International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 212491 |

Patrick K. Malonza, "Natural History Observations on a Warty Frog: Callulina dawida (Amphibia: Brevicipitidae) in the Taita Hills, Kenya", International Scholarly Research Notices, vol. 2012, Article ID 212491, 9 pages, 2012.

Natural History Observations on a Warty Frog: Callulina dawida (Amphibia: Brevicipitidae) in the Taita Hills, Kenya

Academic Editor: T. H. Struck
Received16 Nov 2011
Accepted26 Dec 2011
Published15 Mar 2012


Amphibian populations are declining throughout the world, but most of the susceptible species possess particular biological attributes. Understanding these traits plus the environmental factors responsible for declines greatly aids conservation prioritization and planning. This paper examines the natural history observations and ecological characteristics of Callulina dawida, a frog endemic to the montane forests of the Taita Hills, Kenya. Sampling was accomplished by use of standardized pitfall trapping, transects, and time-limited searches. Mean monthly temperature and elevation significantly influenced the species distribution and abundance but mean monthly rainfall did not. The species was rare or absent during the cold season and its abundance increased with elevation. Breeding occurred during the long dry season (June to October) with juveniles being abundant between January and March. Available evidence shows that this species deposits a cluster of large yolk-rich eggs on the forest floor with maternal care and direct development. Its occurrence only within highly fragmented indigenous forests makes the species worth listing as critically endangered. To conserve this species, all remaining indigenous forest fragments including those communally or privately owned should be preserved and connected through planting of indigenous trees along stream valleys. In addition, the exotic tree plantations should be replaced with indigenous trees to restore the species habitat.

1. Introduction

Amphibians are more susceptible to changes in the local environment than other vertebrates [1, 2] because of their permeable skin that absorbs water and oxygen, and their lives depend on clean environmental resources.

Almost a third of known amphibian species worldwide are already threatened by a combination of habitat loss, climate change, ultraviolet radiation, diseases, pathogens, global warming, overexploitation, pet trade, environmental pollution, and invasive species [2, 7].

Habitat loss and fragmentation [8, 9] are the major causes of the observed global amphibian population declines [3, 10, 11] and is most prevalent in species-rich tropical regions [12]. Among the highly fragmented and threatened habitats is the east African montane forests of the Eastern Arc Mountains (EAM); with the Taita Hills forests being the most fragmented and threatened [13, 14]. Animal populations within such isolated small fragments are ecologically vulnerable to genetic loss due to inbreeding and genetic drift via “bottlenecks” and “founders’ effects” [3, 15, 16].

The rate at which amphibian species are declining as a result of human activities is of significant concern to ecologists and conservation biologists [17]. Amphibian extinction risks and population declines are taxonomically nonrandom [2, 18], indicating that certain species biological attributes influence susceptibility to decline. Such traits include large size, low fecundity, being rainforest endemic specialists, breeding in streams, narrow habitat tolerances, restricted range, living at high altitude and low vagility [3, 18, 19]. Understanding these particular biological traits is important in species conservation management and planning [18, 20].

Despite the exceptionally high amphibian diversity and abundance in many ecosystems, some amphibian species are occasionally misrepresented in biodiversity estimates because of their secretive nature, nocturnal habits, and small ranges or because of a general lack of understanding of their life histories [7]. Knowledge on the life history of many amphibians is limited and for some even the most basic biological data are lacking [21]. The brevicipitids (Breviceps, Balebreviceps, Probreviceps, Callulina, and Spelaeophryne) range from south Africa through east Africa to the Bale Mountains of Ethiopia [22]. They are typically cryptic and spend much of their time in soil or leaf litter [23], a behavior that partly accounts for the paucity of life history information. Many brevicipitids exhibit some form of parental care. There are reports of females found in burrows with a clutch of eggs in Probreviceps [23, 24]. Probreviceps is the sister genus to Callulina [25]. The genus Callulina is endemic to the EAM forests of Tanzania and Kenya. The species Callulina kreffti Nieden, 1911, was for close to a century assumed to be the only species in the entire EAM. The first to be described as distinct species was Callulina kisiwamsitu, De Sá et al. 2004, which is endemic to west Usambara Mountains [26]. Recent taxonomic review has found that Callulina kreffti is endemic to the east Usambara Mountains. Following this revelation four more species have recently been formally described: the Taita Hills Callulina dawida Loader et al. 2009; North Pare Callulina laphani Loader et al. 2010; two species from South Pare Mountains: Callulina shengena and Callulina stanleyi Loader et al. 2010. This shows that it is likely that many of the remaining mountain forest blocks may have more than one species. For example three forms from the Nguru Mountains are thought to be distinct new species [27]. Together with these all the other forms from the other forest blocks such as Nguru, Kanga, Ukaguru, Rubeho, Uluguru, Mahenge, and Udzungwa most likely represent undescribed species [28].

