Research Article

Clothing and Teacher Credibility: An Application of Expectancy Violations Theory

Table 3

Multivariate analysis of variance for credibility ratings.

Independent variableMultivariate effectUnivariate effects

RewardWilks’s Λ = 0.97, 𝐹 ( 3 , 2 3 0 ) = 2 . 7 5 , 𝑃 = . 0 4 4 Competence 𝐹 ( 1 , 2 3 2 ) = 3 . 2 0 , 𝑃 = . 0 7 5 , 𝜂 2 = . 0 1
Character 𝐹 ( 1 , 2 3 2 ) = 8 . 2 9 , 𝑃 = . 0 0 4 , 𝜂 2 = . 0 3
Caring 𝐹 ( 1 , 2 3 2 ) = 2 . 7 1 , 𝑃 = . 1 0 1 , 𝜂 2 = . 0 1
FormalityWilks’s Λ = 0.86, 𝐹 ( 6 , 4 6 0 ) = 6 . 0 5 , 𝑃 < . 0 0 1 Competence 𝐹 ( 2 , 2 3 2 ) = 3 . 5 3 , 𝑃 = . 0 3 1 , 𝜂 2 = . 0 3
Character 𝐹 ( 1 , 2 3 2 ) = 1 6 . 9 4 , 𝑃 < . 0 0 1 , 𝜂 2 = . 1 2
Caring 𝐹 ( 1 , 2 3 2 ) = 8 . 0 8 , 𝑃 < . 0 0 1 , 𝜂 2 = . 0 6
Reward × formalityWilks’s Λ = 0.98, 𝐹 ( 6 , 4 6 0 ) = 0 . 9 8 , 𝑃 = . 4 3 8 Competence 𝐹 ( 2 , 2 3 2 ) = 1 . 0 3 , 𝑃 = . 3 5 9
Character 𝐹 ( 1 , 2 3 2 ) = 2 . 1 7 , 𝑃 = . 1 2 3
C a r i n g 𝐹 ( 1 , 2 3 2 ) = 2 . 5 9 , 𝑃 = . 0 7 7