Table of Contents
ISRN Civil Engineering
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 582426, 16 pages
Research Article

Variability and Accuracy of Target Displacement from Nonlinear Static Procedures

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407-0353, USA

Received 13 December 2010; Accepted 19 January 2011

Academic Editors: R. Jangid, S. Pantazopoulou, and I. Takewaki

Copyright © 2011 Rakesh K. Goel. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. FEMA 356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA Publication no. 356, The American Society of Civil Engineers for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 2000.
  2. ATC-40, “Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, volumes 1 and 2,” Tech. Rep. ATC-40, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, Calif, USA, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  3. FEMA-440, Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures, Applied Technology Council for Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 2005.
  4. E. Miranda and J. Ruiz-García, “Evaluation of approximate methods to estimate maximum inelastic displacement demands,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 539–560, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. Akkar and A. Metin, “Assessment of improved nonlinear static procedures in FEMA-440,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 133, no. 9, pp. 1237–1246, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. ASCE/SEI-41, “Seismic rehabilitation of existing building,” ASCE Standard no. ASCE/SEI 41-06, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Va, USA, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  7. A. C. Guyader and W. D. Iwan, “Determining equivalent linear parameters for use in a capacity spectrum method of analysis,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 132, no. 1, pp. 59–67, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. F. Shakal, M. J. Huang, and V. Graizer, “Strong-motion data processing,” in International Handbook of Earthquake Engineering Seismology, Part B, W. H. K. Lee, H. Kanamori, P. C. Jennings, and C. Kisslinger, Eds., pp. 967–981, Academic Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  9. A. K. Chopra, Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 3rd edition, 2007.
  10. F. McKenna and G. Fenves, The Opensees Command Language Manual: 1.2, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Center, University of California, Berkeley, Calif, USA, 2001,
  11. J. B. Mander, M. J. N. Priestley, and R. Park, “Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete,” Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 114, no. 8, pp. 1804–1826, 1988. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. K. Goel and A. K. Chopra, “Evaluation of modal and FEMA pushover analyses: SAC buildings,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 225–254, 2004. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. K. J. Elwood, A. B. Matamoros, J. W. Wallace et al., “Update to ASCE/SEI 41 concrete provisions,” Earthquake Spectra, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 493–523, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. K. Goel and C. Chadwell, “Evaluation of current nonlinear static procedures for concrete buildings using recorded strong-motion data,” Data Utilization Report, California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program, CDMG, Sacramento, Calif, USA, 2007, View at Google Scholar
  15. ATC-9, “An evaluation of the imperial county services building: earthquake response and associated damage,” Tech. Rep. ATC-9, Applied Technology Council, Palo Alto, Calif, USA, 1984. View at Google Scholar