Table of Contents
ISRN Education
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 426516, 11 pages
Research Article

Evaluating the Impact of Faculty-Embedded Tutor Training Program Factors on Perceived Future Training Needs Using Structural Equation Modeling

1Teaching and Learning Unit, Faculty of Business and Economics, The University of Melbourne, Level 5, The Spot Building, 198 Berkeley Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia
2Assessment Research Centre, Graduate School of Education, The University of Melbourne, 100 Leicester Street, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia

Received 14 December 2011; Accepted 29 December 2011

Academic Editors: M. F. Cerda and K. Y. Kuo

Copyright © 2012 Angelito Calma and Alvin Vista. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. Herbert, R. Hannam, and D. Chalmers, “Enhancing the training, support and management of sessional teaching staff,” 2003,
  2. Department of Education, Employment, and Workplace Relations, “Higher education statistics,” Novermber 2010,
  3. M. Kofod, R. Quinnell, W. Rifkin, and N. Whitaker, “Is tutor training worth it? Acknowledging conflicting agenda,” in Proceedings of the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia (HERDSA '08), pp. 202–210, 2008.
  4. J. C. Condravy, “Learning together: an interactive approach to tutor training,” in From Access to Success: A Book of Readings on College Developmental Education and Learning Assistance Programs, M. Maxwell, Ed., pp. 77–79, H & H Publishing, Clearwater, Fla, USA, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  5. P. Fullmer, “The assessment of a tutoring Program to meet CAS standards using a SWOT analysis and action plan,” Journal of College Reading and Learning, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 51–76, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  6. M. Hicks, H. Smigiel, G. Wilson, and A. Luzeckyj, “Preparing academics to teach in higher education,” November 2010,
  7. H. J. M. Van Berkel and D. H. J. M. Dolmans, “The influence of tutoring competencies on problems, group functioning and student achievement in problem-based learning,” Medical Education, vol. 40, no. 8, pp. 730–736, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  8. W. N. K. A. Van Mook, W. S. De Grave, E. Huijssen-Huisman et al., “Factors inhibiting assessment of students' professional behaviour in the tutorial group during problem-based learning,” Medical Education, vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 849–856, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  9. H. G. Schmidt and J. H. C. Moust, “What makes a tutor effective? A structural-equations modeling approach to learning in problem-based curricula,” Academic Medicine, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 708–714, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  10. S. A. Siler and K. Vanlehn, “Learning, interactional, and motivational outcomes in one-to-one synchronous computer-mediated versus face-to-face tutoring,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 73–102, 2009. View at Google Scholar
  11. R. Davis and D. Wong, “Conceptualizing and measuring the optimal experience of the eLearning environment,” Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 97–126, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  12. J. M. Serrano, T. M. Olivos, R. M. P. Parra, and R. S. L. Villanueva, “Assessment of teacher training programs in cooperative learning methods, based on analysis of structural equations,” Revista Electronica de Investigacion Educativa, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 2–30, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  13. A. Bell, “Exploring tutors' conceptions of excellent tutoring,” Teaching and Learning in (Higher) Education for Sessional Staff, vol. 1, no. 1, 2007. View at Google Scholar
  14. A. Bell and R. Mladenovic, “The benefits of peer observation of teaching for tutor development,” Higher Education, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 735–752, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. J. Randels, “Peer-tutor training: a model for Business Schools,” Journal of Business and Technical Communication, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 337–353, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  16. C. Hall, “The place of empathy in social constructionist approaches to online tutor training in higher education,” Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 33–50, 2008. View at Google Scholar
  17. S. Liebermann and S. Hoffmann, “The impact of practical relevance on training transfer: evidence from a service quality training program for German bank clerks,” International Journal of Training and Development, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 74–86, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  18. G. Hawthorne and P. Elliott, “Imputing cross-sectional missing data: comparison of common techniques,” Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 39, no. 7, pp. 583–590, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at PubMed
  19. J. L. Schafer and J. W. Graham, “Missing data: our view of the state of the art,” Psychological Methods, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 147–177, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  20. SPSS, SPSS Missing Values 17.0, SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill, USA, 2008.
  21. P. D. Allison, “Multiple imputation for missing data: a cautionary tale,” Sociological Methods and Research, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 301–309, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  22. J. Arbuckle, Amos (Version 18.0), Amos Development Corporation, Crawfordville, Fla, USA, 2009.
  23. B. M. Byrne, Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, USA, 2001.
  24. P. Holmes-Smith, Structural Equation Modeling: From the Fundamentals to Advanced Topics, School Research, Evaluation and Measurement Services, Red Hill, Australia, 2010.
  25. G. W. Cheung and R. B. Rensvold, “Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance,” Structural Equation Modeling, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 233–255, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  26. R. P. McDonald and M. H. R. Ho, “Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses,” Psychological Methods, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 64–82, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  27. G. D. Garson, “Structural Equation Modeling. Statnotes: Topics in Multivariate Analysis,” November 2009,