Table of Contents
ISRN Agronomy
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 617081, 8 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/617081
Research Article

Effect of Stem Rust on the Quality of Selected Barley Genotypes

1Department of Crops Horticulture and Soils, Egerton University, P.O. Box 536, Egerton, Kenya
2Department of Biological Sciences, Egerton University, P.O. Box 536, Egerton, Kenya
3National Plant Breeding Centre, Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, P.O. Box Private Bag, Njoro, Kenya

Received 1 December 2011; Accepted 11 January 2012

Academic Editor: I. Vasilakoglou

Copyright © 2012 K. E. Mwando et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. African Breweries East, The Kenyan Beer Industry, Nairobi, Kenya, 2005.
  2. J. Chełkowski, M. Tyrka, and A. Sobkiewicz, “Resistance genes in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and their identification with molecular markers,” Journal of Applied Genetics, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 291–309, 2003. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. J. Williams, “The molecular genetics of disease resistance in barley,” Australia Journal of Agriculture Research, vol. 54, pp. 1065–1079, 2003. View at Google Scholar
  4. M. S. Hovmøller and A. F. Justesen, “Rates of evolution of avirulence phenotypes and DNA markers in a northwest European population of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici,” Molecular Ecology, vol. 16, no. 21, pp. 4637–4647, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. CIMMYT, Sounding the Alarm on Global Stem Rust. An Assessment of Ug99 in Kenya and Ethiopia and Potential for Impact in neighboring Regions and beyond, 2005.
  6. FAO, Meeting of the Technical Subgroup of the Expert Group on International Economic and Social Classifications, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs Statistics Division, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
  7. Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, Effect of a New Race on Wheat Production/Use of Fungicides and Its Cost in Large vs. Small Scale Farmers, Situation of Current Cultivars, KARI, Njoro, Kenya, 2005.
  8. R. Wanyera, M. G. Kinyua, Y. Jin, and R. P. Singh, “The spread of stem rust caused by a. Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici, with virulence on Sr31 in wheat in Eastern Africa,” Plant Disease, vol. 90, p. 113, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  9. Z. A. Pretorius, R. P. Singh, W. W. Wagoire, and T. S. Payne, “Detection of virulence to wheat stem rust resistance gene Sr31 in Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici in uganda,” Plant Disease, vol. 84, article 203, no. 2, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. B. J. Steffenson and Y. Jin, “Resistance to race TTKS of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici in barley,” Phytopathology, vol. 96, p. 110, 2006. View at Google Scholar
  11. A. P. Roelfs and J. W. Martens, “An international system of nomenclature for Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici,” Phytopathology, vol. 78, pp. 526–533, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  12. R. E. Welty and R. E. Barker, “Evaluation of resistance to stem rust in perennial ryegrass grown in controlled and field condition,” Plant Disease, vol. 76, pp. 637–641, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  13. R. A. McIntosh, C. R. Wellings, and R. F. Park, Wheat Rusts: An Atlas of Resistance Genes, CSIRO Publications, East Melbourne, Australia, 1995.
  14. E. C. Stakman, D. M. Stewart, and W. Q. Loegering, Identification of Physiological Races of Puccinia graminis var tritici, U.S Department of Agriculture Research Service, Washington, DC, USA, 1962.
  15. A. P. Roelfs, R. P. Singh, and E. E. Saari, Rust Diseases of Wheat: Concepts and Methods of Disease Management, CIMMYT, Mexico City, Mexico, 1992.
  16. R. Jaetzold and H. Schmidt, Farm Management Handbook of Kenya, vol. 2 of Natural Condition and Farm Management Information, Ministry of Agriculture, Nairobi, Kenya, 1983, In Cooperation with Germany Agricultural Team (GAT) of the Germany Agency for Technical Cooperation (GTZ).
  17. J. C. Zadoks, T. T. Chang, and C. F. Konazak, “A decimal code for growth stages of cereals,” Weed Research, vol. 14, pp. 415–421, 1974. View at Google Scholar
  18. R. F. Peterson, A. B. Campbell, and A. E. Hannah, “A diagramic scale for estimating rust intensity of leaves and stems cereals,” Canadian Journal of Research, vol. 26, pp. 496–600, 1948. View at Google Scholar
  19. Y. Jin, B. J. Steffenson, and J. D. Miller, “Inheritance of resistance to pathotypes QCC and MCC of Puccinia graminis f. sp. tritici. In barley lines Q21861 and temperature effect on the expression of resistance,” Phytopathology, vol. 84, pp. 452–455, 1994. View at Google Scholar
  20. S. L. Fox and D. E. Harder, “Resistance to stem rust in selected barley lines and the inheritance of resistance to pathotype QCC,” Canadian Journal of Plant Science, vol. 75, pp. 781–788, 1995. View at Google Scholar
  21. D. E. Briggs and J. L. Woods, “Dormancy in malting barley: Studies on drying, storage biochemistry and physiology,” HGCA Project Report 84, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  22. R. Benech-Arnold, “Bases of pre-harvest sprouting resistance in barley: physiology, molecular biology and environment control of dormancy in the barley grain,” in Barley Science: Recent Advances from Molecular Biology to Agronomy of Yield and Quality, G. A. Slafer, J. L. Molina-Cano, R. Savin, J. L. Arausi, and I. Romagos, Eds., Food Products Press, New York, NY, USA, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  23. E. Antonelli and J. M. Daly, “Decarboxylation of indolecsetic acid by near isogenic lines of wheat resistant or susceptible to Puccinia graminis f.sp. tritici,” Phytopathology, vol. 56, pp. 610–618, 1966. View at Google Scholar
  24. L. B. Johnson, B. L. Brannaman, and F. B. Zscheile Jr., “Protein and enzyme changes in wheat leaves following infection with Puccinia recondite,” Phytopathology, vol. 58, pp. 578–583, 1968. View at Google Scholar
  25. G Gassner and W. Franke, “Untersuchungen über den Stickstoffhaushalt rostinfizierter Getreideblätter,” Phytopathologische Zeitschrift, vol. 11, pp. 517–570, 1938. View at Google Scholar