Table of Contents
ISRN Nanotechnology
Volume 2011 (2011), Article ID 719027, 6 pages
Research Article

Synthesis and Optical Manifestation of NiO-Silica Nanocomposite

Department of Physics and Technophysics, Vidyasagar University, Midnapore 721102, India

Received 17 March 2011; Accepted 4 May 2011

Academic Editors: G. A. Kachurin and D. Tsoukalas

Copyright © 2011 S. Chakrabarty and K. Chatterjee. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


NiO-silica nanocomposites with average diameter ranging from 2–40 nm were prepared by sol-gel method followed by the heat treatment varying from 400°C to 1000°C. The details of morphology and crystalline nature of all the as prepared samples were characterized by TEM, HRTEM, and XRD analysis. The planes obtained from SAED pattern supports the planes originated from XRD study. From the optical absorption study, it is revealed that the band gap energy of NiO can extensively be manipulated by composite formation with silica and the size variation of that nanocomposite. Absorption peak position varies almost linearly with the oxidation temperature of the samples. Photoluminescence spectroscopy reveals that NiO-silica nanocomposite, prepared at 600°C and below, shows strong emission at 3.62 eV, but the nanocomposites with bigger size greatly hinder the effect of selective emissivity.

1. Introduction

In recent years, nanomaterials especially nanostructured metal oxides attract extensive interests due to their novel optical, electronic, magnetic, thermal, and mechanical properties [1]. NiO (nickelous oxide) nanoparticles are one such momentous metal oxide that tend to be P-type semiconductor with a wide band gap [2]. It has tremendous application in science and technology. It can be used as a transparent P-type semiconducting layer [3, 4] and as an antiferro magnetic film [5] and can also be extensively used in smart windows [6], electrochemical supercapacitor [79], and dye-sensitized photocathode [10]. It exhibits anodic electrochromism. Due to excellent durability and electrochemical stability, low material cost as an ion storage material, large-spin optical density, and various manufacturing possibilities, NiO semiconductors become interesting topics for scientists.

Different methods have already been reported for the synthesis of NiO nanoparticles such as evaporation [11, 12], magnetron sputtering [1315], and sol-gel [16]. Particularly, the optical behavior of NiO under different circumstances is becoming one of the prime searches of the scientists. Proffessor Guerra et al. [17] investigated the cathodoluminescence and photoluminescence of NiO where as Proffessor Kuzmin and his group [18] examined the effect of doping in the origin of visible photoluminescence in NiO. Even the NiO nanowires are also under observation for their emission property [19]. However, the complexity remains in the synthesis technique as well as in the limitation of tailoring the optical properties of NiO nanoparticle. Especially the optical response of bare NiO nanoparticles cannot be tailored much for their large band-gap energy. Keeping this in mind, scientists have proposed to oxidize Ni nanoparticle within insulating medium by ion implantation method in search of better stability and novel optical properties [20]. Effort has been also delivered to synthesize NiO nanoparticle within insulating silica matrix to form nanocomposite films leading toward optical gas sensor [21, 22]. In this paper Proffessor Martucci et al. have shown how the doping of NiO in SiO2 matrix, prepared by sol-gel route, can improve the sensing properties of the materials. But other different aspects of these potential NiO-silica nanocomposite materials still remain unearthed. In this work we concentrate on the synthesis and optical characterization of differently sized NiO-silica nanocomposites prepared by sol-gel technique to tailor the optical band gap in a different approach from the route adopted by ProffessorMartucci et al. [21].

Here well-dispersed Ni nanoparticles were prepared first within SiO2 matrix by sol-gel method and then by a controlled heat treatment at elevated temperature ranging from 400°C to 1000°C, the NiO-silica nanocomposites were prepared with diameter varying from 2 to 40 nm. The crystalline phases of all as-prepared NiO-silica samples were identified by X-ray diffraction (XRD). The structure and morphological properties were studied by TEM and HRTEM. The variation in optical absorbance of different NiO-silica nanocomposites was examined thoroughly. The detail of PL study of the different-sized NiO-silica nanocomposites reveal interesting emission peak at around 3.6 eV for the sample prepared with the heat treatment below 700°C but for NiO-silica composites synthesized at higher temperature (≥700°C) do not exhibit any emission property. The result was discussed on the basis of the electronic transition of the 3d state of the Ni2+ ion and the surface defect states.

2. Experiment

Firstly, a fresh solution was made by taking 0.06 M NiCl2, 50 mL C2H5OH, and 5 mL distilled water and the prepared solution, placed in ice bath, was stirred by a magnetic stirrer for 1 h. This solution was named as “A”. In another beaker 0.05 M TEOS, C2H5OH, and few drops of diluted HCl were taken, and the colorless solution of pH 6 was stirred for 1 h keeping the system in ice bath. This solution was named as “B”. The solution A was then added to the solution B and stirred for few minutes. One transparent green solution was prepared as “Sol”, and it was kept in a Petridis for few days for gelation. After the complete “Gel” formation, the sample was crashed to powder, and a solution was prepared dispersing the powdered sample into distilled water. The solution was placed in the ice bath and stirred for 20 minutes and was kept as “C”. Another saturated solution of NaBH4 with distilled water was prepared and was kept as “D”. Then the solution “D” was added to solution “C” very quickly resulting in a black precipitation. Next, the solution was stirred for 10 minutes, and then the products were collected by centrifugation. The dried sample was treated at different oxidation temperature ranging from 400°C–1000°C for 10 minutes to prepare NiO-silica nanocomposites of various sizes.

All the powdered samples were characterized both by Rigaku Mini flex X-Ray diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation source as well as by JEM 2010 transmission electron microscope. Optical absorption spectra of the powdered samples were recorded in a UV-VIS 1700 Shimadzu Spectrophotometer. The powdered sample were dispersed in ethyl alcohol and mounted in the sample chamber while pure ethyl alcohol was taken in the reference beam position. For photoluminescence measurement, the samples were also taken in ethyl alcohol, and the measurements were carried out in LS55 (Perkin Elmer) PL Spectrophotometer.

3. Result and Discussion

Figure 1 shows the details of the XRD patterns of the NiO-silica nanocomposites obtained at different oxidation temperatures. It is evident from the figure that the sample prepared at 400°C and 500°C has no appreciable peak, but as the oxidation temperature increases, the peaks are generated from different planes of NiO and silica. As the sample treatment temperature increases, the crystal size increases, and in the XRD pattern, the peak intensity and sharpness increase accordingly. Here at comparatively low oxidation temperature, the silica is still in glass form, and as the temperature increases, it starts to become much more crystalline nucleating from the preexisting Ni site. Thus, with the increasing temperature the NiO-silica composite form gets much stronger impression in the XRD data. The measurement also shows that annealing temperature of the different as-prepared samples did not alter their chemical phase in NiO. However, the relative intensities of different planes, indexed in the figure, were greatly improved by the elevated temperature, indicating that nanocrystals could grow with preferential orientation. It is worthy to notice that the crystalline phase of silica comes in the temperature well below the crystallization temperature (1200°C) of pure bulk silica prepared by sol-gel technique. It is established that the crystallization behavior of SiO2 is strongly influenced by the ion species located in the circumference, and the crystallization temperature varies in a complicated manner depending on the methods of processing [23]. Here it is assumed that in presence of Ni site, the effective crystallization temperature of silica has been reduced substantially. It is obvious from the figure that the crystalline peak from silica starts to appear from 700°C onwards. The reason why the crystal planes of NiO were not observed in the XRD patterns of sample obtained from 400°C and 500°C heat treatment is not very clear. It is assumed that the peak intensity originated from the very small dimension of NiO nanocrystal within silica matrix is not sufficient for the detection unit of the instrument. It is known that the very small size of the crystal may not allow detecting the crystal planes by XRD study [21].

Figure 1: XRD pattern of NiO-silica nanocomposites prepared at different temperatures.   represents SiO2 peak, and ■ represents NiO peak.

Figure 2 shows the typical TEM images of well-dispersed NiO-silica nanocomposites obtained from four different oxidation temperatures. It is clearly seen that the particle size increases with the increasing oxidation temperature. Here for the sake of clarity, TEM image of all the heat-treated samples were not included in the figure, but typical four different type samples had been chosen. The average size of the synthesized nanocomposite from different oxidation treatment varies from 2 nm to 40 nm. The smallest size arises due to 400°C heat treatment [Figure 2(a)], and the largest composite size comes due to the 1000°C heat treatment [Figure 2(d)]. The intermediate heat treatments give rise to the intermediate average particle sizes. Here it is interesting to note in the TEM image that nanocomposite prepared even at the lowest heat treatment (400°C) has particle nature which confirms crystalline structure of the sample though it was not observed from the XRD study.

Figure 2: Typical TEM images of NiO-silica nanocomposites prepared at 400°C (a), at 600°C (b), at 800°C (c), and at 1000°C (d).

Figure 3(a) shows the selected-area electron diffraction pattern (SAED) originated from the NiO-silica nanocomposite taking one typical sample prepared at 800°C, and the planes calculated from this diffraction rings are in well agreement with the planes evolved from our XRD study. Investigation of the different ring originated from the SAED pattern also supports the presence of both phases, NiO and SiO2, within the prepared sample. Figure 3(b) shows HRTEM of single typical NiO-silica nanocomposite confirming the well-crystalline phase of the sample. Here d value calculated from the fringe pattern matches with the (101) planes of NiO signifying that the NiO phase is the dominating part of the composite particle which is likely to be. From this HRTEM it is also clear that prepared sample has structurally uniform NiO phase which grows in a single direction.

Figure 3: Typical (a) SAED image and (b) HRTEM of NiO-silica nanocomposite sample prepared at 800°C. The corresponding planes are indexed in (a) and (b).

Optical absorption spectra of the different NiO-silica nanocomposites have been shown in Figure 4. From the figure, it is noticed that with the increasing oxidation temperature, the absorbance peak position of the samples is shifting towards higher wavelength. It is obvious that with higher oxidation temperature the crystal size increases, and we know that the optical absorbance peak get red-shifted with the higher particle size. This absorbance, we assume, is not due to the band- to band-transition of NiO. Rather due to the composite formation of NiO and SiO2, there may be some surface states in between the band, and the transition may occur from intermediate surface states to the conduction band providing a room to tailor the band-gap energy of the prepared NiO-SiO2 nanocomposite. Pure silica prepared by sol-gel method followed by heat treatment for 10 minutes at 400°C to 1000°C with 100°C interval gives the absorption peak at 270 nm which is far away from the peak position originated from the prepared nanocomposites. One such absorption behavior of silica sample heated at 800°C is shown in the inset A of Figure 4 to ensure that the absorptions coming from the samples are not the contribution of pure silica.

Figure 4: Optical absorption spectra for NiO-silica nanocomposite prepared at different temperatures. The inset A shows the optical absorbance of pure silica prepared by sol-gel method followed by 800°C heat treatment for 10 min. Inset B shows absorbance peak position versus oxidation temperature curve of the NiO-silica nanocomposite. Dotted line is for the eye guidance.

It is seen from the figure that the peak position of the NiO-silica nanocomposite varies in the UV region from 300 nm to 340 nm, and the variation of absorbance peak position with the temperature is almost in linear relation shown in the inset B of Figure 4. Here a dotted line is drawn for the eye guidance. This simple linear behavior provides the splendid opportunity to tailor the size of NiO-silica nanocomposites to tune the absorption peak position.

Figure 5 shows the photoluminescence response curves taken from three different NiO-silica samples prepared at 400°C, 500°C, and 600°C. All these samples show one strong peak at 3.62 eV (341 nm) and two shoulders on both side of the main peak centered at about 3.75 eV (330 nm) and 3.46 eV (357 nm). Interestingly, the nanocomposites prepared at higher temperature, 700°C onwards, are not showing any distinct emission peak at those energy levels, and for that reason, they are not shown in the figure. Here for the sake of comparison, photoluminescence responses originating from the pure silica, prepared by sol-gel method and heat treated at respective temperature, are shown as well. From this experiment, it is clear that the feeble shoulder originating at 330 nm in the nanocomposite sample is originally attributed to the silica phase, and the main peak is originating from the electronic transition of the Ni2+ ions. In NiO the existence of several transitions at energies below band gap has been reported by different scientists using optical absorption study [18, 24]. Adler and Feinleib [25] reported a series of absorption peaks below 4 eV as purely intraionic 3d8-3d8 transitions of Ni2+. By the study of electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) and spin-polarized electron energy loss spectroscopy (SPEELS), the existence of this kind of transition of the 3d8 electrons of Ni2+ was also confirmed [26, 27]. But the interesting thing is that the samples prepared at and above 700°C are not showing this emission band at all. One can notice from Figure 1 that, for the samples prepared at 700°C onwards, the existence of silica phase becomes stronger. So, it can be assumed that for the sample prepared at the above-said temperatures the number of surface states is so much that they do not allow the radiative relaxation. It is also reported that NiOs are very much susceptible to the heat treatment for their stoichiometric change in behavior [19]. In the lower oxidation temperature, the particle size and the absence of strong-silica phase provides the opportunity of selective relaxation emission whereas in the higher temperature treatment the silica phase and the effective size of the nanocomposites suppress the quality of emission from the NiO.

Figure 5: PL spectra of NiO-silica nanocomposite prepared at three different temperatures (a)–(c), (a. u. means arbitrary units). PL spectra of pure silica prepared at the same temperature are shown by the dotted line for each sample. All the samples were excited at 4.12 eV (300 nm), and the data are taken in RT.

4. Conclusions

In summery NiO-silica nanocomposites were synthesized by very-easy-to-achieve chemical synthesis route. The size of the nanocomposite was varied from 2 to 40 nm by controlling the oxidation temperature. All the samples were characterized by XRD, TEM, and HRTEM analysis. Optical absorbance study reveals that absorbance peak position varies from 300 nm to 340 nm as the particle size increases. Moreover, photoluminescence investigation reveals that the NiO-silica systems before the crystallization of silica show strong emission peak at around 3.62 eV while nanocomposites prepared at higher oxidation temperature (≥700°C) with the strong crystalline phase of silica do not show emission peaks at all.


The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from FIST, Department of Science and Technology, India and SAP, University Grant Commission, India.


  1. J. L. Gunjakar, A. M. More, and C. D. Lokhande, “Chemical deposition of nanocrystalline nickel oxide from urea containing bath and its use in liquefied petroleum gas sensor,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 131, no. 2, pp. 356–361, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. B. Subramanian, M. M. Ibrahim, V. Senthilkumar et al., “Optoelectronic and electrochemical properties of nickel oxide (NiO) films deposited by DC reactive magnetronsputtering,” Physica B, vol. 403, no. 21-22, pp. 4104–4110, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  3. X. Wang, J. Song, L. Gao, J. Jin, H. Zheng, and Z. Zhang, “Optical and electrochemical properties of nanosized NiO via thermal decomposition of nickel oxalate nanofibres,” Nanotechnology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 37–39, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. B. Sasi, K. G. Gopchandran, P. K. Manoj, P. Koshy, P. P. Rao, and V. K. Vaidyan, “Preparation of transparent and semiconducting NiO films,” Vacuum, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 149–154, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. S. R. Krishnakumar, M. Liberati, C. Grazioli et al., “Magnetic linear dichroism studies of in situ grown NiO thin films,” Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, vol. 310, no. 1, pp. 8–12, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. C. G. Granqvist, Handbook of Electrochromic Materials, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1995.
  7. X. Wang, L. Li, Y. Zhang et al., “High-yield synthesis of NiO nanoplatelets and their excellent electrochemical performance,” Crystal Growth and Design, vol. 6, no. 9, pp. 2163–2165, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. T. Nathan, A. Aziz, A. F. Noor, and S. R. S. Prabaharan, “Nanostructured NiO for electrochemical capacitors: synthesis and electrochemical properties,” Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry, vol. 12, no. 7-8, pp. 1003–1009, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. M. Wu, J. Gao, S. Zhang, and A. Chen, “Comparative studies of nickel oxide films on different substrates for electrochemical supercapacitors,” Journal of Power Sources, vol. 159, pp. 365–369, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. L. Lin, E. A. Gibson, P. Qin et al., “Double-layered NiO photocathodes for p-type DSSCs with record IPCE,” Advanced Materials, vol. 22, no. 15, pp. 1759–1762, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  11. K. Tetsuo and Y. Toshikazu, “Preparation and structural analysis of nickel/nickel oxide multilayers,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 77, no. 12, pp. 6651–6657, 1995. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. W. Wang, Y. Liu, C. Xu, C. Zheng, and G. Wang, “Synthesis of NiO nanorods by a novel simple precursor thermal decomposition approach,” Chemical Physics Letters, vol. 362, no. 1-2, pp. 119–122, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. H. Yu, L. R. Zeng, F. W. Zhu, C. L. Chai, and W. Y. Lai, “Magnetic properties and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy study of NiO/NiFe films prepared by magnetron sputtering,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 90, no. 8, pp. 4039–4043, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. S. Nandy, U. N. Maiti, C. K. Ghosh, and K. K. Chattopadhyay, “Enhanced p-type conductivity and band gap narrowing in heavily Al doped NiO thin films deposited by RF magnetron sputtering,” Journal of Physics, vol. 21, no. 11, article 115804, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  15. H. Hahn and R. S. Averback, “The production of nanocrystalline powders by magnetron sputtering,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 67, no. 2, pp. 1113–1115, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. L. Xiang, X. Y. Deng, and Y. Jin, “Experimental study on synthesis of NiO nano-particles,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 219–224, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. C. D. Guerra, A. Remon, J. A. Garcia, and J. Piqueras, “Cathodoluminescence and photoluminescence spectroscopy of NiO,” Physica Status Solidi (a), vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 497–503, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. A. Kuzmin, N. Mironova-Ulmane, and S. Ronchin, “Origin of visible photoluminescence in NiO and NicMg1-cO single-crystals,” Proceedings of SPIE, vol. 5122, pp. 61–67, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  19. H. Cao, X. Qiu, Y. Liang, L. Zhang, M. Zhao, and Q. Zhu, “Sol—gel template synthesis and photoluminescence of n- and p-type semiconductor oxide nanowires,” ChemPhysChem, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 497–501, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed · View at Scopus
  20. H. Amekura, Y. Takeda, K. Kono, H. Kitazawa, and N. Kishimoto, “Modification of metal nanoparticles in SiO2 by thermal oxidation,” Reviews on Advanced Materials Science, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 178–182, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. A. Martucci, N. Bassiri, M. Guglielmi, L. Armelao, S. Gross, and J. C. Pivin, “NiO-SiO2 sol-gel nanocomposite films for optical gas sensor,” Journal of Sol-Gel Science and Technology, vol. 26, no. 1–3, pp. 993–996, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. L. Zbroniec, A. Martucci, T. Sasaki, and N. Koshizaki, “Optical CO gas sensing using nanostructured NiO and NiO/SiO2 nanocomposites fabricated by PLD and sol—gel methods,” Applied Physics A, vol. 79, no. 4–6, pp. 1303–1305, 2004. View at Google Scholar
  23. Y. Kanno, “Discussion from the nucleation for the crystallization temperature of vitreous silica,” Journal of Materials Science Letters, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 451–453, 1990. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. T. Tsuboi and W. Kleemann, “Fine structure of near infrared optical absorption in NiO,” Journal of Physics, vol. 6, no. 41, pp. 8625–8631, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. D. Adler and J. Feinleib, “Electrical and optical properties of narrow-band materials,” Physical Review B, vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 3112–3134, 1970. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. Gorschluter and H. Merz, “Localized d-d excitations in NiO(100) and CoO(100),” Physical Review B, vol. 49, no. 24, pp. 17293–17302, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. B. Fromme, M. Moller, TH. Anschutz, C. Bethke, and E. Kisker, “Electron-exchange processes in the excitations of NiO(100) surface d states,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 1548–1551, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus