International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2012 / Article
!A Erratum for this article has been published. To view the article details, please click the ‘Erratum’ tab above.

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 637204 |

Owlia Mohammad Bagher, Mehrpoor Golbarg, Modares Mosadegh Moneyreh, "Bedtime Single-Dose Prednisolone in Clinically Stable Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients", International Scholarly Research Notices, vol. 2012, Article ID 637204, 5 pages, 2012.

Bedtime Single-Dose Prednisolone in Clinically Stable Rheumatoid Arthritis Patients

Academic Editor: J. C. Laguna
Received26 Aug 2011
Accepted22 Dec 2011
Published05 Mar 2012


Introduction. Sign and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis have circadian rhythms and are more prominent in the morning. Timing of glucocorticoid administration may be important with respect to the natural secretion of endogenous glucocorticoids. Herein, we intended to test the hypothesis that bedtime administration of prednisolone could be more efficient in controlling signs and symptoms in patients with RA. Material and Methods. Sixty patients with stable disease were treated with single dose prednisolone at 8 a.m. for the first three months and thereafter with similar dose at 10 PM for the next three months (before-after method). We compared fatigue scores, morning stiffness and pain scores, Clinical Disease Activity Indices, erythrocyte sedimentation rates, C Reactive Protein, and profile of adverse effects. Results. The mean of morning stiffness, fatigue scores, CRP and CDAI decreased statistically when prednisolone was administrated at 10 p.m. The means of pain scores and ESR were also decreased when the patients took prednisolone at night, without significant statistical difference. Conclusion. Administration of low-dose oral prednisolone could reduce disease activity scores in morning in clinically stable patients with RA. So it could be supposed that administrating bedtime prednisolone may permit the smallest possible dose.

1. Introduction

In rheumatoid arthritis (RA), a circadian rhythm of disease activity has been well documented [1]. Morning stiffness, joint pain, and swelling (one of the RA classification criteria) are worse in morning, which could be explained by diurnal variations in the metabolism or secretion of endogenous cortisol and cytokines, especially IL6 [2]. Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) release leads to the pituitary production of corticotrophin (ACTH), followed by glucocorticoid secretion by the adrenal cortex. These components constitute the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis, which has a circadian rhythm [3]. The ACTH level varies during the day due to its pulsatile secretion. As a result, in physiologic conditions, plasma ACTH and serum cortisol concentrations are highest at about the time of waking in the morning (at 8 AM), decrease irregularly during the day, are low in the evening, and reach their nadir after beginning sleep (at 2 AM) [4]. In RA patients, impaired cortisol secretion to ACTH has been described, supporting the concept of a relative adrenal glucocorticoid insufficiency [5]. Moreover, IL6 is also considered to be responsible for stimulating the production of acute phase of proteins, and increased levels of it have been reported in serum and synovial fluid in RA. Increased levels of IL6 were found from 2 AM to 7 AM in RA patients, which has been associated with a flare in disease activity in early morning [6, 7]. Therefore, diurnal variations in the clinical signs and symptoms of RA may be partly due to changes in the cortisol and proinflammatory cytokine levels.

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are among the most frequently used drugs in treating RA, and most commonly are used to suppress inflammation and pain. This effect is brought about by their anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive properties [8]. But HPA axis support is a crucial rule of low-dose GCs in stable RA.

When a potentially harmful drug such as a GC is prescribed, a balance between side effects and therapeutic benefits is attempted, and it is prudent to administer the minimal dose for the shortest duration to avoid adverse effects [9]. With assumption of minimizing interference with the normal diurnal hormonal pattern, in usual practice, in single-dose schedule, prednisolone is administered in the morning. It seems that administration of prednisolone at bedtime, which precedes the circadian flare of inflammatory activity, can potentially better control disease activity in somewhat lower doses [10].

