Table of Contents
ISRN Materials Science
Volume 2012, Article ID 140624, 10 pages
Research Article

The Cathodic Breakdown Test to Assess Chromic Acid Anodized Aluminum Alloys Corrosion Protection Performance, in Correlation with Salt Spray (Fog) Testing

1Laboratoire de Nouveaux Matériaux pour l’Énergie et l’Électrochimie (LaNoMat), École Polytechnique de Montréal, C.P. 6079, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, QC, Canada H3C 3A7
2Bombardier Aerospace's Materials and Processes Laboratory (BAMPEL), 105 Marcel Laurin, Montreal, QC, Canada H4N 2M3

Received 22 November 2011; Accepted 27 December 2011

Academic Editors: A. O. Neto and C. S. Ha

Copyright © 2012 Ghita Ouaziz and Oumarou Savadogo. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. K. R. Baldwin and C. J. E. Smith, “Accelerated corrosion tests for aerospace materials: current limitations and future trends,” Aircraft Engineering and Aerospace Technology, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 239–244, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. R. G. Buchheit, M. Cunningham, H. Jensen, M. W. Kendig, and M. A. Martinez, “A correlation between salt spray and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy test results for conversion-coated aluminum alloys,” Corrosion, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 61–69, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. F. Deflorian, S. Rossi, L. Fedrizzi, and P. L. Bonora, “Testing of protective organic coatings on metals: comparison of salt spray and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy,” Journal of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 91–97, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  4. J. R. Scully, Electrochemical Tests, in Corrosion Tests and Standards: Application and Interpretation, ASTM International, 2nd edition, 2005.
  5. C. E. Michelson, S. W. Dean, and P. D. Stransky, “The effect of low cathodic potentials on anodized aluminum in aqueous electrolytes and its application to quality testing,” in Proceedings of the 25th Conference National Association of Corrosion Engineers, 1969.
  6. A. G. Forshee, “Accelerated corrosion testing, Part I: an overview of 20 possible accelerated corrosion tests,” Metal Finishing, vol. 91, no. 9, pp. 50–54, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. A. G. Forshee, “Accelerated corrosion testing—II. Description of three test methods,” Metal Finishing, vol. 91, no. 12, pp. 35–38, 1993. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. A. G. Forshee, “Accelerated corrosion testing—part III: use of cathodic breakdown test,” Metal Finishing, vol. 92, no. 5, pp. 39–41, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. ASTM Standard B117-11, Test Method of Salt Spray [Fog], ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa, USA, 2002, ICS Number Code 77.060. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. Z. B. Bao, Q. M. Wang, W. Z. Li, J. Gong, T. Y. Xiong, and C. Sun, “Corrosion behaviour of AIP NiCoCrAlYSiB coating in salt spray tests,” Corrosion Science, vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 847–855, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus