Table of Contents
ISRN Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume 2011, Article ID 656204, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2011/656204
Research Article

Age-Related Success with Elective Single versus Double Blastocyst Transfer

1Stanford Fertility and Reproductive Medicine Center, Stanford University Medical Center, 900 Welch Road, Suite 350, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA
2Seattle Reproductive Medicine, 1505 Westlake Avenue, North Suite 400, Seattle, WA 98109, USA

Received 27 August 2011; Accepted 26 September 2011

Academic Editors: E. Cosmi and A. Martin-Hidalgo

Copyright © 2011 Brooke E. Friedman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group, “Multiple gestation pregnancy,” Human Reproduction, vol. 15, pp. 1856–1864, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  2. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, http://www.cdc.gov/ART/.
  3. American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Practice Committee Opinion, Guidelines on Number of Embryos Transferred, American Society for Reproductive Medicine, Birmingham, Ala, USA, 1998.
  4. The Practice Committee of the Society for Reproductive Medicine, “Guidelines on the number of embryos transferred,” Fertil Steril, vol. 86, pp. S51–S52, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  5. J. E. Stern, M. I. Cedars, T. Jain et al., “Assisted reproductive technology practice patterns and the impact of embryo transfer guidelines in the United States,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 275–282, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  6. B. Luke and L. G. Keith, “The contribution of singletons, twins and triplets to low birth weight, infant mortality and handicap in the United States,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 661–666, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  7. W. F. Powers and J. L. Kiely, “The risks confronting twins: a national perspective,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 170, no. 2, pp. 456–461, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  8. A. P. MacKay, C. J. Berg, J. C. King, C. Duran, and J. Chang, “Pregnancy-related mortality among women with multifetal pregnancies,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 563–568, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. X. Xiong, L. D. Saunders, F. L. Wang, and N. N. Demianczuk, “Gestational diabetes mellitus: Prevalence, risk factors, maternal and infant outcomes,” International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 221–228, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. A. F. Saftlas, D. R. Olson, A. L. Franks, H. K. Atrash, and R. Pokras, “Epidemiology of preeclampsia and eclampsia in the United States, 1979–1986,” American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 460–465, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  11. A. P. Mackay, C. J. Berg, and H. K. Atrash, “Pregnancy-related mortality from preeclampsia and eclampsia,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 533–538, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. A. Thurin, J. Hausken, T. Hillensjö et al., “Elective single-embryo transfer versus double-embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 23, pp. 2392–2402, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  13. H. Martikainen, A. Tiitinen, C. Tomás et al., “One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI: a randomized study,” Human Reproduction, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 1900–1903, 2001. View at Google Scholar
  14. Z. Veleva, S. Vilska, C. Hydén-Granskog, A. Tiitinen, J. S. Tapanainen, and H. Martikainen, “Elective single embryo transfer in women aged 36–39 years,” Human Reproduction, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 2098–2102, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  15. A. P. A. van Montfoort, J. C. M. Dumoulin, J. A. Land, E. Coonen, J. G. Derhaag, and J. L. H. Evers, “Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) policy in the first three IVF/ICSI treatment cycles,” Human Reproduction, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 433–436, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  16. D. A. Blake, C. M. Farquhar, N. Johnson, and M. Proctor, “Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted conception,” Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, no. 4, Article ID CD002118, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  17. J. L. Frattarelli, M. P. Leondires, J. L. McKeeby, B. T. Miller, and J. H. Segars, “Blastocyst transfer decreases multiple pregnancy rates in in vitro fertilization cycles: a randomized controlled trial,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 228–230, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. I. van der Auwera, S. Debrock, C. Spiessens et al., “A prospective randomized study: day 2 versus day 5 embryo transfer,” Human Reproduction, vol. 17, no. 6, pp. 1507–1512, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  19. R. Z. Karaki, S. S. Samarraie, N. A. Younis, T. M. Lahloub, and M. H. Ibrahim, “Blastocyst culture and transfer: A step toward improved in vitro fertilization outcome,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 114–118, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. A. A. Milki, M. D. Hinckley, J. D. Fisch, D. Dasig, and B. Behr, “Comparison of blastocyst transfer with day 3 embryo transfer in similar patient populations,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 126–129, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. D. K. Gardner, W. B. Schoolcraft, L. Wagley, T. Schlenker, J. Stevens, and J. Hesla, “A prospective randomized trial of blastocyst culture and transfer in in-vitro fertilization,” Human Reproduction, vol. 13, no. 12, pp. 3434–3440, 1998. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. E. G. Papanikolaou, M. Camus, E. M. Kolibianakis, L. Van Landuyt, A. Van Steirteghem, and P. Devroey, “In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 354, no. 11, pp. 1139–1146, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  23. L. B. Davis, R. B. Lathi, L. M. Westphal, and A. A. Milki, “Elective single blastocyst transfer in women older than 35,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 89, no. 1, pp. 230–231, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  24. A. K. Styer, D. L. Wright, A. M. Wolkovich, C. Veiga, and T. L. Toth, “Single-blastocyst transfer decreases twin gestation without affecting pregnancy outcome,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 89, no. 6, pp. 1702–1708, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  25. A. Criniti, A. Thyer, G. Chow, P. Lin, N. Klein, and M. Soules, “Elective single blastocyst transfer reduces twin rates without compromising pregnancy rates,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 84, no. 6, pp. 1613–1619, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  26. C. M. Mullin, M. E. Fino, S. Talebian, L. C. Krey, F. Licciardi, and J. A. Grifo, “Comparison of pregnancy outcomes in elective single blastocyst transfer versus double blastocyst transfer stratified by age,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 93, no. 6, pp. 1837–1843, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  27. S. H. Jun, B. Choi, L. Shahine et al., “Defining human embryo phenotypes by cohort-specific prognostic factors,” PLoS ONE, vol. 3, no. 7, Article ID e2562, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  28. B. Behr, J. Gebhardt, J. Lyon, and A. A. Milki, “Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 697–699, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. W. Ombelet, P. De Sutter, J. Van der Elst, and G. Martens, “Multiple gestation and infertility treatment: registration, reflection and reaction—the Belgian project,” Human Reproduction Update, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 3–14, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  30. A. P. A. van Montfoort, A. A. A. Fiddelers, J. M. Janssen et al., “In unselected patients, elective single embryo transfer prevents all multiples, but results in significantly lower pregnancy rates compared with double embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial,” Human Reproduction, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 338–343, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  31. K. I. Aston, C. M. Peterson, and D. T. Carrell, “Monozygotic twinning associated with assisted reproductive technologies: A review,” Reproduction, vol. 136, no. 4, pp. 377–386, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  32. S. E. Moayeri, B. Behr, R. B. Lathi, L. M. Westphal, and A. A. Milki, “Risk of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer decreases over time: an 8-year experience,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 87, no. 5, pp. 1028–1032, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  33. M. G. Bulmer, The Biology of Twinning in Man, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK, 1970.
  34. V. Wright, L. A. Schieve, A. Vahratian, and M. A. Reynolds, “Monozygotic twinning associated with day 5 embryo transfer in pregnancies conceived after IVF,” Human Reproduction, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 1831–1836, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  35. O. Shebl, T. Ebner, M. Sommergruber, A. Sir, and G. Tews, “Birth weight is lower for survivors of the vanishing twin syndrome: a case-control study,” Fertility and Sterility, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 310–314, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  36. A. Pinborg, O. Lidegaard, N. la Cour Freiesleben, and A. N. Andersen, “Consequences of vanishing twins in IVF/ICSI pregnancies,” Human Reproduction, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 2821–2829, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed