Abstract

This paper deals with the study of super quasi-Einstein manifolds admitting 𝑊2-curvature tensor. The totally umbilical hypersurfaces of 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛 are also studied. Among others, the existence of such a manifold is ensured by a nontrivial example.

1. Introduction

It is well known that a Riemannian manifold (𝑀𝑛,𝑔)(𝑛>2) is Einstein if its Ricci tensor 𝑆 of type (0,2) is of the form 𝑆=𝑎𝑔, where 𝑎 is a constant, which turns into 𝑆=(𝑟/𝑛)𝑔,𝑟 being the scalar curvature (constant) of the manifold. Let (𝑀𝑛,𝑔)(𝑛>2) be a Riemannian manifold. Let 𝑈𝑆={𝑥𝑀𝑆(𝑟/𝑛)𝑔at𝑥}, then the manifold (𝑀𝑛,𝑔) is said to be quasi-Einstein manifold [112] if on 𝑈𝑆𝑀, we have𝑆𝑎𝑔=𝑏𝐴𝐴,(1.1) where 𝐴 is a 1-form on 𝑈𝑆 and, 𝑎, 𝑏 are some functions on 𝑈𝑆. It is clear that the 1-form 𝐴 as well as the function 𝑏 are nonzero at every point on 𝑈𝑆. From the above definition, it follows that every Einstein manifold is quasi-Einstein. In particular, every Ricci-flat manifold (e.g., Schwarzschild spacetime) is quasi-Einstein. The scalars 𝑎, 𝑏 are known as the associated scalars of the manifold. Also, the 1-form 𝐴 is called the associated 1-form of the manifold defined by 𝑔(𝑋,𝜌)=𝐴(𝑋) for any vector field 𝑋,𝜌 being a unit vector field, called the generator of the manifold. Such an 𝑛-dimensional quasi-Einstein manifold is denoted by (𝑄𝐸)𝑛. The quasi-Einstein manifolds have also been studied by De and Ghosh [13], Shaikh et al. [14], and Shaikh and Patra [15].

As a generalization of quasi-Einstein manifold, Chaki [16] introduced the notion of generalized quasi-Einstein manifolds. A Riemannian manifold (𝑀𝑛,𝑔)(𝑛>2) is said to be generalized quasi-Einstein manifold if its Ricci tensor 𝑆 of type (0,2) is not identically zero and satisfies the following:[],𝑆(𝑋,𝑌)=𝑎𝑔(𝑋,𝑌)+𝑏𝐴(𝑋)𝐴(𝑌)+𝑐𝐴(𝑋)𝐵(𝑌)+𝐴(𝑌)𝐵(𝑋)(1.2) where 𝑎, 𝑏, and 𝑐 are scalars of which 𝑏0,𝑐0, 𝐴, 𝐵 are nonzero 1-forms such that 𝑔(𝑋,𝜌)=𝐴(𝑋),𝑔(𝑋,𝜇)=𝐵(𝑋) for all 𝑋 and 𝜌,𝜇 are two unit vector fields mutually orthogonal to each other. In such a case, 𝑎,𝑏, and 𝑐 are called the associated scalars, 𝐴,𝐵 are called the associated 1-forms, and 𝜌,𝜇 are the generators of the manifold. Such an 𝑛-dimensional manifold is denoted by 𝐺(𝑄𝐸)𝑛.

In [17], Chaki also introduced the notion of super quasi-Einstein manifold. A Riemannian manifold (𝑀𝑛,𝑔)(𝑛>2) is called super quasi-Einstein manifold if its Ricci tensor 𝑆 of type (0,2) is not identically zero and satisfies the following:[]𝑆(𝑋,𝑌)=𝑎𝑔(𝑋,𝑌)+𝑏𝐴(𝑋)𝐴(𝑌)+𝑐𝐴(𝑋)𝐵(𝑌)+𝐴(𝑌)𝐵(𝑋)+𝑑𝐷(𝑋,𝑌),(1.3) where 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐, and 𝑑 are nonzero scalars, 𝐴, 𝐵 are two nonzero 1-forms such that 𝑔(𝑋,𝜌)=𝐴(𝑋), 𝑔(𝑋,𝜇)=𝐵(𝑋) for all vector fields 𝑋, and 𝜌, 𝜇 are unit vectors such that 𝜌 is perpendicular to 𝜇 and 𝐷 is a symmetric (0,2) tensor with zero trace, which satisfies the condition 𝐷(𝑋,𝜌)=0 for all vector fields 𝑋. Here, 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐, and 𝑑 are called the associated scalars, 𝐴, 𝐵 are the associated 1-forms of the manifold, and 𝐷 is called the structure tensor. Such an 𝑛-dimensional manifold is denoted by 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛. The super quasi-Einstein manifolds have also been studied by Debnath and Konar [18], Özgür [19], and many others.

