Research Article
Effect of Margin Design and Processing Steps on Marginal Adaptation of Captek Restorations
Table 2
Summary of one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc comparisons.
| | Group | n | Mean | SD | P value | Tukey post hoc* |
| Stage 1 | A | 6 | 114.77 | 24.57 | .014 | A | | B | 6 | 107.93 | 21.10 | A | B | C | 6 | 92.13 | 11.89 | A | B | D | 6 | 79.11 | 12.67 | | B |
| Stage 2 | A | 6 | 123.70 | 23.74 | .028 | A | | B | 6 | 110.39 | 23.84 | A | B | C | 6 | 104.94 | 17.65 | A | B | D | 6 | 79.61 | 27.48 | | B |
| Stage 3 | A | 6 | 85.15 | 35.45 | .135 | N/A | B | 6 | 97.28 | 39.46 | C | 6 | 54.85 | 19.16 | D | 6 | 65.63 | 31.77 |
|
|
*letters A and B indicate homogenous subsets, respectively.
|