Table of Contents
ISRN Anesthesiology
Volume 2011, Article ID 596848, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/596848
Research Article

Diagnostic Potential of Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Noninvasive Assessment of Elevated Intracranial Pressure: Different Patterns of DPOAE Alterations in the Guinea Pig

1Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Technical University of Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
2Walter Brendel Centre for Experimental Medicine, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
3Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany
4Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Marchioninistraße 15, 81377 Munich, Germany

Received 31 October 2011; Accepted 5 December 2011

Academic Editors: S. Baris and E. Shipton

Copyright © 2011 Ulrich Strassen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. L. C. Padayachy, A. A. Figaji, and M. R. Bullock, “Intracranial pressure monitoring for traumatic brain injury in the modern era,” Child's Nervous System, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 441–452, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  2. R. R. Ciuman, “Communication routes between intracranial spaces and inner ear: function, pathophysiologic importance and relations with inner ear diseases,” American Journal of Otolaryngology, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 193–202, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  3. B. Büki, A. Chomicki, M. Dordain et al., “Middle-ear influence on otoacoustic emissions. II: contributions of posture and intracranial pressure,” Hearing Research, vol. 140, no. 1-2, pp. 202–211, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. R. Kast, “A new method for noninvasive measurement of short-term cerebrospinal fluid pressure changes in humans,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 232, no. 4, pp. 260–261, 1985. View at Google Scholar
  5. I. Klockhoff, G. Anggård, and L. Anggård, “Recording of cranio-labyrinthine pressure transmission in man by acoustic impedance method,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 361–370, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  6. A. M. Frank, C. Alexiou, P. Hulin, T. Janssen, W. Arnold, and A. E. Trappe, “Non-invasive measurement of intracranial pressure changes by otoacoustic emissions (OAES)—a report of preliminary data,” Zentralblatt fur Neurochirurgie, vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 177–180, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. S. E. Voss, M. F. Adegoke, N. J. Horton, K. N. Sheth, J. Rosand, and C. A. Shera, “Posture systematically alters ear-canal reflectance and DPOAE properties,” Hearing Research, vol. 263, no. 1-2, pp. 43–51, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  8. B. Büki, E. De Kleine, H. P. Wit, and P. Avan, “Detection of intracochlear and intracranial pressure changes with otoacoustic emissions: a gerbil model,” Hearing Research, vol. 167, no. 1-2, pp. 180–191, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. T. Nakashima, S. Naganawa, M. Sone et al., “Disorders of cochlear blood flow,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 17–28, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. T. Suzuki, T. Nakashima, and N. Yanagita, “Effects of increased cerebrospinal fluid pressure on cochlear and cerebral blood flow,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 250, no. 6, pp. 332–336, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  11. E. O. Thalen, H. P. Wit, J. M. Segenhout, and F. W. J. Albers, “Dynamics of inner ear pressure change caused by intracranial pressure manipulation in the guinea pig,” Acta Oto-Laryngologica, vol. 121, no. 4, pp. 470–476, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  12. T. Mom, P. Avan, R. Romand, and L. Gilain, “Monitoring of functional changes after transient ischemia in gerbil cochlea,” Brain Research, vol. 751, no. 1, pp. 20–30, 1997. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. T. Mom, F. F. Telischi, G. K. Martin, and B. L. Lonsbury-Martin, “Measuring the cochlear blood flow and distortion-product otoacoustic emissions during reversible cochlear ischemia: a rabbit model,” Hearing Research, vol. 133, no. 1-2, pp. 40–52, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. B. Olzowy, G. Von Gleichenstein, M. Canis, N. Plesnila, and K. Mees, “Complex level alterations of the 2f1-f2 distortion product due to hypoxia in the guinea pig,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 265, no. 11, pp. 1329–1333, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  15. B. Olzowy, G. Von Gleichenstein, M. Canis et al., “Level alterations of the 2f 1-f 2 distortion product due to hypoxia in the guinea pig depend on the stimulus frequency,” European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, vol. 267, no. 3, pp. 351–355, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  16. G. Rebillard, J. F. L. Klis, M. Lavigne-Rebillard, P. Devaux, J. L. Puel, and R. Pujol, “Changes in 2f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emissions following alterations of cochlear metabolism,” British Journal of Audiology, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 117–121, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  17. C. E. Michaelis, D. D. Gehr, K. Deingruber, W. Arnold, and K. Lamm, “Optimum primary tone level setting for measuring high amplitude DPOAEs in guinea pigs,” Hearing Research, vol. 189, no. 1-2, pp. 58–62, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  18. W. Wagner, G. Heppelmann, R. Vonthein, and H. P. Zenner, “Test-retest repeatability of distortion product otoacoustic emissions,” Ear and Hearing, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 378–391, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  19. B. Büki, F. Giraudet, and P. Avan, “Non-invasive measurements of intralabyrinthine pressure changes by electrocochleography and otoacoustic emissions,” Hearing Research, vol. 251, no. 1-2, pp. 51–59, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed