International Scholarly Research Notices / 2011 / Article / Tab 2 / Research Article
Body Mass Index Impacts In Vitro Fertilization Stimulation Table 2 IVF Stimulation Characteristics and IVF outcomes. Results are given as mean values with their associated standard deviations for all patients in the study, patients with
B
M
I
<
2
5
kg/
m
2
compared to patients with
B
M
I
≥
2
5
kg/
m
2
, and patients with
B
M
I
<
3
0
kg/
m
2
compared to patients with
B
M
I
≥
3
0
kg/
m
2
.
All patients
𝑁
=
1
1
7
B
M
I
<
2
5
kg/
m
2
𝑁
=
5
8
B
M
I
≥
2
5
kg/
m
2
𝑁
=
5
9
𝑃
value
B
M
I
<
3
0
kg/
m
2
𝑁
=
9
6
B
M
I
≥
3
0
kg/
m
2
𝑁
=
2
1
𝑃
valuePeak estradiol (pg/mL)
2
7
7
4
.
6
±
1
9
3
3
.
9
2
4
7
6
.
7
±
1
8
6
6
.
7
3
0
8
9
.
4
±
1
9
7
0
.
9
<
.
0
5
∗
2
6
9
0
.
8
±
1
7
7
3
.
3
3
1
7
1
.
6
±
2
5
8
6
.
6
.61 Ampules of gonadotropins
5
5
.
9
±
1
1
.
8
5
9
.
3
±
1
0
.
9
5
2
.
3
±
1
1
.
8
<
.
0
0
1
∗
5
6
.
8
±
1
1
.
7
5
1
.
9
±
1
2
.
1
.13 Days of stimulation
1
0
.
1
±
1
.
3
1
0
.
4
±
1
2
.
2
9
.
7
±
1
.
3
<
.
0
0
1
∗
1
0
.
1
±
1
.
4
1
0
.
0
±
1
.
0
.45 Number of follicles
1
8
.
9
±
1
1
.
6
1
6
.
1
±
1
0
.
3
2
1
.
9
±
1
2
.
1
<
.
0
1
∗
1
7
.
8
±
1
0
.
3
2
4
.
3
±
1
5
.
5
.12 Number of oocytes
1
6
.
7
±
1
1
.
9
1
5
.
5
±
1
1
.
1
1
8
.
1
±
1
2
.
6
.21
1
6
.
3
±
1
1
.
5
1
9
.
0
±
1
4
.
0
.56 Number of mature oocytes
1
3
.
2
±
8
.
9
1
2
.
4
±
8
.
9
1
4
.
1
±
9
.
0
.24
1
3
.
1
±
8
.
9
1
3
.
8
±
9
.
3
.85 Number of embryos
1
0
.
4
±
7
.
8
9
.
6
±
7
.
4
1
1
.
3
±
8
.
2
.18
1
0
.
4
±
7
.
9
1
0
.
8
±
7
.
8
.83 Number of embryos transferred
2
.
9
±
0
.
9
3
.
0
±
0
.
9
2
.
9
±
1
.
0
.54
2
.
9
±
0
.
9
2
.
9
±
0
.
9
.80 Day of embryo transfer
3
.
6
±
1
.
1
3
.
6
±
1
.
1
3
.
6
±
1
.
1
.93
3
.
7
±
1
.
1
3
.
2
±
1
.
0
.19 Pregnancy rate (%)
5
0
.
4
%
4
8
.
3
%
5
2
.
5
%
.64
5
2
.
1
%
3
8
.
1
%
.30 Implantation rate (%)
2
6
.
5
%
2
2
.
6
%
3
0
.
7
%
.10
2
5
.
7
%
2
8
.
6
%
.65
∗
S
ignificant
𝑃
values (
≤
.05).
