Table of Contents
ISRN High Energy Physics
Volume 2012 (2012), Article ID 637950, 12 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/637950
Research Article

The Higgs Boson: From the Lattice to LHC

P. Cea1,2 and L. Cosmai1

1Sezione di Bari, INFN, 70126 Bari, Italy
2Physics Department, University of Bari, 70126 Bari, Italy

Received 27 August 2011; Accepted 17 October 2011

Academic Editors: C. A. de. S. Pires and A. Koshelev

Copyright © 2012 P. Cea and L. Cosmai. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. J. F. Gunion, H. E. Haber, G. Kane, and S. Dawson, The Higgs Hunter's Guide, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, Calif, USA, 1990.
  2. A. Djouadi, “The anatomy of electroweak symmetry breaking. Tome I: the Higgs boson in the Standard Model,” Physics Reports, vol. 457, no. 1–4, pp. 1–216, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. K. G. Wilson and J. Kogut, “The renormalization group and the ε expansion,” Physics Reports, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 75–199, 1974. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Lüscher and P. Weisz, “Scaling laws and triviality bounds in the lattice φ4 theory. (I). One-component model in the symmetric phase,” Nuclear Physics, vol. 290, no. C, pp. 25–60, 1987. View at Google Scholar
  5. M. Lüscher and P. Weisz, “Scaling laws and triviality bounds in the lattice ϕ4 theory. (II). One-component model in the phase with spontaneous symmetry breaking,” Nuclear Physics, vol. 295, no. 1, pp. 65–92, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  6. R. Fernandez, J. Fröhlich, and A. D. Sokal, Random Walks, Critical Phenomena, and Triviality in Quantum Field Theory, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 1992.
  7. C. B. Lang, Computer Stochastics in Scalar Quantum Field Theory, arXiv:hep-lat/9312004v1, 1993.
  8. M. Consoli and P. M. Stevenson, “The non-trivial effective potential of the 'trivial' λΦ4 theory: a lattice test,” Zeitschrift für Physik C, vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 427–436, 1994. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. P. Cea, M. Consoli, and L. Cosmai, “Indications on the Higgs boson mass from lattice simulations,” Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements, vol. 129-130, pp. 780–782, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. P. Cea, M. Consoli, and L. Cosmai, “Large rescaling of the Higgs condensate: theoretical motivations and lattice results,” Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements, vol. 83-84, no. 1–3, pp. 658–660, 2000. View at Google Scholar
  11. S. Coleman and E. Weinberg, “Radiative corrections as the origin of spontaneous symmetry breaking,” Physical Review D, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1888–1910, 1973. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. R. Jackiw, “Functional evaluation of the effective potential,” Physical Review D, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 1686–1701, 1974. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. D. S. Gaunt, M. F. Sykes, and S. McKenzie, “Susceptibility and fourth-field derivative of the spin-1/ 2 Ising model for T>Tc and d=4,” Journal of Physics A: General Physics, vol. 12, no. 6, article 018, pp. 871–877, 1979. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. R. H. Swendsen and J.-S. Wang, “Nonuniversal critical dynamics in Monte Carlo simulations,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 86–88, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  15. U. Wolff, “Collective monte Carlo updating for spin systems,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 62, no. 4, pp. 361–364, 1989. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. J. Balog, A. Duncan, R. Willey, F. Niedermayer, and P. Weisz, “The 4d one component lattice φ4 model in the broken phase revisited,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 714, no. 3, pp. 256–268, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. P. Cea, M. Consoli, and L. Cosmai, Large Logarithmic Rescaling of the Scalar Condensate: A Subtlety with Substantial Phenomenological Implications, arXiv:hep-lat/0501013v1, 2005.
  18. P. M. Stevenson, “Comparison of perturbative RG theory with lattice data for the 4d Ising model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 729, no. 3, pp. 542–557, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet
  19. J. Balog, F. Niedermayer, and P. Weisz, “Repairing Stevenson's step in the 4d Ising model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 741, no. 3, pp. 390–403, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at MathSciNet · View at Scopus
  20. P. Castorina, M. Consoli, and D. Zappalà, “An alternative heavy Higgs mass limit,” Journal of Physics G: Nuclear and Particle Physics, vol. 35, no. 7, Article ID 072010, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  21. P. H. Lundow and K. Markstrom, “private communication,” 2009. View at Google Scholar
  22. A. Nisati, “Higgs searches at ATLAS,” in Proceedings of the 25 International Symposium on Lepton Photon Interactions at High Energies, Mumbai, India, August 2011.
  23. V. Sharma, “Higgs searches at CMS,” in Proceedings of the 25 International Symposium on Lepton Photon Interactions at High Energies, Mumbai, India, August 2011.
  24. S. Dittmaier, Handbook of LHC Higgs Cross Sections: 1. Inclusive Observables, arXiv:1109.5922, 2011.
  25. P. Cea and L. Cosmai, The Trivial Higgs at LHC, arXiv:1101.0593v3, 2011.