In 1970, Pokhariyal and Mishra [20] introduced new tensor fields, called 𝑊2 and 𝐸 tensor fields, in a Riemannian manifold and studied their properties. According to them, a 𝑊2-curvature tensor on a manifold (𝑀𝑛,𝑔)(𝑛>2) is defined by𝑊21(𝑋,𝑌)𝑍=𝑅(𝑋,𝑌)𝑍+[],𝑛1𝑔(𝑋,𝑍)𝑄𝑌𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)𝑄𝑋(1.4) where 𝑄 is the Ricci operator, that is, 𝑔(𝑄𝑋,𝑌)=𝑆(𝑋,𝑌) for all 𝑋,𝑌. In this connection, it may be mentioned that Pokhariyal and Mishra [20, 21] and Pokhariyal [22] introduced some new curvature tensors defined on the line of Weyl projective curvature tensor.

The 𝑊2-curvature tensor was introduced on the line of Weyl projective curvature tensor, and by breaking 𝑊2 into skew-symmetric parts, the tensor 𝐸 has been defined. Rainich conditions for the existence of the nonnull electrovariance can be obtained by 𝑊2 and 𝐸 if we replace the matter tensor by the contracted part of these tensors. The tensor 𝐸 enables to extend Pirani formulation of gravitational waves to Einstein space [23, 24]. It is shown that [20] except the vanishing of complexion vector and property of being identical in two spaces which are in geodesic correspondence, the 𝑊2-curvature tensor possesses the properties almost similar to the Weyl projective curvature tensor. Thus, we can very well use 𝑊2-curvature tensor in various physical and geometrical spheres in place of the Weyl projective curvature tensor.

The 𝑊2-curvature tensor has also been studied by various authors in different structures such as De and Sarkar [25], Matsumoto et al. [26], Pokhariyal [23, 24, 27], Shaikh et al. [28], Shaikh et al. [29], Taleshian and Hosseinzadeh [30], Tripathi and Gupta [31], Venkatesha et al. [32], and Yíldíz and De [33].

Motivated by the above studies, in Section 3, we study 𝑊2-curvature tensor of a super quasi-Einstein manifold. It is proved that if in an 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛(𝑛>2) the associated scalars are constants, the structure tensor is of Codazzi type and the generators 𝜌 and 𝜇 are vector fields with the associated 1-forms 𝐴 and 𝐵 not being the 1-forms of recurrences, then the manifold is 𝑊2-conservative.

Recently, Özen and Altay [34] studied the totally umbilical hypersurfaces of weakly and pseudosymmetric spaces. Again, Özen and Altay [35] also studied the totally umbilical hypersurfaces of weakly concircular and pseudoconcircular symmetric spaces. In this connection, it may be mentioned that Shaikh et al. [36] studied the totally umbilical hypersurfaces of weakly conharmonically symmetric spaces. Section 4 deals with the study of totally umbilical hypersurfaces of 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛. It is proved that the totally umbilical hypersurfaces of 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛+1 are 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛 if and only if the hypersurface is a totally geodesic hypersurface.

Finally, in the last section, the existence of super quasi-Einstein manifold is ensured by a nontrivial example.

2. Preliminaries

In this section, we will obtain some formulas of 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛, which will be required in the sequel. Let {𝑒𝑖𝑖=1,2,,𝑛} be an orthonormal frame field at any point of the manifold, then setting 𝑋=𝑌=𝑒𝑖 in (1.3) and taking summation over 𝑖,1𝑖𝑛, we obtain𝑟=𝑛𝑎+𝑏,(2.1) where 𝑟 is the scalar curvature of the manifold.

Also from (1.3), we have𝑆(𝑋,𝜌)=(𝑎+𝑏)𝐴(𝑋)+𝑐𝐵(𝑋),(2.2)𝑆(𝜌,𝜌)=(𝑎+𝑏),(2.3)𝑆(𝑋,𝜇)=𝑎𝐵(𝑋)+𝑐𝐴(𝑋)+𝑑𝐷(𝑋,𝜇),(2.4)𝑆(𝜇,𝜇)=𝑎+𝑑𝐷(𝜇,𝜇),(2.5)𝑆(𝜌,𝜇)=𝑐.(2.6)

3. 𝑊2-Curvature Tensor of 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛

Let a manifold 𝑀 be an 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛(𝑛>2), which is 𝑊2-flat, then from (1.4), we get1𝑅(𝑌,𝑍,𝑈,𝑉)=[].𝑛1𝑔(𝑍,𝑈)𝑆(𝑌,𝑉)𝑔(𝑌,𝑈)𝑆(𝑍,𝑉)(3.1) Setting 𝑈=𝜌 and 𝑉=𝜇 in (3.1) and using (2.2) and (2.4), we obtain𝑎𝑅(𝑌,𝑍,𝜌,𝜇)=[]+𝑑𝑛1𝐴(𝑍)𝐵(𝑌)𝐴(𝑌)𝐵(𝑍)[].𝑛1𝐴(𝑍)𝐷(𝑌,𝜇)𝐴(𝑌)𝐷(𝑍,𝜇)(3.2) Again, plugging 𝑈=𝜇 and 𝑉=𝜌 in (3.1) and using (2.2) and (2.4), we get𝑅(𝑌,𝑍,𝜇,𝜌)=𝑎+𝑏[].𝑛1𝐴(𝑌)𝐵(𝑍)𝐴(𝑍)𝐵(𝑌)(3.3) From (3.2) and (3.3), we have[][],𝐴(𝑍)𝑏𝐵(𝑌)𝑑𝐷(𝑌,𝜇)=𝐴(𝑌)𝑏𝐵(𝑍)𝑑𝐷(𝑍,𝜇)(3.4) that is,𝐴(𝑍)𝐸(𝑌)=𝐴(𝑌)𝐸(𝑍),(3.5) where 𝐸(𝑌)=𝑔(𝑌,𝜎)=𝑏𝐵(𝑌)𝑑𝐷(𝑌,𝜇) for all 𝑌. From (3.5), we may conclude that the two vector fields 𝜌 and 𝜎 are codirectional, provided 𝐸0.

If 𝐸(𝑌)=0, then we have𝑏𝐷(𝑌,𝜇)=𝑑𝑏𝐵(𝑌)=𝑑𝑔(𝑌,𝜇)since𝛿0,(3.6) which implies that 𝑏/𝑑 is an eigenvalue of the tensor 𝐷 corresponding to the eigenvector 𝜎. Thus, we have the following result.

Theorem 3.1. Let a manifold 𝑀 be a 𝑊2-flat 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛(𝑛>2) such that 𝑏/𝑑 is not an eigenvalue of the tensor 𝐷 corresponding to the eigenvector 𝜎 defined by 𝐸(𝑌)=𝑔(𝑌,𝜎)=𝑏𝐵(𝑌)𝑑𝐷(𝑌,𝜇), then the vector fields 𝜌 and 𝜎 corresponding to the 1-forms 𝐴 and 𝐸, respectively, are codirectional.

From (1.4), we get thatdiv𝑊21(𝑌,𝑍)𝑈=(div𝑅)(𝑌,𝑍)𝑈+2[],(𝑛1)𝑑𝑟(𝑍)𝑔(𝑌,𝑈)𝑑𝑟(𝑌)𝑔(𝑍,𝑈)(3.7) where “div” denotes the divergence.

Again, it is known that in a Riemannian manifold, we have(div𝑅)(𝑌,𝑍)𝑈=𝑌𝑆(𝑍,𝑈)𝑍𝑆(𝑌,𝑈).(3.8) Consequently, by virtue of the above relation, (3.7) takes the formdiv𝑊2(𝑌,𝑍)𝑈=𝑌𝑆(𝑍,𝑈)𝑍𝑆1(𝑌,𝑈)+2(𝑛1){𝑑𝑟(𝑍)𝑔(𝑌,𝑈)𝑑𝑟(𝑌)𝑔(𝑍,𝑈)}.(3.9) We now consider the associated scalars 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐, and 𝑑 as constants, then (2.1) yields that the scalar curvature 𝑟 is constant, and hence 𝑑𝑟(𝑋)=0 for all 𝑋. Consequently, (3.9) yieldsdiv𝑊2(𝑌,𝑍)𝑈=𝑌𝑆(𝑍,𝑈)𝑍𝑆(𝑌,𝑈).(3.10) Since 𝑎, 𝑏, 𝑐, and 𝑑 are constants, we have from (1.3) that𝑌𝑆(𝑍,𝑈)=𝑏𝑌𝐴(𝑍)𝐴(𝑈)+𝐴(𝑍)𝑌𝐴(𝑈)+𝑐𝑌𝐴(𝑍)𝐵(𝑈)+𝐴(𝑍)𝑌𝐵(+𝑈)𝑌𝐴(𝑈)𝐵(𝑍)+𝐴(𝑈)𝑌𝐵(𝑍)+𝑑𝑌𝐷(𝑍,𝑈).(3.11) We now assume that the structure tensor 𝐷 of such as 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛 is of Codazzi type [37], then for all vector fields 𝑌, 𝑍, and 𝑈, we have𝑌𝐷(𝑍,𝑈)=𝑍𝐷(𝑌,𝑈).(3.12) By virtue of (3.11) and (3.12), (3.10) yieldsdiv𝑊2(𝑌,𝑍)𝑈=𝑏𝑌𝐴(𝑍)𝐴(𝑈)+𝐴(𝑍)𝑌𝐴(𝑈)𝑍𝐴(𝑌)𝐴(𝑈)𝐴(𝑌)𝑍𝐴(𝑈)+𝑐𝑌𝐴(𝑍)𝐵(𝑈)+𝐴(𝑍)𝑌𝐵+(𝑈)𝑌𝐴(𝑈)𝐵(𝑍)+𝐴(𝑈)𝑌𝐵(𝑍)𝑍𝐴(𝑌)𝐵(𝑈)𝐴(𝑌)𝑍𝐵(𝑈)𝑍𝐴(𝑈)𝐵(𝑌)𝐴(𝑈)𝑍𝐵(.𝑌)(3.13) Now, if the generators 𝜌 and 𝜇 of the manifold are recurrent vector fields [38], then we have 𝑌𝜌=𝜋1(𝑌)𝜌 and 𝑌𝜇=𝜋2(𝑌)𝜇, where 𝜋1 and 𝜋2 are called the 1-forms of recurrence such that 𝜋1 and 𝜋2 are different from 𝐴 and 𝐵. Consequently, we get 𝑌𝐴(𝑍)=𝑔𝑌𝜋𝜌,𝑍=𝑔1(𝑌)𝜌,𝑍=𝜋1(𝑌)𝐴(𝑍),𝑌𝐵(𝑍)=𝑔𝑌𝜋𝜇,𝑍=𝑔2(𝑌)𝜌,𝑍=𝜋2(𝑌)𝐵(𝑍).(3.14) In view of (3.14), (3.13) turns intodiv𝑊2(𝑌,𝑍)𝑈=2𝑏𝜋1𝜋(𝑌)𝐴(𝑍)𝐴(𝑈)+𝑐1(𝑌)+𝜋2({𝜋𝑌)𝐴(𝑍)𝐵(𝑈)+𝐴(𝑈)𝐵(𝑍)}1(𝑍)+𝜋2.(𝑍){𝐴(𝑌)𝐵(𝑈)+𝐴(𝑈)𝐵(𝑌)}(3.15) Since 𝑔(𝜌,𝜌)=𝑔(𝜇,𝜇)=1, it follows that (𝑌𝐴)(𝜌)=𝑔(𝑌𝜌,𝜌)=0, and hence (3.14) reduces to 𝜋1(𝑌)=0 for all 𝑌. Similarly, we have 𝜋2(𝑌)=0. Hence, from (3.15), we have (div𝑊2)(𝑌,𝑍)𝑈=0, that is, the manifold under consideration is 𝑊2-conservative [39]. Hence, we can state the following.

Theorem 3.2. Suppose that a manifold 𝑀 is an 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛(𝑛>2) such that associated scalars are constants and the structure tensor is of Codazzi type. If the generators 𝜌 and 𝜇 corresponding to the associated 1-forms 𝐴 and 𝐵 are not being the 1-forms of recurrences, then the manifold is 𝑊2-conservative.

4. Totally Umbilical Hypersurfaces of 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛

Let (𝑉,𝑔) be an (𝑛+1)-dimensional Riemannian manifold covered by a system of coordinate neighbourhoods {𝑈,𝑦𝛼}. Let (𝑉,𝑔) be a hypersurface of (𝑉,𝑔) defined in a locally coordinate system by means of a system of parametric equation 𝑦𝛼=𝑦𝛼(𝑥𝑖), where Greek indices take values 1,2,,𝑛+1 and Latin indices take values 1,2,,𝑛. Let 𝑁𝛼 be the components of a local unit normal to (𝑉,𝑔), then we have𝑔𝑖𝑗=𝑔𝛼𝛽𝑦𝛼𝑖𝑦𝛽𝑗,𝑔𝛼𝛽𝑁𝛼𝑦𝛽𝑗=0,𝑔𝛼𝛽𝑁𝛼𝑁𝛽𝑦=𝑒=1,𝛼𝑖𝑦𝛽𝑗𝑔𝑖𝑗=𝑔𝛼𝛽𝑁𝛼𝑁𝛽,𝑦𝛼𝑖=𝜕𝑦𝛼𝜕𝑥𝑖.(4.1) The hypersurface (𝑉,𝑔) is called a totally umbilical hypersurface [40, 41] of (𝑉,𝑔) if its second fundamental form Ω𝑖𝑗 satisfiesΩ𝑖𝑗=𝐻𝑔𝑖𝑗,𝑦𝛼𝑖,𝑗=𝑔𝑖𝑗𝐻𝑁𝛼,(4.2) where the scalar function 𝐻 is called the mean curvature of (𝑉,𝑔) given by 𝑔𝐻=(1/𝑛)𝑖𝑗Ω𝑖𝑗. If, in particular, 𝐻=0, that is,Ω𝑖𝑗=0,(4.3) then the totally umbilical hypersurface is called a totally geodesic hypersurface of (𝑉,𝑔).

The equation of Weingarten for (𝑉,𝑔) can be written as 𝑁𝛼,𝑗=(𝐻/𝑛)𝑦𝛼𝑗. The structure equations of Gauss and Codazzi [40, 41] for (𝑉,𝑔) and (𝑉,𝑔) are, respectively, given by𝑅𝑖𝑗𝑘𝑙=𝑅𝛼𝛽𝛾𝛿𝐹𝛼𝛽𝛾𝛿𝑖𝑗𝑘𝑙+𝐻2𝐺𝑖𝑗𝑘𝑙,𝑅𝛼𝛽𝛾𝛿𝐹𝛼𝛽𝛾𝑖𝑗𝑘𝑁𝛿=𝐻,𝑖𝑔𝑗𝑘𝐻,𝑗𝑔𝑖𝑘,(4.4) where 𝑅𝑖𝑗𝑘𝑙 and 𝑅𝛼𝛽𝛾𝛿 are curvature tensors of (𝑉,𝑔) and (𝑉,𝑔), respectively, and𝐹𝛼𝛽𝛾𝛿𝑖𝑗𝑘𝑙=𝐹𝛼𝑖𝐹𝛽𝑗𝐹𝛾𝑘𝐹𝛿𝑙,𝐹𝛼𝑖=𝑦𝛼𝑖,𝐺𝑖𝑗𝑘𝑙=𝑔𝑖𝑙𝑔𝑗𝑘𝑔𝑖𝑘𝑔𝑗𝑙.(4.5) Also we have [40, 41]𝑆𝛼𝛿𝐹𝛼𝑖𝐹𝛿𝑗=𝑆𝑖𝑗(𝑛1)𝐻2𝑔𝑖𝑗,(4.6)𝑆𝛼𝛿𝑁𝛼𝐹𝛿𝑖=(𝑛1)𝐻,𝑖,(4.7)𝑟=𝑟𝑛(𝑛1)𝐻2,(4.8) where 𝑆𝑖𝑗 and 𝑆𝛼𝛿 are the Ricci tensors of (𝑉,𝑔) and (𝑉,𝑔), respectively, and 𝑟 and 𝑟 are the scalar curvatures of (𝑉,𝑔) and (𝑉,𝑔), respectively.

In terms of local coordinates, the relation (1.3) can be written as𝑆𝑖𝑗=𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑗+𝑏𝐴𝑖𝐴𝑗𝐴+𝑐𝑖𝐵𝑗+𝐴𝑗𝐵𝑖+𝑑𝐷𝑖𝑗.(4.9) Let (𝑉,𝑔) be an 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛+1, then we get𝑆𝛼𝛽=𝑎𝑔𝛼𝛽+𝑏𝐴𝛼𝐴𝛽𝐴+𝑐𝛼𝐵𝛽+𝐴𝛽𝐵𝛼+𝑑𝐷𝛼𝛽.(4.10) Multiplying both sides of (4.10) by 𝐹𝛼𝛽𝑖𝑗 and then using (4.6) and (4.9), we obtain 𝐻=0, which implies that the hypersurface is a totally geodesic hypersurface.

Conversely, we now consider that the hypersurface (𝑉,𝑔) is totally geodesic hypersurface, that is,𝐻=0.(4.11) In view of (4.11), (4.6) yields𝑆𝛼𝛿𝐹𝛼𝑖𝐹𝛿𝑗=𝑆𝑖𝑗.(4.12) Using (4.12) in (4.10), we have the relation (4.9). Thus, we can state the following.

Theorem 4.1. The totally umbilical hypersurface of an 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛+1 is an 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛 if and only if the hypersurface is a totally geodesic hypersurface.

Note that the theorem is a statement on the hypersurface based on the restrictions of the associated scalars and 1-forms coming from the manifold.

5. Example of a Super Quasi-Einstein Manifold

This section deals with a nontrivial example of 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)4.

Example 5.1. We define a Riemannian metric 𝑔 on 4 by the formula 𝑑𝑠2=𝑔𝑖𝑗𝑑𝑥𝑖𝑑𝑥𝑗=𝑑𝑥12+𝑒𝑥1𝑒𝑥2𝑑𝑥22+𝑒𝑥3𝑑𝑥32+𝑒𝑥4𝑑𝑥42,(𝑖,𝑗=1,2,3,4).(5.1)

Then, the only nonvanishing components of the Christoffel symbols, the curvature tensor, the Ricci tensor, and the scalar curvature are given byΓ1221=2𝑒𝑥1+𝑥2,Γ1331=2𝑒𝑥1+𝑥3,Γ1441=2𝑒𝑥1+𝑥4,Γ222=12=Γ333=Γ444=Γ212=Γ313=Γ414,𝑅1221=14𝑒𝑥1+𝑥2,𝑅1331=14𝑒𝑥1+𝑥3,𝑅1441=12𝑒𝑥1+𝑥4,𝑅2332=14𝑒2𝑥1+𝑥2+𝑥3,𝑅2442=14𝑒2𝑥1+𝑥2+𝑥4,𝑅3443=14𝑒2𝑥1+𝑥3+𝑥4,𝑆11=34,𝑆22=34𝑒𝑥1+𝑥2,𝑆33=34𝑒𝑥1+𝑥3,𝑆44=34𝑒𝑥1+𝑥4,𝑟=3(5.2) and the components which can be obtained from these by the symmetry properties. Therefore, 4 is a Riemannian manifold (𝑀4,𝑔) of nonvanishing scalar curvature. We will now show that 𝑀4 is an 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)4, that is, it satisfies (1.3). Let us now consider the associated scalars as follows:3𝑎=4,𝑏=2𝑒𝑥1,𝑐=𝑒𝑥1+𝑥31,𝑑=2𝑒𝑥4.(5.3) In terms of local coordinate system, let us consider the 1-forms 𝐴 and 𝐵 and the structure tensor 𝐷 as follows:𝐴𝑖1(𝑥)=21for𝑖=1,𝑒𝑥1𝐵for𝑖=2,0otherwise,𝑖1(𝑥)=𝑒𝑥31for𝑖=1,𝑒𝑥1𝐷for𝑖=3,0otherwise,𝑖𝑗𝑒(𝑥)=𝑥1+𝑥4for𝑖=𝑗=1,4𝑒𝑥4for𝑖=𝑗=2,𝑒𝑥3+𝑥4for𝑖=1,𝑗=3,2𝑒𝑥3+𝑥4𝑒𝑥1for𝑖=2,𝑗=3,0otherwise.(5.4) In terms of local coordinate system, the defining condition (1.3) of an 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)𝑛 can be written as𝑆𝑖𝑗=𝑎𝑔𝑖𝑗+𝑏𝐴𝑖𝐴𝑗𝐴+𝑐𝑖𝐵𝑗+𝐴𝑗𝐵𝑖+𝑑𝐷𝑖𝑗,𝑖,𝑗=1,2,3,4.(5.5) By virtue of (5.3) and (5.4), it can be easily shown that the relation (5.5) holds for 𝑖,𝑗=1,2,3,4. Therefore, (𝑀4,𝑔) is an 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)4, which is neither quasi-Einstein nor generalized quasi-Einstein. Hence, we can state the following.

Theorem 5.2. Let (𝑀4,𝑔) be a Riemannian manifold endowed with the metric given in (5.1), then (𝑀4,𝑔) is an 𝑆(𝑄𝐸)4 with nonvanishing scalar curvature which is neither quasi-Einstein nor generalized quasi-Einstein.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the referees and editors for their comments and suggestions. This work was funded by the Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology, Japan.