International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2012 / Article

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 428269 | 6 pages |

Thrombosis in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Review Article

Academic Editor: G. Murdaca
Received19 Apr 2012
Accepted20 Jun 2012
Published30 Jul 2012


Thrombosis is a well-known clinical entity in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and it is multifactorial. The most important risk factor is the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs). However, approximately 40% of adults with SLE who are negative for APL A are diagnosed with thrombosis, indicating the importance of other risk factors. Thus, the thrombosis risk factors should be evaluated extensively and regularly and treated aggressively in every patient with systemic lupus erythematosus.

1. Introduction

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease with diverse clinical manifestations that primarily affects young women. Women are affected nine times more frequently than men [1]. Of patients with SLE, 65% have disease onset between ages 16 and 55, 20% present before age 16, and 15% present after the age of 55 [2]. Estimated incidence rates in North America, South America, and Europe range from 2 to 8 per 100,000 per year [1]. Prevalence rates of SLE are estimated to be 51 per 100,000 in the United States [3], while in Saudi Arabia were estimated to be 19.28 per 100,000 population based on study done in the Al-Qaseem region [4]. Patients may be classified as having SLE if they fulfill four or more of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) classification criteria (Table 1).


Malar rashFixed erythema, flat or raised, over the malar eminences, tending to spare the nasolabial folds

Discoid rashErythematous raised patches with adherent keratotic scaling and follicular plugging; atrophic scarring occurs in older lesions

PhotosensitivitySkin rash as a result of unusual reaction to sunlight, by patient history or physician observation

Oral ulcersOral or nasopharyngeal ulceration, usually painless, observed by a physician

ArthritisNonerosive arthritis involving two or more peripheral joints, characterized by tenderness, swelling, or effusion

Serositis(a) Pleuritis—convincing history of pleuritic pain or rub heard by a physician or evidence of pleural effusion
(b) Pericarditis—documented by ECG or rub or evidence of pericardial effusion

Renal disorder(a) Persistent proteinuria > 0.5 g/day > 3+ if quantitation is not performed
(b) Cellular casts—may be red blood cell, hemoglobin, granular tubular, mixed

Neurologic disorder(a) Seizures—in the absence of offending drugs or known metabolic derangements (e.g., uremia, acidosis, or  electrolyte imbalance)
(b) Psychosis—in the absence of offending drugs or known metabolic derangements (e.g., uremia, acidosis,  or electrolyte imbalance)

Hematologic disorder(a) Hemolytic anemia with reticulocytosis
(b) Leukopenia—<4000/mm
(c) Lymphopenia—<1500/mm
(d) Thrombocytopenia—<100,000/mm in the absence of offending drugs

Immunologic disorder(a) Anti-DNA—antibody to native DNA in abnormal titer
(b) Anti-Sm—presence of antibody to Sm nuclear antigen
(c) Positive finding of antiphospholipid antibodies based on (1) abnormal serum concentration of IgG or  IgM anticardiolipin antibodies, (2) positive test result for lupus anticoagulant using a standard method,  or (3) false-positive serologic test for syphilis known to be positive for at least 6 mo and confirmed by  Treponema pallidum immobilization or fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption test

ANAAbnormal titer of ANA by immunofluorescence or equivalent assay at any point in time and in the absence of drugs known to be associated with drug-induced lupus syndrome

2. Thrombosis in SLE

Patients with SLE have an increased risk for thrombosis. Arterial and/or venous thrombosis is a well-known clinical entity in SLE, with a prevalence >10%. This prevalence may even exceed 50% in high-risk patients [5]. The incidence of thrombosis in SLE patients according to two inception cohorts was 26.8 [6] and up to 51.9 per 1000 patient-years, according to the disease duration [7]. Other study reported that the incidence of thrombosis was 36.3 per 1000 patient-years [8]. In a 10-year prospective cohort study of patients with SLE, the most frequent causes of death were active SLE (26.5%), thrombosis (26.5%), and infection (25%), with thrombosis dominating the second 5-year period of followup [9]. The age at onset of thrombosis in SLE patient is lower than that of general population which is a major concern. The incidence of thrombosis increased in the first year. Possible reasons for this early higher incidence of thrombosis could be the high levels of disease activity and circulating immune complexes, cytotoxic antibodies, or a higher inflammatory state [10].

