiarrhythmics were used in patients (mainly after myocardial infarction) with high-risk for SCD in order to prevent malign tachycardias. However, these drugs showed a considerable, sometimes fatal proarrhythmic potential in several large randomized studies [13]. Antiarrhythmics including amiodarone which is regarded as most effective and accordingly safe [14–16] are also inferior compared to today’s standard treatment of SCD, the implantable cardioverter/defibrillator (ICD [2]). Thus, sole (i.e., without concomitant implantation of an ICD) primary preventive antiarrhythmic therapy in order to anticipate SCD is obsolete [3].

On the one hand, incidence of malign tachycardias within an observation period is also high in patients currently considered as high-risk suffering SCD, but—on the other hand—these patients represent only a small percentage of all cases of SCD. In the majority of patients with SCD, only little or even no clinical signs for a potential occurrence of lethal arrhythmias can be observed [17].

Besides reliable and accordingly feasible methods to identify high risk patients for SCD, this discrepancy depicts the main problem of primary prevention of SCD with ICDs.

5. Current Problems in Primary Preventive ICD Therapy

Current primary prevention of SCD (implantation of an ICD) is mostly limited to patients with considered high-risk for SCD. According to present level of knowledge, this high risk collective is mainly defined by having reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LV-EF) and/or clinical symptoms of CHF. Primary preventive implantation of an ICD can be considered in all patients with severely reduced LV-EF (<35%) and little or moderate symptoms (NYHA II-III) or even independent of symptomatology for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy [3].

However, problems are implicated by using reduced LV-EF to identify candidates for ICD implantation: first, after myocardial infarction, most cases of SCD can be found in patients with better preserved LV-EF [18–20]. Second, only a minority of patients received an ICD due to severely reduced LV-EF de facto suffer from life-threatening arrhythmias [16, 21, 22]. Finally, at as far as 50% of all patients with CHF, cause of death is progressive heart failure but not malign ventricular arrhythmias [23].

As well as antiarrhythmics, ICDs are also not free of risks: proportion of infectious complications, inadequate shock deliveries, and other device malfunctions is considerable [24–26]. Despite proven efficiency of primary prevention of SCD [14, 16, 21], ICD implantation is still expensive and depicts a significant burden of health care system [27].

A multiplicity of invasive and, respectively, non-invasive methods in order to better select patients for primary preventive ICD implantation was developed. Some approaches are based on signal-averaged ECGs [28], QT variability, heart rate variability, T-wave variability, microvolt T-wave alternans, heart rate turbulence, deceleration capacity, or the so-called Wedensky modulation index [29]. Holter-ECG can be also used to evaluate the incidence of nonsustained ventricular tachycardias [30] as well as invasive electrophysiological analyses (programmed ventricular stimulation [30]). Ventricular arrhythmogenic substrate can be described using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging [31]. Finally, some laboratory parameters like BNP [32] or CRP [33] seem to predict the risk for SCD in some patients.

All these approaches—neither alone nor combined [19]—do not have an adequate positive or rather negative predictive value. Thus, LV-EF and symptoms of CHF (NYHA classification) are still mainly used to legitimate primary preventive ICD implantation with the most additional denotations of the above-mentioned methods [3, 34].

In summary, delineated problems of current primary preventive ICD therapy underline the need for new methods for a better risk stratification of primary prevention of SCD.

6. Genetic Predisposition for Sudden Cardiac Death

In comparison with normal population, first-degree relatives of patients with SCD have an increased risk for this purpose (relative risk 1.5–2.7) [35–37].

Family history concerning SCD is more often positive in patients with ventricular fibrillation up to the time of first myocardial infarction (odds ratio 2.7) [38].

Positive family history potentiates the individual risk in patients suffering from certain diseases predisposing for SCD, as for example, fivefold in patient with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy [39].

Taken together, these data speak for a familiar accumulation of SCD, maybe because of common genes influencing individual vulnerability to life-threatening arrhythmias independent of a familiar predisposition for ischemic heart disease in general.

In addition, dependence of risk on the number of affected family members (the more, the higher) is compatible with a complex genetic architecture where predisposing alleles increase the risk for SCD in case of arrhythmogenic environment variables in an additive or synergistic way [40, 41].

7. Genetic Polymorphisms as a Risk Stratification Tool in Primary Preventive ICD Therapy

Genetic variations (so called polymorphisms) are the basis of human uniqueness. Specific pros and cons concerning state of health or susceptibility to certain diseases would not be expected from variations of genes coding, for example, for the physiognomy of a single person. However, occurrence of variations of genes coding for proteins essentially for physiological functions (e.g., cellular calcium homoeostasis or function of ion channels) might be disadvantageous in terms of, for example, proarrhythmic compensatory mechanisms during myocardial ischemia, disbalance of electrolytes, or also after drug intake. Therefore, polymorphisms of these genes might explain different susceptibility of persons concerning arrhythmogenic events and may suit for non-invasive risk stratification of SCD: if, for example, two patients are considered to have the same risk for SCD using currently available approaches for risk stratification but then in only one patient SCD actually occurs, this differential outcome might be explained by genetic polymorphisms.

As a clinical aim, identification of several polymorphisms in a patient which might play a role in arrhythmogenesis may result in an individual genetic “polymorphism pattern” in order to characterize the individual risk for occurrence of arrhythmic events. Besides the well-established parameters (LV-EF, NYHA class), this “genetic pattern” might then act as another helpful tool in decision-making concerning primary preventive ICD implantation.

Associations of many polymorphisms—most notably of genes coding for ion channels—and SCD were already reported [42].

Besides cardiac ion channels, molecular signaling cascades like, for example, the beta-1-receptor cascade and accordingly the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone-system (RAAS) play an important role concerning regulation of cardiac electrophysiology.

On the one hand, many polymorphisms of these signaling cascades with unclear function importance are known; on the other hand there are others with relevance demonstrated in vitro and others associated with the incidence of arrhythmias in patients with CHF.

For example, sensitivity of the beta-1-receptor in vitro [43] and heart rate [44] and survival [45] in a small cohort of patients with CHF is influenced by the Ser49Gly polymorphism (frequency of occurrence in normal population 22%). In transfected fibroblasts, the Arg389Gly polymorphism (frequency of occurrence in normal population 30%) causes a threefold increase of the activity of the adenylate cyclase [46] and seems to enhance the incidence of arrhythmias in patients with CHF [47].

Development of an arrhythmic cardiac fibrosis is essentially influenced by the RAAS [48]. It has been shown that patients with CHF rather die of a progressive heart failure than of a malign arrhythmia if a common polymorphism of angiotensin can be detected [49]. Further RAAS polymorphisms were identified but not yet validated in patients with CHF.

Intracellular calcium overload is a well-known cause of triggered ventricular arrhythmias as a result of delayed afterdepolarisations [10]. Polymorphisms of proteins important for regulation of intracellular calcium homoeostasis were also described (e.g., Glu692Val (frequency of occurrence in normal population 5%) of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger, Gln2958Arg (frequency of occurrence in normal population 20–30%) of the cardiac ryanodine type 2 receptor). As cellular calcium homoeostasis is per se defective in patients with CHF, it can be speculated that these polymorphisms cause an increased risk for occurrence of malign tachycardias.

8. Conclusion

As a summary, utilization of the genetic information for non-invasive risk stratification of SCD seems to be feasible. By obtaining an individual “pattern” of polymorphisms of genes encoding for proteins which are important in arrhythmogenesis in one patient, risk stratification in primary prevention of SCD might by improved, and current problems in primary preventive ICD therapy might be minimized.

References

S. G. Priori, E. Aliot, C. Blomstrom-Lundqvist et al., “Task Force on sudden cardiac death of the European Society of Cardiology,” European Heart Journal, vol. 22, no. 16, pp. 1374–1450, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Mirowski, M. M. Mower, and P. R. Reid, “The automatic implantable defibrillator,” American Heart Journal, vol. 100, no. 6, part 2, pp. 1089–1092, 1980.
View at: Google Scholar
D. P. Zipes et al., “ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death—executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for Management of Patients with Ventricular Arrhythmias and the Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death) Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association and the Heart Rhythm Society,” European Heart Journal, vol. 27, no. 17, pp. 2099–2140, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
J. J. Goldberger, M. E. Cain, S. H. Hohnloser et al., “American Heart Association/american College of Cardiology Foundation/heart Rhythm Society scientific statement on noninvasive risk stratification techniques for identifying patients at risk for sudden cardiac death: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology Committee on Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention,” Heart Rhythm, vol. 5, no. 10, pp. e1–e21, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. S. Chugh, J. Jui, K. Gunson et al., “Current burden of sudden cardiac death: multiple source surveillance versus retrospective death certificate-based review in a large U.S. community,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 1268–1275, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. J. Podrid and R. J. Myerburg, “Epidemiology and stratification of risk for sudden cardiac death,” Clinical Cardiology, vol. 28, no. 11, supplement 1, pp. I3–I11, 2005.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Rubart and D. P. Zipes, “Mechanisms of sudden cardiac death,” Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 115, no. 9, pp. 2305–2315, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Engdahl, M. Holmberg, B. W. Karlson, R. Luepker, and J. Herlitz, “The epidemiology of out-of-hospital 'sudden' cardiac arrest,” Resuscitation, vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 235–245, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. L. Wit and M. J. Janse, “Experimental models of ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation caused by ischemia and infarction,” Circulation, vol. 85, supplement 1, pp. I32–I42, 1992.
View at: Google Scholar
S. M. Pogwizd and P. B. Corr, “Mechanisms underlying the development of ventricular fibrillation during early myocardial ischemia,” Circulation Research, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 672–695, 1990.
View at: Google Scholar
T. Takahashi, P. van Dessel, J. C. Lopshire et al., “Optical mapping of the functional reentrant circuit of ventricular tachycardia in acute myocardial infarction,” Heart Rhythm, vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 451–459, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. G. Stevenson, L. W. Stevenson, H. R. Middlekauff, and L. A. Saxon, “Sudden death prevention in patients with advanced ventricular dysfunction,” Circulation, vol. 88, no. 6, pp. 2953–2961, 1993.
View at: Google Scholar
D. S. Echt, P. R. Liebson, L. B. Mitchell et al., “Mortality and morbidity in patients receiving encainide, flecainide, or placebo—the Cardiac Arrhythmia Suppression Trial,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 324, no. 12, pp. 781–788, 1991.
View at: Google Scholar
A. J. Moss et al., “Improved survival with an implanted defibrillator in patients with coronary disease at high risk for ventricular arrhythmia. Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial Investigators,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 335, no. 26, pp. 1933–1940, 1996.
View at: Google Scholar
D. G. Wyse, M. Talajic, G. E. Hafley et al., “Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the Multicenter Unsustained Tachycardia Trial (MUSTT): drug testing and as-treated analysis,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 344–351, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. H. Bardy, K. L. Lee, D. B. Mark et al., “Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 352, no. 3, pp. 225–237, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Sotoodehnia, A. Zivin, G. H. Bardy, and D. S. Siscovick, “Reducing mortality from sudden cardiac death in the community: lessons from epidemiology and clinical applications research,” Cardiovascular Research, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 197–209, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Bauer, J. W. Kantelhardt, P. Barthel et al., “Deceleration capacity of heart rate as a predictor of mortality after myocardial infarction: cohort study,” The Lancet, vol. 367, no. 9523, pp. 1674–1681, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. V. Exner, K. M. Kavanagh, M. P. Slawnych et al., “Noninvasive risk assessment early after a myocardial infarction. The REFINE study,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 50, no. 24, pp. 2275–2284, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. H. Mäkikallio, P. Barthel, R. Schneider et al., “Prediction of sudden cardiac death after acute myocardial infarction: role of Holter monitoring in the modern treatment era,” European Heart Journal, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 762–769, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. J. Moss, W. Zareba, W. Jackson Hall et al., “Prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator in patients with myocardial infarction and reduced ejection fraction,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 346, no. 12, pp. 877–883, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kadish, A. Dyer, J. P. Daubert et al., “Prophylactic defibrillator implantation in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 350, no. 21, pp. 2151–2158, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wolpert, J. Kuschyk, N. Aramin et al., “Incidence and electrophysiological characteristics of spontaneous ventricular tachyarrhythmias in high risk coronary patients and prophylactic implantation of a defibrillator,” Heart, vol. 90, no. 6, pp. 667–671, 2004.
View at: Google Scholar
M. R. Reynolds, D. J. Cohen, A. D. Kugelmass et al., “The frequency and incremental cost of major complications among medicare beneficiaries receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 47, no. 12, pp. 2493–2497, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Tung, P. Zimetbaum, and M. E. Josephson, “A critical appraisal of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy for the prevention of sudden cardiac death,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 52, no. 14, pp. 1111–1121, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kowalski, J. F. Huizar, K. Kaszala, and M. A. Wood, “Problems with implantable cardiac device therapy,” Cardiology Clinics, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 441–458, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. W. Smith and M. E. Cain, “Sudden cardiac death: epidemiologic and financial worldwide perspective,” Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 199–203, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Farwell and M. H. Gollob, “Risk stratification for sudden death in heart failure,” Minerva Cardioangiologica, vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 379–384, 2007.
View at: Google Scholar
G. A. Lanza, “The electrocardiogram as a prognostic tool for predicting major cardiac events,” Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 87–111, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. L. Kusmirek and M. R. Gold, “Sudden cardiac death: the role of risk stratification,” American Heart Journal, vol. 153, no. 4, supplement, pp. 25–33, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Villuendas and A. H. Kadish, “Cardiac magnetic resonance for risk stratification: the sudden death risk portrayed,” Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 128–134, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Berger, M. Huelsman, K. Strecker et al., “B-type natriuretic peptide predicts sudden death in patients with chronic heart failure,” Circulation, vol. 105, no. 20, pp. 2392–2397, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Blangy, N. Sadoul, B. Dousset et al., “Serum BNP, hs-C-reactive protein, procollagen to assess the risk of ventricular tachycardia in ICD recipients after myocardial infarction,” Europace, vol. 9, no. 9, pp. 724–729, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Jung, D. Andresen, M. Block et al., “Guidelines for implantation of defibrillators,” Clinical Research in Cardiology, vol. 95, no. 12, pp. 696–708, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Jouven, M. Desnos, C. Guerot, and P. Ducimetière, “Predicting sudden death in the population. The Paris prospective study I,” Circulation, vol. 99, no. 15, pp. 1978–1983, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Friedlander, D. S. Siscovick, P. Arbogast et al., “Sudden death and myocardial infarction in first degree relatives as predictors of primary cardiac arrest,” Atherosclerosis, vol. 162, no. 1, pp. 211–216, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Friedlander, D. S. Siscovick, S. Weinmann et al., “Family history as a risk factor for primary cardiac arrest,” Circulation, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 155–160, 1998.
View at: Google Scholar
L. R. C. Dekker, C. R. Bezzina, J. P. S. Henriques et al., “Familial sudden death is an important risk factor for primary ventricular fibrillation: a case-control study in acute myocardial infarction patients,” Circulation, vol. 114, no. 11, pp. 1140–1145, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Elliott, J. Poloniecki, S. Dickie et al., “Sudden death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: identification of high risk patients,” Journal of the American College of Cardiology, vol. 36, no. 7, pp. 2212–2218, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Spooner, C. Albert, E. J. Benjamin et al., “Sudden cardiac death, genes, and arrhythmogenesis: consideration of new population and mechanistic approaches from a national heart, lung, and blood institute workshop, part II,” Circulation, vol. 103, no. 20, pp. 2447–2452, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
P. M. Spooner, C. Albert, E. J. Benjamin et al., “Sudden cardiac death, genes, and arrhythmogenesis: consideration of new population and mechanistic approaches from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute workshop, part I,” Circulation, vol. 103, no. 19, pp. 2361–2364, 2001.
View at: Google Scholar
J. M. Prutkin and N. Sotoodehnia, “Genetics of sudden cardiac arrest,” Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 390–403, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Levin, S. Marullo, O. Muntaner, B. Andersson, and Y. Magnusson, “The myocardium-protective Gly-49 variant of the β-adrenergic receptor exhibits constitutive activity and increased desensitization and down-regulation,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, no. 34, pp. 30429–30435, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Ranade, E. Jorgenson, W. H. H. Sheu et al., “A polymorphism in the β1 adrenergic receptor is associated with resting heart rate,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 935–942, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Borjesson, Y. Magnusson, A. Hjalmarson, and B. Andersson, “A novel polymorphism in the gene coding for the beta-adrenergic receptor associated with survival in patients with heart failure,” European Heart Journal, vol. 21, no. 22, pp. 1853–1858, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
D. A. Mason, J. D. Moore, S. A. Green, and S. B. Liggett, “A gain-of-function polymorphism in a G-protein coupling domain of the human beta1-adrenergic receptor,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 18, pp. 12670–12674, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Iwai, A. Hozuka, S. Nobuyuki et al., “Suppressive effect of the Gly389 allele of the β1-adrenergic receptor gene on the occurrence of ventricular tachycardia in dilated cardiomyopathy,” Circulation Journal, vol. 66, no. 8, pp. 723–728, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. D. Blumenfeld, J. E. Sealey, S. J. Mann et al., “β-Adrenergic receptor blockade as a therapeutic approach for suppressing the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in normotensive and hypertensive subjects,” American Journal of Hypertension, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 451–459, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Bedi, L. A. Postava, S. Murali et al., “Interaction of implantable defibrillator therapy with angiotensin- converting enzyme deletion/insertion polymorphism,” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 1162–1166, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2011 Roman Laszlo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

812

Downloads

605

Citations