While currently taxonomists are describing new forms from this genus, little information exists on their life history characteristics such as breeding and other habits that can be used to enhance their conservation management plans. What is known is that species in this genus are mainly forest dwellers, good climbers, and lay eggs that are presumed to develop directly into young frogs [23].

Herein I provide additional information on the natural history of one of the warty frogs Callulina dawida, by examining its ecological and breeding characteristics. The aim of this study was to get a better understanding of the species’ behavioural characteristics that can aid conservation efforts. My specific objectives were to investigate whether: (1) Callulina dawida is a forest dwelling species; (2) the distribution and abundance of this frog is independent of mean monthly temperature, rainfall and elevation; (3) the frogs’ eggs are terrestrially deposited anywhere in the forest; (4) the frog is a good climber and terrestrially moves widely within the forest

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Site

Callulina dawida were studied in fragmented forests of the Taita Hills (Dawida, Mbololo, Sagalla, and Kasigau) mountain blocks. The Taita Hills lie between 38°20′ East and 3°25′ South, in southeastern Kenya. Sampling was done in selected sites of indigenous forests, exotic plantations and farms at varying elevation and disturbance gradients (see the Appendix).

2.2. Sampling

Data collection was conducted over a period of 30 months (December 2004 to March 2008). Sampling was accomplished by use of standardized night transect walks and pitfall trapping for quantitative data. Thirty transects were rectangular in shape totaling 600 m standard similar to that used in previous studies [29, 30]. All Callulina dawida individuals observed within 1 m on either side and above the transect path were recorded. Sampling of each transect was repeated every week. The traps consisted of Y-shaped drift fence (30 cm high polythene paper supported with wooden pegs) array with segments of 5 m length in association with four pitfall traps (10 liter plastic buckets) flush with the ground [31]. Three trap sets were set in each site for five days (trapping sessions) after which they were closed and reopened after one week. In total, there were 15 trapping sites. Checking of the traps was done once every morning not later than 7:30 am o’clock morning. Day time one person hour time-limited searches similar to the procedure described by Karns [32] and opportunistic visual encounter surveys generated qualitative data mainly on species habits.

To study movement, capture-mark-recapture was done beginning in September 2006 in Ngangao, Chawia, and Mwachora, and later in Fururu, Ndiwenyi, and Vuria forests. Captured frogs were marked by inserting numbered alpha-numeric tags (VIAlpha, northwest Marine, USA) subcutaneously on the ventral surface of the thigh and released for later identity after recapture. A Pesola spring balance (Max. 60 g) was used to take body mass (to the nearest 1 g) while snout-vent length (SVL) was measured using a ruler (to the nearest 1 mm). Age classes were defined using SVL size ranges. Voucher specimens were processed and are deposited at the National Museums of Kenya, Nairobi—NMK Herpetology reference collection (see the Appendix).

To study the species breeding habits, nests were searched and when found they were marked and monitored until all the eggs hatched.

2.3. Statistical Analyses

All quantitative analyses used data from traps as transect data were not sufficiently productive in terms of number of individuals recorded. One sample t-test was used to test the variation in frog abundance among the forest fragments. Nonparametric Spearman Rank Correlation was used to test the influence of temperature and rainfall on abundance. Chi-square was used to test monthly age group variation in abundance and to test whether abundance was associated with altitude. Data were analyzed with STATISTICA 6.0 [33].

3. Results

3.1. Species Diagnosis

Callulina dawida is a medium sized frog in which females can reach 55 mm and males 35 mm (Figure 1). The toes of the hind feet are arranged in two opposable groups, with the fourth and fifth together, pointing backward when walking on the forest floor. The skin is warty and dorsal adult color is variable from light brown, grey, dark brown, orange to yellowish. In terms of coloration there is no well-marked sexual dimorphism. Using SVL, the frog population was grouped into three age groups: juveniles (<20 mm), Subadults (20–30 mm) and adults >30 mm).

3.2. Population and Habitat Characteristics

From December 2004 until March 2008, 101 individuals were recorded. Twenty-one individual frogs were recorded in traps and seven in transects (Table 3). The majority of the rest were from time-limited searches or opportunistic visual encounter surveys and leaf-litter sampling. Thirty three individuals were marked with three recaptures. The SVL of the largest adult and the smallest juvenile recorded in this study were 55 mm and 9 mm, respectively. Characteristically, frogs were found in microhabitats such as on or under leaf litter, or debris and within decomposing logs, tree stems and or bark.

Callulina dawida was only found in indigenous forest fragments above an altitude of 1400 m in the Dawida and Mbololo mountain blocks and not in the Sagalla or Kasigau blocks. No individuals were found in typical farmland or exotic plantation habitats.

3.3. Distribution and Abundance

There was a discernable monthly age group variation in distribution and abundance ( 𝜒 2 = 2 0 . 3 1 , 𝑑 . 𝑓 . = 2 , 𝑛 = 1 2 , 𝑃 = 0 . 0 0 0 0 4 ). While adults could be caught in most months of the year; most of the juveniles were trapped in January and February (Table 2). The mean number of individuals trapped in the four forest fragments differed (one sample t-test; 𝑡 = 4 . 1 7 , 𝑑 . 𝑓 . = 3 , 𝑛 = 4 , 𝑃 = 0 . 0 2 5 ). Consequently, a high number of individuals were recorded in Ngangao as compared to the other three forests (Mwachora, Chawia, Mbololo).

3.4. Influence of Rainfall, Temperature, and Altitude

Spearman Rank Correlation showed that Callulina dawida abundance was positively influenced by mean monthly temperature ( 𝑡 = 2 . 3 9 , 𝑃 = 0 . 0 3 7 , 𝑅 = 0 . 6 0 , 𝑛 = 1 2 ) and there was no effect of rainfall in the data set ( 𝑡 = 1 . 4 9 9 , 𝑃 = 0 . 1 6 6 , 𝑅 = 0 . 2 8 , 𝑛 = 1 2 ). Therefore individuals are commonly recorded during the warm months of January to March and August to October and less during the cold months of June and July. They are also few to none during the peak rainy seasons in April and November/December (Table 2). The results also demonstrate a clear association between altitude and abundance ( 𝜒 2 = 8 . 0 , 𝑑 . 𝑓 . = 2 , 𝑛 = 4 , 𝑃 < 0 . 0 1 8 ). Hence the species is most abundant in the high altitude Ngangao forest fragment (Table 1).


Indigenous forests
Ngangao192195211 (141)1 (18)
Chawia5016254 (146)0 (17)
Mwachora316504 (131)0 (17)
Macha317000 (15)
Boma0.2514600 (18)
Mbololo22017792 (123)6 (21)
Sagalla315000 (132)0 (15)
Kasigau2016450 (32)0 (19)



SpecimenSVL (mm)Wt (g)Age groupSiteDateMethodComments

1457.1FemaleFururu16/12/2004Visual encounter surveyPreserved: NMK-A4266
2363.7FemaleKiangungu16/12/2004Visual encounter surveyPreserved: NMK-A4267
3302.5MaleNgangao28/12/2004Visual encounter surveyPreserved: NMK-A4268/1
4291.8SubadultNgangao28/12/2004Visual encounter surveyPreserved: NMK-A4268/2
540.68FemaleNgangao20/04/2005Pitfall trapPreserved: NMK-A4343
643.118.26FemaleChawia25/04/2005Time-limited searchPreserved: NMK-A4344/1
7302.59MaleChawia26/04/2005 Leaf litter searchPreserved: NMK-A4344/2
815JuvenileMbololo29/03/2006Pitfall trapPreserved: NMK-A4574
9190.6JuvenileMbololo03/04/2006Night transect walkPreserved: NMK-A4582/1
10200.79SubadultMbololo03/04/2006Night transect walkPreserved: NMK-A4582/2
11190.63JuvenileMbololo03/04/2006Night transect walkPreserved: NMK-A4582/3
1231MaleNgangao07/04/2006Time-limited searchReleased
1335FemaleNgangao21/12/2005Pitfall trapPreserved: NMK-A4492
1410JuvenileNgangao06/01/2006Pitfall trapReleased
1510JuvenileNgangao17/01/2006Pitfall trapReleased
1645FemaleNgangao24/01/2006Visual encounter surveyReleased
1740FemaleNgangao10/02/2006Pitfall trapReleased
1814JuvenileNgangao21/02/2006Pitfall trapPreserved: NMK-A4594
1911JuvenileNgangao21/02/2006Pitfall trapReleased
2015JuvenileNgangao22/02/2006Pitfall trapReleased
2112JuvenileNgangao22/02/2006Pitfall trapReleased
2234MaleNgangao20/03/2006Pitfall trapPreserved: NMK-A4590
2340FemaleNgangao20/03/2006Funnel trap against drift fenceReleased
24AdultNgangao20/03/2006Visual encounter surveyDisappeared before capture
25292SubadultVuria16/04/2006Visual encounter surveyReleased
2612JuvenileMwachora05/01/2006Pitfall trapReleased
2714JuvenileMwachora06/01/2006Pitfall trapReleased
2815JuvenileMwachora17/01/2006Pitfall trapReleased
2921SubadultMwachora14/03/2006Pitfall trapPreserved: NMK-A4624
309JuvenileFururu06/12/2005Visual encounter surveyPreserved: NMK-A4416
3150FemaleChawia07/02/2006 Leaf litter searchReleased
3238FemaleChawia22/02/2006 Leaf litter searchReleased
3321SubadultChawia08/03/2006 Leaf litter searchReleased
3446FemaleBoma10/05/2006Time-limited searchPreserved: NMK-A4645
3545FemaleMbololo05/05/2006Pitfall trapPreserved: NMK-A4684
3625SubadultMbololo30/05/2006Time-limited searchReleased
3733MaleBoma03/07/2006Time-limited searchReleased
3851FemaleBoma03/07/2006Time-limited searchReleased
39adultNgangao26/06/2006Time-limited searchReleased
4020SubadultNgangao30/05/2006Pitfall trapReleased
41AdultMakandenyiMarch 2006Visual encounter surveyReleased
4230MaleChawia08/08/2006Pitfall trapReleased
4333MaleNgangao14/08/2006Time-limited searchReleased
4434MaleChawia20/09/2006Pitfall trapReleased
4530MaleChawia20/09/2006Pitfall trapReleased
4620SubadultNgangao25/09/2006Patch samplingRecaptured on 01/04/2007; SVL 42 mm
47447FemaleNgangao27/09/2006Patch samplingReleased
48221.25SubadultNgangaoOctober 2006Patch samplingReleased
49211.25SubadultNgangaoOctober 2006Patch samplingReleased
5035FemaleChawia11/10/2006Patch samplingReleased
5127SubadultChawia28/10/2006Pitfall trapReleased
5232MaleChawia29/10/2006Pitfall trapReleased
53436.5FemaleNgangao02/11/2006Time-limited searchReleased
54353FemaleNgangao2/11/2006Time-limited searchRecaptured on 02/05/2007; SVL 48 mm, wt 9 g
55302MaleNgangao02/11/2006Night transect walkReleased
56456FemaleNgangao03/11/2006Time-limited searchReleased
5730MaleMbololo05/12/2006Night transect walkReleased
5835FemaleMbololo05/12/2006Night transect walkReleased
5946FemaleMbololo06/12/2006Time-limited searchReleased
6055FemaleMbololo08/12/2006Time-limited searchReleased
6143FemaleNdiwenyi03/04/2007Time-limited searchReleased
6240FemaleFururu05/04/2007Time-limited searchReleased
6329SubadultNdiwenyi05/04/2007Time-limited searchReleased
6446FemaleVuria11/05/2007Time-limited searchReleased
6545FemaleNdiwenyi28/05/2007Time-limited searchReleased
6648FemaleNgangao02/05/2007Time-limited searchReleased
674312FemaleMwachora04/05/2007Time-limited searchReleased
68489.5FemaleMbololo17/05/2007Time-limited searchRecaptured on 09/12/2007, SVL 48 mm
694811FemaleNgangao09/06/2007Time-limited searchReleased
70406.5FemaleNgangao09/06/2008Time-limited searchReleased
71262SubadultNgangao09/06/2009Time-limited searchReleased
7247FemaleVuria23/06/2007Time-limited searchReleased
7350FemaleVuria24/06/2007Time-limited searchReleased
7430MaleVuria24/06/2007Time-limited searchReleased
7547FemaleVuria25/06/2007Time-limited searchReleased
7655FemaleVuria25/06/2007Time-limited searchReleased
7752FemaleVuria25/06/2007Time-limited searchReleased
7833MaleVuria25/06/2007Time-limited searchReleased
7950FemaleVuria26/06/2007Time-limited searchReleased
8030MaleVuria26/06/2007Time-limited searchReleased
8112JuvenileVuria26/06/2007Time-limited searchReleased
8230MaleMwachora14/08/2007Time-limited searchReleased
83457.5FemaleFururu12/11/2007Time-limited searchReleased: female sitting on 30–40 egg clutch
84489FemaleNgangao08/10/2007Time-limited searchReleased
85458FemaleNgangao28/10/2008Time-limited searchReleased
86456FemaleChawia30/10/2007Time-limited searchReleased
87478.5FemaleChawia03/12/2007Time-limited searchReleased
884712FemaleNgangao05/12/2007Time-limited searchReleased
89407.5FemaleNgangao05/12/2007Time-limited searchReleased
90507FemaleMwachora17/12/2007Time-limited searchReleased
91202SubadultNgangao6/01/2008Time-limited searchReleased
9246FemaleMbololo18/02/2008Time-limited searchReleased
9345FemaleMbololo22/02/2008Time-limited searchReleased
9440FemaleMbololo25/02/2008Time-limited searchReleased
95498.5FemaleMwachora26/02/2008Time-limited searchReleased
96508FemaleMwachora14/03/2008Time-limited searchReleased
9742FemaleVuria20/03/2008Time-limited searchReleased
9845FemaleVuria20/03/2008Time-limited searchReleased
9922SubadultVuria20/03/2008Time-limited searchReleased
10040FemaleVuria21/03/2008Time-limited searchReleased
10155FemaleVuria23/03/2008Time-limited searchReleased