3. Risk Factors of Thrombosis in SLE

There are several factors that increase the thrombosis risk in SLE patients. The most important risk factors are the following.

(1) Antiphospholipid Antibodies (APLAs)
Antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs) bind to plasma proteins with an affinity for phospholipids' surfaces. Most important identified antigens (ß2-glycoprotein and prothrombin) are involved in blood coagulation. Anticardiolipin antibodies (ACA) and the lupus anticoagulant (LAC) are included in classification criteria, but also anti-ß2-glycoprotein I (anti-ß2-GPI) has been confirmed to increase thrombosis risk. The prevalences of lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibodies are 28 and 42%, respectively, according to Love and Santoro review [11]. They also reported that 45% of ACA-positive patients were also LAC positive, while 59% of LAC-positive patients were also ACA positive. The risk of thrombosis in LAC/ACA patients has been examined by many authors. It appears that about one-third of all patients with LACs have had at least one thrombotic event. Among SLE patients, 42% of the LAC-positive and 40% of the ACA-positive individuals had a history of thrombosis; in contrast, the prevalence of thrombosis in LAC negative or ACA-negative SLE patients was only10–18% [11].
The antiphospholipid antibodies might be transiently positive, and to be considered significant, should be persistently positive on at least two occasions, 12 weeks apart. APLAs should be done for any patient with SLE because they considered part of ACR classification criteria for SLE not only that but also because they have associated with increased risk of thrombosis. Not all patients with APLA develop thrombosis which could be explained by different phospholipids or various binding proteins. This raised a concern about the prophylaxis which will be discussed later in this paper.
Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the pathogenic effects of these autoantibodies and their role in the development of thrombosis. They attach to the negatively charged phospholipid surface that may induce platelet activation, interfere with coagulation inhibitors such as protein-c, inhibit antithrombin and fibrinolysis, and then initiate the formation of a thrombus. It is well established that APLAs are associated with both arterial and venous thrombosis. In Large cohort studies, the lupus anticoagulant has been shown to be a significant risk factor for myocardial infarction [12] and stroke [13].
Approximately 40% of adults with SLE who are negative for APLA are diagnosed with thrombosis [14]. Thus, the precise mechanism(s) responsible for thrombosis in these patients remains unclear and indicating the role of other factors.

(2) Inflammation and Disease Activity
Inflammation may affect several steps in blood coagulation: initiation, propagation, and regulation [15]. It has been shown that inflammation induces the expression of tissue factors, an important step of the initiation of coagulation [1618]. The presence of inflammation reduces the fibrinolytic activity through upregulation of the production of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI) [19]. Further, the anticoagulant effect of the protein C pathway is impaired due to downregulation of thrombomodulin [2022] and a decrease of protein S [23]. This might explain the reason of the occurrence of thrombosis early in lupus patients as compared with non-SLE controls, with odds ratio of approximately 5–10. Lupus nephritis is one of SLE clinical features that is associated with high risk for thrombosis particularly with significant proteinuria that increases the risk of deep vein thrombosis and renal vein thrombosis mainly. Different hemostatic abnormalities have been recognized in these patients, which probably account for this hypercoagulable state [24]. Systemic hypertension and hyperlipidemia are frequent in lupus nephritis and have been associated with thrombosis. Therefore, SLE itself is considered an independent risk for thrombosis.

