Table of Contents
ISRN Astronomy and Astrophysics
Volume 2012, Article ID 189625, 15 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/189625
Review Article

Implications and Applications of Kinematic Galaxy Scaling Relations

Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, 933 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA

Received 27 August 2012; Accepted 17 September 2012

Academic Editors: J. A. L. Aguerri and P. Salucci

Copyright © 2012 Dennis Zaritsky. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. V. Springel, S. White, A. Jenkins et al., “Simulations of the formation, evolution and clustering of galaxies and quasars,” Nature, vol. 435, pp. 629–636, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  2. S. M. Faber and R. E. Jackson, “Velocity dispersions and mass-to-light ratios for elliptical galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 204, pp. 668–683, 1976. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. J. Kormendy, “Families of ellipsoidal stellar systems and the formation of dwarf elliptical galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 295, pp. 73–79, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  4. D. Burstein, R. Bender, S. M. Faber, and R. Nolthenius, “Global relationships among the physical properties of stellar systems,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 114, no. 4, pp. 1365–1392, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. H. G. Khosroshahi, Y. Wadadekar, A. Kembhavi, and B. Mobasher, “A near-infrared photometric plane for elliptical galaxies and bulges of spiral galaxies,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 531, no. 2, pp. L103–L106, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. A. Graham, “Mass-to-light ratios from the fundamental plane of spiral galaxy discs,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 334, no. 4, pp. 721–734, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  7. R. B. Tully and J. R. Fisher, “A new method of determining distances to galaxies,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 661–673, 1977. View at Google Scholar
  8. S. Djorgovski and M. Davis, “Fundamental properties of elliptical galaxies,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 313, pp. 59–68, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. A. Dressler, D. Lynden-Bell, D. Burstein et al., “Spectroscopy and photometry of elliptical galaxies. I-a new distance estimator,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 313, pp. 42–58, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. J. Pizagno, F. Prada, D. H. Weinberg et al., “The Tully-Fisher relation and its residuals for a broadly selected sample of galaxies,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 134, no. 3, p. 945, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. D. Zaritsky, A. H. Gonzalez, and A. I. Zabludoff, “The fundamental manifold of spheroids,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 638, no. 2, pp. 725–738, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. D. Zaritsky, A. I. Zabludoff, and A. H. Gonzalez, “Toward equations of galactic structure,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 682, no. 1, pp. 68–80, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. T. Page, “Radial velocities and masses of double galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 116, p. 63, 1952. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  14. J. N. Bahcall and S. Tremaine, “Methods for determining the masses of spherical systems. I-test particles around a point mass,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 244, pp. 805–819, 1981. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Heisler, S. Tremaine, and J. N. Bahcall, “Estimating the masses of galaxy groups-alternatives to the virial theorem,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 298, pp. 8–17, 1985. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. L. K. Erickson, S. T. Gottesman, and J. H. Hunter, “Mass distribution in spiral galaxies,” Nature, vol. 325, no. 6107, pp. 779–782, 1987. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. B. Little and S. Tremaine, “Distant satellites as probes of our Galaxy's mass distribution,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 320, pp. 493–501, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. D. Zaritsky and S. D. M. White, “The massive halos of spiral galaxies,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 435, no. 2, pp. 599–610, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. M. A. Smith and D. F. Gray, “Fourier analysis of spectral line profiles: a new tool for an old,” Astronomical Society of the Pacific, vol. 88, no. 526, pp. 809–823, 1976. View at Google Scholar
  20. H. Dejonghe, “Stellar dynamics and the description of stellar systems,” Physics Reports, vol. 133, no. 3-4, pp. 217–313, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  21. M. R. Merrifield and S. M. Kent, “Fourth moments and the dynamics of spherical systems,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 99, no. 5, pp. 1548–1557, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. P. O. Vandervroot, “On Schwarzschild's method for the construction of model galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 287, pp. 475–486, 1984. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  23. T. S. Statler, “Self-consistent models of perfect triaxial galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 321, pp. 113–152, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  24. N. Cretton, P. Tim De Zeeuw, R. P. Van Der Marel, and H. W. Rix, “Axisymmetric three-integral models for galaxies,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 383–401, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. M. G. Walker, M. Mateo, E. W. Olszewski, J. Peñarrubia, N. W. Evans, and G. Gilmore, “A universal mass profile for dwarf spheroidal galaxies?” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 704, no. 1, pp. 1274–1287, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. J. Wolf, G. D. Martinez, J. S. Bullock et al., “Accurate masses for dispersion-supported galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 406, p. 1220, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  27. A. S. Bolton, S. Burles, L. V. E. Koopmans et al., “The sloan lens ACS survey V. The full ACS strong-lens sample,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 682, no. 2, pp. 964–984, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. R. P. Van Der Marel and P. G. Van Dokkum, “Dynamical models of elliptical galaxies in z=0.5 clusters. II. Mass-to-light ratio evqlution without fundamental plane assumptions,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 668, no. 2, pp. 756–771, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Cappellari, R. Bacon, M. Bureau et al., “The SAURON project-IV. The mass-to-light ratio, the virial mass estimator and the Fundamental Plane of elliptical and lenticular galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 366, no. 4, pp. 1126–1150, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  30. A. G. Bedregal, A. Aragón-Salamanca, and M. R. Merrifield, “The Tully-Fisher relation for S0 galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 373, no. 3, pp. 1125–1140, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  31. M. Pasquato and G. Bertin, “On the fundamental plane of the Galactic globular cluster system,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 489, no. 3, p. 1079, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  32. D. Zaritsky, A. I. Zabludoff, and A. H. Gonzalez, “Star clusters, galaxies, and the fundamental manifold,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 727, no. 2, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. I. Jorgensen, M. Franx, and P. Kjaergaard, “The fundamental plane for cluster E and S0 galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 280, no. 1, pp. 167–185.
  34. M. Bernardi, R. K. Sheth, J. Annis et al., “Early-type galaxies in the SDSS. III. The fundamental plane,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 1866–1881, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  35. M. Bernardi, N. Roche, F. Shankar, and R. K. Sheth, “Evidence of major dry mergers at M* > 2 × 1011M⊙ from curvature in early-type galaxy scaling relations?” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 412, no. 1, pp. L6–L10, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. E. J. Tollerud, M. Boylan-Kolchin, E. J. Barton, J. S. Bullock, and C. Q. Trihn, “Small-scale structure in the sloan digital sky survey and ?cdm: isolated ~L galaxies with bright satellites,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 738, no. 1, p. 102, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  37. R. L. Davies, G. Efstathiou, S. M. Fall, G. Illingworth, and P. L. Schechter, “The kinematic properties of faint elliptical galaxies,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 266, pp. 41–57, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  38. R. Bender, “Unraveling the kinematics of early-type galaxies—Presentation of a new method and its applications to NGC4621,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 229, p. 441, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  39. B. Weiner, C. N. A. Willmer, S. M. Faber et al., “A survey of galaxy kinematics to z~1 in the TKRS/GOODS-N field. II. Evolution in the Tully-Fisher relation,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 653, no. 2, p. 1049, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. S. A. Kassin, “The Stellar Mass Tully-Fisher Relation to z=1.2 from AEGIS,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 660, pp. L35–L38, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  41. G. Zhu, M. R. Blanton, and J. Moustakas, “Stellar populations of elliptical galaxies in the local universe,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 722, no. 1, pp. 491–519, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. M. Aaronson and J. Mould, “A distance scale from the infrared magnitude/H I velocity-width relation. IV-The morphological type dependence and scatter in the relation; the distances to nearby groups,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 265, pp. 1–17, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  43. S. Courteau, A. A. Dutton, F. C. Van Den Bosch et al., “Scaling relations of spiral galaxies,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 671, no. 1, pp. 203–225, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  44. A. Saintonge and K. Spekkens, “Disk galaxy scaling relations in the SFI++: intrinsic scatter and applications,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 726, no. 2, p. 77, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. S. M. Fall and G. Efstathiou, “Formation and rotation of disc galaxies with haloes,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 193, pp. 189–206, 1980. View at Google Scholar
  46. P. Salucci, A. Lapi, C. Tonini, G. Gentile, I. Yegorova, and U. Klein, “The universal rotation curve of spiral galaxies-II. the dark matter distribution out to the virial radius,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 378, no. 1, pp. 41–47, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. I. A. Yegorova and P. Salucci, “The radial Tully-Fisher relation for spiral galaxies-I,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 377, no. 2, pp. 507–515, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. J. Mould, H. Mingsheng, and G. Bothun, “Nonlinearity of the Tully-Fisher relation,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 347, pp. 112–117, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  49. M. Persic and P. Salucci, “Non-linearity of the Tully-Fisher relation,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 248, p. 325, 1991. View at Google Scholar
  50. F. C. van den Bosch, X. Yang, and H. J. Mo, “Linking early- and late-type galaxies to their dark matter haloes,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 340, no. 3, pp. 771–792, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  51. X. Yang, H. J. Mo, Y. P. Jing, and F. C. van den Bosch, “Galaxy occupation statistics of dark matter haloes: observational results,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 358, no. 1, pp. 217–232, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  52. H. Hoekstra, B. C. Hsieh, H. K. C. Yee, H. Lin, and M. D. Gladders, “Virial masses and the baryon fraction in galaxies,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 635, no. 1, pp. 73–85, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. R. Mandelbaum, U. Seljak, G. Kauffmann, C. M. Hirata, and J. Brinkmann, “Galaxy halo masses and satellite fractions from galaxy-galaxy lensing in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Stellar mass, luminosity, morphology and environment dependencies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 368, no. 2, pp. 715–731, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. S. Meidt, E. Schinnerer, J. H. Knapen et al., “Reconstructing the stellar mass distributions of galaxies using S4G IRAC 3.6 and 4.5 micron images: I. Correcting for contamination by PAH, hot dust, and intermediate age stars,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 744, no. 1, p. 17, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  55. M. Eskew, D. Zaritsky, and S. Meidt, “Converting from 3.6 and 4.5 micron fluxes to Stellar mass,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 143, no. 6, p. 139, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  56. M. Cappellari, R. M. McDermid, K. Alatalo et al., “The Atlas3D project-XX. Mass-size and Mass-sigma projections of the Virial Plane of early-type galaxies: variation of morphology, kinematics, mass-to-light ratio and stellar initial mass function,” Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics. In press.
  57. F. Donato, G. Gentile, P. Salucci et al., “A constant dark matter halo surface density in galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 397, no. 3, pp. 1169–1176, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  58. B. Willman and J. Strader, “‘Galaxy,’ defined,” TheAstronomical Journal, vol. 144, no. 3, p. 76, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  59. S. Mieske, H. Hilker, A. Jordan et al., “The nature of UCDs: Internal dynamics from an expanded sample and homogeneous database,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 487, no. 3, pp. 921–935, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  60. D. A. Forbes, P. Lasky, A. W. Graham, and L. Spitler, “Uniting old stellar systems: from globular clusters to giant ellipticals,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 389, no. 4, pp. 1924–1936, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. I. Misgeld and M. Hilker, “Families of dynamically hot stellar systems over 10 orders of magnitude in mass,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 414, no. 4, pp. 3699–3710, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. E. J. Tollerud, J. S. Bullock, L. E. Strigari, and B. Willman, “Hundreds of milky way satellites? Luminosity bias in the satellite luminosity function,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 688, no. 1, pp. 277–289, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. M. Hilker, L. Infante, G. Vieira, M. Kissler-Patig, and T. Richtler, “The central region of the Fornax cluster: II. Spectroscopy and radial velocities of member and background galaxies,” Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, vol. 134, no. 1, pp. 75–86, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. M. J. Drinkwater, J. B. Jones, M. D. Gregg, and S. Phillipps, “Compact stellar systems in the Fornax cluster: super-massive star clusters or extremely compact dwarf galaxies?” Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 227–233, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. S. Phillipps, M. J. Drinkwater, M. D. Gregg, and J. B. Jones, “Ultracompact dwarf galaxies in the Fornax Cluster,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 560, no. 1, pp. 201–206, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. I. Misgeld, S. Mieske, M. Hilker, T. Richtler, I. Y. Georgiev, and Y. Schuberth, “A large population of ultra-compact dwarf galaxies in the Hydra i cluster,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 531, p. A4, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. K. Chiboucas, R. Tully, R. Marzke et al., “Ultra-compact dwarfs in the coma cluster,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 737, no. 2, p. 86, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  68. A. A. Dutton and F. C. van den Bosch, “The angular momentum of disc galaxies: implications for gas accretion, outflows, and dynamical friction,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 421, no. 1, pp. 608–620, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  69. M. E. Anderson and J. N. Bregman, “Do hot halos around galaxies contain the missing baryons?” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 714, no. 1, pp. 320–331, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. S. S. McGaugh, “The baryonic Tully-Fisher relation of gas-rich galaxies as a test of ΛCDM and MOND,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 143, no. 2, p. 40, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  71. A. A. Dutton, “The baryonic Tully-Fisher relation and galactic outflows,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 424, p. 3123, 2012. View at Google Scholar
  72. P. G. Van Dokkum and C. Conroy, “A substantial population of low-mass stars in luminous elliptical galaxies,” Nature, vol. 468, no. 7326, pp. 940–942, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. G. J. Graves, S. M. Faber, and R. P. Schiavon, “Dissecting the red sequence-II. Star formation histories of early-type galaxies throughout the fundamental plane,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 698, no. 2, p. 1590, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  74. J. S. Gallagher, P. M. Garnavich, N. Caldwell et al., “Supernovae in early-type galaxies: directly connecting age and metallicity with type Ia luminosity,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 685, no. 2, pp. 752–766, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. Howell, D. A et al., “The effect of progenitor age and metallicity on luminosity and 56Ni yield in Type Ia supernovae,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 691, no. 1, p. 661, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  76. M. Romaniello, F. Primas, M. Mottini et al., “The influence of chemical composition on the properties of Cepheid stars,” Astronomy & Astrophysics, vol. 488, pp. 731–747, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  77. W. L. Freedman and B. F. Madore, “Two new tests of the metallicity sensitivity of the cepheid period-luminosity relation (The Leavitt Law),” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 734, no. 1, p. 46, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  78. K. Sheth, M. Regan, J. L. Hinz et al., “The Spitzer survey of Stellar structure in galaxies (S4G),” Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, vol. 122, no. 898, pp. 1397–1414, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  79. G. Kauffmann, S. D. M. White, T. M. Heckman et al., “The environmental dependence of the relations between stellar mass, structure, star formation and nuclear activity in galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 353, no. 3, pp. 713–731, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. C. A. Tremonti, T. M. Heckman, and G. Kauffmann, “The origin of the mass-metallicity relation: insights from 53,000 star-forming galaxies in the Sloan digital sky survey,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 613, no. 2, p. 898, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  81. K. Bundy, R. Ellis, C. Conselice et al., “The mass assembly history of field galaxies: detection of an evolving mass limit for star-forming galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 651, no. 1, pp. 120–141, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  82. J. Harris and D. Zaritsky, “The star formation history of the small magellanic cloud,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 1531–1544, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. J. Harris and D. Zaritsky, “The star formation history of the large magellanic cloud,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 138, no. 5, pp. 1243–1260, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  84. M. Eskew and D. Zaritsky, “Nearby galaxies in more distant contexts,” Astronomical Journal, vol. 141, no. 2, p. 69, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. D. Weisz, J. J. Dalcanton, B. F. Williams et al., “The acs nearby galaxy survey treasury. VIII. the global star formation histories of 60 dwarf galaxies in the local volume,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 739, no. 1, p. 5, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  86. C. Maraston, E. Daddi, A. Renzini et al., “Evidence for TP-AGB stars in high-redshift galaxies, and their effect on deriving stellar population parameters,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 652, no. 1, pp. 85–96, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. C. Conroy, J. E. Gunn, and M. White, “The propagation of uncertainties in stellar population synthesis modeling I: the relevance of uncertain aspects of stellar evolution and the IMF to the derived physical properties of galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 699, p. 486, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  88. K. B. W. McQuinn, E. D. Skillman, J. M. Cannon et al., “The nature of starbursts. II. The duration of starbursts in dwarf galaxies?” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 724, no. 1, pp. 49–58, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  89. J. Melbourne, B. F. Williams, J. J. Dalcanton et al., “The contribution of tp-agb and rheb stars to the near-ir luminosity of local galaxies: implications for stellar mass measurements of high-redshift galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 748, no. 1, p. 47, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  90. N. Bastian, K. R. Covey, and R. M. Meyer, “A universal stellar initial mass function? A critical look at variations,” Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 48, pp. 339–389, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  91. D. E. McLaughlin and R. P. Van Der Marel, “Resolved massive star clusters in the Milky Way and its satellites: brightness profiles and a catalog of fundamental parameters,” Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series, vol. 161, no. 2, pp. 304–360, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. D. Zaritsky, A. I. Zabludoff, and A. H. Gonzalez, “Testing distance estimators with the fundamental manifold,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 758, no. 1, p. 15, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  93. P. G. Van Dokkum, “Evidence of cosmic evolution of the stellar initial mass function,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 674, no. 1, pp. 29–50, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  94. J. Dabringhausen, P. Kroupa, and H. Baumgardt, “A top-heavy stellar initial mass function in starbursts as an explanation for the high mass-to-light ratios of ultra-compact dwarf galaxies,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 394, no. 3, pp. 1529–1543, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  95. T. Treu, M. W. Auger, L. V. E. Koopmans, R. Gavazzi, P. J. Marshall, and A. S. Bolton, “The initial mass function of early-type galaxies,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 709, no. 2, p. 1195, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  96. L. Spitzer, “Distribution of galactic clusters,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 127, p. 17, 1958. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  97. J. M. D. Kruijssen, “Explaining the mass-to-light ratios of globular clusters,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 486, no. 3, pp. L21–L24, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. P. Anders, H. J. G. L. M. Lamers, and H. Baumgardt, “The photometric evolution of dissolving star clusters II. Realistic models. Colours and M/L ratios,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 502, no. 3, pp. 817–832, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. Q. E. Minor, G. Martinez, J. Bullock, M. Kaplinghat, and R. Trainor, “Correcting velocity dispersions of dwarf spheroidal galaxies for binary orbital motion,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 721, no. 2, pp. 1142–1157, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. M. Gieles, H. Sana, and S. F. Pertegies Zwart, “On the velocity dispersion of young star clusters: super-virial or binaries?” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 402, no. 3, pp. 1750–1757, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  101. M. Fioc and B. Rocca-Volmerange, “PEGASE: A UV to NIR spectral evolution model of galaxies: application to the calibration of bright galaxy counts,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, vol. 326, no. 3, pp. 950–962, 1997. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  102. E. E. Salpeter, “The luminosity function and stellar evolution,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 121, p. 161, 1955. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  103. S. P. Goodwin and N. Bastian, “Gas expulsion and the destruction of massive young clusters,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 373, no. 2, pp. 752–758, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  104. P. Kroupa, “On the variation of the initial mass function,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 322, no. 2, pp. 231–246, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  105. G. Chabrier, “Galactic stellar and substellar initial mass function,” The Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, vol. 115, no. 809, pp. 763–795, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  106. K. Glatt, “Present-day mass function of six small magellanic cloud intermediate-age and old star clusters,” The Astronomical Journal, vol. 142, no. 2, p. 36, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  107. P. G. Van Dokkum and R. P. Van Der Marel, “The star formation epoch of the most massive early-type galaxies,” Astrophysical Journal, vol. 655, no. 1, pp. 30–50, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  108. A. Babul and M. J. Rees, “On dwarf elliptical galaxies and the faint blue counts,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, vol. 255, pp. 346–350, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  109. C. Marinoni and M. J. Hudson, “The mass-to-light function of virialized systems and the relationship between their optical and X-ray properties,” Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 569, no. 1, pp. 101–111, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. E. P. Hubble, “Extragalactic nebulae,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 64, pp. 321–369, 1926. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  111. A. Sandage, The Hubble Atlas of Galaxies, Carnegie Institution, Washington, DC, USA, 1961.