Table of Contents
ISRN Mathematical Analysis
Volume 2012, Article ID 384906, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/384906
Research Article

Two Different Classes of Wronskian Conditions to a (3 + 1)-Dimensional Generalized Shallow Water Equation

Department of Applied Mathematics, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Shaanxi, Xi’an 710072, China

Received 4 June 2012; Accepted 19 June 2012

Academic Editors: G. L. Karakostas and T. Ozawa

Copyright © 2012 Yaning Tang and Pengpeng Su. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Based on the Hirota bilinear method and Wronskian technique, two different classes of sufficient conditions consisting of linear partial differential equations system are presented, which guarantee that the Wronskian determinant is a solution to the corresponding Hirota bilinear equation of a (3+1)-dimensional generalized shallow water equation. Our results show that the nonlinear equation possesses rich and diverse exact solutions such as rational solutions, solitons, negatons, and positons.

1. Introduction

Wronskian formulations are a common feature for soliton equations, and it is a powerful tool to construct exact solutions to the soliton equations [14]. The resulting technique has been applied to many soliton equations such as the MKdV, NLS, derivative NLS, sine-Gordon, and other equations [510]. Within Wronskian formulations, soliton solutions, rational solutions, positons, and negatons are usually expressed as some kind of logarithmic derivatives of Wronskian-type determinants [1116].

The following (3+1)-dimensional generalized shallow water equation 𝑢𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑦3𝑢𝑥𝑥𝑢𝑦3𝑢𝑥𝑢𝑥𝑦+𝑢𝑦𝑡𝑢𝑥𝑧=0(1.1) was investigated in different ways (see, e.g., [17, 18]). In [17], soliton-typed solutions for (1.1) were constructed by a generalized tanh algorithm with symbolic computation. In [18], the traveling wave solutions of (1.1) expressed by hyperbolic, trigonometric, and rational functions were established by the 𝐺/𝐺-expansion method, where 𝐺=𝐺(𝜉) satisfies a second order linear ordinary differential equation.

Under a scale transformation 𝑥𝑥, (1.1) is reduced equivalently to 𝑢𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑦+3𝑢𝑥𝑥𝑢𝑦+3𝑢𝑥𝑢𝑥𝑦𝑢𝑦𝑡𝑢𝑥𝑧=0,(1.2) and the Cole-Hopf transformation 𝑢=2(ln𝑓)𝑥(1.3) gives the corresponding Hirota bilinear equation of (1.2) 𝐷3𝑥𝐷𝑦𝐷𝑦𝐷𝑡𝐷𝑥𝐷𝑧=𝑓𝑓𝑓𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑦𝑓𝑦𝑡𝑓𝑥𝑧𝑓𝑓𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑓𝑦3𝑓𝑥𝑥𝑦𝑓𝑥+𝑓𝑦𝑓𝑡+𝑓𝑥𝑓𝑧+3𝑓𝑥𝑥𝑓𝑥𝑦=0,(1.4) where 𝐷𝑥,𝐷𝑦,𝐷𝑧, and 𝐷𝑡 are the Hirota operators [19].

As we know, in the process of employing Wronskian technique, the main difficulty lies in looking for the linear differential conditions, which the functions in the Wronskian determinant should satisfy. Moreover, the differential conditions for the Wronskian determinant solutions of many soliton equations are not unique [5, 7, 10, 12]. In this paper, we will give two different classes of linear differential conditions for the Nth order Wronskian determinant solutions (simply, Wronskian conditions) of (1.4) based on the special structure of the Hirota bilinear form (1.4). Our results will show that (1.4) has diverse Wronskian determinant solutions under different linear differential conditions and further (1.2) will have diverse exact solutions such as rational solutions, solitons, negatons, and positons.

2. The First Class of Wronskian Conditions

The Nth order Wronskian determinant was introduced firstly by Freeman and Nimmo [1, 20]: 𝑊𝜙1,𝜙2,,𝜙𝑁=||||||=||||||||||||𝜙𝑁11(0)𝜙1(1)𝜙1(𝑁1)𝜙2(0)𝜙2(1)𝜙2(𝑁1)𝜙𝑁(0)𝜙𝑁(1)𝜙𝑁(𝑁1)||||||||||||,𝑁1,(2.1) where 𝜙𝑖(𝑗)=𝜕𝑗𝜕𝑥𝑗𝜙𝑖,0𝑗𝑁1,1𝑖𝑁.(2.2) Solutions determined by 𝑓=|𝑁1| to (1.4) are called Wronskian determinant solutions.

In this section, we present the first class of linear differential conditions for the Wronskian determinant solutions of (1.4).

Theorem 2.1. Let a set of functions 𝜙𝑖=𝜙𝑖(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑡), 1𝑖𝑁 satisfy the following linear differential conditions: 𝜙𝑖,𝑥𝑥=𝑁𝑗=1𝜆𝑖𝑗𝜙𝑗,𝜙(2.3)𝑖,𝑦=𝑛𝜙𝑖,𝑥,𝜙𝑖,𝑡=𝜙𝑖,(𝑚𝑥),𝜙𝑖,𝑧=4𝑛𝜙𝑖,𝑥𝑥𝑥+𝑛𝜙𝑖,(𝑚𝑥),(2.4) where the coefficient matrix 𝐴=(𝜆𝑖𝑗)1𝑖,𝑗𝑁 is an arbitrary real constant matrix (see [10, 12]), 𝑛 is an arbitrary nonzero constant, 𝑚 is an arbitrary positive integer, and 𝜙𝑖,(𝑚𝑥) denotes the 𝑚th order derivative of 𝜙𝑖 with respect to 𝑥. Then the Wronskian determinant 𝑓=|𝑁1| defined by (2.1) solves (1.4).

The proof of Theorem 2.1 needs the following two useful known Lemmas.

Lemma 2.2. Set 𝑎𝑗,𝑗=1,2,,𝑁 to be an N-dimensional column vector, and 𝑏𝑗,𝑗=1,2,,𝑁 to be a real nonzero constant. Then one has 𝑁𝑖=1𝑏𝑖||𝑎1,𝑎2,,𝑎𝑁||=𝑁𝑗=1||𝑎1,𝑎2,,𝑏𝑎𝑗,,𝑎𝑁||,(2.5) where 𝑏𝑎𝑗=(𝑏1𝑎1𝑗,𝑏2𝑎2𝑗,,𝑏𝑁𝑎𝑁𝑗)𝑇.

Lemma 2.3 (see [11]). Under the condition (2.3) and Lemma 2.2, the following equalities hold: ||||||𝑁1𝑁𝑖=1𝜆𝑖𝑖𝑁𝑖=1𝜆𝑖𝑖||||||=𝑁1𝑁𝑖=1𝜆𝑖𝑖||||||𝑁12=||||||+||||||𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁2,𝑁+12=||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||+||||||.𝑁1𝑁5,𝑁3,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁+1+2𝑁3,𝑁,𝑁+1𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+2𝑁2,𝑁+3(2.6)

Proof of Theorem 2.1. Under the properties of the Wronskian determinant and the conditions (2.3) and (2.4), we can compute various derivatives of the Wronskian determinant 𝑓=|𝑁1| with respect to the variables 𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑡 as follows: 𝑓𝑥=||||||𝑁2,𝑁,𝑓𝑥𝑥=||||||+||||||,𝑓𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁2,𝑁+1𝑥𝑥𝑥=||||||||||||+||||||,𝑓𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁+2𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+1𝑁2,𝑁+2𝑦||||||=𝑛𝑁2,𝑁,𝑓𝑥𝑦||||||+||||||,𝑓=𝑛𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁2,𝑁+1𝑥𝑥𝑦||||||||||||+||||||,𝑓=𝑛𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁+2𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+1𝑁2,𝑁+2𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑦||||||||||||||||||||||||+||||||,𝑓=𝑛𝑁5,𝑁3,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁+3𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁+1+2𝑁3,𝑁,𝑁+1+3𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+2𝑁2,𝑁+3𝑡𝜕=𝑚𝑓𝜕𝑥𝑚𝜕=𝑚||||||𝑁1𝜕𝑥𝑚,𝑓𝑦𝑡𝜕=𝜕𝜕𝑦𝑚||||||𝑁1𝜕𝑥𝑚𝜕=𝑛𝜕𝜕𝑥𝑚||||||𝑁1𝜕𝑥𝑚,𝑓𝑧||||||||||||+||||||𝜕=4𝑛𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+1𝑁2,𝑁+2+𝑛𝑚||||||𝑁1𝜕𝑥𝑚,𝑓𝑥𝑧||||||||||||+||||||𝜕=4𝑛𝑁5,𝑁3,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁3,𝑁,𝑁+1𝑁2,𝑁+3+𝑛𝜕𝜕𝑥𝑚||||||𝑁1𝜕𝑥𝑚.(2.7) Therefore, we can now compute that 𝑓𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑦𝑓𝑦𝑡𝑓𝑥𝑧𝑓||||||+||||||||||||+||||||||||||||||||,=3𝑛𝑁5,𝑁3,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁+1+2𝑁3,𝑁,𝑁+1𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+2𝑁2,𝑁+3𝑁1𝑓𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑓𝑦3𝑓𝑥𝑥𝑦𝑓𝑥+𝑓𝑦𝑓𝑡+𝑓𝑥𝑓𝑧||||||||||||,=12𝑛𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+1𝑁2,𝑁3𝑓𝑥𝑥𝑓𝑥𝑦||||||+||||||=3𝑛𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁2,𝑁+12||||||+||||||=3𝑛𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁2,𝑁+12||||||||||||.+12𝑛𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁2,𝑁+1(2.8) Using Lemma 2.3, we can further obtain that 𝐷3𝑥𝐷𝑦𝐷𝑦𝐷𝑡𝐷𝑥𝐷𝑧||||||||||||||||||||||||+||||||||||||𝑓𝑓=12𝑛𝑁3,𝑁,𝑁+1𝑁1𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+1𝑁2,𝑁𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁2,𝑁+1=0.(2.9) This last equality is just the Plücker relation for determinants: ||𝐵,𝐴1,𝐴2||||𝐵,𝐴3,𝐴4||||𝐵,𝐴1,𝐴3||||𝐵,𝐴2,𝐴4||+||𝐵,𝐴1,𝐴4||||𝐵,𝐴2,𝐴3||=0,(2.10) where 𝐵 denotes an 𝑁×(𝑁2) matrix, and 𝐴𝑖,1𝑖4 are four N-dimensional column vectors. Therefore, we have shown that 𝑓=|𝑁1| solve (1.4) under the conditions (2.3) and (2.4). Further, the corresponding solution to (1.2) is 𝑢=2(ln𝑓)𝑥||||||,𝑓=𝑁1.(2.11)

Remarks 1. The condition (2.4) is a generalized linear differential condition which includes many different special cases.
For example, when 𝑚=1, the condition (2.4) is reduced to 𝜙𝑖,𝑦=𝑛𝜙𝑖,𝑥,𝜙𝑖,𝑡=𝜙𝑖,𝑥,𝜙𝑖,𝑧=4𝑛𝜙𝑖,𝑥𝑥𝑥+𝑛𝜙𝑖,𝑥.(2.12) When 𝑚=2, the condition (2.4) is reduced to 𝜙𝑖,𝑦=𝑛𝜙𝑖,𝑥,𝜙𝑖,𝑡=𝜙𝑖,𝑥𝑥,𝜙𝑖,𝑧=4𝑛𝜙𝑖,𝑥𝑥𝑥+𝑛𝜙𝑖,𝑥𝑥.(2.13) When 𝑚=3, the condition (2.4) is reduced to 𝜙𝑖,𝑦=𝑛𝜙𝑖,𝑥,𝜙𝑖,𝑡=𝜙𝑖,𝑥𝑥𝑥,𝜙𝑖,𝑧=5𝑛𝜙𝑖,𝑥𝑥𝑥.(2.14)
Using the linear differential conditions (2.3) and (2.4) as well as the transformation (1.3), we can compute many exact solutions of (1.2) such as rational solutions, solitons, negatons, and positons.
As an example, in the special case of 𝑚=2 and 𝑛=1, the conditions (2.3) and (2.4) read 𝜙𝑖,𝑥𝑥=𝑁𝑗=1𝜆𝑖𝑗𝜙𝑗𝜙,𝑖=1,,𝑁,(2.15)𝑖,𝑦=𝜙𝑖,𝑥,𝜙𝑖,𝑡=𝜙𝑖,𝑥𝑥,𝜙𝑖,𝑧=4𝜙𝑖,𝑥𝑥𝑥+𝜙𝑖,𝑥𝑥.(2.16)
If we let the coefficient matrix 𝐴=(𝜆𝑖𝑗)1𝑖,𝑗𝑁 of condition (2.15) has the following form (see [1012, 16] for details), 𝜆𝐴=110𝜆220𝜆𝑁𝑁𝑁×𝑁,𝜆𝑖𝑖𝜆𝑗𝑗,,𝑖𝑗(2.17) using the same method as that in [16], we can obtain N-soliton solutions of (1.2).
For example, when 𝜆11>0,𝜆𝑖𝑖=0,𝑖=2,,𝑁, we can compute two exact 1-soliton solutions for (1.2), 𝑢1=2𝜕𝑥lncosh4𝜆3/211𝑧+𝜆11𝑧+𝜆11𝑦+𝜆11𝑥𝜆11𝑡+𝛾1=2𝜆11tanh4𝜆3/211𝑧+𝜆11𝑧+𝜆11𝑦+𝜆11𝑥𝜆11𝑡+𝛾1,𝑢(2.18)2=2𝜕𝑥lnsinh4𝜆3/211𝑧+𝜆11𝑧+𝜆11𝑦+𝜆11𝑥𝜆11𝑡+𝛾1=2𝜆11coth4𝜆3/211𝑧+𝜆11𝑧+𝜆11𝑦+𝜆11𝑥𝜆11𝑡+𝛾1,(2.19) with 𝛾1 being a constant.

3. The Second Class of Wronskian Condition

In this section, we show another linear differential condition to the Wronskian determinant solutions of (1.4).

Theorem 3.1. Let a group of functions 𝜙𝑖=𝜙𝑖(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑡),1𝑖𝑁 satisfy the following linear differential condition: 𝜙𝑖,𝑦=𝑘𝜙𝑖,𝑥𝑥,𝜙𝑖,𝑡=2𝜙𝑖,𝑥𝑥𝑥,𝜙𝑖,𝑧=3𝑘𝜙𝑖,𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑥,(3.1) where 𝑘 is an arbitrary nonzero constant. Then the Wronskian determinant 𝑓=|𝑁1| defined by (2.1) solves (1.4).

Proof. Under the properties of the Wronskian determinant and the condition (3.1), various derivatives of the Wronskian determinant 𝑓=|𝑁1| with respect to the variables 𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑡 are obtained as follows: 𝑓𝑥=||||||𝑁2,𝑁,𝑓𝑥𝑥=||||||+||||||,𝑓𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁2,𝑁+1𝑥𝑥𝑥=||||||||||||+||||||,𝑓𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁+2𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+1𝑁2,𝑁+2𝑦||||||+||||||,𝑓=𝑘𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁2,𝑁+1𝑥𝑦||||||+||||||,𝑓=𝑘𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁2,𝑁+2𝑥𝑥𝑦||||||||||||+||||||+||||||,𝑓=𝑘𝑁5,𝑁3,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁+1𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+2𝑁2,𝑁+3𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑦||||||||||||||||||+||||||||||||+||||||,𝑓=𝑘𝑁6,𝑁4,𝑁3,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁,𝑁+12𝑁5,𝑁3,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁+1𝑁3,𝑁,𝑁+2+2𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+3𝑁2,𝑁+4𝑡||||||||||||+||||||,𝑓=2𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+1𝑁2,𝑁+2𝑦𝑡||||||||||||+||||||+||||||||||||+||||||,𝑓=2𝑘𝑁6,𝑁4,𝑁3,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁,𝑁+1𝑁5,𝑁3,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁+1𝑁3,𝑁,𝑁+2𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+3𝑁2,𝑁+4𝑧||||||+||||||||||||+||||||,𝑓=3𝑘𝑁5,𝑁3,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁+1𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+2𝑁2,𝑁+3𝑥𝑧||||||+||||||||||||+||||||.=3𝑘𝑁6,𝑁4,𝑁3,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁,𝑁+1𝑁3,𝑁,𝑁+2𝑁2,𝑁+4(3.2) Therefore, we can now compute that 𝑓𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑦𝑓𝑦𝑡𝑓𝑥𝑧||||||+||||||||||||,𝑓=6𝑘𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁,𝑁+1𝑁3,𝑁,𝑁+2𝑁13𝑓𝑥𝑥𝑦𝑓𝑥+𝑓𝑥𝑓𝑧||||||||||||||||||,=6𝑘𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁+1𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+2𝑁2,𝑁𝑓𝑥𝑥𝑥𝑓𝑦+𝑓𝑦𝑓𝑡+3𝑓𝑥𝑥𝑓𝑥𝑦||||||||||||+||||||||||||,=6𝑘𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁2,𝑁+1𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁2,𝑁+2(3.3) then, substituting the above results into (1.4), we can further obtain that 𝐷3𝑥𝐷𝑦𝐷𝑦𝐷𝑡𝐷𝑥𝐷𝑧𝐴𝑓𝑓=6𝑘1+𝐴2,(3.4) where 𝐴1||||||||||||+||||||||||||||||||||||||=||||||||||||||||||||||||+||||||||||||,𝐴=𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁,𝑁+1𝑁1𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁+1𝑁2,𝑁𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁2,𝑁+1𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁3,𝑁1𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁,𝑁+1𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁3,𝑁𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁+1𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁3,𝑁+1𝑁4,𝑁2,𝑁1,𝑁2=||||||||||||||||||||||||+||||||||||||=||||||||||||||||||||||||+||||||||||||.𝑁3,𝑁,𝑁+2𝑁1𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+2𝑁2,𝑁𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁𝑁2,𝑁+2𝑁3,𝑁,𝑁+2𝑁3,𝑁2,𝑁1𝑁3,𝑁2,𝑁𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁+2𝑁3,𝑁2,𝑁+2𝑁3,𝑁1,𝑁(3.5) From (3.5), it is easy to see that the above expression (3.4) is nothing but zero because they both satisfy the Plücker relation (2.10). Therefore, we have shown that 𝑓=|𝑁1| also solve (1.4) under the condition (3.1).
The condition (3.1) has an exponential-type function solution: 𝜙𝑖=𝑝𝑗=1𝑑𝑖𝑗𝑒𝜂𝑖𝑗,𝜂𝑖𝑗=𝑙𝑖𝑗𝑥+𝑘𝑙2𝑖𝑗𝑦+3𝑘𝑙4𝑖𝑗𝑧2𝑙3𝑖𝑗𝑡,𝑖=1,2,,𝑁,(3.6) where 𝑑𝑖𝑗 and 𝑙𝑖𝑗 are free parameters and 𝑝 is an arbitrary natural number.
In particular, we can have the following Wronskian solutions of (1.2): 𝑢=2(ln𝑓)𝑥𝜙,𝑓=𝑊1,𝜙2,,𝜙𝑁,(3.7) where 𝜙𝑖=𝑒𝑙𝑖𝑥+𝑘𝑙2𝑖𝑦+3𝑘𝑙4𝑖𝑧2𝑙3𝑖𝑡+𝑒𝑤𝑖𝑥+𝑘𝑤2𝑖𝑦+3𝑘𝑤4𝑖𝑧2𝑤3𝑖𝑡,𝑖=1,,𝑁,(3.8) with 𝑙𝑖 and 𝑤𝑖 being free parameters.

4. Conclusions and Remarks

In summary, we have established two different kinds of linear differential conditions for the Wronskian determinant solutions of the (3+1)-dimensional generalized shallow water equation (1.1) or equivalently (1.2). Especially, the first Wronskian conditions are generalized linear differential conditions which include many different special cases. Our results show that the nonlinear equation (1.1) carry rich and diverse Wronskian determinant solutions.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Science Foundation of China (under Grant nos. 11172233, 11102156, and 11002110) and Northwestern Polytechnical University Foundation for Fundamental Research (no. GBKY1034).

References

  1. N. C. Freeman and J. J. C. Nimmo, “Soliton solutions of the Korteweg-de Vries and Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equations: the Wronskian technique,” Physics Letters A, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 1–3, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  2. V. B. Matveev, “Positon-positon and soliton-positon collisions: KdV case,” Physics Letters A, vol. 166, no. 3-4, pp. 209–212, 1992. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  3. W.-X. Ma, “Wronskians, generalized Wronskians and solutions to the Korteweg-de Vries equation,” Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 163–170, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  4. W.-X. Ma and K.-i. Maruno, “Complexiton solutions of the Toda lattice equation,” Physica A, vol. 343, no. 1–4, pp. 219–237, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  5. X. Geng and Y. Ma, “N-soliton solution and its Wronskian form of a (3+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equation,” Physics Letters A, vol. 369, no. 4, pp. 285–289, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  6. Z. Yan, “Multiple solution profiles to the higher-dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvilli equations via Wronskian determinant,” Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 951–957, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  7. J. Wu, “N-soliton solution, generalized double Wronskian determinant solution and rational solution for a (2+1)-dimensional nonlinear evolution equation,” Physics Letters A, vol. 373, no. 1, pp. 83–88, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  8. J. Ji, “The double Wronskian solutions of a non-isospectral Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation,” Physics Letters A, vol. 372, no. 39, pp. 6074–6081, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  9. Y. Zhang, Y.-N. Lv, L.-Y. Ye, and H.-Q. Zhao, “The exact solutions to the complex KdV equation,” Physics Letters A, vol. 367, no. 6, pp. 465–472, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  10. C.-X. Li, W.-X. Ma, X.-J. Liu, and Y.-B. Zeng, “Wronskian solutions of the Boussinesq equation–-solitons, negatons, positons and complexitons,” Inverse Problems, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 279–296, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  11. W.-X. Ma and Y. You, “Solving the Korteweg-de Vries equation by its bilinear form: Wronskian solutions,” Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 357, no. 5, pp. 1753–1778, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  12. W.-X. Ma, C.-X. Li, and J. He, “A second Wronskian formulation of the Boussinesq equation,” Nonlinear Analysis A, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 4245–4258, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  13. W.-X. Ma, “Wronskian solutions to integrable equations,” Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems A, pp. 506–515, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  14. X. Geng, “Algebraic-geometrical solutions of some multidimensional nonlinear evolution equations,” Journal of Physics A, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 2289–2303, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Zentralblatt MATH
  15. J. P. Wu, “A new Wronskian condition for a (3+1 )-dimensional nonlinear evolution equation,” Chinese Physics Letters, vol. 28, no. 5, article 050501, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  16. Y. Tang, W.-X. Ma, W. Xu, and L. Gao, “Wronskian determinant solutions of the (3+1)-dimensional Jimbo-Miwa equation,” Applied Mathematics and Computation, vol. 217, no. 21, pp. 8722–8730, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  17. B. Tian and Y. T. Gao, “Beyond traveling waves: a new algorithm for solving nonlinear evolution equations,” Computer Physics Communications, vol. 95, pp. 39–142, 1996. View at Google Scholar
  18. E.M.E. Zayed, “Traveling wave solutions for higher dimensional nonlinear evolution equations using the G/G-expansion method,” Journal of Applied Mathematics & Informatics, vol. 28, pp. 383–395, 2010. View at Google Scholar
  19. R. Hirota, The Direct Methods in Soliton Theory, vol. 155 of Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. J. J. C. Nimmo and N. C. Freeman, “A method of obtaining the N-soliton solution of the Boussinesq equation in terms of a Wronskian,” Physics Letters A, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 4–6, 1983. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar