Research Article

Economic Analysis of Biomass Supply Chains: A Case Study of Four Competing Bioenergy Power Plants in Northwestern Ontario

Table 1

Estimates of parameters used in BASE scenario of the model.

DescriptionsUnitEstimatesRemarks

Harvesting and processing costs of FHR $·gt−126Forest BioProducts Inc. (2006) [7]
Harvesting and processing costs of UW$·gt−131Forest BioProducts Inc. (2006) [7]
Fixed cost due to load/unload overhead$·gt−15.24Own estimate
Charge rate of biomass truck$·hr−185Alam et al. (2012) [36]
Biomass demand of ABTB CHP plant gt·yr−1730,000Power plant data
Biomass demand of ABFF CHP plantgt·yr−1800,000Power plant data
Biomass demand of AGS Power plantgt·yr−1200,000Power plant data
Biomass demand of DDPP CHP plantgt·yr−1480,000Power plant data
Range of availability of FHRgt/km2525.6–5,256 Alam et al. (2012) [36]
Range of availability of UWgt/km20–4,730.4 Alam et al. (2012) [36]
Harvesting factor of FHR% of FHR61 Own estimate
Harvesting factor of UW% of UW61 Own estimate
Price of biomass at power plants$·gt−139Own estimate
Number of depleted forest cells No19,315Alam et al. (2012) [36]

FHR: forest harvest residue, UW: underutilized wood, gt: green tonne, hr: hour, yr: year, ABTB: Abitibi-Bowater Thunder Bay Power Plant, CHP: combined heat and power, ABFF: Abitibi-Bowater Fort Frances Power Plant, AGS: Atikokan generating station, DDPP: Domtar Dryden Power Plant.