Research Article  Open Access
Yangui Yu, Yiming Sun, Yanghui Ma, Feng Xu, "The Computing of Intersectant Relations for Its Strength Problem on Damage and Fracture to Materials with Short and Long Crack", International Scholarly Research Notices, vol. 2011, Article ID 876396, 7 pages, 2011. https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/876396
The Computing of Intersectant Relations for Its Strength Problem on Damage and Fracture to Materials with Short and Long Crack
Abstract
Adopt two types of damage variables, and , and make the bidirectional combined coordinate system and the bidirectional curves in the whole process, describing their damage evolutive behaviors on fatigue damagefracture to elasticplastic steels; communicate the crossreferencing between their computing models and between describing curves at each stage among varied disciplines; bring forward a viewpoint about the driving force of material damage, that is the damage stress factor at crack forming stage, Provide the computation expressions and computing methods of the strength problem of materials with short crack and long crack at each stage; reveal the geometrical and the physical meaning of force triangle and its edge vector at each stage, Provide the conversion methods between the variables, the equations, the material constants and the dimensional units; Indicate the physical and the geometrical meanings for some key parameters. This will be having practical significance for promoting developing, and applying each discipline.
1. Introduction
As is now well known, we adopt the crack size as a variable in the fracture mechanics to describe crack growth process undergoing damage for a material and we adopt a damage variable in the damage mechanics to describe an evolutive process undergoing damage for one. Either the sign or the sign are all virtually damage variables so, we could also adopt the damage to describe the evolutive law of a structure material with crack. References [1โ3] had made out such research. In each discipline we have all inhouse features and its advantages. If we can communicate and convert corresponding relations for that among the damage variables, and the equations, the material constants, the dimensional units which describe the material behavior for varied discipline and provide some conversion methods, thus we are also able to adopt the same variables and or the variable and to compute the strength and the life at each stage or even in overall process for structures and materials undergoing fatigue damage [4, 5]. And the conventional materials and damage mechanics are made by inheritance and development and the modern one is made by all better combination and application. Based on this aim THE authors adopt the mathematical derivation and computational analyses used with computer by longrange research, educe a series of the computation expressions and the computing methods. Thus, this may be having practical significance for promoting, developing, and applying of some disciplines.
2. Bidirectional Combined Coordinate System and Bidirectional Curves in the Whole Process
In some of branch disciplines on fatiguedamage fracture, for finding their correlations among variables, curves, equations, and material constants of describing material behaviors at each stage and for connecting their relations to each other, we must put up analysis and developments for a number of problems that are above mentioned. Here, it is by means of bidirectional combined coordinate system that is, adopted in Figure 1 [6] we express the damage evolving process of material behavior at each stage and in the whole course, which consists of six abscissa axes , , , , , and and two bidirectional ordinate axis and . Between the axes and , it is the calculation domain of the conventional material mechanics; between the axes and , it is the calculation domain of the current ultrahigh cycle fatigue; among the axes , , and , it is the calculation domain of the damage mechanics and the microfracture mechanics; between the axes and , it is calculation domain of the macrofracture mechanics; Between the axes and , it is all applicable calculation domain for the microfracture mechanics and macrofracture mechanics. The upward direction along the ordinate axis is presented as damage evolving rate or crack growth rate (that can also carve up the damage evolving rate or short crack growth rate at crack forming stage or the damage evolving rate or long crack growth rate at crack growth stage), and the downward direction is presented as each stage life 2N. The distance between axis and is shown as the region of the nominal stress or remote stress ; the distance between axis and is shown as the region from uncrack to microcrack initiation; the distance between axes and is shown as the region relative to life from microcrack growth to macrocrack forming. Consequently, the distance is shown as the region relating to life from grains size to microcrack initiation until macrocrack forming; the distance is shown as the region relating to the lifelong life 2N from microcrack initiation until fracture of structure material. The coordinate system combined from upward axis and abscissa axes , , and is presented to be the relationship between the damage evolving rate (or the short crack growth rate ) and the damage stress factor amplitude (or damage strain factor amplitude ) at crack forming stage; the coordinate system combined from and () at the same direction is presented to be the relationship between macrocrack growth rate and stress intensity factor amplitude , integral amplitude , and crack tip displacement amplitude (, and ) at macrocrack growth stage. The coordinate system combined from downward ordinate axis and abscissa axes , and is presented as the relationship between the , amplitude, and the life 2N (or between the , amplitude, and the life 2N). The curve abcd is the ultrahigh cycle fatigue one to correspond to stress below fatigue limit. On abscissa , point is corresponding to fatigue strength coefficient ; point is corresponding to fatigue ductility coefficient ; point is corresponding to ultrahigh cycle fatigue strength coefficient . The shows the varying regularities of elastic material behaviors as under high cycle loading at macrocrack forming stage; positive direction shows the relation between (or ) and ; inverted shows the relation between the and . The curve shows the varying regularities of plastic material behaviors, as is under lowcycle loading at macrocrack forming stage; positive direction shows the relation between and ; inverted shows the relation between the . And the curve at crack growth stage is showed as under high cycle loading: positive direction ; shows  (); inverted , shows the relation between the and . The shows the positive direction relation between the and under lowcycle loading, inverted , shows the relation between () and 2N. And it should point that the (curve 11โฒ) is expressed for the curve under symmetrical cycle loading (i.e., under zero mean stress); the (curve 33โฒ) is expressed for the curve under unsymmetrical cycle loading (i.e., under nonzero mean stress).
3. Relations among Force Triangles and Relations among Edge Vectors of Force Triangle Itself at Each Stage
Due to extent of material undergone damage at each stage is different and due to the variance in the material behaviors after undergoing damage, the rigidity of material is also different to ensue from change, so the force triangles consist of edge vectors at different stages which are also varied relationships among force triangles, and relationships among the edge vectors themselves at each stage, their geometrical and physical meanings are all compiled in Table 1. We can make out from the force triangle in each area from Figure 1 find the mathematic model of driving force is different in each discipline. The driving force seen from force triangle between the axes and is the damage stress intensity factor under ultrahigh cycle fatigue. We should also point out that this is the calculation domain in microdamage mechanics or in conventional material mechanics where the and are, respectively, the microcrock stress intensity factor or the microdamage stress intensity factor under ultrahigh cycle fatigue to correspond a crystal grain or microdamage defect which is originated from interior materials. And the mathematic models of driving force between the axes and are the stress intensity factor range of shortcrack or the damage stress intensity factor range . or that is calculation domain of the microfracture mechanics or damage mechanics. And the mathematic models of driving force between the axes and are the stress intensity factor range of longcrack or the damage stress intensity factor range at the second stage or that is calculation domain of the macrofracture mechanics. Relations among force triangles can be expressly made out in Figure 1; the relations among edge vectors of force triangle iteself and their geometrical and physical meaning at each stage are all compiled in Table 1.

4. Computing the Damage Strength for ElasticPlastic Material under HighCycle Fatigue
Based upon abovementioned viewpoints we bring forward the computation expressions and calculation methods of strength for elasticplastic steels which are the material behaviors undergoing fatigue damage at different stages. And we proportionally analyze for the crossreferencing between their equations, material constants, and dimensional units and also explain conversion methods between them.
4.1. Computing of Strength for Material with Crack
4.1.1. Computing of Strength at the First Stage
About computing the material strength with short crack, many researchers had presented varied computing models and made out valuable contributions [7, 8]. Murakami [9] provides the computation expression as follows: And research and analysis of the driving force of force triangle in Figure 1 and according to above explanation and the present author provide again a computational model to describe stressstrain about the tip of short crack that is the stress intensity factor at the first stage as following [10โ12]: where Critical stress intensity factor of short crack that is corresponding to macrocrack size at about the threshold level and more than one, that is artificially definite according to the size of structure member.
is a correction coefficient concerned with shape and size, for example, of a structure member. And it became the damage stress intensity factor at the same stage when we adopt damage variable to describe [13] where : Critical damage stress intensity factor that is equivalent to the . : Critical damage level that is equivalent to ; if , then .
Conversion method between variables and and between the dimensional units defines 1โmm equivalent to one damage unit (nondimensional value), 1โm equivalent to 1000 damage unit. If critical , then critical damage value of the equivalent is damage unit. And define that ; . The is an initial damage value corresponding to microcrack size , and it is advised to take the average value of 10 crystal sizes or to take the maximum size of crystal size. It should also be pointed out that the stresses are all local ones in (2)โ(5) and (7)โ(10).
4.1.2. Computing of Strength at the Second Stage
The computational model to describe stress strain about the tip of long crack at the second stage had been provided by famous scientists Broek and Hellan as follows [14, 15]: where Critical stress intensity factor of long crack is a correctional coefficient concerned with the shape of crack and shape and size of structure member. And it becomes the damage stress intensity factor at the same stage if we adopt damage variable to describe [16, 17] is a critical damage stress intensity factor equivalent to the . is a critical damage value correspondent to the critical crack size .
Conversion method between variables and and between the dimensional units at the second stage is the same as the first stage. It should be pointed out that the dimensional unit of the damage stress intensity factor and the at each stage become identical with the unit of stress because the dimensional unit between the variables and is converted.
It should be pointed out that both the values between the stress intensity factor of shortcrack and the stress intensity of long crack are different under the condition of the same crack size (e.g., ) because the mechanisms of material damage and because their mathematical models and dimensional units of both driving forces are all different. But both growth rates at the turning point from short crack to long crack should be accordant or near.
5. Computing Example
A pressure vessel adopts the steel 16โMnR to make its strength limit of material , yield limit , the strainhardening exponent , fatigue strength exponent in short crack growth , threshold level , critical stress intensity factor , critical damage stress intensity factor equivalent to the , the critical stress intensity factor and the damage stress intensity factor of short crack corresponding to the threshold level , and the mean sizes of crystal grains; its working stress is of pressure vessel and local stress is at focal point of stress. Try respectively, to compute the stress intensity factor and the damage stress intensity factor at short crack size undergone after damage for a crystal grain and the stress intensity factor and the damage stress intensity factor at long crack size . Computing approach is as follows.
5.1. Computing the Stress Intensity Factor and the Damage Stress Intensity Factor for Short Crack
5.1.1. Computing the Stress Intensity Factor for Short Crack
According to (7), select the computing parameter: ; the local stress is 840โMPa at focal point of stress undergone damage; If we take , This results in So this short crack is growth.
5.1.2. Computing of the Damage Stress Intensity Factor for Short Crack
According to (9), when the , equivalent damage value of short crack is the (damage unit).
So This results in So this short crack is also growth.
5.2. Computing the Stress Intensity Factor and the Damage Stress Intensity Factor for Long Crack
5.2.1. Computing the Stress Intensity Factor for Long Crack
According to (11), select a parameter, take the correction coefficient , , working stress ; This results in So the pressure vessel is safe.
5.2.2. Computing the Damage Stress Intensity Factor for Long Crack
According to equation (13), take the computing parameter ; when take , the equivalent damage value of long crack is (damage unit).
So This results in So the pressure vessel is also safe.
6. Summarization
The bidirectional combined coordinate system, the bidirectional curves in the whole process and their force triangles at each stage are important scientific method and tool to communicate the crossreferencing which is to describe the evolutive process of a material behavior undergoing of the fatigue damage in each of the disciplines, which are able to make available communications and conversions for those complicated correlations among some variables, some equations, curves, and dimensional units, which are clearely able to explain the geometrical and physical meanings for the key parameters. Thus, it is also able to adopt same variables and or the variables and to compute the strength and the lift at each stage or even in overall process for structures and materials undergoing a fatigue damage. And the conventional material and damage mechanics are able of making inheritance and development, and the modern one are all able to make better combination and application. Thus, that may be having practical significance for promoting developing, and applying some disciplines.
7. Conclusions
About the Problem of the Relation between the Mathematical Model and the Material Behavior. Under identical loading, when the structure material is undergoing fatigue damage, the differences between the mathematical models to describe the material behavior are due to the degree of damage undergone at varied stages that makes the stiffness of the material change, which find that expressions in the curves in evolutive process are turned to take place at the points b, B, and . The slopes of the curves at each stage also are brought to change. The exponents in the equation also became from the at crack forming stage to the at crack growth stage. The driving forces became from the () to the (). The compositive material constants became from the to the .About the Problem of Driving Force. It well known that the driving force of long crack growth in macro fracture mechanics is the stress intensity factor but the driving force of microdamage at crack forming stage is defined by the author as the damage stress intensity factor , and the driving force in microfracture mechanics is defined as the stress intensity factor of shortcrack growth.About Problem of Dimensional Units. The stress intensity factor and the damage stress intensity factor of short crack at crack forming stage are all to describe the stress strain about the crack tip of microcrack, the unit of the is , and the unit of the is the . Both the units are different, but the unit of the damage stress intensity factor is the same as the unit of the stress, and the and the are all essentially the stress intensity factor and a relation of equivalents. And the stress intensity factor and the damage stress intensity factor of long crack at crack growth stage are all to describe the stress strain about the crack tip of long crack, the unit of the is , and the unit of is the . Both the units are also different, but the unit of the damage stress intensity factor is also the same as the unit of the stress, and the and the are all essentially the stress intensity factor and a relation between equivalents. In addition, both values and dimensional units between the stress intensity factor of short crack and the stress intensity factor of long crack are also different under the condition of same crack size.Nomenclature
= damage variable in the whole process, , = microdamage variable equivalent to microcrack or short crack at the crack forming stage (first stage), and = damage variable at the crack growth stage (the second stage)., = micro, shortcrack size at the crack forming stage (variable of the first stage), = macro, longcrack size at the crack growth stage (variable of the second stage), = initial size of microcrack forming (ordaining value), crack size = corresponding to the threshold level , original size = of macrocrack forming stage (ordaining value), and = critical size of long crack. = nominal stress range, = remote stress range, = stress amplitude, = strain range, = strain amplitude, and = mean stress. or = microcrack stress intensity factor range or microdamage stress intensity factor range corresponding to microcrack size or microdamage under ultrahigh cycle fatigue, = stress intensity factor of short crack, = critical stress intensity factor of short crack, = damage stress intensity factor of short crack and or or = stress intensity factor range or stress intensity factor amplitude relative to shortcrack ; = damage stress intensity factor range or damage stress intensity factor amplitude relative to damage variable .or = damage strain factor range or damage strain factor amplitude relative to short crack . = fatigue strength exponent under ultrahigh cycle fatigue, = fatigue strength exponent under high cycle fatigue, = fatigue ductility exponent under low cycle fatigue, = fatigue strength exponent in microcrack growth rate equation under ultrahigh cycle fatigue, ; = fatigue strength exponent in shortcrack growth rate equation under highcycle fatigue, , = fatigue ductility exponent in shortcrack growth rate equation under low cycle fatigue, , = fatigue strength exponent of the macrocrack growth stage under highcycle fatigue, = the fatigue ductility exponent at the macrocrack growth stage under lowcycle fatigue, = the fatigue strength exponent in crack growth rate equation under highcycle fatigue, , = the fatigue ductility exponent in crack growth rate equation under lowcycle fatigue, . = damage evolutive rate, = damage evolutive rate at the crack forming stage, = damage evolutive rate at the macrocrack growth stage, = crack growth rate, = short crack growth rate at the crack forming stage, and = its rate at the macrocrack growth stage. = life of correspondance to medial damage variable or shortcrack medial size at the first stage, and = life of correspondance to medial damage variable or longcrack medial size at the second stage. stress intensity factor of long crack, = damage stress intensity factor of long crack, integral of long crack; and crack tip opening displacement of long crack, mean stress intensity factor, = stress intensity factor amplitude of correspondance to macrocrackโโ, = integral amplitude corresponding to macrocrack , = crack tip opening displacement amplitude corresponding to macrocrack . = critical stress intensity factor corresponding to macrocrack critical , = effective stress intensity factor to be applicable in Parisโs equation, = critical integral value corresponding to macrocrack critical , and = critical crack tip opening displacement corresponding to macrocrack critical .
Acknowledgment
The Authors thank sincerey the Zhejiang Province Natural Science fund Committee that gave support and provided subsidization of the research funds.
References
 Y. Yu and X. Liu, โStudies and applications of three kinds of calculation methods by describing damage evolving behaviors for elasticplastic materials,โ Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 52โ58, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Yu, X. Jiang, J. chen, and Z. Wu, โThe fatigue damage calculated with method of the multiplication $\mathrm{\Delta}{\epsilon}_{e}\mathrm{\Delta}{\epsilon}_{p}$,โ in Proceedings of the 8th International Fatigue Congress (Fatigue '02), vol. 5, pp. 2815โ2822, Stockholm, Sweden, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Yu, โFatigue damage calculated by the ratiomethod to materials and its machine part,โ Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 157โ161, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Yu, Z. Li, Z. Bi, Y. Ma, and F. Xu, โTo accomplish integrity calculations of structures and materials with calculation program in whole evolving process on fatiguedamagefracture,โ in Proceedings of the UK Forum for Engineering Structural Integrity's Ninth International Conference on Engineering Structural Integrity Assessment, pp. 180โ183, Engineering Structural Integrity: Research, Development and Application, Beijing, China, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. G. Yu, W. G. Pan, and Z. H. Li, โCorrelations among curves equations and material parameters in the whole process on fatiguedamagefracture of components, fracture and strength of solids,โ Key Engineering Materials, vol. 145–149, part 2, pp. 661โ667, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Yu, B. Bi, Y. Ma, and F. Xu, โDamage calculations in whole evolving process actualized for the materials behaviors of structure with cracks to use software technique,โ in Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Fracture Proceeding, pp. 12โ19, Ottawa, Canada, 2009, (CD, Author Index Y. Yangui). View at: Google Scholar
 B. Z. Marklen and V. A. Shbeichova, โAnalysis of initiation and growth fatigue crack for pearlitic steels,โ Strength Problem, no. 4, pp. 12โ21, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Murakami, S. Harada, T. Endo, H. TaniIshi, and Y. Fukushima, โCorrelations among growth law of small cracks lowcycle fatigue law and applicability of Miner's rule,โ Engineering Fracture Mechanics, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 909โ924, 1983. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Murakami, โMeasurement of mode II threshold stress intensity factor range $\mathrm{\Delta}{K}_{\text{IIth}}$ for various steels and the threshold condition of biaxal fatigue crack growth,โ in Proceedings of the 7th International Fatigue Congress (Fatigue '99), vol. 2–4, p. 882, Higher Education Press, Beijing, China, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Yu, X. Liu, C. H. Zhang, and Y. Tan, โFatigue damage calculated by ratiomethod metallic material with small crack under unsymmetric cyclic loading,โ Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 312โ315, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Yu, โFatigue damage of materials with small crack calculated by the ratio method under cycle loading,โ Advanced Materials Research, vol. 9, pp. 79โ86, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Yu and F. Xu, โStudies and application of calculation methods on small crack growth behaviors for elasticplastic materials,โ Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 240โ245, 2007. View at: Publisher Site  Google Scholar
 Y. G. Yu and E. J. Zhao, โCalculations to damage evolving rate under symmetric cyclic loading,โ in Proceedings of the 7th International Fatigue Congress (Fatigue '99), p. 1137, Beijing, China, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
 D. Broek, Elementary Engineering Fracture Mechanics, Martinus Nijhoff, 3rd edition, 1982.
 K. Hellan, Introduction to Fracture Mechanics, McGrawHill, New York, NY, USA, 1984.
 Y. Yu, โA calculating parameter by way of using the damage variable D2 on intensity and life at crack growth stage,โ Journal of Materials Engineering, pp. 264โ267, 2003 (Chinese). View at: Google Scholar
 Y. Yu, โThe correlation among each parameter in some equation on crack growth stage,โ in Advances in Fracture Research, vol. 3, pp. 1395โ2002, Pergamon, Sydney, Australia, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
Copyright
Copyright © 2011 Yangui Yu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.