3.5. Breeding and Other Behavioral Characteristics

Results from time-limited searches showed that Callulina dawida breeds during the long dry season which runs from June to October. In July and August a strong three note trilling call was heard from males in several forests. On 12 September 2007 in Fururu forest a female (45 mm, 7.5 g) was found on leaf litter sitting on a clutch of 30–40 eggs (2-mm diameter egg capsule) bound together (Figure 2). When displaced she returned to sit on the eggs. The female was then visited on 21 November 2007 and found on the same state until 29 November when only 6 eggs remained with the female still sitting on them. It was observed that the eggs hatch directly into froglets which immediately leave the nest. Once all the eggs have hatched the mother leaves the nest. The smallest juvenile (9 mm) recorded was found on 6 December; 2005 perched on grass within a forest site in Fururu infested with army ants Dorylus molestus Gerstäcker, 1859. Callulina dawida are good climbers and on several occasions in Vuria forest individuals were found perched higher than 1 m on tree stems. Callulina dawida is normally solitary although on two occasions in Mbololo forest during night transect walks two individuals were found within a meter of one another. One of the adults which had been found perched on a sloping dry thin branch about 30 cm off the ground, was subsequently found on the same site and position the following night. On the forest floor the frog mainly walks but can also make short hops. When disturbed; while walking it tends to become immobile, inflating itself or freezing before proceeding. Information gathered from three marked and recaptured individuals indicates that the species movement is limited: (a) An individual of 20 mm had moved about 25 m after 8 months with a new SVL of 42 mm. (b) An adult of 35 mm was recaptured about 7 m away having increased in SVL to 48 mm after 7 months. (c) An adult of 48 mm was recaptured about 30 m away after 7 months with no change in body length.

4. Discussion

Callulina dawida is a high-elevation species occurring in indigenous forest fragments above 1400 m within Dawida and Mbololo blocks of the Taita Hills [28]. These fragments range from <1 ha to 220 ha [34]. It is absent in typical farmland and plantation habitats as well as the isolated indigenous forest fragments on Kasigau Mountain and Sagalla Hill. Results on monthly distribution showed age group variation in abundance, which for juveniles reflects the time of their recruitment. This means after hatching around November it is in January and February when they are grown-up enough to move around and become easily detected.

Movement is limited in this species justifying its survival in tiny forest patches though continued population viability within such small isolated patches is questionable due to the associated ecological and genetic problems [3, 15, 16]. Ngangao forest had the highest number of individuals captured in traps. This suggests that it has a combination of ideal habitat characteristics suitable for the occurrence of this species. Also there is less human disturbance than in Mwachora and Chawia. The high density of individuals in small fragments such as Vuria forest which is at the highest altitude could be because of a combination of factors. It could be due to the fact that the habitat is ideal and the dispersal area is small and there is low disturbance because of inaccessibility of the forest to humans as well as less predation and competition from other species.

The abundance of the Callulina dawida is influenced by temperature with more individuals being recorded during the warm months of the year in the Taita Hills [35]. This coincides with the periods of moderate to high temperatures and humidity. No individuals were recorded in July which is the coldest month in the Taita Hills [36, 37]. These observations concur with other studies that have shown that temperature affects amphibian populations through its effects on growth and development [38]. It was also found that more individuals were recorded in high altitude forests of Ngangao in traps and Vuria in time-limited searches than those on lower elevations. Extrinsic factors such as temperature, rainfall, and altitude are interrelated [3841] and affect the biology of amphibians and hence their abundance [42]. In particular, studies have found that altitude and its relation with temperature has negative effects on amphibian population [40]. A study on Mount Kupe in Cameroon found that species that do not depend on water for breeding (direct developers like Callulina dawida) were more abundant on high altitudes than the open water breeders [43]. Previous studies have generally found that rainfall and temperature directly affect food availability which in turn affects amphibian populations through growth and development and these factors relate to elevation [3841]. Other studies have found rainfall to be the most important abiotic factor influencing tropical anuran reproduction by affecting and regulating the timing and length of breeding season in open (water) site breeders [21].

Callulina dawida start breeding with calls mainly during the long dry season from around July. The call is a fast repeated “brrr brr brr…” [44]. Then egg clutch is deposited on leaf litter nests in September and the mother broods them for three months until November, a relatively long developmental period as expected at high elevations [38]. While a clutch of 30–40 capsulated eggs was found, it was only 6 that were found towards the end of the incubation. This means that eggs hatch at different times and the young ones immediately leave the nest site. Elsewhere in another brevicipitid (Probreviceps macrodactylus macrodactylus), Müller et al. [45] found a clutch of 32 eggs including 21 infertile jelly-filled capsulated eggs laid during the dry season. They suggested that infertile jelly-filled egg capsules prevent the fertile eggs from desiccation during the dry period. This form of parental care is not new as it has been recorded in other brevicipitids, for example, Probreviceps uluguruensis, Probreviceps macrodactylus loveridgei [23] and Probreviceps rhodesianus [24]. These results also show that Callulina dawida, like other brevicipitids, deposit relatively small clutches of large yolk-rich eggs that are buffered by infertile jelly-filled egg capsules. My findings concurs with others that have shown that direct developing montane species produce relatively small clutches of large yolk-rich eggs and exhibit increased parental care [41].

Growth and development in Callulina dawida is fast attaining sexual maturity within eight months. This rapid attainment of a reproductive size is expected in tropical areas where temperatures are high, allowing anurans to grow throughout the year [38, 42].

4.1. Conservation and Management Strategy

The species is restricted to severely fragmented indigenous forests and I conclude that its extent of occurrence, area of occupancy, and habitat quality will continue to decline. A combination of these factors makes the species eligible for listing in the critically endangered (CR) category B 1a&b (i, ii, iii, iv) [46]. To ensure a comprehensive protection of Callulina dawida maintenance or step-up efforts for all currently known indigenous forest fragments is paramount. I strongly recommend promotion of local initiatives that encourage planting indigenous plant species over exotics and preservation of private or community sacred forest groves including maintenance of potential habitat corridors (e.g., riverine forests) that connect existing forest fragments. I also support habitat restoration programmes that involve careful replacement of exotic tree plantations with native trees.


The author is very grateful to Peter Mwasi, Peter Alama, Oliver Mwakio, Bigvai Karingo, Greshon Kisombe, Kitiro Jumapili and Rensone Dio, his Taita Hills field assistants who did the day-to-day sampling. Thanks to the local community and the Kenya Forest Service for allowing the author and his team to work in farms and forests, respectively. The study formed part of the author’s Ph.D. student scholarship fund by the Katholischer Akademischer Ausländer-Dienst (KAAD), Bonn, plus logistical support from the BIOLOG BIOTA East Africa Project (Federal Ministry of Education and Research, Germany).


  1. K. Roelants, D. J. Gower, M. Wilkinson et al., “Global patterns of diversification in the history of modern amphibians,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no. 3, pp. 887–892, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. S. N. Stuart, J. S. Chanson, N. A. Cox et al., “Status and trends of amphibian declines and extinctions worldwide,” Science, vol. 306, no. 5702, pp. 1783–1786, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. S. A. Cushman, “Effects of habitat loss and fragmentation on amphibians: a review and prospectus,” Biological Conservation, vol. 128, no. 2, pp. 231–240, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. “Amphibian conservation action plan,” in Proceedings of the IUCN/SSC Amphibian Conservation Summit, C. Gascon, J. P. Collins, R. D. Moore, D. R. Church, J. E. Mckay, and J. R. Mendelson III, Eds., The World Conservation Union (IUCN), Gland, Switzerland, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  5. J. R. Mendelson Jr., K. R. Lips, R. W. Gagliardo et al., “Biodiversity: confronting amphibian declines and extinctions,” Science, vol. 313, p. 48, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  6. S. N. Stuart, M. Hoffmann, J. S. Chanson et al., Eds., Threatened Amphibians of the World, Lynx Edicions, in Association with IUCN, Conservation International and NatureServe, Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
  7. J. D. Taylor and J. C. Jones, “Quantifying amphibian richness in South-eastern forests,” Proceedings of the Annual Conference of Southeast Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, vol. 56, pp. 3021–311, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  8. L. Fahrig, “Effect of habitat fragmentation on the extinction threshold: a synthesis,” Ecological Applications, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 346–353, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  9. L. Fahrig, “Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity,” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, vol. 34, pp. 487–515, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  10. K. E. Bell and M. A. Donnelly, “Influence of forest fragmentation on community structure of frogs and lizards in northeastern Costa Rica,” Conservation Biology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1750–1760, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. W. C. Funk, A. E. Greene, P. S. Corn, and F. W. Allendorf, “High dispersal in a frog species suggests that it is vulnerable to habitat fragmentation,” Biology Letters, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 13–16, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. C. S. Jha, L. Goparaju, A. Tripathi, B. Gharai, A. S. Raghubanshi, and J. S. Singh, “Forest fragmentation and its impact on species diversity: an analysis using remote sensing and GIS,” Biodiversity and Conservation, vol. 14, no. 7, pp. 1681–1698, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. W. Newmark, “Forest area, fragmentation and loss in the Eastern Arc Mountains; implications for the conservation of biological diversity,” Journal of East African Natural History, vol. 87, pp. 29–36, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  14. N. D. Burgess, T. M. Butynski, N. J. Cordeiro et al., “The biological importance of the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania and Kenya,” Biological Conservation, vol. 134, no. 2, pp. 209–231, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. T. J. C. Beebee, “Conservation genetics of amphibians,” Heredity, vol. 95, no. 6, pp. 423–427, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. I. F. Spellerberg, Monitoring Ecological Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1991.
  17. C. K. Dodd and B. S. Cade, “Movement patterns and the conservation of amphibians breeding in small, temporary wetlands,” Conservation Biology, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 331–339, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  18. J. Bielby, N. Cooper, A. A. Cunningham, T. W. J. Garner , and A. Purvis, “Predicting susceptibility to future declines in world's frogs,” Conservation Letters, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 82–90, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  19. B. R. Murray and G. C. Hose, “Life-history and ecological correlates of decline and extinction in the endemic Australian frog fauna,” Austral Ecology, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 564–571, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. A. Budischak, J. M. Hester, S. J. Price, and M. E. Dorcas, “Natural history of Terrapene carolina (Box Turtles) in an urbanized landscape,” Southeastern Naturalist, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 191–204, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. M. A. Donnelly and C. Guyer, “Patterns of reproduction and habitat use in an assemblage of neotropical hylid frogs,” Oecologia, vol. 98, no. 3-4, pp. 291–302, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  22. D. R. Frost, Amphibian Species of the World: An Online Reference, Version 5.0. Electronic database accessible, American Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA, 2007.
  23. T. Barbour and A. Loveridge, “A comparative study of the herpetological fauna of the Uluguru and Usambara mountains, Tanganyika Territory with description of new species,” Memoirs of Museum of Comparative Zoology Harvard, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 178–261, 1928. View at: Google Scholar
  24. J. C. Poynton and D. G. Broadley, “A new species of Probrevicepss (Amphibia) from Rhodesia,” Arnoldia, vol. 3, pp. 1–3, 1967. View at: Google Scholar
  25. D. R. Frost, T. Grant, J. Faivovich et al., “The amphibian tree of life,” Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History, no. 297, pp. 1–370, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. R. O. De Sá, S. P. Loader, and A. Channing, “A new species of Callulina (Anura: Microhylidae) from the West Usambara Mountains, Tanzania,” Journal of Herpetology, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 219–224, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  27. M. Menegon, N. Doggart, and N. Owen, “The Nguru Mountains of Tanzania, an outstanding hotspot of herpetofaunal diversity,” Acta Herpetologica, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 107–127, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  28. S. P. Loader, D. J. Gower, W. Ngalason, and M. Menegon, “Three new species of Callulina (Amphibia: Anura: Brevicipitidae) highlight local endemism and conservation plight of Africa's Eastern Arc forests,” Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, vol. 160, no. 3, pp. 496–514, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. M.-O. Rödel and R. Ernst, “Measuring and monitoring amphibian diversity in tropical forests. I. An evaluation of methods with recommendations for standardization,” Ecotropica, vol. 10, pp. 1–14, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  30. M. Veith, S. Lötters, F. Andreone, and M.-O. Rödel, “Measuring and monitoring amphibians diversity in tropical forests. II. Estimating species richness from standardized transect censing,” Ecotropica, vol. 10, pp. 85–99, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  31. W. R. Heyer, M. A. Donnelly, M. R. W. Diarmid, L.-A. C. Hayek, and M. S. Foster, Eds., Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity: Standard Methods for Amphibians, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA, 1994.
  32. D. R. Karns, “Field herpetology: methods for the study of amphibians and reptiles in Minnesota,” Occasional Paper 18, James Ford Bell Museum of Natural History, University of Minnesota, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  33. StatSoft, STATISTICA Data analysis software system, Version 6.0. StatSoft, Oklahoma, 2001.
  34. T. Brooks, L. Lens, J. Barnes, R. Barnes, J. K. Kihuria, and C. Wilder, “The conservation status of the forest birds of the Taita Hills, Kenya,” Bird Conservation International, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 119–139, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  35. R. Jätzold and H. Schmidt, Farm Management Handbook of Kenya. Vol. II: Natural Conditions and Farm Management Information. Part B: Central Kenya (Rift Valley and Central Provinces), The Kenyan Ministry of Agriculture, in Cooperation with the German Agricultural Team (GAT) of the German Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ), 1983.
  36. P. K. Malonza, Amphibian biodiversity in Taita Hills, Kenya, Ph.D. thesis, University of Johness-Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany, 2008.
  37. G. J. Measey, M. Smita, R. S. Beyo, and O. V. Oommen, “Year-round spermatogenic activity in an oviparous subterranean caecilian, Boulengerula taitanus Loveridge 1935 (Amphibia Gymnophiona Caeciliidae),” Tropical Zoology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 109–122, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  38. C. Morrison and J. M. Hero, “Geographic variation in life-history characteristics of amphibians: a review,” Journal of Animal Ecology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 270–279, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. S. J. Lai, Y. C. Kam, and Y. S. Lin, “Elevational variation in reproductive and life history traits of Sauter's frog Rana sauteri Boulenger, 1909 in Taiwan,” Zoological Studies, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 193–202, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  40. C. A. Navas, “Patterns of distribution of anurans in high Andean tropical elevations: insights from integrating biogeography and evolutionary physiology,” Integrative and Comparative Biology, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 82–91, 2006. View at: Google Scholar
  41. K. Summers, C. S. McKeon, H. Heying, J. Hall, and W. Patrick, “Social and environmental influences on egg size evolution in frogs,” Journal of Zoology, vol. 271, no. 2, pp. 225–232, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. W. E. Duellman and L. Trueb, Biology of Amphibians, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Md, USA, 1994.
  43. U. Hofer, L. F. Bersier, and D. Borcard, “Ecotones and gradient as determinants of herpetofaunal community structure in the primary forest of Mount Kupe, Cameroon,” Journal of Tropical Ecology, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 517–533, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. P. Loader, G. J. Measey, R. O. De Sá, and P. K. Malonza, “A new brevicipitid species (Brevicipitidae: Callulina) from the fragmented forests of the Taita Hills, Kenya,” Zootaxa, no. 2123, pp. 55–68, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  45. H. Müller, S. P. Loader, W. Ngalason, K. M. Howell, and D. J. Gower, “Reproduction in Brevicipitid frogs (Amphibia: Anura: Brevicipitidae): evidence from Probreviceps m. macrodactylus,” Copeia, no. 3, pp. 726–733, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  46. IUCN, IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria (version 3.1), IUCN, Conservation International, & NatureServe. Global Amphibian Assessment, Gland, Switzerland, 2001,

Copyright © 2012 Patrick K. Malonza. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.
 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

No related content is available yet for this article.

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2021, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.