(3) The Other Thrombophilic Risk Factors
Protein C, protein S, and antithrombin deficiencies are rare but carry a higher risk for venous thrombosis [25]. The protein C pathway is one of the most important anticoagulant systems. Protein C is activated on endothelial cells by thrombin bound to thrombomodulin. The activated protein C (APC) exerts its anticoagulant function by proteolytic cleavage of the procoagulant protein factors Va and VIIIa [26]. The activated protein C resistance (APC-R) is defined as a decreased anticoagulant response to the protein C pathway [27]. Hereditary APC-R caused by the factor V Leiden mutation is strongly associated with an increased risk of venous thrombosis(VTE) [28, 29]. Acquired APC-R, a phenotypic APC-R that occurs in the absence of the factor V Leiden mutation, has been reported in patients with APLA [3034].
Male et al. [35] reported that the prevalence of acquired APC-R was significantly higher in LA-positive patients (50%) than in LA-negative patients (21%).
Factor V Leiden (FVL) is a point mutation in the factor V gene that results in the substitution of glycine for arginine at codon 506. This mutated factor V is activated normally by thrombin and, therefore, functions normally as a coagulation cofactor. However, the activated factor V is resistant to cleavage by activated protein C (APC), thus removing an important feedback inhibition of the clotting system, and conferring a risk of thrombosis, primarily venous thrombosis [36].
The G20210A prothrombin gene mutation—substitution of adenine for guanine at position 20,210 in the nucleotide sequence—is present in 2-3% of the population and in ~6% of unselected patients experiencing their first venous thrombosis [37]. The mutation does not affect the structure of prothrombin, but results in higher circulating levels of the protein [36].
Several studies had demonstrated that FVL and prothrombin G20210A mutation increased the risk of venous thrombosis (VTE), and the risk is even higher in presence of APLA. These factors alone increased the risk of VTE 20-fold, and in combination with APLA 30-fold, compared with the general population. Thrombophilic defects, in contrast with APLA, did not influence the risk of arterial thrombosis (ATE).
The plasma homocysteine level is an independent risk factor for atherosclerosis, arterial thrombosis, and possibly, venous thrombosis [38]. Elevated plasma homocysteine levels can occur as the result of deficiencies of vitamins B12 or B6 or folic acid, chronic renal failure, hypothyroidism, certain malignancies, drugs, and inherited enzyme abnormalities [36]. Prothrombotic activities may be attributable to either direct toxic effect on endothelium or indirect effects. Hyperhomocysteinemia is detected in around 15% of lupus patients. The prevalence of hyperhomocysteinemia is significantly higher in SLE patients with thrombosis. Raised levels of homocysteine are demonstrated in 27.3% of SLE patients with thrombosis compared to 16.9% in those without thrombosis [39].

(4) The Traditional Risk Factors
Smoking has consistently been associated with worse outcomes [4042] and the occurrence of thrombotic events in general, and venous events in particular [4345]. One possible mechanism by which smoking increases the risk of thrombotic events is by inducing endothelial damage, which results in the activation of the endothelium and the initiation of a cascade of events leading to thrombosis.
Hypertension, Diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia are not uncommon in SLE patients. These factors have been associated with thrombosis in numerous studies [46, 47].
Age has been demonstrated to be a risk factor for the occurrence of thrombotic events in SLE [48, 49]. This might be explained by the fact that older SLE patients tend to have more damage and more vascular morbidity.

(5) Drugs and Thrombosis in SLE
Glucocorticoids are commonly used for treatment of various manifestations of SLE. Glucocorticoids have been associated with thrombosis, probably mediated by endothelial damage and accelerated atherosclerosis [49, 50]. When administered in high doses, glucocorticoids have also been associated with abnormalities in the coagulation cascade.
Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is commonly prescribed antimalarial agent for SLE. It has a very reasonable safety profile and it decreases the probability of flares [51]. It has antithrombotic effect.
The antithrombotic effect is probably mediated by inhibition of platelet aggregation and adhesion, and arachidonic acid release from stimulated platelets [52]. It also decreases the thrombus size and the time of thrombus development in a dose-dependent manner [53] and inhibits the APLA-induced GPIIb/IIIa receptor expression [54]. Furthermore, it has cholesterol-lowering effects. As it reduces the risk of thrombosis as well as the disease activity, it should be started for all SLE patients.
Aspirin (ASA) inhibits the cyclooxygenase enzyme and inhibits the synthesis of thromboxane A2, a potent stimulator of platelet aggregation. Low-dose aspirin (81–100 mg) is not uncommonly used for primary thrombosis prophylaxis in high-risk patients. Among asymptomatic APLA-positive patients with SLE, primary prophylaxis with aspirin (although data are conflicting) and hydroxychloroquine appears to reduce the frequency of thrombotic events. Tektonidou et al. 2009 reported the duration of use of ASA and HCQ associated with decreased thrombosis in APLA-positive patients [55]. Tarr et al. 2007 also reported lower incidence of thrombosis in APLA-positive when given ASA prophylaxis [56]. However, Erkan et al. 2002 found that ASA was not effective in preventing thrombosis compared to placebo [57]. Therefore, there is no solid data to support the routine use of ASA for primary thromboprophylaxis. Despite that, use of low-dose aspirin has been recommended by the Expert Committee in the European League Against Rheumatism guidelines for the management of SLE [58].

4. Treatment Strategies of Thrombosis in SLE

Given the beneficial effects of antimalarial agents (HCQ) in patients with lupus, the use of HCQ is recommended for all patients unless it is contraindicated. Anticoagulants are used for the treatment of thrombotic events. Heparin (either intravenous or subcutaneous) and oral anticoagulation, warfarin, should be started together. Heparinization usually continues for 3–5 days to be sure therapeutic range of INR that has been achieved. If intravenous heparin is used, APTT will be used to monitor the response to establish effective heparinization. However, APTT might be prolonged by the presence of LAC. When the preheparinization APTT is prolonged, the thrombin time may be followed. The thrombin time reflects the conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin but is also sensitive to the presence of inhibitors that may be present in the plasma, for example, heparin. The reference range in general is 13–15 s. Therefore, it is sensitive to heparin, but is not prolonged by LACs and a reasonable approach would be to heparinize to a thrombin time of about 100–120 s [36]. The duration of treatment might be determined by the presence of APLA, site of thrombosis, recurrence, and presence of precipitating factors. Unprovoked thrombotic events, arterial events, or presence of APLA support prolonged anticoagulation therapy. Derksen et al. [59] found the probability of no recurrence in patients receiving oral anticoagulants at eight years to be 100%, whereas patients in whom anticoagulant drugs were stopped, the rate of recurrence was 50% at 2 years and 78% at 8 years of followup. The intensity of anticoagulation has been debated. Randomized controlled trials (Finazzi et al. 2005 [60]; Crowther et al. 2003 [61]) have suggested that INR levels between 2.0 and 3.0 are sufficient in uncomplicated antiphospholipid syndrome patients with only venous thrombotic events. However, for arterial thrombosis or recurrent events, high-intensity warfarin with INR > 3 is recommended [62]. Ruiz-Irastorza et al., 2007, [62] did a systematic review and found that the risk of recurrent events was higher in those with arterial than with venous thrombosis; therefore, it was recommended that patients with definite APS be treated with prolonged moderate-intensity warfarin in patients with first venous events and high-intensity warfarin for those with recurrent and/or arterial events. One of major complications of anticoagulation is bleeding. However, the risk of recurrent thrombotic events exceeds the risk of bleeding which is relatively low [60, 61].

5. Conclusions

SLE patients are at significantly high risk for thrombosis which is multifactorial. A risk-stratified approach to thrombosis risk factors is important in management of lupus. Traditional risk factors should be assessed each visit and treated rigorously. APLA should be screened in all SLE patients. Active disease particularly lupus nephritis should be treated promptly. Hydroxychloroquine has been demonstrated to reduce the disease-related morbidity and mortality and as it may reduce the thrombotic risk, it should be started for all patients unless contraindicated. The protective effect of low dose of aspirin as primary thromboprophylaxis is controversial issue. The treatment of thrombotic event is anticoagulation with target INR 2-3 for venous events and 3-4 for arterial or recurrent venous events.


The author would like to thank Dr. Dafna D. Gladman (Rheumatologist, Senior Scientist, Toronto Western Research Institute, Toronto Western Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada) for reviewing the paper.


  1. I. O. Tassiulas and D. T. Boumpas, “Clinical features and treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus,” in Textbook of Rheumatology, G. S. Firestein and W. N. Kelley, Eds., Saunders/Elsevier, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 8th edition, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  2. S. P. Ballou, M. A. Khan, and I. Kushner, “Clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus. Differences related to race and age of onset,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 55–60, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  3. R. C. Lawrence, C. G. Helmick, F. C. Arnett et al., “Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and selected musculoskeletal disorders in the United States,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 778–799, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. A. S. Al-Arfaj, S. R. Al-Balla, A. N. Al-Dalaan et al., “Prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus in central Saudi Arabia,” Saudi Medical Journal, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 87–89, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  5. A. Afeltra, M. Vadacca, L. Conti et al., “Thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus: congenital and acquired risk factors,” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 452–459, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. C. C. Mok, S. S. K. Tang, C. H. To, and M. Petri, “Incidence and risk factors of thromboembolism in systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison of three ethnic groups,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 2774–2782, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. Z. S. Sarabi, E. Chang, R. Bobba et al., “Incidence rates of arterial and venous thrombosis after diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus.,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 609–612, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  8. J. Romero-Díaz, I. García-Sosa, and J. Sánchez-Guerrero, “Thrombosis in systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune diseases of recent onset,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 68–75, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. R. Cervera, M. A. Khamashta, J. Font et al., “Morbidity and mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus during a 10-year period: a comparison of early and late manifestations in a cohort of 1,000 patients,” Medicine, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 299–308, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. K. Manger, B. Manger, R. Repp et al., “Definition of risk factors for death, end stage renal disease, and thromboembolic events in a monocentric cohort of 338 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 61, no. 12, pp. 1065–1070, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. P. E. Love and S. A. Santoro, “Antiphospholipid antibodies: anticardiolipin and the lupus anticoagulant in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and in non-SLE disorders. Prevalence and clinical significance,” Annals of Internal Medicine, vol. 112, no. 9, pp. 682–698, 1990. View at: Google Scholar
  12. M. Petri, “The lupus anticoagulant is a risk factor for myocardial infarction (but not atherosclerosis): Hopkins Lupus Cohort,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 114, no. 5-6, pp. 593–595, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. C. C. Mok, C. S. Lau, and R. W. S. Wong, “Neuropsychiatric manifestations and their clinical associations in southern Chinese patients with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 766–771, 2001. View at: Google Scholar
  14. A. Amoroso, A. P. Mitterhofer, F. Del Porto et al., “Antibodies to anionic phospholipids and anti-β2-GPI: association with thrombosis and thrombocytopenia in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Human Immunology, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 265–273, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  15. C. T. Esmon, “The impact of the inflammatory response on coagulation,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 114, no. 5-6, pp. 321–327, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. T. S. Edgington, N. Mackman, K. Brand, and W. Ruf, “The structural biology of expression and function of tissue factor,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 67–79, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  17. J. Cermak, N. S. Key, R. R. Bach, J. Balla, H. S. Jacob, and G. M. Vercellotti, “C-reactive protein induces human peripheral blood monocytes to synthesize tissue factor,” Blood, vol. 82, no. 2, pp. 513–520, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  18. C. Dosquet, D. Weill, and J. L. Wautier, “Cytokines and thrombosis,” Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. S13–S19, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  19. S. Devaraj, D. Y. Xu, and I. Jialal, “C-reactive protein increases plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression and activity in human aortic endothelial cells: implications for the metabolic syndrome and atherothrombosis.,” Circulation, vol. 107, no. 3, pp. 398–404, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  20. S. R. Lentz, M. Tsiang, and J. E. Sadler, “Regulation of thrombomodulin by tumor necrosis factor-α: comparison of transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms,” Blood, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 542–550, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  21. K. L. Moore, C. T. Esmon, and N. L. Esmon, “Tumor necrosis factor leads to the internalization and degradation of thrombomodulin from the surface of bovine aortic endothelium cells in culture,” Blood, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 159–165, 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  22. E. M. Conway and R. D. Rosenberg, “Tumor necrosis factor suppresses transcription of the thrombomodulin gene in endothelial cells,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 5588–5592, 1988. View at: Google Scholar
  23. R. Kerr, D. Stirling, and C. A. Ludlam, “Interleukin 6 and haemostasis,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 3–12, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. B. K. Mahmoodi, M. K. Ten Kate, F. Waanders et al., “High absolute risks and predictors of venous and arterial thromboembolic events in patients with nephrotic syndrome: results from a large retrospective cohort study,” Circulation, vol. 117, no. 2, pp. 224–230, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. P. Bucciarelli, F. R. Rosendaal, A. Tripodi et al., “Risk of venous thromboembolism and clinical manifestations in carriers of antithrombin, protein C, protein S deficiency, or activated protein C resistance: a multicenter collaborative family study,” Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1026–1033, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  26. D. A. Lane, P. M. Mannucci, K. A. Bauer et al., “Inherited thrombophilia: part 1,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 76, no. 5, pp. 651–662, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  27. B. Dahlback, M. Carlsson, and P. J. Svensson, “Familial thrombophilia due to a previously unrecognized mechanism characterized by poor anticoagulant response to activated protein C: prediction of a cofactor to activated protein C,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 1004–1008, 1993. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. V. De Stefano, I. Martinelli, P. M. Mannucci et al., “The risk of recurrent deep venous thrombosis among heterozygous carriers of both factor V Leiden and the G20210A prothrombin mutation,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 341, no. 11, pp. 801–806, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. I. Martinelli, P. Bucciarelli, M. Margaglione, V. De Stefano, G. Castaman, and P. M. Mannucci, “The risk of venous thromboembolism in family members with mutations in the genes of factor V or prothrombin or both,” British Journal of Haematology, vol. 111, no. 4, pp. 1223–1229, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. S. Ehrenforth, K. P. Radtke, and I. Scharrer, “Acquired activated protein C-resistance in patients with lupus anticoagulants,” Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 74, no. 2, pp. 797–798, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  31. M. Martinuzzo, R. Forastiero, Y. Adamczuk, G. Cerrato, and L. O. Carreras, “Activated protein C resistance in patients with anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies,” Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, vol. 7, no. 7, pp. 702–704, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  32. G. J. Ruiz-Argüelles, J. Garcés-Eisele, D. Alarcón-Segovia, and A. Ruiz-Argüelles, “Activated protein C resistance phenotype and genotype in patients with primary antiphospholipid syndrome,” Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 344–348, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  33. J. Aznar, P. Villa, F. España, A. Estellés, S. Grancha, and C. Falcó, “Activated protein C resistance phenotype in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies,” Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 202–208, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  34. U. Picillo, D. De Lucia, E. Palatiello et al., “Association of primary antiphospholipid syndrome with inherited activated protein C resistance,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1232–1234, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  35. C. Male, L. Mitchell, J. Julian et al., “Acquired activated protein C resistance is associated with lupus anticoagulants and thrombotic events in pediatric patients with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Blood, vol. 97, no. 4, pp. 844–849, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. S. S. Shapiro and S. E. F. Spurgeon, “Hematology: coagulation problems,” in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, R. G. Lahita, Ed., vol. 7, pp. 1144–1145, Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego, Calif, USA, 4th edition, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  37. S. R. Poort, F. R. Rosendaal, P. H. Reitsma, and R. M. Bertina, “A common genetic variation in the 3'-untranslated region of the prothrombin gene is associated with elevated plasma prothrombin levels and an increase in venous thrombosis,” Blood, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 3698–3703, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  38. M. Den Heijer and M. B. A. J. Keijzer, “Hyperhomocysteinemia as a risk factor for venous thrombosis,” Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 710–713, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. K. K. Sallai, E. Nagy, I. Bodó, A. Mohl, and P. Gergely, “Thrombosis risk in systemic lupus erythematosus: the role of thrombophilic risk factors,” Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 198–205, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. N. O. Ghaussy, W. L. Sibbitt, A. D. Bankhurst, and C. R. Qualls, “Cigarette smoking and disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1215–1221, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  41. M. M. Ward and S. Studenski, “Clinical prognostic factors in lupus nephritis: the importance of hypertension and smoking,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 152, no. 10, pp. 2082–2088, 1992. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. I. Turchin, S. Bernatsky, A. E. Clarke, Y. St-Pierre, and C. A. Pineau, “Cigarette smoking and cutaneous damage in systemic lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 36, no. 12, pp. 2691–2693, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. S. J. Jay and S. R. Kahn, “Cigarette smoking: risk factor for venous thromboembolic disease?” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 159, no. 10, p. 1144, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. S. R. Kahn, “The clinical diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis: integrating incidence, risk factors, and symptoms and signs,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 158, no. 21, pp. 2315–2323, 1998. View at: Google Scholar
  45. P. O. Hansson, H. Eriksson, L. Welin, K. Svärdsudd, and L. Wilhelmsen, “Smoking and abdominal obesity: risk factors for venous thromboembolism among middle-aged men: “The study of men born in 1913”,” Archives of Internal Medicine, vol. 159, no. 16, pp. 1886–1890, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. A. Danowski, M. N. L. De Azevedo, J. A. D. S. Papi, and M. Petri, “Determinants of risk for venous and arterial thrombosis in primary antiphospholipid syndrome and in antiphospholipid syndrome with systemic lupus erythematosus,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1195–1199, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. M. Petri, “Thrombosis and systemic lupus erythematosus: the hopkins lupus cohort perspective,” Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 191–193, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  48. S. M. A. Toloza, A. G. Uribe, G. McGwin et al., “Systemic lupus erythematosus in a multiethnic US cohort (LUMINA): XXIII. Baseline predictors of vascular events,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 3947–3957, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. J. Calvo-Alén, S. M. A. Toloza, M. Fernández et al., “Systemic lupus erythematosus in a multiethnic US cohort (LUMINA): XXV. Smoking, older age, disease activity, lupus anticoagulant, and glucocorticoid dose as risk factors for the occurrence of venous thrombosis in lupus patients,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 2060–2068, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  50. M. J. Roman, B. A. Shanker, A. Davis et al., “Prevalence and correlates of accelerated atherosclerosis in systemic lupus erythematosus,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 349, no. 25, pp. 2399–2406, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  51. V. Bykerk, J. Sampalis, J. M. Esdaile et al., “A randomized study of the effect of withdrawing hydroxychloroquine sulfate in systemic lupus erythematosus,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 324, no. 3, pp. 150–154, 1991. View at: Google Scholar
  52. K. H. Yoon, “Sufficient evidence to consider hydroxychloroquine as an adjunct therapy in antiphospholipid antibody (Hughes') syndrome,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 29, no. 7, pp. 1574–1575, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  53. M. H. Edwards, S. Pierangeli, X. Liu, J. H. Barker, G. Anderson, and E. Nigel Harris, “Hydroxychloroquine reverses thrombogenic properties of antiphospholipid antibodies in mice,” Circulation, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 4380–4384, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  54. S. S. Pierangeli, M. Vega-Ostertag, and E. Nigel Harris, “Intracellular signaling triggered by antiphospholipid antibodies in platelets and endothelial cells: a pathway to targeted therapies,” Thrombosis Research, vol. 114, no. 5-6, pp. 467–476, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  55. M. G. Tektonidou, K. Laskari, D. B. Panagiotakos, and H. M. Moutsopoulos, “Risk factors for thrombosis and primary thrombosis prevention in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus with or without antiphospholipid antibodies,” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 61, no. 1, pp. 29–36, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  56. T. Tarr, G. Lakos, H. P. Bhattoa et al., “Clinical thrombotic manifestations in SLE patients with and without antiphospholipid antibodies: a 5-year follow-up,” Clinical Reviews in Allergy and Immunology, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 131–137, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  57. D. Erkan, Y. Yazici, M. G. Peterson, L. Sammaritano, and M. D. Lockshin, “A cross-sectional study of clinical thrombotic risk factors and preventive treatments in antiphospholipid syndrome,” Rheumatology, vol. 41, no. 8, pp. 924–929, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  58. G. K. Bertsias, J. P. A. Ioannidis, M. Aringer et al., “EULAR recommendations for the management of systemic lupus erythematosus with neuropsychiatric manifestations: report of a task force of the EULAR standing committee for clinical affairs,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 2074–2082, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  59. R. H. W. M. Derksen, P. G. De Groot, L. Kater, and H. K. Nieuwenhuis, “Patients with antiphospholipid antibodies and venous thrombosis should receive long term anticoagulant treatment,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 689–692, 1993. View at: Google Scholar
  60. G. Finazzi, V. Brancaccio, P. Schinco et al., “A randomized clinical trial of high-intensity warfarin vs. conventional antithrombotic therapy for the prevention of recurrent thrombosis in patients with the antiphospholipid syndrome (WAPS),” Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 848–853, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  61. M. A. Crowther, J. S. Ginsberg, J. Julian et al., “A comparison of two intensities of warfarin for the prevention of recurrent thrombosis in patients with the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 349, no. 12, pp. 1133–1138, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  62. G. Ruiz-Irastorza, B. J. Hunt, and M. A. Khamashta, “A systematic review of secondary thromboprophylaxis in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies,” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 57, no. 8, pp. 1487–1495, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Ibrahim A. Al-Homood. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

20461 Views | 1928 Downloads | 13 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.