Table of Contents
ISRN Ecology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 571749, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/571749
Research Article

Partial Least Square Analyses of Landscape and Surface Water Biota Associations in the Savannah River Basin

US EPA, ORD, Landscape Ecology Branch, 944 E. Harmon Ave, Las Vegas, NV 89119, USA

Received 13 January 2011; Accepted 17 March 2011

Academic Editors: I. Izaguirre and M. van Noordwijk

Copyright © 2011 Maliha S. Nash and Deborah J. Chaloud. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. Noy-Meir, “Multivariate analysis of the semiarid vegetation in south-eastern Australia. II Vegetation Catenae and environmental gradients,” Australian Journal of Botany, vol. 22, p. 115, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  2. K. Jones, A. C. Neale, M. S. Nash et al., “Predicting nutrient and sediment loadings to streams from landscape metrics: a multiple watersheds study from the United States Mid-Atlantic Region,” Landscape Ecology, vol. 16, p. 301, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  3. H. Mehaffey, T. G. Wade, M. S. Nash, and C. M. Edmonds, “Analysis of land cover and water quality in the New York catskill-delaware basins,” in Managing for Healthy Ecosystems, D. J. Rapport, W. L. Lasley, D. E. Rolston, N. O. Nielsen, C. O. Qualset, and A. B. Damania, Eds., pp. 1327–1339, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Fla, USA, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. S. Nash and D. J. Chaloud, “Multivariate analyses (Canonical Correlation Analysis and Partial Least Square, PLS) to model and assess the association of landscape metrics to surface water chemical and biological properties using Savannah River Basin Data,” Tech. Rep. EPA/600-R-02-091, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  5. S. Cumming and P. Vernier, “Statistical models of landscape pattern metrics, with applications to regional scale dynamic forest simulations,” Landscape Ecology, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 433–444, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. S. Nash, D. J. Chaloud, and S. E. Franson, “Association of Landscape Metrics to Surface Water Biology in the Savannah River Basin,” Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, vol. 1, p. 29, 2005. View at Google Scholar
  7. R. Barcikowski and J. P. Stevens, “A Monte Carlo study of stability of canonical weights, and canonical variate-variable correlation,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 10, p. 353, 1975. View at Google Scholar
  8. R. M. Thorndike, Correlation Procedure for Research, Gardner Press, New York, NY, USA, 1978.
  9. R. Gittins, Canonical Analysis: A Review with Application in Ecology, Springer, NewYork, NY, USA, 1985.
  10. W. Lindberg, J. Å. Persson, and S. Wold, “Partial least-squares method for spectrofluorimetric analysis of mixtures of humic acid and ligninsulfonate,” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 643–648, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. S. De Jong and H. A. L. Kiers, “Principal covariates regression—part I: theory,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 14, no. 1–3, pp. 155–164, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. E. Frank and J. H. Friedman, “A statistical view of some chemometrics regression tools,” Technometrics, vol. 35, pp. 109–135, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  13. I. S. Helland, “On the structure of partial least square regression,” Communications in Statistics—Simulation, vol. 17, p. 581, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  14. S. Wold, “The collinearity problem in linear regression: the partial Leats squares (PLS) approach to generalized inverses,” Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, vol. 5, p. 735, 1984. View at Google Scholar
  15. S. Wold, “Chemometric methods in molecular design methods and principles in medicinal chemistry,” in PLS for Multivariate Linear Modeling, H. van de Waterbeemd, Ed., pp. 195–218, Verlag-Chemie, Weinheim, Germany, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  16. H. Martens and T. Næs, Multivariate Calibration, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, 1989.
  17. R. K. Heikkinen, “Predicting patterns of vascular plant species richness with composite variables: a meso-scale study in Finnish Lapland,” Vegetatio, vol. 126, no. 2, pp. 151–165, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. M. E. Johansson and C. Nilsson, “Responses of riparian plants to flooding in free-flowing and regulated boreal rivers: an experimental study,” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 971–986, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. [USEPA] Environmental Protection Agency, “A demonstration of the usefulness of probability sampling for the purpose of estimating ecological condition in state monitoring programs,” Tech. Rep. EPA/904-R-99-002, Region IV, Athens, Ga, USA, 1999. View at Google Scholar
  20. M. T. Barbour, J. Gerritsen, B. D. Snyder, and J. B. Stribling, Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers: Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA, 2nd edition, 1999, Report no.EPA/841-B-99-002.
  21. APHA, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA, 19th edition, 1995.
  22. D. A. Schultz, R. L. Raschke, and R. Jones, “A shortened algal growth potential test,” Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 201–205, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. D. J. Chaloud, C. M. Edmond, and D. T. Heggem, “Savannah River basin landscape analysis,” Tech. Rep. EPA/600-R-01-069, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Las Vegas, Nev, USA, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  24. T. J. Bara, Multi-Resolution Land Characteristics Consortium—Documentation Notebook, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, NC, USA, 1994.
  25. Natural Resource Conservation Service, State Soil Survey Geographic Data Base (STATSGO) Metadata, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resource Conservation Service, Washington, DC, USA, 1996.
  26. [USEPA] Environmental Protection Agency, The U.S. EPA Reach File Version 3.0 Alpha Release (RF3-Alpha), Office of Wetlands, Oceans, and Watersheds, Office of Water, Washington, DC, USA, 1994.
  27. [USGS] US Geological Survey, Digital Elevation Models, National Mapping Program Technical Instructions, Data Users Guide 5', 2nd Printing (Revised), Reston, Va, USA, 1990.
  28. [USGS] US Geological Survey, Digital Line Graphs from 1:100,000-Scale Maps, Data Users Guide 2, Reston, Va, USA, 1989.
  29. T. Næs and H. Martens, “Comparison of predicted methods for multicolinear data,” Communications in Statistics—Simulation and Computation, vol. 14, p. 545, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  30. T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani, and J. Friedman, The Elements of Statistical Learning; Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, Springer, New York, NY, USA, 2001.
  31. H. Van Der Voet, “Comparing the predictive accuracy of models using a simple randomization test,” Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 313–323, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. SAS, Stat User's Guide, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA, 1998.
  33. D. J. Sheskin, Handbook of Parametric and Nonparametric Statistical Procedures, Chapman & Hall/CRC, New York, NY, USA, 2000.
  34. S. Schmidtlein, “Imaging spectroscopy as a tool for mapping Ellenberg indicator values,” Journal of Applied Ecology, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 966–974, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus