Table of Contents
ISRN Pharmacology
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 563267, 6 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/563267
Research Article

Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Free Radical Scavenging Potential of Aerial Parts of Periploca aphylla and Ricinus communis

1Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan
2Department of Chemistry, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad 22060, Pakistan

Received 6 April 2012; Accepted 18 May 2012

Academic Editors: T. Irie, R. Thurmond, and T. B. Vree

Copyright © 2012 Jamshed Iqbal et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Context. Many diseases are associated with oxidative stress caused by free radicals. Objective. The present study evaluated the in vitro antioxidant and antibacterial activities of various extracts of aerial parts of Periploca aphylla and Ricinus communis. Materials and Methods. In vitro antioxidant activities of the plant extract were determined by DPPH and NO scavenging method. Superoxide anion radical activity was measured by the reduction of nitro blue tetrazolium as compared with standard antioxidants. Total phenolic contents and antibacterial activities of these plants were determined by gallic acid equivalent (GAE) and serial tube dilution method, respectively. Results. Plants showed significant radical scavenging activity. The results were expressed as IC50. n-Propyl gallate and 3-t-butyl-4-hydroxyanisole were used as standards for antioxidant assay. All the extracts of both plants showed comparable IC50 to those of standards. Plants extract exhibited high phenolic contents and antibacterial activities were comparable with standard drug, Ciprofloxacin. Discussion and Conclusion. The present study provides evidence that Periploca aphylla and Ricinus communis prove to be potent natural antioxidants and could replace synthetic antioxidants. Plants can also be used against pathogenic bacterial strains.

1. Introduction

Epidemiological studies have brought into being that intake of antioxidants such as vitamin C reduces the risk of coronary heart diseases and cancer [1]. It is possible to reduce the risk of chronic diseases and to prevent disease progression by either enhancing the body’s natural antioxidant defense or by supplementing with proven dietary antioxidants [2]. Several studies revealed that phenols, mainly flavonoids, from some medicinal plants are safe and bioactive, and have antioxidant properties and exert anticarcinogenic, antimutagenic, antitumor, antibacterial, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory effects [3]. Therefore, in current years, substantial attention has been directed towards credentials of plants with antioxidant ability that may be used for human expenditure.

Nitric oxide (NO), a powerful neurotransmitter, exerts influence on a number of functions including vasodilation, neurotransmission, synaptic plasticity, and memory in the central nervous system [4, 5]. Besides mediating normal function, NO has been implicated in pathophysiologic states like neurodegenerative and Alzheimer’s disease. Overproduction of NO can mediate toxic effects, for example, DNA fragmentation, cell damage, and neuronal cell death [6, 7].

Periploca aphylla belongs to the genus Periploca (Asclepiadaceae), which contains 12 species and out of these only three species have been found in Pakistan. Medicinally, genus Periploca is very important. The root bark of Periploca sepium contains the substances that are antitumor in nature and is used to relieve chronic congestive heart failure [8], whereas its essential oil has also shown insecticidal as well as antimicrobial and antioxidant activities. Periploca sepium contains a pregnane glycoside “Periplocoside E.” It is a highly immunosuppressive compound, which stops the activation of T-cells in vitro and in vivo. This plant is used to cure the autoimmune disorders of T-cells and also has shown antitumor activity [9]. The roots of P. sepium and P. forrestii are useful for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and wounds. Periploca laevigata is taken as tea and is used as a herbal medicine for the treatment of diabetes and headache and also possesses antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities.

Locally, Periploca aphylla is known as “Bata” or “Barara.” The milky juice of this plant is applied to tumors and swellings. It is useful for the treatment of swollen joints, cough, and flu. The plant is also used to treat skin diseases, ulcer, and constipation. Various constituents isolated from P. aphylla have shown inhibitory action of α-glucosidase type VI and antibacterial activities [10].

Ricinus communis (commonly known as castor oil plant) belongs to family Euphorbiaceae. In Pakistan, the plant is distributed in Sub-Himalayan track and also in plain areas. Ricinus communis is well known for its biological activities; most important of which are hepatoprotective, laxative, antidiabetic, and antifertility activities. The seeds yield castor oil, which has been used to treat liver infections and to cure inflammation in Indian system of medicine. Free radical scavenging and anti-inflammatory activities of methanolic extract of R. communis roots have been studied in Wistar albino rats [11]. A 50% ethanolic extract of Ricinus communis roots showed antidiabetic activity [12]. The castor oil is taken in diarrhea of childhood and sometimes in combination with opium, in inflammatory conditions of bowels, to the lying-in women after child birth, and also to facilitate delivery before child birth. Castor oil is also used for the treatment of constipation. In addition, castor oil cake’s used as manure. The seeds are also used for treatment of warts, colic, enteritis, ringworms, dandruff, for itching, hemorrhoids, for hair loss and also as laxative before X-ray examination of bowels. In India, the leaf poultice is applied to boils and sores, used to treat fever and headache. Swellings and gout are cured by heated leaves. The plant is also useful for the treatment of several skin infections such as scrofula and dog bite. Pharmacological activities of R. communis are also remarkable such as antiviral [13], antioxidant [11], antifertility [1418], antipsychotic, convulsant [19], hepatoprotective, insecticidal [20], haemagglutination, and anti-inflammatory [11]. Castor oil is proved to be one of the cheapest, easily available and highly useful purgatives of the Pharmacopoeia, for old people and children in all delicate conditions.

Plants extracts were tested for various activities such as antioxidant, antibacterial, nitric oxide, and superoxide scavenging, and their total phenolic contents have been determined.

2. Methods

2.1. Plant Material Collection

The plant Periploca aphylla was collected from Mansehra, Pakistan, in May, 2009. The plant Ricinus communis was collected from Haripur, Pakistan, in May, 2010. The plants were identified by Dr. Manzoor Ahmad (taxonomist) at the Department of Botany, Post-Graduate College, Abbottabad, KPK, Pakistan. A voucher specimen (no. 3571) of Periploca aphylla and (no. 3570) of Ricinus communis have been deposited at the herbarium of the above department.

2.2. Fractionation and Extract Preparation

The shade-dried powdered form of aerial parts of Periploca aphylla (25 kg) was extracted three times with methanol at room temperature. The brownish crude extract (1606 g) was then suspended in water and was partitioned successively between n-hexane (260 g), chloroform (425 g), ethyl acetate (247 g), and n-butanol (313 g). Crude extract as well as all the other fractions were subjected to biological activities.

The air-dried and ground aerial parts of Ricinus communis (7 kg) was soaked in methanol at room temperature and then filtered. The methanolic extract was evaporated and a thick greenish matrix (325 g) was obtained, which was partitioned into four fractions: n-hexane (87 g), chloroform (59 g), ethyl acetate (55 g), and n-butanol (96 g). All the four fractions were evaluated for biological activities.

2.3. Antioxidant Assay

The free radical scavenging capacity of the compounds was measured by 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) method [21] with little modifications. Test compounds were allowed to react with stable free radical, DPPH for half an hour at 37°C. The concentration of DPPH was 100 mM. The plants extracts were dissolved in DMSO, while the DPPH solution was prepared in methanol. n-Propyl gallate and 3-t-butyl-4-hydroxyanisole were used as standards. Five dilutions for each compound and standards were tested. Each dilution was tested in triplicate. After incubation, decrease in absorbance was measured at 517 nm using microplate reader (Bio-Tek Elx800 TM, Instruments, Inc., USA). Percent radical scavenging activity (% RSA) of samples was determined in comparison with DMSO treated as control group [22] using the following formula: %RSA=100Absorbanceoftestcompound.Absorbanceofcontrol×100(1)

2.4. Antibacterial Activity

The antibacterial activity was evaluated in vitro by minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) using the serial tube dilution method [23]. For the assay, two Gram-positive bacteria, namely, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis and two Gram-negative bacteria, namely, Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri were used. Bacterial strains stored in Muller-Hinton broth (Merck) were subcultured for testing in the same medium and were grown at 37°C for 24 h and fresh culture was obtained. Then the cells were suspended, in saline solution, to produce a suspension of about 10−5 CFU mL−1 (colony-forming units per mL). Serial dilutions of the plants extracts, previously dissolved in N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF), were prepared in test tubes to final concentrations of 2.5, 1.25, 0.625, 0.313, and 0.156 μg/mL. 100 μL of a 24 h old inoculum was added to each tube. The MIC, defined as the lowest concentration of the test compound which inhibits the visible growth after 24 h, was determined visually after incubation at 37°C. Tests using DMF as negative control were carried out in parallel. Ciprofloxacin was used as a control drug. Because the MIC values are not spectacular, no statistical calculations were made.

2.5. Nitric Oxide Generation and Assay of Nitric Oxide Scavenging Method

Nitric oxide (NO) was generated from sodium nitroprusside (SNP) and was measured by the Griess reagent (1% sulphanilamide, 0.1% naphthylethylenediamine dichloride, and 3% phosphoric acid). SNP in aqueous solution at physiological pH spontaneously generates NO [24, 25], which interacts with oxygen to produce nitrite ions that can be estimated by the use of Griess reagent. Scavengers of NO compete with oxygen leading to reduced production of NO [26]. SNP (10 mM) in phosphate buffer saline (PBS) was mixed with different concentrations of extracts (100–1000 μg/mL) of the plants dissolved in ethanol and water and were incubated at 25°C for 3 hrs. The samples from the above were reacted with Griess reagent. The absorbance of the chromophores formed during the diazotization of nitrite with sulphanilamide, and subsequent coupling with naphthylethylenediamine dichloride (NED) was read at 546 nm using microplate reader and referred to the absorbance of Ascorbic Acid, used as a positive control treated in the same way with Griess reagent =𝐴NitricOxidescavenged(%)control𝐴test𝐴control×100,(2) where 𝐴control is absorbance of control reaction and 𝐴test is absorbance in the presence of the samples of extracts.

2.6. Superoxide Radical Scavenging Assay

This activity was measured by the reduction of NBT according to a previously reported method [27]. The nonenzymatic phenazinemethosulfate-nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (PMS/NADH) system generates superoxide radicals, which reduce nitro blue tetrazolium (NBT) to a purple formazan. 1 mL of reaction mixture contained phosphate buffer (20 mM, pH 7.4), NADH (73 μM), NBT (50 μM), PMS (15 μM), and various concentrations (0–20 μg/mL) of plants extracts. After incubation for 5 min at ambient temperature, the absorbance at 562 nm was measured against an appropriate blank to determine the quantity of formazan generated. All tests were performed in triplicate. Quercetin was used as positive control =Eectofscavenging(%)1AbsorbanceofsampleAbsorbanceofcontrol×100.(3)

2.7. Total Phenolic Contents

The total phenolic contents of the extracts were determined using the literature method with slight modifications. Calibration curve was prepared by mixing ethanol solution of Gallic acid (1 mL; 0.025–0.400 mg/mL) with 5 mL Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (diluted tenfold) and sodium carbonate (4 mL, 0.7 M). Absorbance values were measured at 765 nm and the standard curve was drawn. 1 mL of plant extract (5 g/L) was also mixed with the above reagents, and after 30 min the absorbance was measured to determine the total phenolic contents. All determinations were carried out in triplicate. The total phenolic compounds in the extract in gallic acid equivalents (GAE) were calculated by the following formula: 𝑇=𝐶𝑉𝑀,(4) where T is the total phenolic contents, mg/g of extract, in GAE; C is the concentration of gallic acid established from the calibration curve, mg/mL; V is the volume of the extract, mL; M is the weight of the extract (g).

3. Results

3.1. Antioxidant Assay

The percentage radical scavenging activity and thus the degree of discoloration of free radicals by different extracts of Periploca aphylla (PA) and Ricinus communis (RC) were determined against DPPH. The highest percentage of discoloration (61.49%) of DPPH was observed in the extract of Ricinus communis n-butanol extract and lowest (22.37%) in chloroform extract of the same plant. Regression equations to derive the IC50 values (concentration of extracts required to scavenge 50% DPPH free radicals) showed inverse relationship between IC50 value and percentage scavenging potential of a sample. The strongest DPPH radical scavenging activity was exhibited by n-butanol extract of RC with IC50 = 140 ± 0.19 μg/mL, while the lowest activity was found in chloroform extract of RC with IC50 = 48560 ± 0.81 μg/mL.

In case of Periploca aphylla, crude showed more percentage of discoloration (60.27%) of DPPH, while the n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol fraction showed 57.53, 50.92, 59.05, and 39.11% inhibitory effects, respectively.

In case of Ricinus communis n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol fraction showed percent discoloration of 56.62, 22.37, 57.99, and 61.49%, respectively, (Table 1).

tab1
Table 1: Antioxidant results of different extracts of Periploca aphylla and Ricinus communis.
3.2. Antibacterial Assay

Two Gram-positive bacteria, namely, Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis and two Gram-negative bacteria, namely, Escherichia coli and Shigella flexneri were used for screening the antibacterial activities of Periploca aphylla and Ricinus communis. RC ethyl acetate and chloroform extract were showing more effective MIC values against bacterial strains. These extracts showed same MIC value for E. coli, S. aureus, and S. flexneri and also showed even twofold low MIC value than standard drug for B. subtilis. The least active fraction among all the extracts was n-butanol of RC showing 0.625 and 2.50 μg/mL, antibacterial activity, against S. aureus and S. flexneri, respectively (Table 2).

tab2
Table 2: MIC values (𝜇g/mL) of different extracts of Periploca aphylla and Ricinus communis.
3.3. NO Scavenging Assay

Ascorbic acid, an extreme antioxidant, was used as the reference NO radical scavenger in this study. It exhibited potent NO radical scavenging activity with an IC50 value of 49.98±0.12μg/mL.

The IC50 values of crude, n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol fractions of Periploca aphylla were 143.18±0.49, 124.46±0.32, 103.29±0.52, 115.07±0.28, and 113.82±0.43μg/mL, respectively, showing that PA chloroform extract has lower IC50 value as compared to other extracts of this plant. The IC50 values of n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol fractions of Ricinus communis of were 173.45±0.84, 231.36±0.91, 109.77±0.66, and 92.29±0.72μg/mL, respectively. In the extracts of RC, n-butanol extract showed lower IC50 value compared to other extracts (Table 3).

tab3
Table 3: NO scavenging activity of different extracts of Periploca aphylla and Ricinus communis.
3.4. Superoxide Scavenging Assay

The ability to reduce NBT can be measured by superoxide radicals generated from dissolved oxygen by PMS-NADH coupling. The decrease in absorbance at 562 nm with the plant extracts and the reference compound quercetin indicates their abilities to quench superoxide radicals in the reaction mixture. The % RSA  value of quercetin, taken as standard, on superoxide scavenging activity was 42.06±0.35μg/mL (Table 4). The % RSA  values of Periploca aphylla crude, n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol extracts on superoxide radical were 58.35±0.76, 53.97±0.52, 69.11±0.69, 68.96±0.84, and 71.05±0.44μg/mL, respectively. The % RSA  values of Ricinus communis n-hexane, chloroform, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol extracts on superoxide radical were 37.19±0.39, 56.99±0.48, 55.03±0.97, and 66.79±0.65μg/mL, respectively. The % RSA  values of n-hexane extract of both plants were less than other extracts of the same plants.

tab4
Table 4: Superoxide radical scavenging assay of different extracts of Periploca aphylla and Ricinus communis.
3.5. Total Phenolic Contents

Table 5 shows the contents of total phenols that were measured by Folin-Ciocalteu reagent in terms of gallic acid equivalent (standard curve equation: 𝑦=0.004𝑥+0.086, 𝑅2 = 0.903). The total phenols varied from  42±8  to 156 ± 5 mg g−1 in the extracts of PA, and from  52±7  to  89 ± 6 mg/g in RC extracts. PA crude methanolic extract with the total phenol contents of 156 ± 5 mg/g had the highest amount among all the other fractions. It may be due to the reason that all phenolic contents were concentrated in crude and then in fractionation process these go to all subfractions. Thus fractions contain less phenolic contents as compared to crude.

tab5
Table 5: Phenolic contents of different extracts of Periploca aphylla and Ricinus communis.

4. Discussion

Table 1 shows the percentage of DPPH radical scavenged by standards, that is, n-propyl gallate and 3-t-butyl-4-hydroxyanisole and different extracts of 2 plants at various concentrations (μg/mL). Scavenging activities of these plants are comparable with standards. It is evident from the data that Periploca aphylla and Ricinus communis possess hydrogen donating capabilities and free radical scavenging ability and can act as antioxidants.

All the extracts of both plants were tested against bacterial strains and each extract showed potent antibacterial activity. Two extracts of RC showed potent antibacterial activity. n-hexane of RC and crude and chloroform extracts of PA showed least tested concentration against two bacterial strains; it means these extracts have significant antibacterial activity.

All the tested extracts of both plants exhibited strong NO radical scavenging activity with low IC50 values. Hence these plants can act as NO radical scavengers. Regarding the %RSA values, the extracts showing high IC50 values have shown less scavenging activity, whereas extracts having low IC50 value means that they are more potent scavengers of NO radical.

The results suggest that the n-hexane of Ricinus communis was a less potent scavenger of superoxide radical than the standard quercetin, whereas all the fractions of Periploca aphylla and Ricinus communis showed more potent scavenging effects as compared to quercetin at 20 μg/mL.

The results showed significant total phenolic contents in the extracts of Periploca aphylla and Ricinus communis. The extract of Periploca aphylla, which contains highest quantity of phenolic compounds, exhibited the greatest antioxidant activity. The high scavenging property of Periploca aphylla may be due to hydroxyl groups existing in the phenolic compounds that can provide the necessary component as a radical scavenger. All the extracts of both plants exhibited different extent of antioxidant activity. Crude extract of Periploca aphylla and n-butanol extract of Ricinus communis showed a higher potency in scavenging of DPPH free radical. This may be related to the high amount of phenolic compounds in these plant extracts.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, in vitro free radical scavenging activities indicated that both the plants have significant radicals scavenging abilities on DPPH, NO, and superoxide radicals. The scavenging effects were powerful, close to the positive controls used in respective assays. Therefore, Periploca aphylla and Ricinus communis should be explored as novel potential antioxidants. The extracts of the aerial parts of the plants may be used in therapeutically relevance. On the other hand, some extracts showed significant, moderate, and even weak antibacterial activities compared to the reference. Therefore, further investigations of their in vivo antioxidant activities must be elucidated and carried out. Further studies are needed to better characterize the important active constituents responsible for the free radical scavenging activity.

Conflict of Interests

The authors report no conflict of interests.

References

  1. R. Marchioli, C. Schweiger, G. Levantesi, L. Tavazzi, and F. Valagussa, “Antioxidant vitamins and prevention of cardiovascular disease: epidemiological and clinical trial data,” Lipids, vol. 36, pp. S53–S63, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. S. A. Stanner, J. Hughes, C. N. M. Kelly, and J. Buttriss, “A review of the epidemiological evidence for the ‘antioxidant hypothesis’,” Public Health Nutrition, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 407–422, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. Š. Ozgová, J. Heřmánek, and I. Gut, “Different antioxidant effects of polyphenols on lipid peroxidation and hydroxyl radicals in the NADPH-, Fe-ascorbate- and Fe-microsomal systems,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 1127–1137, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. D. S. Bredt and S. H. Snyder, “Nitric oxide: a physiological messenger molecule,” Annual Review of Biochemistry, vol. 63, pp. 175–195, 1994. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. K. Shibuki and D. Okada, “Endogenous nitric oxide release required for long-term synaptic depression in the cerebellum,” Nature, vol. 349, no. 6307, pp. 326–328, 1991. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. S. Moncada, R. M. J. Palmer, and E. A. Higgs, “Nitric oxide: physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology,” Pharmacological Reviews, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 109–142, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. T. M. Dawson, V. L. Dawson, and S. H. Snyder, “A novel neuronal messenger molecule in brain: the free radical, nitric oxide,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 297–311, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. K. Umehara, N. Sumii, H. Satoh, T. Miyase, M. Kuroyanagi, and A. Ueno, “Studies on differentiation inducers. V. Steroid glycosides from periplocae radicis cortex,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1565–1568, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. Itokawa, J. Xu, and K. Takeya, “Studies on chemical constituents of antitumor fraction from Periploca sepium. V. Structures of new pregnane glycosides, periplocosides J, K, F and O,” Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 4441–4446, 1988. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. G. Mustafa, E. Anis, S. Ahmed et al., “Lupene-type triterpenes from Periploca aphylla,” Journal of Natural Products, vol. 63, no. 6, pp. 881–883, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. R. Ilavarasan, M. Mallika, and S. Venkataraman, “Anti-inflammatory and free radical scavenging activity of Ricinus communis root extract,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 478–480, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. P. Shokeen, P. Anand, Y. K. Murali, and V. Tandon, “Antidiabetic activity of 50% ethanolic extract of Ricinus communis and its purified fractions,” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 46, no. 11, pp. 3458–3466, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. H. X. Wang and T. B. Ng, “Examination of lectins, polysaccharopeptide, polysaccharide, alkaloid, coumarin and trypsin inhibitors for inhibitory activity against human immunodeficiency virus reverse transcriptase and glycohydrolases,” Planta Medica, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 669–672, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. C. O. Isichei, S. C. Das, O. O. Ogunkeye et al., “Preliminary clinical investigation of the contraceptive efficacy and chemical pathological effects of RICOM-1013-J of Ricinus communis var minor on women volunteers,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 40–42, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. E. Makonnen, L. Zerihun, G. Assefa, and A. A. H. Rostom, “Antifertility activity of Ricinus communis seed in female guinea pigs,” East African Medical Journal, vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 335–337, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. F. K. Okwuasaba, U. A. Osunkwo, M. M. Ekwenchi et al., “Anticonceptive and estrogenic effects of a seed extract of Ricinus communis var. minor,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 34, no. 2-3, pp. 141–145, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. Y. Raji, A. K. Oloyo, and A. O. Morakinyo, “Effect of methanol extract of Ricinus communis seed on reproduction of male rats,” Asian Journal of Andrology, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 115–121, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. K. Sandhyakumary, R. G. Bobby, and M. Indira, “Antifertility effects of Ricinus communis (Linn) on rats,” Phytotherapy Research, vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 508–511, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. A. C. Ferraz, M. E. M. Angelucci, M. L. Da Costa, I. R. Batista, B. H. De Oliveira, and C. Da Cunha, “Pharmacological evaluation of ricinine, a central Nervous system stimulant isolated from Ricinus communis,” Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 367–375, 1999. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. S. M. Upasani, H. M. Kotkar, P. S. Mendki, and V. L. Maheshwari, “Partial characterization and insecticidal properties of Ricinus communis L. foliage flavonoids,” Pest Management Science, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 1349–1354, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. M. I. Choudhary, A. Begum, A. Abbaskhan, S. G. Musharraf, A. Ejaz, and Atta-ur-Rahman, “Two new antioxidant phenylpropanoids from Lindelofia stylosa,” Chemistry and Biodiversity, vol. 5, no. 12, pp. 2676–2683, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. S. K. Lee, Z. H. Mbwambo, H. Chung et al., “Evaluation of the antioxidant potential of natural products,” Combinatorial Chemistry and High Throughput Screening, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 35–46, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. I. C. Zampini, S. Cuello, M. R. Alberto et al., “Antimicrobial activity of selected plant species from “the Argentine Puna” against sensitive and multi-resistant bacteria,” Journal of Ethnopharmacology, vol. 124, no. 3, pp. 499–505, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. L. C. Green, D. A. Wagner, and J. Glogowski, “Analysis of nitrate, nitrite, and [15N]nitrate in biological fluids,” Analytical Biochemistry, vol. 126, no. 1, pp. 131–138, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. L. Marcocci, J. J. Maguire, M. T. Droy-Lefaix, and L. Packer, “The nitric oxide-scavenging properties of Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761,” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 201, no. 2, pp. 748–755, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. L. Marcocci, L. Packer, M. T. Droy-Lefaix, A. Sekaki, and M. Gardes-Albert, “Antioxidant action of Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761,” Methods in Enzymology, vol. 234, pp. 462–475, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. M. Fontana, L. Mosca, and M. A. Rosei, “Interaction of enkephalins with oxyradicals,” Biochemical Pharmacology, vol. 61, no. 10, pp. 1253–1257, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus