International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 342738 |

Amit Pramanik, Manabendra Saha, Sanjay Bhar, "“On-Water” Catalyst-Free Ecofriendly Synthesis of the Hantzsch Dihydropyridines", International Scholarly Research Notices, vol. 2012, Article ID 342738, 7 pages, 2012.

“On-Water” Catalyst-Free Ecofriendly Synthesis of the Hantzsch Dihydropyridines

Academic Editor: G. Giambastiani
Received05 Apr 2012
Accepted13 May 2012
Published12 Aug 2012


An eco-friendly “on-water” protocol for efficient catalyst-free synthesis of the Hantzsch dihydropyridines from aryl, heteroaryl, alkyl, and vinylogous aldehydes has been developed with minimum auxiliary substances, toxic reagents, organic solvents, and disposal problems.

1. Introduction

4-Substituted 1,4-dihydropyridine framework has emerged as one of the most prolific chemotypes in the recent computational analysis of medicinal chemistry database due to its multifarious pharmaceutical applications. They serve as important analogues of NADH coenzymes [1] exhibiting neuroprotectant [2] and platelet anticoagulatory activity [3]. These compounds often act as cerebral anti-ischemic [3] agents in the treatments of Alzheimer’s disease and as chemosensitizers [4] in tumour therapy. Due to their high efficiency as Ca2+ channel blockers, the Hantzsch dihydropyridines also find immense applications in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders and hypertension [5]. 1,4-Dihydropyridine skeleton is also present in many vasodilator, bronchodilator, antiatherosclerotic, antitumor, antidiabetic, geroprotective, and hepatoprotective agents. Moreover, these compounds serve as important synthetic intermediates [6, 7] for the preparation of various pyridine derivatives through oxidative aromatization sequences. A number of synthetic protocols for the construction of the dihydropyridine skeleton are available in the literature using ammonia [8], refluxing ammonium hydroxide in a closed vessel microwave synthesizer [9], urea-silica gel [10], ammonium acetate in ethanol under microwave irradiation [11], ammonium hydroxide in ethanol [12], 2,4,6-trichloro-1,3,5-triazine [13], magnesium nitride [14] in water at an elevated temperature in a sealed vessel using stoichiometric excess of organic reactants, and many others. Many of the aforesaid protocols use expensive and toxic reagents (often in excess amounts than required for reaction stoichiometry), have complicated reaction setup, require long reaction times, and form byproducts due to various side reactions. Often these reactions are performed in various organic solvents posing a serious threat of fire hazard, especially when they are carried out under microwave irradiation. Several solvent-free protocols [10] have been developed using supported reagents, but still they require toxic organic solvents during product isolation. Also the disposal of the left-over inorganic supports remains problematic [10] which causes perturbation in the environment. In recent times, ammonium acetate has been judiciously utilized [15, 16] as a convenient source of ammonia during the construction of various important heterocyclic skeletons. Its application for the synthesis of 1,4-dihydropyridines in combination with various reagents like trimethylsilyl iodide [17], tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate in diethylene glycol [18], baker’s yeast [19], p-toluenesulfonic acid-sodium dodecyl sulphate [20], phenylboronic acid [21], triphenylphosphine [22], and many others has been reported. Many of the aforesaid protocols have limited applicability to a few specific simple aliphatic aldehydes [19] and mostly aryl aldehydes [17, 18, 21, 22] exclusively. Moreover, the aforesaid protocols have some drawbacks in terms of lack of reproducibility, formation of considerable amount of byproducts, use of auxiliary reagents (as promoters) involving separation procedures [17, 18, 21, 22], utilization of inorganic support [18] causing disposal issues, and substantial involvement of organic solvents [1722] for the isolation and purification of the products through their separation from the auxiliary reagents. Therefore, a better alternative for the synthesis of 1,4-dihydropyridine skeleton in an ecologically benign medium preventing waste [23] and avoiding auxiliary substances [23] is always in great demand in order to improve environmental performance.

2. Results and Discussion

Water is the most abundant environmentally friendly solvent in nature and works as a unique solvent for biochemical processes. Water is also a desirable solvent for in vitro chemical reactions from the standpoint of cost and safety. Study of various organic reactions in aqueous medium has emerged as an important arena of contemporary research [2430]. After the pioneering paper by Sharpless and co-workers [31], numerous synthetic applications of “on-water” reactions have been reported [3135]. As a part of our ongoing endeavour to develop cost-effective ecofriendly methodology for the construction of important molecular frameworks, we report herein ammonium acetate-mediated catalyst-free “on-water” protocol (Scheme 1) for the synthesis of Hantzsch dihydropyridines bearing various substituents at the 4-position.


Detailed results are presented in Table 1 (relevant reference(s) of the known products are shown in the parenthesis after the literature melting point of the respective product).

Entrya RCHO Time (min) Isolated yield of dihydropyridine (%)Observed M.p. ( C )Literature M.p. ( C )

1342738.table.001a 70 89 155 157 [10]
2342738.table.001b 75 91 139 140 [11]
3342738.table.001c 65 89 136 135–137 [22]
4342738.table.001d 75 80 229-230 230–232 [21]
5342738.table.001e 65 93 145 146 [10]
6342738.table.001f 65 96 125 126 [10]
7342738.table.001g 12092 163 163 [10]
8342738.table.001h 90 84 129 129 [11]
9342738.table.001i 9085162-163 163 [10]
10342738.table.001j 90 80 192-193 192–194 [46]
11342738.table.001k 70 89 145-146147 [10]
12342738.table.001l 80 86 142
13342738.table.001m 150b 70 Viscous oil
14342738.table.001n 180c 75 182 183 [36]
15342738.table.001o 120b 71 Viscous oil [10, 13]

aAldehyde : EAA : ammonium acetate = 1 : 2 : 1.3.
bReactions in water : ethanol = 1 : 1.
cReaction temperature = 30 C .

According to the Table 1, several alkyl, aryl, and heteroaryl aldehydes smoothly underwent rapid “on-water” multicomponent condensation with ethyl acetoacetate and ammonium acetate to accomplish diversely substituted functionally important Hantzsch dihydropyridines in good yield and purity. Aryl aldehydes with electron-donating and electron-withdrawing substituents at various positions furnished the corresponding products without affecting the substituents and the substitution patterns (entries 1–8). Highly vulnerable thermolabile heteroaryl aldehydes also underwent the multicomponent transformation preferentially over thermal polymerization (entries 9 and 10). Interestingly, the 𝛼 , 𝛽 -unsaturated aryl aldehydes underwent clean transformation (entries 11 and 12) without polymerization and other usual side reactions. The analogous 𝛼 , 𝛽 -unsaturated alkyl aldehyde (entry 13) and long-chain saturated alkyl aldehyde (entry 15) reacted better in 1 : 1 ethanol-water and furnished the respective products in moderate yield. Paraformaldehyde, a solid synthetic equivalent of formaldehyde, produced the 4-unsubstituted dihydropyridine (diludine) in good yield (entry 14) under “on-water” condition. This compound has important applications in metal-free transfer hydrogenation reactions [36]. It shows antioxidant activity in 𝛽 -carotene-methyl linoleate, sunflower oil, and emulsion [37] and acts as inhibitor of peroxidation of egg yolk lecithin liposome [38]. So the reported method can be utilized for the rapid and efficient synthesis of the Hantzsch dihydropyridine skeletons with a wide range of structural diversity from appropriate aldehydes. The reactions showed excellent chemoselectivity towards aldehydes. This was evident from the fact that the keto moiety remained totally unaffected in an intramolecular competition experiment (Scheme 2).


It is important to note that the byproducts of this reaction (water and acetic acid) are environment benign compared to those of many alternative procedures. The aforesaid protocol completely eliminates the inorganic support and toxic and flammable organic solvents as reaction medium, uses water as the ecologically most accepted reaction medium, and utilizes ecocompatible organic solvent, namely, ethanol, in small amount during workup in most of the cases. Moreover, unlike the previous procedures [1722], the present “on-water” protocol does not require any auxiliary reagent as catalyst. Therefore, separation of the product from the auxiliary substance and subsequent purification is totally eliminated. This simplifies the entire procedure making it more cost effective. Also the problem of disposal of the leftover auxiliary is totally eliminated. The pH of the water left after isolation of the product was found to be 5.86. 30 mL of this water, after evaporation, produced 31 mg of residue, mainly consisting of unreacted ammonium acetate. This water was boiled with charcoal, and the pH was found to be 5.90. After evaporation of 40 mL of charcoalized water, 29 mg of residue was left.

Although 1 : 1 ethanol-water combination gave better results with alkyl (conjugated and saturated) aldehydes (entries 13 and 15 in Table 1), yet the majority of the reactions involving poorly water-miscible aryl and vinylogous aryl aldehydes (entries 1 to 12 in Table 1) smoothly occurred under “on-water” condition. It is important to note that the reactions with aryl aldehydes in the presence of ammonium acetate did not work well in 1 : 1 ethanol-water combination and produced numerous unidentified byproducts with very little formation of the desired dihydropyridines (as evident from the TLC and NMR analyses). Therefore, water comes out as the better alternative to 1 : 1 ethanol-water combination. There are reports [39, 40] for the preparation of 4-unsubstituted dihydropyridine (diludine) in refluxing aqueous ethanol (1 : 1) where liquor ammonia and formalin (aqueous solution of formaldehyde) reacted with ethyl acetoacetate and the product was obtained in modest yield (40–60%). It is important to note that, in the present protocol, the aforesaid compound was prepared with better yield (75%) through the reaction of ammonium acetate and paraformaldehyde (a solid synthetic equivalent of formaldehyde) with ethyl acetoacetate under “on-water” condition at room temperature without any cosolvent like ethanol. Moreover, the reported processes [39, 40] utilize liquor ammonia and formalin as the reagents. From the standpoints of safety, toxicity, and ecocompatibility, ammonium acetate (a noncorrosive stable solid source of ammonia having toxicity parameters IPR-RAT LD50 632 mg kg−1; IPR-MUS LD50 736 mg kg−1 [41]) is more acceptable than liquor ammonia (corrosive, lachrymatory, destructive to mucous membrane, dangerous to environment, and toxic to aquatic organism having toxicity parameters IHL-HMN TCLO 5000 ppm/5 m; IHL-RAT LC50 1000 ppm/4 h; IHL-MUS LC50 4230 ppm/1 h for ammonia [42] and ORL-RAT LD50 350 mg kg−1; ORL-MAN LDLO 43 mg kg−1; IHL-HMN LCLO 5000 ppm for ammonium hydroxide [43]). Similarly, paraformaldehyde (a solid equivalent of formaldehyde having toxicity parameters ORL-RAT LD50 800 mg kg−1; IHL-RAT LC50 1070 mg/m3/4 h [44]) is a less toxic and ecologically more compatible alternative of formalin (37% aq. solution of formaldehyde which is extremely lachrymatory and destructive to mucous membranes, upper respiratory tract, eyes, kidneys, and skin and causes heritable genetic damage having toxicity parameters IHL-TCLO HMN 17 mg/m3/30 m; ORL-WMN LDLO 108 mg kg−1; IPR-MUS LDLO 16 mg kg−1; ORL-RAT LD50 100 mg kg−1; SKN-RBT LD50 270 mg kg−1 [45]). Therefore, it is obvious that the present protocol provides a better and more ecofriendly method for the preparation of diludine in comparison to the reported ones [39, 40] where ammonia and formalin are used in 1 : 1 ethanol-water. Although the reactions of alkyl (conjugated and saturated) aldehydes (entries 13 and 15 in Table 1) in the present method works better in 1 : 1 ethanol-water, yet they utilize ammonium acetate as the reagent which is less toxic than ammonia. In this context, the present method bodes for a new ecocompatibility in comparison to the aforesaid reports [39, 40] where only a limited number of compounds have been synthesized. So the present ammonium acetate-mediated “on-water” protocol possesses widespread applicability, uses reagents of negligible toxicity, involves water as the most ecocompatible reaction medium, and minimizes the dispersal of undesired chemicals in the environment. From this standpoint, it can be called a green technology.

Various ammonium salts like ammonium formate, ammonium chloride, ammonium sulfate, and ammonium oxalate were totally unsatisfactory because they took much longer time for complete consumption of the substrates, but the reaction mixture contained inseparable mixtures of unidentified byproducts due to various side reactions with very little formation of the desired products. Using urea as an alternative source of ammonia, the desired Hantzsch dihydropyridine was formed, but it was contaminated with substantial amount of unidentifiable byproducts. Therefore, ammonium acetate has come out as the most reliable and convenient source of ammonia in this protocol.

Several organic solvents in place of water have been attempted as the reaction medium for this catalyst-free ammonium acetate-mediated reaction (Table 2). It is obvious from Table 2 that water is the best medium for this reaction in terms of reaction outcome, selectivity, yield, and purity of the products. Therefore, the present ammonium acetate-mediated catalyst-free “on-water” protocol for the efficient construction of differently substituted Hantzsch dihydropyridines is unique of its kind and warrants the efficacy of “on-water” protocol with a step forward to improve environmental performance which is a formidable task in recent times for the synthetic organic chemists all over the globe.

SolventReaction outcome a

HexaneCrude dihydropyridine (58% yield, contaminated with a lot of unidentified byproducts)
AcetoneMixture of unidentified byproducts without any
formation of dihydropyridine
DichloromethaneMixture of unidentified byproducts without any formation of dihydropyridine
ChloroformMixture of unidentified byproducts with trace amount of dihydropyridine
Ethyl acetateCrude dihydropyridine (54% yield, contaminated with a lot of unidentified byproducts)
DMFExclusive formation of dihydropyridine (44% yield, remainder starting material)
DMSOExclusive formation of dihydropyridine (38% yield, remainder starting material)
EthanolCrude dihydropyridine (60% yield, contaminated with a lot of unidentified byproducts)
1-PropanolCrude dihydropyridine (39% yield, contaminated with a lot of unidentified byproducts)
2-PropanolCrude dihydropyridine (36% yield, contaminated with a lot of unidentified byproducts)
WaterExclusive formation of dihydropyridine (89% yield of crystallized product) without any formation of byproduct

a All the reactions were done with 4-methylbenzaldehyde : EAA : ammonium acetate = 1 : 2 : 1.3 at the boiling point of the corresponding solvent or at 70 ∘ C (whichever is lower) for 1 hr.

3. Conclusions

A novel, efficient, economically viable and ecologically compatible synthesis of structurally varied Hantzsch dihydropyridine has been accomplished using easily accessible substrates and reagents. Notable features of the present green methodology are (a) use of water as the most ecocompatible reaction medium, (b) high yield of the product with good purity, (c) complete elimination of the toxic solvents, reagents, and inorganic support, (d) avoiding the use of other auxiliary substances, (e) minimum perturbation in the surroundings in terms of disposal of byproducts and other waste products due to their minimum involvement and formation during the reaction, and (f) general applicability accommodating a variety of substitution patterns.

4. Experimental Section

4.1. General

All organic solvents used for the synthesis were purchased from SRL, India, and were distilled before use. Meting points were measured by using capillary tube and were uncorrected. IR spectra were recorded on IR instrument (Perkin Elmer) using KBr discs. 1H- and 13C-NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker-300 spectrometer (300 MHz) in CDCl3 solutions with TMS as internal reference. Mass spectrums were measured on HRMS (Qtof micro YA263). Thin-layer chromatographic separations were performed on pre coated silica gel plates (E. Merck). All solvents were distilled before use.

4.2. General Procedure

A mixture of an aldehyde (1 mmol), ethyl acetoacetate (2 mmol), and ammonium acetate (1.3 mmol) was vigorously stirred in water (2 mL) at 70°C for the stipulated period of time (Table 1) till the completion of the reaction (monitored by TLC). After completion of reaction, few drops of ethanol were added to the reaction mixture (to facilitate granulation of the products) followed by crushed ice. A solid product was obtained which was filtered, washed with water, and crystallized from aqueous ethanol, if needed. When the products were viscous oils (entries 13 and 15 in Table 1), they were isolated through extraction with an ecocompatible solvent, namely, ethyl acetate. If the amount of water was further decreased, vigorous stirring was interrupted and caused inferior reactions. The combination of neat reactants in the absence of water did not produce any product. The references of the known products have been cited in parenthesis after the literature melting points in the right column of Table 1.

4.3. Spectral Data of the Unknown Compounds
4.3.1. Diethyl 4-(4′-methoxycinnamyl)-2,6-dimethyl-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate

(Entry 12 in Table 1): 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.27 (t, 6H, 𝐽 = 6 . 6 H z ), 2.31 (s, 6H), 3.78 (s, 3H), 4.12–4.23 (m, 4H), 4.58 (d, 1H, 𝐽 = 6.3 Hz), 5.62 (s, 1H), 5.98 (dd, 1H, 𝐽 1 = 15.5 Hz, 𝐽 2 = 6 Hz), 6.18 (d, 1H, 𝐽 = 15 Hz), 6.78 (d, 2H, 𝐽 = 8.4 Hz), 7.23 (d, 2H, 𝐽 = 9 Hz); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 14.4, 19.4, 36.4, 55.2, 59.7, 101.7, 113.7, 127.3, 127.4, 129.7, 130.6, 144.6, 158.6, 167.6. HRMS observed for [M + Na]+ at 408.1787, calculated for C22H27NO5 [M + Na]+ at 408.1790.

4.3.2. Diethyl 4-(1′-propenyl)-2,6-dimethyl-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate

(Entry 13 in Table 1): 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.27 (6H, t, 𝐽 = 7 . 2  Hz), 1.60 (d, 1H, 𝐽 = 5.5 Hz), 2.29 (s, 6H), 4.09–4.27 (m, 4H), 4.38 (d, 1H, 𝐽 = 6.5 Hz), 5.32–5.37 (m, 1H); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 14.4, 17.8, 19.4, 36.0, 59.6, 102.4, 123.4, 132.9, 144.2, 167.8. HRMS observed for [M + H]+ at 294.1702, calculated for C16H23NO4 [M + H]+ at 294.1706.

4.3.3. Diethyl 4-(4′-acetylphenyl)-2,6-dimethyl-1,4-dihydropyridine-3,5-dicarboxylate

(Scheme 2): IR (KBr): 3344, 2981, 1725, 1688, 1609, 1366, 1262, 1042, 863, 668 cm−1; 1H-NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ 1.21 (t, 6H 𝐽 = 7.1 Hz), 2.32 (s, 6H), 2.54 (s, 3H), 4.04–4.11 (m, 4H), 5.04 (s, 1H), 5.91 (s, 1H), 7.37 (t, 2H, 𝐽 = 9.1 Hz,), 7.81 (dd, 2H, 𝐽 1 = 8.3 Hz, 𝐽 2 = 2.1 Hz); 13C-NMR (75 MHz, CDCl3): δ 13.5, 14.2, 19.4, 26.5, 39.9, 59.7, 103.4, 128.2, 135.1, 144.4, 153.3, 167.3, 198.04. HRMS observed for [M + Na]+ at 394.1631, calculated for C21H25NO5 [M + Na]+ at 394.1633.


A. Pramanik thanks the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, Government of India, for the Junior Research Fellowship awarded to him. Infrastructural support from the DST-FIST Programme and financial assistance from the DST-PURSE Programme at Jadavpur University are gratefully acknowledged. Authors express sincere gratitude to Mr. N. Dutta of the Indian Association for the Cultivation of Science and Mr. J. Podder of the Jadavpur University for necessary assistance. Financial support from the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi, Government of India (CSIR Grant no. 01 (2383)/10/EMR-II), towards the latter part of this investigation is also acknowledged.


  1. D. Mauzerall and F. H. Westheimer, “1-Benzyldihydronicotinamide—a model for reduced DPN,” Journal of the American Chemical Society, vol. 77, no. 8, pp. 2261–2264, 1955. View at: Google Scholar
  2. V. Klusa, “Cerebrocrast. Neuroprotectant, cognition enhancer,” Drugs of the Future, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 135–138, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  3. R. S. Kumar, A. Idhayadhulla, A. J. A. Nasser, and J. Selvin, “Synthesis and anticoagulant activity of a new series of 1,4-dihydropyridine derivatives,” European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 804–810, 2011. View at: Google Scholar
  4. R. Boer and V. Gekeler, “Chemosensitizers in tumor therapy: new compounds promise better efficacy,” Drugs of the Future, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 499–509, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  5. F. Bossert, H. Meyer, and E. Wehinger, “4-Aryldihydropyridines, a new class of highly active calcium antagonists,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 20, no. 9, pp. 762–769, 1981. View at: Google Scholar
  6. N. Nakamichi, Y. Kawashita, and M. Hayashi, “Activated carbon-promoted oxidative aromatization of Hantzsch 1,4-dihydropyridines and 1,3,5-trisubstituted pyrazolines using molecular oxygen,” Synthesis, no. 7, pp. 1015–1020, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  7. B. Han, Q. Liu, Z. Liu et al., “A metal-free catalytic aerobic aromatization of Hantzsch 1,4-dihydropyridines by N-hydroxyphthalimide,” Synlett, no. 15, pp. 2333–2334, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. A. McKillop and A. J. Boulton, “Synthesis of six-membered rings,” in Comprehensive Heterocyclic Chemistry, A. R. Katritzky and C. W. Rees, Eds., vol. 2, pp. 87–88, Pergamon Press, London, UK, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  9. L. Öhberg and J. Westman, “An efficient and fast procedure for the Hantzsch dihydropyridine synthesis under microwave conditions,” Synlett, no. 8, pp. 1296–1298, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  10. J. S. Yadav, B. V. Subba Reddy, P. Thirupati et al., “Unprecedented synthesis of Hantzsch 1,4-dihydropyridines under biginelli reaction conditions,” Synthetic Communications, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 425–430, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  11. M. Anniyappam, D. Muralidharan, and P. T. Perumal, “Synthesis of Hantzsch 1, 4-dihydropyridines under microwave irradiation,” Synthetic Communications, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 659–663, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. R. S. Varma, Advances in Green Chemistry: Chemical Syntheses Using Microwave Irradiation, AstraZeneca Research Foundation India, Bangalore, India, 2003.
  13. G. V. M. Sharma, K. L. Reddy, P. S. Lakshmi, and P. R. Krishna, “‘In situ’ generated “HCl”—an efficient catalyst for solvent-free Hantzsch reaction at room temperature: Synthesis of new dihydropyridine glycoconjugates,” Synthesis, no. 1, Article ID P05205SS, pp. 55–58, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. K. L. Bridgwood, G. E. Veitch, and S. V. Ley, “Magnesium nitride as a convenient source of ammonia: preparation of dihydropyridines,” Organic Letters, vol. 10, no. 16, pp. 3627–3629, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. B. Khalili, P. Jajarmi, B. Eftekhari-Sis, and M. M. Hashemi, “Novel one-pot, three-component synthesis of new 2-alkyl-5-aryl-(1H)-pyrrole-4-ol in water,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 73, no. 6, pp. 2090–2095, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. M. M. Heravi, S. Sadjadi, H. A. Oskooie, R. H. Shoar, and F. F. Bamoharram, “A direct oxidative route for the synthesis of pyrimidines using heteropolyacids,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 50, no. 6, pp. 662–666, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. G. Sabitha, G. S. K. K. Reddy, C. S. Reddy, and J. S. Yadav, “A novel TMSI-mediated synthesis of Hantzsch 1,4-dihydropyridines at ambient temperature,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 44, no. 21, pp. 4129–4131, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. N. Tewari, N. Dwivedi, and R. P. Tripathi, “Tetrabutylammonium hydrogen sulfate catalyzed eco-friendly and efficient synthesis of glycosyl 1,4-dihydropyridines,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 45, no. 49, pp. 9011–9014, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. J. H. Lee, “Synthesis of Hantsch 1,4-dihydropyridines by fermenting bakers' yeast,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 46, no. 43, pp. 7329–7330, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. A. Kumar and R. A. Maurya, “Efficient synthesis of Hantzsch esters and polyhydroquinoline derivatives in aqueous micelles,” Synlett, no. 6, pp. 883–885, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. A. Debache, R. Boulcina, A. Belfaitah, S. Rhouati, and B. Carboni, “One-pot synthesis of 1,4-dihydropyridines via a phenylboronic acid catalyzed Hantzsch three-component reaction,” Synlett, no. 4, pp. 509–512, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. A. Debache, W. Ghalem, R. Boulcina, A. Belfaitah, S. Rhouati, and B. Carboni, “An efficient one-step synthesis of 1,4-dihydropyridines via a triphenylphosphine-catalyzed three-component Hantzsch reaction under mild conditions,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 50, no. 37, pp. 5248–5250, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. S. Tang, R. Bourne, R. Smith, and M. Poliakoff, “The 24 principles of green engineering and green chemistry: ‘Improvements Productively’,” Green Chemistry, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 268–269, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. R. Breslow, “Hydrophobic effects on simple organic reactions in water,” Accounts of Chemical Research, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 159–164, 1991. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. J. B. F. N. Engberts and M. J. Blandamer, “Understanding organic reactions in water: from hydrophobic encounters to surfactant aggregates,” Chemical Communications, no. 18, pp. 1701–1708, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  26. S. Mecking, A. Held, and F. M. Bauers, “Aqueous catalytic polymerization of olefins,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 544–561, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. N. E. Leadbeater and M. Marco, “Rapid and amenable Suzuki coupling reaction in water using microwave and conventional heating,” Journal of Organic Chemistry, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 888–892, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. K. Yamaguchi, M. Matsushita, and N. Mizuno, “Efficient hydration of nitriles to amides in water, catalyzed by ruthenium hydroxide supported on alumina,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 43, no. 12, pp. 1576–1580, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. S. Minakata, D. Kano, Y. Oderaotoshi, and M. Komatsu, “Silica-water reaction media: its application to the formation and ring opening of aziridines,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 79–81, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. N. E. Leadbeater, “Fast, easy, clean chemistry by using water as a solvent and microwave heating: the Suzuki coupling as an illustration,” Chemical Communications, vol. 23, pp. 2881–2902, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. S. Narayan, J. Muldoon, M. G. Finn, V. V. Fokin, H. C. Kolb, and K. B. Sharpless, “‘On water’: unique reactivity of organic compounds in aqueous suspension,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 44, no. 21, pp. 3275–3279, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. H. Buchammagari, Y. Toda, M. Hirano, H. Hosono, D. Takeuchi, and K. Osakada, “Room temperature-stable electride as a synthetic organic reagent: application to pinacol coupling reaction in aqueous media,” Organic Letters, vol. 9, no. 21, pp. 4287–4289, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. N. Shapiro and A. Vigalok, “Highly efficient organic reactions “on water”, “in water”, and both,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 47, no. 15, pp. 2849–2852, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. Q.-Y. Zhang, B.-K. Liu, W.-Q. Chen, Q. Wu, and X. F. Lin, “A green protocol for synthesis of benzo-fused N,S-, N,O- and N,N-heterocycles in water,” Green Chemistry, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 972–977, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. L. D. S. Yadav, S. Singh, and V. K. Rai, “Catalyst-free, step and pot economic, efficient mercaptoacetylative cyclisation in H2O: synthesis of 3-mercaptocoumarins,” Green Chemistry, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 878–882, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. J. W. Yang, M. T. Hechavarria Fouseca, and B. List, “A metal-free transfer hydrogenation: organocatalytic conjugate reduction of α, β-unsaturated aldehydes,” Angewandte Chemie International Edition, vol. 43, no. 48, pp. 6660–6662, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  37. A. E. Abdalla, D. Tirzite, G. Tirzitis, and J. P. Roozen, “Antioxidant activity of 1,4-dihydropyridine derivatives in β-carotene-methyl linoleate, sunflower oil and emulsions,” Food Chemistry, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 189–195, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. R. A. Olek, W. Ziolkowski, J. J. Kaczor, L. Greci, J. Popinigis, and J. Antosiewicz, “Antioxidant activity of NADH and its analogue—an in vitro study,” Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 416–421, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  39. B. E. Norcross, G. Clement, and M. Weinstein, “The Hantzsch pyridine synthesis: a factorial design experiment for the introductory organic laboratory,” Journal of Chemical Education, vol. 46, no. 10, pp. 694–695, 1969. View at: Google Scholar
  40. A. P. Dicks, “A review of aqueous organic reactions for the undergraduate teaching laboratory,” Green Chemistry Letters and Reviews, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 9–21, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. Material safety data sheet,
  42. Material safety data sheet,
  43. Material safety data sheet,
  44. Material safety data sheet,
  45. Material safety data sheet,
  46. F. Tamaddon, Z. Razmi, and A. A. Jafari, “Synthesis of 3, 4-dihydropyrimidin-2(1H)-ones and 1, 4-dihydropyridines using ammonium carbonate in water,” Tetrahedron Letters, vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 1187–1189, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Amit Pramanik et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.