In order to reduce the chance of HPA suppression, we should use the lowest dose of short half-life GCs, preferably in alternate fashion. Accordingly, using the drug at the optimal time may permit the smallest possible dose to be used. Prescribing GCs at night may in part lead to the suppression of an explosive surge of cytokines between 2 AM and 7 AM by better HPA axis support, so it is assumed that when a low dose GC is used for relief of morning stiffness, night administration could be more effective than an equivalent dose given in the morning [5].

In this study, we decided to test the hypothesis that administration of low-dose prednisolone at bedtime could be more effective in control of disease activity and morning symptoms.

2. Material and Methods

Sixty patients who fulfilled the criteria of the 2010 American College of Rheumatology [11] for RA were included in this study from April to September 2008. All patients were referred to the Yazd Rheumatology Center and were studied after obtaining informed consents and approval of the local ethics committee according to the Declaration of Helsinki. At the start of the study, all of the patients had been on long treatment with a single daily dose of prednisolone (≤7.5 mg/day) and one or more disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs).

Those who were taking drugs other than nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and DMARDs and those with any comorbid conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and other chronic diseases were excluded.

5 mg prednisolone was reinstituted for the patients in the morning (8 AM) for the first three months, and, for the next three months, the patients received 5 mg prednisolone at 10 PM (before-after method). No change in the DMARDs was scheduled during the study. Patients took their drug at 10 PM to prevent interference with their sleep.

A questionnaire including age, gender, the number of involved and tender joints, pain score (none = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3), fatigue score (none = 0, mild = 1–3, moderate = 4–6, severe = 7–10), morning stiffness score (0 = none, 1 ≤ 30 min, 2 = 30–60 min, 3 = 1-2 h, 4 = 2–4 h, 5 ≥ 4 h and 6 = all day), erythrocyte sedimentation rates (ESR), C reactive protein (CRP), and supposed adverse effects profile of tachycardia, nocturia, sleep disturbance, infection, and blood pressure disturbance was designed by the authors on the basis of similar studies. ESR and CRP were measured at the beginning of the study and end of the first and second trimester. The clinical data were collected at the end of each month during the study.

We used the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) [12], a numerical index that is calculated by summing the number of tender and swollen joints using the 28-joint count and the patient and physician global assessments on a 10 cm visual analogue scale. The CDAI ranges from 0 to 76. The cut points for remission and various degrees of disease activity are as follows:(i)remission ≤ 2.8,(ii)low disease activity ≤ 10,(iii)moderate disease activity ≤ 22,(iv)high disease activity > 22.

Means of each variable within the first and second trimester and at the end of each trimester were compared.

3. Statistical Analysis

Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation of the mean. Statistical significance was calculated by nonparametric Wilcoxon’s signed ranks test using SPSS version 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for Windows. A 𝑃 value < 0.05 was considered as significant difference.

4. Results

Sixty patients, nine male (15%) and fifty-one female (85%), with a mean age of 46 ± 11.09, were included in the study. Baseline characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. Disease duration among our patients was between 12 months to 40 years with mean of 7 . 1 ± 7 . 5 years as mentioned in Table 1. But they were on DMARDs from beginning of disease in some and months after initiation of disease in the others. Minimum duration of DMARD used in our patient when they enrolled in the study was around 6 months. Thirty-seven patients (53.3%) were treated with two DMARDs, and ten (16.7%) patients were treated with three DMARDs (Table 2).

Age (year) (mean ± SD)20–67 (46 ± 11.09)

Duration of disease (year) (mean ± SD)1–40 (7.1 ± 7.5)
Number of involved joints (mean ± SD)0–8 (4.1 ± 1.78)
Mean of fatigue score2–8 (4.6 ± 1.90)
Mean of pain score0–2 (1.18 ± 0.46)
Mean of morning stiffness score1–3 (1.91 ± 0.67)
Mean of ESR3–60 (24.11 ± 14.01)
Mean of CRP6–24 (11.37 ± 8.31)
Mean of CDAI4–9 (6.56 ± 1.35)
Mean of prednisolone dose5–7.5 (5.125 ± 0.549)

CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Indices, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP: C-reactive protein.

DMARDsNumber (percent)

HCQ or SSZ or MTX13 (21.7)
HCQ + MTX32 (53.3)
MTX + SSZ4 (6.7)
HCQ + SSZ1 (1.7)
MTX + HCQ + CsA1 (1.7)
MTX + SSZ + CsA1 (1.7)
MTX + SSZ + HCQ8 (13.3)

MTX: methotrexate, HCQ: hydroxychloroquine,   SSZ: sulfasalazine, CsA: cyclosporine A.

The mean of the morning stiffness was decreased and had significant statistical differences ( 𝑃 value = 0.000). The mean of the CDAI was reduced at the end of the second three months, when the patients were treated with prednisolone at night ( 𝑃 value = 0.000). The mean of the fatigue score and CRP level were decreased when prednisolone was administrated at 10 PM, and differences were significant ( 𝑃 value < 0.05). The mean of the pain score was decreased when the patients took prednisolone at night, but there was no significant statistical difference ( 𝑃 value = 0.146). Also, the mean of tender joint was decreased when the patient took prednisolone at nigh; however, there was no significant statistical difference ( 𝑃 value = 0.129). The mean of the ESR was decreased, but the difference was not significant ( 𝑃 value = 0.283). These data are compared in Table 3.

VariableMorning group ± SD (min–max)Bedtime group ± SD (min–max)P valuea

Fatigue scoreb4.58 ± 1.87(1–8)3.58 ± 2.17(0–7)0.000
Pain scorec1.000 ± 0.52(0–2)0.88 ± 0.52(0–2)0.146
Morning stiffness scored1.81 ± 4.28(0–3)1.03 ± 2.92(0–2)0.000
CDAIe6.4 ± 2.7(3–7)4.07 ± 2.18(3–5)0.000

CDAI: Clinical Disease Activity Indices aP < 0.05 is significant.
b(none: 0, low grade: 1, high grade: 2.)
c(none=0, mild: 1, moderate: 2, severe: 3.)
d(0: none, 1: ≤30 min, 2: 30-60 min, 3: 1-2 h, 4: 2-4 h, 5: ≥4 h and 6: all day.)
e(Remission ≤ 2.8, low disease activity ≤ 10, moderate disease activity ≤ 22, high disease activity > 22.)

Means of each variable at the end of the first and the second trimester are compared in Table 4.

VariableMorning group ± SD (min–max)Bedtime group ± SD(min–max)P value

Fatigue score4.37 ± 1.44 (2–7)2.57 ± 1.00 (1–6)<0.0001
Morning stiffness score0.77 ± 0.33 (1–3)0.74 ± 0.51 (1–3)0.0003
CDAI6.20 ± 1.87 (4–8)4.02 ± 2.00 (3–7)<0.0001
Pain score0.85 ± 0.55 (0–2)0.82 ± 0.54 (0–2)0.7367
CRP (mg/dl)7.6 ± 0.93 (6–26)6.4 ± 0.76 (6–23)0.04
ESR (mm/h)18 ± 11.56 (1–56)17 ± 8.93 (2–40)0.283

ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate; CRP: C reactive protein.

Nocturia was seen in 3 patients (5%) when prednisolone was administrated at night, and sleep disturbance was seen in 1 patient in this group (Table 5).

Adverse effectsMorning group number (percent)Night group number (percent)

NocturiaNo3 (5%)
Sleep disturbanceNo1 (0.016%)
BP disturbance2 (0.03%)No
Tachycardia2 (0.03%)2 (0.03%)
Overt infectionNoNo

In Figure 1, comparison of variable means at baseline and end of before and after phase was shown.

5. Discussion

Better control of inflammation and improving patient symptoms related to inflammatory state with minimal drug adverse effect is the best management in chronic inflammatory conditions like RA.

In the current study, administration of prednisolone at night induced a significant beneficial effect on the morning stiffness ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 1 ), which was similar to the results of the Arvison [8] and Buttgereit report [13]. It should be stated that in the Arvidson study, prednisolone was taken at 2 AM, which could potentially have a negative effect on the sleep pattern of patients [8]. De Silva et al. showed a significantly shorter duration of morning stiffness in patients when prednisolone was given at night [14]. Similar to our study, the patients were on oral prednisolone at 10 PM Deandrade et al. also noted that a small evening dose was more effective than the same dose given in the morning [15]. Klinefelter and his coworkers evaluated the safety of single low-dose prednisone therapy. In their study, a number of patients required nocturnal doses to control their morning stiffness and did not show any more suppression of the HPA axis suppression than the patients receiving morning doses [16].

Fatigue is frequently identified as a significant symptom by RA patients [17]. The prevalence of clinically relevant fatigue is commonly seen between 40% and 80% of patients with RA [18]. We showed that the mean of fatigue scores also decreased when the prednisolone was administrated at night ( 𝑃 < 0 . 0 0 0 ). However, this variable was not taken into consideration in the previous studies, although it is a main complaint of patients.

The theoretical optimal timing of prednisolone administration could be at 2 AM but due to interfering with pre-disturbed sleep in RA patients, modified release prednisolone was introduced to overcome this problem. We, in our study, showed that shifting single oral prednisolone from morning to bedtime schedule also could have similar beneficial effect on morning symptom which is universally available.

In our patients, there was a tendency for a decrease in the mean of pain scores when the patients took prednisolone at night, although employing Wilcoxon’s test showed no statistical significant difference. Result of means of variables was similar within and at the end of each trimester.

However, in the study conducted by Arvidson [8] and Buttgereit [13], pain scores decreased statistically significant after bedtime administration of GCs.

In another study, clinical outcome after administration of prednisolone at 8 AM, 1 PM and 11 PM was compared. Four weeks later, there was no difference in pain or stiffness scores between these times of prednisolone administration [19]. Also, Karatay and his colleagues reported that there were no differences between pain and morning stiffness scores when GCs were administered at different times of the day [20]. The differences between our and their findings could be attributed to the total daily doses and/or ethnic differences in the patients.

A comparison of objective measurements of joint inflammation revealed no significant statistical differences, although there was a decline in the number of tender joints. Nevertheless, it should be mentioned that in most of our patients, joint tenderness was not a predominant symptom.

In our study, CDAI was also used for clinical assessment and there was a significant statistical difference between the mean of two groups.

In spite of a reduction in the mean of ESR, there was no significant statistical difference ( 𝑃 = 0 . 2 8 3 ). As in the studies done by Arvidson et al. and Karatay et al., the mean of CRP levels decreased significantly following nocturnal use of prednisolone [8, 20].

We emphasized that adverse profile of shifting prednisolone from morning to bedtime was negligible in our survey and none of them was related to HPA axis derangement.

Addressing to our limitations in the study, we should mention that, due to clinical nature of our study we did not determine the cytokines such as IL6 and hormones involving in HPA axis notably serum and urine cortisol that it could be designed as a separate supplementary study. Also, we think that due to potential beneficial of bedtime dosing of prednisolone, we could test smaller doses of prednisolone at bedtime along with this study and compare the mean of prednisolone doses in two phases (groups) of study.

6. Conclusion

In conclusion, our study showed that similar doses of prednisolone could be safely administrated at bedtime with better clinical responses in most (but not all) of RA patients.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.


The authors thank Dr. F. Alam-Rajabi and Dr. Z. Mehrnahad for their contribution in data gathering and Dr. H. Lotfi for statistical analysis.


  1. M. Cutolo, A. Sulli, C. Pizzorni et al., “Circadian rhythms: glucocorticoids and arthritis,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1069, pp. 289–299, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. M. Cutolo, B. Villaggio, K. Otsa, O. Aakre, A. Sulli, and B. Seriolo, “Altered circadian rhythms in rheumatoid arthritis patients play a role in the disease's symptoms,” Autoimmunity Reviews, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 497–502, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. M. Cutolo, K. Otsa, O. Aakre, and A. Sulli, “Nocturnal hormones and clinical rhythms in rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1051, pp. 372–381, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. R. H. Straub and M. Cutolo, “Circadian rhythms in rheumatoid arthritis: implications for pathophysiology and therapeutic management,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 399–408, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. M. Cutolo, B. Seriolo, C. Craviotto, C. Pizzorni, and A. Sulli, “Circadian rhythms in RA,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 62, no. 7, pp. 593–596, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. J. R. Kirwan, L. Clarke, L. P. Hunt, M. G. Perry, R. H. Straub, and D. S. Jessop, “Effect of novel therapeutic glucocorticoids on circadian rhythms of hormones and cytokines in rheumatoid arthritis: annals of the New York Academy of Sciences,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1193, pp. 127–133, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. N. G. Arvidson, B. Gudbjornsson, L. Elfman, A. C. Ryden, T. H. Totterman, and R. Hallgren, “Circadian rhythm of serum interleukin-6 in rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 53, no. 8, pp. 521–524, 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  8. N. G. Arvidson, B. Gudbjörnsson, A. Larsson, and R. Hällgren, “The timing of glucocorticoid administration in rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 27–31, 1997. View at: Google Scholar
  9. I. C. Kowanko, R. Pownall, and M. S. Knapp, “Time of day of prednisolone administration in rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 447–452, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  10. M. Cutolo, R. H. Straub, and F. Buttgereit, “Circadian rhythms of nocturnal hormones in rheumatoid arthritis: translation from bench to bedside,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 905–908, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. Aletaha, T. Neogi, A. J. Silman et al., “2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: an American College of Rheumatology/European League against rheumatism collaborative initiative,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 62, no. 9, pp. 2569–2581, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. J. S. Smolen, F. C. Breedveld, M. H. Schiff et al., “A simplified disease activity index for rheumatoid arthritis for use in clinical practice,” Rheumatology, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 244–257, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  13. F. Buttgereit, G. Doering, A. Schaeffler et al., “Efficacy of modified-release versus standard prednisone to reduce duration of morning stiffness of the joints in rheumatoid arthritis (CAPRA-1): a double-blind, randomised controlled trial,” The Lancet, vol. 371, no. 9608, pp. 205–214, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. M. De Silva, A. Binder, and B. L. Hazleman, “The timing of prednisolone dosage and its effect on morning stiffness in rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 790–793, 1984. View at: Google Scholar
  15. J. R. Deandrade, J. N. McCormick, and A. G. Hill, “Small doses of prednisolone in the management of rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 23, pp. 158–162, 1964. View at: Google Scholar
  16. H. F. Klinefelter, W. L. Winkenwerder, and T. Bledsoe, “Single daily dose prednisone therapy,” Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 241, no. 25, pp. 2721–2723, 1979. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. Stebbings, P. Herbison, T. C. H. Doyle, G. J. Treharne, and J. Highton, “A comparison of fatigue correlates in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis: disparity in associations with disability, anxiety and sleep disturbance,” Rheumatology, vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 361–367, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. F. Wolfe, D. J. Hawley, and K. Wilson, “The prevalence and meaning of fatigue in rheumatic disease,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1407–1417, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  19. I. C. Kowanko, R. Pownall, and M. S. Knapp, “Time of day of prednisolone administration in rheumatoid arthritis,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 447–452, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  20. S. Karatay, K. Şenel, M. Uǧur, and K. Yildirim, “The timing of low dose glucocorticoid therapy in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis,” Pain Clinic, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 305–312, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Owlia Mohammad Bagher et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.