Table of Contents
ISRN Sensor Networks
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 196590, 11 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/196590
Research Article

Fault-Tolerant Energy-Efficient Priority-Based Routing Scheme for the Multisink Healthcare Sensor Networks

Centre for Informatics and Applied Optimization, University of Ballarat and Melbourne Institute of Technology, Ballarat, VIC 3350, Australia

Received 11 January 2012; Accepted 23 February 2012

Academic Editor: F. Viani

Copyright © 2012 Ather Saeed et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. I. F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam, and E. Cayirci, “A survey on sensor networks,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 102–114, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. J. Faruque, K. Psounis, and A. Helmy, “Analysis of gradient-based routing protocols in sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS'05), vol. 3560, pp. 258–275, June 2005.
  3. M. Meng, H. Xu, X. Wu et al., “PBR: priority based routing in multi-sink sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Networks (ICWN'07), Los Vegas, Nev, USA, June 2007.
  4. Y. Liu and W.K.G. Seah, “A Priority based routing protocol for sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE 15th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Cmmunications (PIMRC'04), IEEE, Barcelona, Spain, September 2004.
  5. C. Intanagonwiwat, R. Govindan, and D. Estrin, “Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 6th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MOBICOM'00), pp. 56–67, ACM, Boston, Mass, USA, August 2000. View at Scopus
  6. F. Koushanfar, M. Potkonjak, and A. Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, “Fault tolerance techniques in wireless ad-hoc sensor networks,” UC Berkeley Technical Reports, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  7. K. Marzullo, “Tolerating failures of continuous valued sensors,” ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 284–304, 1990. View at Google Scholar
  8. E. F. Moore and C. E. Shannon, “Reliable circuits using less reliable relays I,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. 262, no. 3, pp. 191–208, 1956. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  9. D. N. Jayasimha, “Fault tolerance in multisensor networks,” IEEE Transactions on Reliability, vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 308–315, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. H. Liu, Z. L. Zhang, J. Srivastava, and V. Firoiu, “PWave: a multi-source multi-sink anycast routing framework for wireless sensor networks,” in Proceeding of the 6th International IFIP-TC6 Networking Conference, pp. 179–190, May 2007.
  11. R. C. Shah and J. M. Rabaey, “Energy aware routing for low energy ad hoc sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC'02), vol. 1, pp. 350–355, March 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  12. K. Sohrabi, J. Gao, V. Ailawadhi, and G. J. Pottie, “Protocols for self-organization of a wireless sensor network,” IEEE Personal Communications, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 16–27, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. G. J. Pottie and W. J. Kaiser, “Wireless integrated network sensors,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 51–58, 2000. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. Y. Yao and J. Gehrke, “Query processing for sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the Conference on Innovative Data Systems Research, Asilomar, Calif, USA, 2003.
  15. Y. C. Tseng, S. Y. Ni, Y. S. Chen, and J. P. Sheu, “The broadcast storm problem in a mobile ad hoc network,” Wireless Networks, vol. 8, no. 2-3, pp. 153–167, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  16. S. Lindsey and C. S. Raghavendra, “PEGASIS: power efficient gathering in sensor information systems,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, Mont, USA, March 2002.
  17. W. Heinzelman, J. Kulik, and H. Balakrishnan, “Adaptive protocols for information dissemination in wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom_99), ACM, Seattle, WA, USA, August 1999.
  18. J. Liu, F. Zhao, and D. Petrovic, “Information-directed routing in ad hoc sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the ACM 2nd International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA'03), pp. 88–97, September 2003. View at Scopus
  19. M. Youssef, M. Younis, and K. Arisha, “A constrained shortestpath energy-aware routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of theIEEE Wireless Communication and Networks Conference (WCNC '02), Orlando, Fla, USA, March 2002.
  20. C. Intanagonwiwat, D. Estrin, R. Govindan, and J. Heidemann, “Impact of network density on data aggregation in wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Distributed Systems (ICDCS'02), pp. 457–458, July 2002. View at Scopus
  21. J. Heidemann, F. Silva, and D. Estrin, “Matching data dissemination algorithms to application requirements,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'03), pp. 218–229, November 2003. View at Scopus
  22. D. Braginsky and D. Estrin, “Rumor routing algorithm for sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the ACM 1st International Workshop on Wireless Sensor Networks and Applications (WSNA'02), pp. 22–31, September 2002.
  23. L. M. L. de Lau and M. M. B. Breteler, “Epidemiology of Parkinson's disease,” The Lancet Neurology, vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 525–535, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. N. L. W. Keijsers, M. W. I. M. Horstink, and S. C. A. M. Gielen, “Ambulatory motor assessment in Parkinson's disease,” Movement Disorders, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 34–44, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. J. I. Hoff, B. J. van Hilten, and R. A. C. Roos, “A review of the assessment of dyskinesias,” Movement Disorders, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 737–743, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. A. J. Manson, P. Brown, J. D. O'Sullivan, P. Asselman, D. Buckwell, and A. J. Lees, “An ambulatory dyskinesia monitor,” Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, vol. 68, no. 2, pp. 196–201, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. R. J. Dunnewold, J. I. Hoff, H. C. van Pelt, P. Q. Fredrikze, E. A. Wagemans, and B. J. van Hilten, “Ambulatory quantitative assessment of body position, bradykinesia, and hypokinesiain parkinson's disease,” Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 235–242, 1998. View at Google Scholar
  28. A. Salarian, H. Russmann, F. J. G. Vingerhoet et al., “An ambulatory system to quantify bradykinesia and tremor in Parkinson's disease,” in Proceedings of the 4th International IEEE EMBS Special Topic Conference on Information Technology Applications in Biomedicine, pp. 35–38, April 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  29. A. Salarian, H. Russmann, F. J. G. Vingerhoets et al., “Gait assessment in Parkinson's disease: toward an ambulatory system for long-term monitoring,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 1434–1443, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  30. S. Madden, M. J. Franklin, J. M. Hellerstein, and W. Hong, “TAG: a tiny aggregation service for ad-hoc sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI'02), 2002.
  31. C. Intanagonwiwat, D. Estrin, R. Govindan, and J. Heidemann, “Impact of network density on data aggregation in wireless sensor networks,” in Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Distributed Systems (CDCS'02), pp. 457–458, July 2002. View at Scopus
  32. J. Heidemann, F. Silva, and D. Estrin, “Matching data dissemination algorithms to application requirements,” in Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (SenSys'03), pp. 218–229, November 2003. View at Scopus
  33. Y. Xu, J. Heidemann, and D. Estrin, “Geography-informed energy conservation for ad hoc routing,” in Proceedings of the 7th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom '01), Rome, Italy, July 2001.
  34. N. Sadagopan, B. Krishnamachari, and A. Helmy, “Active query forwarding in sensor networks (ACQUIRE),” SNPA, 2003.
  35. M. Chu, H. Haussecker, and F. Zhao, “Scalable information-driven sensor querying and routing for ad hoc heterogeneous sensor networks,” International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 293–313, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. Omnet++ Similulator download, http://www.omnetpp.org/.