Research Article

Psychosocial Health Status of Persons Seeking Treatment for Exposure to Libby Amphibole Asbestos

Table 2

Impact of external factors on depression scores ( š‘ = 3 8 6 ).

Sum of squaresdfMean square š¹ š‘ƒ Pair diffs.

Age
ā€ƒ0ā€“49293.242146.621.46.23 NA
ā€ƒ50ā€“64
ā€ƒ65+

Gender
ā€ƒMen55.30155.300.55.46 NA
ā€ƒWomen

Education
ā€ƒLess than high school126.00263.000.63.53 NA
ā€ƒHigh school
ā€ƒMore than high school

Exposure
ā€ƒWorker76.12238.060.69.69 NA
ā€ƒFamily/HH contact
ā€ƒOther

Residence
ā€ƒLocal35.89135.890.36.55 NA
ā€ƒDistant

Primary insurance
ā€ƒPublic796.842398.423.97.02 NA
ā€ƒPrivate
ā€ƒHNA/LAMP

Satisfaction with financial resources
ā€ƒFirst quartile421.633140.541.40.24 NA
ā€ƒSecond quartile
ā€ƒThird quartile
ā€ƒFourth quartile

Satisfaction with healthcare access1
ā€ƒFirst quartile (1)2217.653739.227.37.001 versus 2
1 versus 3
ā€ƒSecond quartile (2)1 versus 4
ā€ƒThird quartile (3)2 versus 4
ā€ƒFourth quartile (4)3 versus 4

Age*Gender2
ā€ƒMen 0ā€“49 (1)995.912497.954.96.001 versus 6
ā€ƒWomen 0ā€“49 (2)3 versus 6
ā€ƒMen 50ā€“64 (3)5 versus 6
ā€ƒWomen 50ā€“64 (4)2 versus 6
ā€ƒMen 65+ (5)4 versus 6
ā€ƒWomen 65+ (6)

1Bonferroni adjusted š‘ƒ < . 0 5 .
2Games-Howell š‘ƒ < . 0 5 .