International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 680598 | https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/680598

Sofía Borrego, Paola Lavin, Ivette Perdomo, Sandra Gómez de Saravia, Patricia Guiamet, "Determination of Indoor Air Quality in Archives and Biodeterioration of the Documentary Heritage", International Scholarly Research Notices, vol. 2012, Article ID 680598, 10 pages, 2012. https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/680598

Determination of Indoor Air Quality in Archives and Biodeterioration of the Documentary Heritage

Academic Editor: M. T. Rowe
Received19 Jul 2012
Accepted23 Aug 2012
Published30 Oct 2012

Abstract

Documentary heritage is permanently subject to suffering from physical, chemical, and/or biological alterations. Biological deterioration by microorganisms (bacteria and fungi) causes undesirable changes on material properties. Microorganisms affect different organic, natural or synthetic substrates (cellulose, polycarbonates), metals, and compounds of optical and magnetic devices (CD, VHS). Paper made by vegetal fibers, functional additives (glue, optical polishers, consolidating agents), and inks with organic bindings are used as sources of nutrients. The environmental microorganisms that form the microbial charge of indoor air at repositories (archives, libraries) storing cultural heritage can deteriorate the different supports of heritage importance and affect human health as allergies and skin affections. The aims of this research were to study microbial contamination of the environment and its influence on biodeterioration by the biofilm formation and to analyze the relationship between environment microbiota and biofilm formation in materials stored at three archives in Argentina and in two repositories of the National Archive of the Republic of Cuba.

1. Introduction

Archives preserve documents written on papyrus, parchment papers, papers, and electronic supports. These organic, inorganic, and synthetic materials are deteriorated by physical, chemical, and biological agents [1].

As environmental microorganisms can deteriorate the different supports of heritage significance [2, 3] as well as to affect human health as allergies and skin affections [4], it is important to investigate the microbial concentration of indoor air at repositories (archives and libraries) to preserve the cultural heritage. These microorganisms can be carried by dust particles into the indoor archive repositories by means of the people and the air ventilation systems [5] and when settling on the document surface they create a microecosystem that stops the normal flux of air on them. This situation conditions the surfaces to absorb humidity that helps the microbial adherence and the subsequent biofilm formation [2, 6]. At the suitable temperature and relative humidity the air microbiota can coexist together with the collections and people in a specific ecosystem without causing significant damages. However, when increasing thermohygrometric values at the repository, microorganisms can accelerate biodeterioration [3]. In order to define the air quality at archive repositories and to know the indoor ecosystems, it is necessary to systematically evaluate the microbial concentration of the air [2].

Most of microorganisms exist at indoor environments are saprophytic, and they obtain nutrients for their metabolism from inorganic and organic material such as wood, paper, painting, dust, rocks, and so forth [2, 7]. Fungi are the most important organisms as biodeterioration agents of the organic material, they produce extracellular enzymes and their hyphae can exert mechanical pressure on the support causing weakness [8].

The development and maintenance of a fungal community on a shelf of a library and archive or in a single book or document depends on the spores that reach the surface of the material, on the microenvironment (temperature, relative humidity, light), on the water activity of the substrate, and on the events that help colonization of materials (insect dispersion, human contamination, external sources of fungal diversity). When considering paper stored in a closed environment, its colonization and biodegradation depends on species identity and composition since only cellulolytic organisms can exploit the bulk of the substrate. As in natural environments, the diversity-functioning relationship is driven by the presence or absence of key species by niche differentiation and species interaction [9].

The aims of this research were to study microbial air quality and its influence on biodeterioration by the biofilm formation and to analyze the relationship between environment microbiota and biofilm formation in materials stored in three archives in Argentina and in two repositories of the National Archive of the Republic of Cuba.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Characterization of the Archives

Studies were performed at Historical Archive of Museum of La Plata (HAMLP), Archive of Historical and Cartographic Research Department from the Geodesy Direction (AHCRD), Archive of Notaries of Buenos Aires Province (AN) located in La Plata city, Buenos Aires Province, Argentina; at two repositories: Photo Library (PL) and Map Library (ML) of the National Archive of the Republic of Cuba (NARC) situated in La Havana city. The temperature () and relative humidity (RH) were measured inside of these repositories at each point of sampling at the moment when the microbiological sampling was performed using a digital thermo hygrometer (Model 8705, Bresciani, Italy).

2.2. Microbiological Sampling of Air

The determinations were made in October, 2010. The sedimentation method suggested by Omeliansky was used for the environmental microbiological sampling [10, 11]. Open Petri dishes at 2 m from the floor were placed for 30 minutes in five different points, by triplicate at the HAMLP, at the AHCRD, and at AN. Culture media employed were Nutrient Agar (Merck) for the bacteria growth and YGC (Yeast extract Agar, Glucose and Chloramphenicol, Merck) to isolate fungi. At the NARC repositories, the bacteria were isolated in the Agar Nutrient but the Malt Extract Agar (Merck) with addition of chloramphenicol (0.1%) [12]. Five different places were analyzed at the ML and two at the PL, by triplicate. Subsequently, the dishes were incubated at °C for 72 hours and 7 days, respectively.

Once dishes incubated, fungal and bacterial colonies were counted. Colony forming units per cubic metre (CFU · m−3) were determined, taking into account the following equation described by Omeliansky [10, 11]: where : microbial CFU · m−3 of indoor air; : number of colonies per Petri dish; : dish surface, cm2; : exposure time, min.

relative microbial distribution was conducted according to Smith [13], where

2.3. Documents Analyzed

All documents analyzed are from the 19th Century. At HAMLP three photos were analyzed, two paper photos (F1 and F2) and one glass slide (F3); at AHCRD, one book (L1) and one map (M3), both made of paper; at AN two paper notarial acts (P1a, P1b and P2). From the MLNARC two maps were analyzed, one of paper (M1) and the other of silk (M2) and from the PLNARC, two photographs, one of silk (F3A) and the other of paper (F4).

2.4. Isolation of Microorganisms from Documents

Samples of 1 cm2 from the surface of the documents were taken using sterile cotton swabs [14, 15]. Cotton swabs were submerged in 1 mL of sterile distilled water and decimal dilutions were performed. Suitable dilutions of each sample were inoculated onto Nutrient Agar on Petri dishes to isolate total bacteria. They were incubated at °C for 72 h and subsequently colonies were counted by spread plate [16]. Amylolytic and proteolytic bacteria were counted in differential culture media (Starch Agar and Frazier Gelatin Agar) and their percentages were determined in relation to the total aerobic bacteria. Acid-producing bacteria were enumerated in broth for total acidifying bacteria [6, 14].

A similar procedure was used to determine the absence/presence of sulphite reducing bacteria (Clostridium sp.), but the aliquots were inoculated into differential-reinforced Clostridium broth (DRCM) and incubated at (°C) for 15 days. In some cases cells were enumerated by the most probable number (MPN) method [16].

To count colonies of fungi, suitable dilutions of each sample from different materials were inoculated onto YGC Agar and incubated at °C for 5 days prior to counting colonies [16].

2.5. Identification of the Microorganisms Isolated from Air and Documents

Cultural and morphological characteristics of fungal colonies were observed and the identification was performed according to different manuals [1720]. Bacteria were typified according to the Gram stain and the biochemical tests described in the Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology [21]. Bacillus sp. was identified by molecular techniques [22].

2.6. Laboratory and SEM Studies

Microsamples from original documents were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Bacillus sp., a strain commonly isolated from documents, were tested. This microorganism was cultivated in tubes with solid mineral medium, and a strip of filter paper was placed as the sole carbon source. The same medium with the addition of 1% glucose was the control employed. The adhesions to paper together with biodeterioration were observed by SEM Jeol 6360 LV. For their observation, samples were prepared keeping them in a closed chamber with ethyl alcohol for 24 hours and metalized with Au/Pd.

2.7. Qualitative Determination of the Cellulolytic Activity and the Production of Pigments by Fungi

The fungal strains isolated were seeded in a culture medium whose saline composition for 1 L is sodium nitrate 2 g; dipotassium phosphate 1 g; magnesium sulphate 0,5 g; potassium chloride 0,5 g; yeast extract 0,5 g; ferrous sulphate 0,01 g; agar 20 g; pH = 5.5. A strip of filter paper 4,8 cm long and 1 cm wide (equivalent to 50 mg of filter paper) was used as the sole carbon source in one case and in the other, crystalline cellulose (1%), glucose (1%) was used as control. The cultures were incubated at °C during 21 days [11, 23].

2.8. Qualitative Determination of Proteolytic Activities by Fungi

Proteolytic activity was determined using only gelatin hydrolysis assay in a tube test. In this case, each isolate was inoculated by puncture inside gelatin medium in a test tube. The medium composition was identical to that before assay, but gelatin at 120 g/L was added as the carbon source. The inoculated tubes were incubated for 7 days at °C. Afterwards they were stored at 4°C and a gelatin hydrolysis reaction was evidenced by medium liquefaction when the tubes were inverted [11, 24].

2.9. Qualitative Determination of Amylolytic Activities by Fungi

Each fungal strain isolated was seeded in a Petri dish with a saline composition similar to the one previously used and starch was (5 g/L) employed as the carbon source. After 7 days of incubation at °C, 5 mL of Lugol’s reagent were added over each culture plate, and the presence of a colourless zone around the colonies was taken as an indication of the positive hydrolysis [11].

2.10. Determination of the Production of Acids by Fungi

A suspension of spores from the fungal strains isolated was seeded in a culture broth with a saline composition similar to the one previously used, but with glucose at 1%, pH was adjusted in 7. Cultures were incubated at the same temperature for three days and then the pH of the culture medium was measured using a pH meter [11].

2.11. Statistical Analysis

The ANOVA-1 and Duncan tests were used to compare the environment concentration of fungi and bacteria among different Argentinean archives. The Student’s -test was used to evaluate differences in the fungal and bacterial concentration of the air in two repositories of NARC. Results with were considered statistically significant.

3. Results

When analyzing fungal and bacterial concentrations in the air of Argentinean archives (Table 1), a great variation in spite of having similar values of temperature and relative humidity can be observed. The Archive of the Notaries (AN) was that of greater total microbial concentration (14400 CFU · m−3) and where the greater fungi concentration in the environment was detected (7667 CFU · m−3).


ArchivesCFU · m−3
FungiBacteriaTotal microorganisms* (°C) RH (%)

HAMLP120a100d22019.7 ± 1.450.6 ± 5.1
AHCRD1271b1422e269318.7 ± 1.650.1 ± 5.2
AN7667c6827f1449418.5 ± 1.968.6 ± 1.7

a,b,c,d,e,fIndicates significant differences according to the Duncan test (P 0.05) on comparing the environmental concentration of fungi and bacteria among different Argentinean archives. The microbial determination was made in 5 points by triplicate and the data averaged ( ). *Indicates the sum of the median concentration of fungi and bacteria.

Fungal and bacterial concentrations of the environment at the NARC repositories (Table 2), with a higher relative humidity, were lower than those obtained in some Argentinean archives. In these repositories fungal concentration oscillated between 60 and 261 CFU · m−3 and bacterial concentration ranged between 502 and 2149 CFU · m−3. However, the greatest fungal and bacterial concentrations were detected at the PLNARC.


RepositoriesCFU · m−3
FungiBacteriaTotal microorganisms* (°C) RH (%)

Map library (ML) 60a 502c56224.0 ± 0.152 ± 1.0
Photo library (PL) 261b 1149d 141028.0 ± 0.565 ± 1.0

a,b,c,dIndicates significant differences according to the Student’s test ( 0.05) on comparing the fungi and bacteria concentration between the repositories of NARC. The microbial determination was made in 5 and 2 points by triplicate, respectively and the data averaged ( ). *Indicates the sum of the median concentration of fungi and bacteria.

The prevailing fungal genera isolated from air (Figure 1) were Aspergillus and Penicillium, although Cladosporium, Curvularia, Alternaria, Fusarium, Scopulariopsis, and Syncephalastrum were also isolated. At the AHCRD Aspergillus spp. prevailed (60%), at the AN, Aspergillus and Penicillium were isolated with the same relative distribution (30%), whereas at the HAMLP, colonies belonging to the Penicillium spp. were the only found (100%). At the MLNARC Penicillium prevailed (40%) whereas at the PLNARC it was Aspergillus the predominant one (41%).

Scopulariopsis spp. was only found at the Argentinean archives of AHCRD and AN (8 and 9%, resp.) while Syncephalastrum spp. was only detected at MLNARC (20%).

In relation to bacterial groups of air (Figure 2), Gram-positive bacteria in the majority of archives studied except for MLNARC were Gram-negative bacteria prevailed (77%). In the air of the Argentinean archives the Bacillus spp. prevailed but it was not the case of the NARC, as only at the PLNARC a 3% of this bacterial genus was found.

In air of NARC repositories low concentrations of Streptomyces spp. were detected, but this bacterial genus was not found in the air of Argentine archives.

Microbial counts obtained in different documents analyzed (Table 3) showed a bacterial predominance regardless of the type of document support. This trend was similar to that obtained in the air from the repositories analyzed. In Figure 3 microbial adherence, biofilms formation, and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) by scanning electron microscopy on document can be observed. It is worth mentioning that bacterial and fungal concentrations that adhered on the documents preserved at the AHCRD were significantly lower than the rest of the documents analyzed, regardless of the support they are made of. However, in some documents, the bacteria adhesion found was greater than that of fungi. It can also be observed that bacterial concentration of the map and photograph of silk (M2 and F3A) was significantly higher than in the rest of the maps and photographs of paper or crystal.


Type of documentLocationCFU · m−2
BacteriaFungi

Paper map 1 (M1)Map Library (NARC)3.5 1042.2 104
Silk map 2 (M2)Map Library (NARC)7.1 1052.0 102
Paper map 3 (M3)AHCRD203
Paper book 1 (L1)AHCRD21
Paper photograph 1 (F1)HAMLP2.2 1031.0 102
Paper photograph 2 (F2)HAMLP3.7 104
Glass slide 3 (F3)HAMLP3.0 1041.0 103
Silk photograph 3A (F3A)Photo Library (NARC)1.2 1051.5 102
Paper photograph 4 (F4)Photo Library (NARC)3.9 1042.8 104
Paper protocol 1a (P1a)AN1.3 1031.4 103
Paper protocol 1b (P1b)AN4.0 1025.0 102
Paper protocol 2 (P2)AN1.1 1062.0 104

Physiological characteristics of bacteria isolated of documents showed high concentrations of amylolytic and proteolytic bacteria in great part of documents analyzed (Table 4). From the M2 map and the F3A photograph having a silk support, the greatest concentrations of proteolytic bacteria were isolated. Also, acidifying bacteria were isolated from the M3 paper map, F1 paper photograph and paper protocols P1a, P1b, and P2.


Type of document (CFU · cm−2)
TABABPBAcidifying BSulphite RB  ( sp.)

M13.5 1041.1 1044.2 103
M27.1 1053.0 1043.0 105
M3203+
L12
F12.2 1033.4 1032.3 103++
F23.0 1041.0 103.7 104
F33.0 1042.5 1043.0 104
F3A1.2 1057.2 1032.4 105+
F43.9 1041.6 104+
P1a1.3 10320+
P1b4.0 10233+
P21.1 1063 1031.1 103++

TAB: total aerobic bacteria determined on nutrient agar; AB: amylolytic bacteria determined on starch agar; PB: proteolytic bacteria determined on Frazier gelatin agar; Acidifying B: acidifying bacteria determined on broth for total acidifying bacteria; sulphite RB: sulphite reducing bacteria determined on reinforced Clostridium medium (DRCM).

Sulphate reducing bacteria were not detected in the documents studied. Clostridium spp. were detected in F1 and F4 paper photographs, in F3A (silk photograph), and in P2 (paper protocol).

Different fungal and bacterial genera were isolated from the documents (Table 5), the prevailing fungal Aspergillus spp. (A. niger and A. flavus were isolated from the great part of documents) and Penicillium spp. were detected in 83.3% and 50%, respectively. As regards M2 silk map, Talaromyces helicus Benjamín var. major (teleomorph of Penicillium) was isolated. Besides, from the M3 map and P1a protocol, both of paper, Scopulariopsis spp. was isolated. Cellulolytic, proteolytic and amylolytic activities, and production of acids were detected in all fungal strains isolated (Table 6).


Type of microorganism and/or morphological characteristicsM1M2M3L1F1F2F3F3AF4P1aP1bP2

Fungi
Aspergillus spp.+ + ++++ + +++
Penicillium spp.++++++
Talaromyces helicus +
Cladosporium spp.+
Alternaria spp.+
Scopulariopsis spp.++
 Non-sporing isolated+

Bacteria
Bacillus spp.++++++++++
Clostridium spp. ++
 Gram-positive cocci++++++
 Gram-negative cocci+++
 Non sporulated Gram-positive bacilli+a+++
 Gram-negative bacilli++++

aIndicates that strains of Streptomyces spp. were isolated too.

IsolateStrainDegradation of celluloseProduction of acidsAmylolytic ActivityProteolytic Activity
Growth on filter paperGrowth on crystalline cellulose Pigment productionapHStarch degradationDegradation of gelatin

AIRAspergillus niger 1+ + + + + ++3.90++
A. flavus 1+ + ++ +5.99++
A. clavatus 5.20++
A. versicolor + +++6.10++
A. terreus + + ++4.46++
Cladosporium cladosporoides + + ++ ++3.93+
C. herbarum +±6.42++
C. sphaerospermum +±6.47++
C. oxysporum 1+ ++ ++6.90
C. elatum + + + + + ++6.87+
Cladosporium spp.+ + + + + ++6.70+
Penicillium commune 1+ + +++5.10++
P. citrinum 15.26++
P. chrysogenum 1+ + +5.83++
P. griseofulvum + + ++ ++5.73++
Fusarium solani + + ++ ++5.95+
Fusarium sp. + + ++5.32++
Curvularia lunata + + +6.77+
C. pallescens + + +++5.70++
Alternariaalternata + + ++ + +6.54+
Syncephalastrum sp. + + ++ + ++4.80++

MAPSAspergillus niger 2+ + ++ + ++4.52++
A. flavus 2+ + + + + +4.35+ +
P. commune 2+ + + + ++3.58++
P. chrysogenum 2+ + ++3.65++
Alternaria sp. + +++5.21++
Talaromyces helicus + + + +5.62++

PHOTOSAspergillus niger 3+ + + + + ++3.15++
A. flavus 3+ +++5.00+ +
Penicillium decumbens + + ++6.18++
P. citrinum 2+ + ++ + +3.14++
Non-sporing isolated+ + +2.69+

+ + +: Indicates abundant growth, + +: Indicates moderate growth, +: Indicates poor growth, it is also indicative of the presence of pigment, ±: Indicates very poor growth or production of pigment, −: Indicates NO growth and NO production of pigment. aThe production of pigments was evidenced on the filter paper strip.

In relation with bacteria isolated from documents, it was observed that 80% of them were Gram-positive bacteria such as Bacillus, Clostridium, and Streptomyces genera. Only 24% of Gram-negative bacteria were found.

4. Discussion

When comparing environments of the archives, it can be seen that the HAMLP is the only archive having a microbial concentration lower than 150 CFU · m−3, the rest showed higher ones. Fungi concentrations were lower than 300 CFU · m−3 only at the HAMLP, but at the NARC (MLNARC and PLNARC) repositories, at the AHCRD and at the AN they were significantly higher, reaching a value of 7000 CFU · m−3.

Bacterial concentrations were higher than the fungal ones at AHCRD and NARC, whereas at the HAMLP and at AN the last ones were lower.

In other previous samplings, when employing the sedimentation method proposed by Omeliansky, we obtained as a tendency that the fungal concentration was lower than the bacterial one [6, 11]; however, at the HAMLP and at AN it happened the contrary. This difference can be due to the fact that these archives do not have a ventilation system that facilitates water absorption by conidia and their sedimentation, as it was explained by Reponen et al. [25].

The low microbial concentrations at the HAMLP can be caused by the outdoor environment characteristics, which is much cleaner than the NARC. The NARC is located in a port zone, near factories and a busy avenue; consequently there is a high entry of dust into the deposits through the tubes of natural ventilation which do not have anti-dust filters. However, the AHCRD and AN archives, situated in the town center of La Plata, characterized by a high traffic and dust pollution, neither have ventilation systems nor suitable sanitary conditions.

Despite the fact that there is no international standard to determine whether an indoor environment is contaminated or not, it has been suggested that environments with a microbial prevalence above 1000 CFU · m−3 should be considered contaminated [5]. Other authors consider that total microbial prevalence (bacteria and fungi combined) should not exceed 750 CFU · m−3—above this level the environment is regarded as contaminated [26], and still other authors consider that 300 CFU · m−3 should be the lower limit for fungi [27]. However, from 1998 the Ministery of Culture in Italy established that the air of a good quality in Italian archives, libraries, and museums cannot exceed the 750 CFU · m−3 of bacteria or the 150 CFU · m−3 of fungi [28].

Considering what was said before it can be appreciated that the HAMLP and MLNARC indoor environments are not contaminated. In the PLNARC case the bacteria values are very high and for that reason it can be considered as a contaminated environment. The environments of the AHCRD and AN are highly contaminated.

When analyzing the relationship between the microbial concentration and the and RH values (Tables 1 and 2), it can be observed that there is a very high variability between Argentinean and Cuban archives. In the Argentinean archives, and RH are suitable for document preservation [1] but the climatic conditions in the National Archive of Cuba are higher than optimal to preserve special materials (photographs and maps) despite being climatized the repositories. However, the adequate hygienic conditions of these repositories imply that concentrations of airborne microorganisms are lower than those of most Argentines archives. Similar results for the HAMLP and PLNARC have been obtained before [6, 11].

Aspergillus spp. was the predominant one in the air of PLNARC (41.3%) and in the AHCRD (40%) whereas Penicillium spp. predominated in the air of HAMLP (100%) and of the Map Library (40%). In the AN archive both genera were represented at similar proportions (30%). Other genera isolated were Scopulariopsis, Fusarium, Alternaria, Curvularia, Syncephalastrum and Cladosporium, in accordance with other authors [6, 7, 11, 12, 29].

It is known that the majority of the fungal genus isolated from the air of archives, libraries, and museums exhibit cellulolytic, proteolytic, and/or amylolytic activities, produce acids, excrete different pigments on the substrates (paper) (Table 6), and contribute to the formation of biofilms, which accelerate the deterioration of the different document substrates [2, 6, 11, 30]. When the relative humidity increases and indoor environments are without ventilation during long periods of time the conidia could be deposited more quickly over documents and deteriorate the document supports.

In relation with environmental bacteria (cocci and rod shaped) the predominance of Gram-positives (HAMLP: 100%, AHCRD: 88%, AN: 84%, PLNARC: 92%) was observed. Only at MLNARC the Gram-negative bacteria predominate (77%). At the NARC deposits Streptomyces spp. strains were isolated (from 1 to 8%) considered as one of the most important genera in relation with occupational risks [31]. In all the Argentinean archives Bacillus spp. was the predominant genus according to similar results previously obtained [11]; however, this bacteria genus has been isolated in the environment of other NARC deposits [11, 29]. Others Gram-positive genera such as Staphylococcus, Streptococcus could be found and within the Gram-negative, strains of Serratia spp., Pseudomonas spp., Serratia marcescens,and Enterobacter agglomerans were identified.

Genera as Bacillus, Serratia, Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Streptomyces were isolated by other authors in archive and museums indoor environment [7, 29, 32]. Enterobacter spp. has been isolated in other samplings in the NARC [11, 29].

Results obtained for the Gram-positive bacteria are in agreement with those reported by literature for this type of environments [33, 34].

Microbial adherence to document substrates showed viable bacteria and fungi. In particular, on the map (M2) and on the photo (F3A), both of silk, bacterial concentrations were higher than those obtained in other maps and photos, this could be due to the protein nature of support which would help the existence of a high concentration of viable proteolytic bacteria. Within the isolated Gram-positive bacteria genera Bacillus, Clostridium and Streptomyces could be found. Similar results were reported by Garside [35] and Michaelsen et al. [8].

Bacillus and Streptomyces genera are able to excrete hydrolytic enzymes such as proteases and chitinases [36, 37] that can degrade proteins and chitin that is part of the fungal wall [38]. It is probable that fungi concentrations on these documents (M2 and F3A) were the lowest ones. A bacterial genus anaerobic facultative, as Clostridium spp., was detected on the paper book (L1), the silk photograph (F3A) and the paper photograph (F4). This genus has also proteolytic and cellulolytic activities and seems to play an active role in the deterioration processes [8, 24, 30, 39], for these reason the strain could damage the document substrates if the weather conditions (T, RH, and ventilation) of the repositories environments would be favorable for its development.

It was reported that during the manufacturing process of the paper photograph, the Bacillus spp. can pollute the gelatin belonging to the emulsion [40]. More recently, it was demonstrated that many bacteria can colonize the gelatin during the manufacturing process of the paper photograph, and despite of the fact that Bacillus was the predominant genus, nonsporulated bacteria from different species belonging to the Salmonella, Kluyvera, Pseudomonas, Enterococcus, Streptococcus, and Staphylococcus [41] genera that can liquefy gelatin were identified.

This could explain the presence of other shapes of bacteria and Gram stain that is in accordance with every genus mentioned before. De Clerck et al. [42] reported that other endospore forming bacteria could also contaminate the gelatin, as they are able to resist the treatment employed during disinfection. This could justify the detection of Bacillus spp. and Clostridium, spp. strains on the photographs analyzed.

Bacillus spp. has been already isolated from paper affected by foxing (rusty-red and irregular shaped areas caused by metal contamination, fungi and moisture condensation processes on paper) [2, 43] as well as from wooden art objects in museum environments [32]. Furthermore, Bacillus and related species have been shown to be the most commonly detected bacteria (up to about 20%) among the variety of microbial species isolated from the pulp and paper mill environment [44].

In addition, Bacillus spp. have been found as the predominant cellulolytic group of bacteria in landfill, where cellulose accounts for 40% to 50% of the municipal solid waste [45], and they form a significant proportion of the intestinal microbial community of soil invertebrates, especially among cellulose degraders [46].

The actinomycetes, in particular Streptomyces, are capable of decomposing relatively complex organic substances such as cellulose, pectin, chitin, proteins, and humic substances [47].

The presence of these bacteria on documents results to be highly risky for their preservation, they can degrade paper at a relative humidity of 90% in 24 hours what could be carried out if relative humidity of deposits would abruptly increase.

In relation with fungi isolated from documents, the Aspergillus genus was the predominant and the Aspergillus niger and Aspergillus flavus species were detected in all documents, colonies of Penicillium spp., and Cladosporium spp. were isolated too. From the M2 silk map Talaromyces helicus Benjamín var. major (Penicillium teleomorph) was isolated [6] and in other documents colonies of Alternaria, Scopulariosis and nonsporing isolations were obtained.

It is worth mentioning that the Aspergillus spp., Penicillium spp., Cladosporium spp., Alternaria spp. and Scopulariopsis spp. were also isolated from the air of these rooms, which can colonize different surfaces due to their cosmopolitan distribution [8, 48]. It was found that teleomorphic shapes of fungi are difficult to isolate from the surface of art objects and documents [2], however, Michaelsen et al. [8] have recently detected teleomorphs from other fungi, showing that these fungal shapes can be isolated from documents.

The succession of biological “events” that could have occurred to the object is somehow recorded in the microbial and fungal dead or living material present in it. Among the fungal species found in the documents, some of them could be considered strongly cellulolytic and, therefore, capable of colonizing pure cellulose. This is the case of the Penicillium teleomorph (Talaromyces helicus Benjamín var. major) which has cellulolytic activity, the A. niger y A. flavus species [6, 29, 49], Penicillium spp., Cladosporium spp., Alternaria spp., and Scopulariopsis spp. [6, 29, 50].

Acknowledgments

the authors thank the National University of La Plata (UNLP) Incentive Project 11N 578, the National Council of Scientific and Technical Research-PIP 0200 (CONICET), the Scientific Commission Research of the Buenos Aires province (CIC-2410/12), the Scientific Collaboration Project MINCyT/CITMA (Argentina-Cuba) Cu/09/09, and the ADAI Program Project 2008/140. Also, they are grateful to BA Patricia Battistoni for technical support, BA Juan Carlos Alvarez Gelves and Dr. Silvia Ametrano for allowing the microbial sampling on AHCRD and HAMLP, respectively, the Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (Spain) for its financial support (grants AL07-PID-02 and AL08-PID-08), and they acknowledge Ana M. García and Diego A. Moreno for their assistance with biomolecular techniques.

References

  1. A. Walker, Basic Preservation Guidelines For Library and Archive Colections, National Preservation Office, The British Library, 2003, http://www.bl.uk/blpac/pdf/basic.pdf.
  2. M. L. E. Florian, Fungal Facts. Solving Fungal Problems in Heritage Collections, Archetype Publications, London, UK, 2004.
  3. F. Pinzari, G. Pasquariello, and A. De Mico, “Biodeterioration of paper: A SEM study of fungal spoilage reproduced under controlled conditions,” Macromolecular Symposia, vol. 238, pp. 57–66, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. K. Huttunen, A. Hyvärinen, A. Nevalainen, H. Komulainen, and M. R. Hirvonen, “Production of proinflammatory mediators by indoor air bacteria and fungal spores in mouse and human cell lines,” Environmental Health Perspectives, vol. 111, no. 1, pp. 85–92, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  5. A. Nevalainen and L. Morawaska, Eds., Biological Agents in Indoor Environments. Assessment of Health Risks, Work conducted by a WHO Expert Group between 2000–2003, QUT, 2009, http://www.ilaqh.qut.edu.au/Misc/BIOLOGICALAGENTS,2009.pdf.
  6. P. Guiamet, S. Borrego, P. Lavin, I. Perdomo, and S. G. D. Saravia, “Biofouling and biodeterioration in materials stored at the Historical Archive of the Museum of La Plata, Argentine and at the National Archive of the Republic of Cuba,” Colloids and Surfaces B, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 229–234, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. N. Valentín, “Microorganisms in museum collections,” Coalition, no. 19, pp. 2–6, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  8. A. Michaelsen, G. Piñar, and F. Pinzari, “Molecular and microscopical investigation of the microflora inhabiting a deteriorated Italian manuscript dated from the thirteenth century,” Microbial Ecology, vol. 60, no. 1, pp. 69–80, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. D. A. Wardle, “Is 'sampling effect' a problem for experiments investigating biodiversity-ecosystem function relationships?” Oikos, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 403–407, 1999. View at: Google Scholar
  10. E. Bogomolova and I. Kirtsideli, “Airborne fungi in four stations of the St. Petersburg Underground railway system,” International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 156–160, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. S. Borrego, P. Guiamet, S. Gómez de Saravia et al., “The quality of air at archives and the biodeterioration of photographs,” International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 139–145, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. B. Gutarowska, “Metabolic activity of moulds as a factor of building materials biodegradation,” Polish Journal of Microbiology, vol. 59, no. 2, pp. 119–124, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  13. G. Smith, Ecology and Field Biology, Harper & Row, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 1980.
  14. P. S. Guiamet, P. Lavin, P. Battistoni, and S. G. Gómez de Saravia, “Different techniques applied to the study of biodeterioration of documentary heritage: paper, VHS magnetic tape and compact discs,” in Proceedings of the 14th International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation Symposium, pp. 64–65, Mesina, Italy, October, 2008. View at: Google Scholar
  15. F. Pinzari, M. Montanari, A. Michaelsen, and G. Piñar, “Analytical protocols for the assessment of biological damage in historical documents,” Coalition, no. 19, pp. 6–13, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  16. M. T. Madigan, J. M. Martinko, P. Dunlap, and D. Clark, Brock Biology of Microorganisms, Benjamin Cummings, 12th edition, 2009.
  17. M. B. Ellis, More Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes, Commonwealth Mycological Institute, Surrey, England, 1976.
  18. H. L. Barnett and B. B. Hunter, Illustrated Genera of Imperfect Fungi, Burgess Publishing, Minneapolis, Minn, USA, 3rd edition, 1987.
  19. J. I. Pitt, A Laboratory Guide To Common Penicillium Species, CSIRO, North Ryde, Australia, 2nd edition, 1988.
  20. M. A. Klich and J. I. Pitt, A Laboratory Guide To Common Aspergillus Species and Their Teleomorphs, CSIRO, Division of Food Processing, North Ryde, Australia, 1994.
  21. P. Sneath, N. Mair, M. Sharpe, and J. Holt, Eds., Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, vol. 2, Williams & Wilkins, Baltimore, Md, USA, 2000.
  22. P. Guiamet, V. Rosato, S. Gómez de Saravia, A. M. García, and D. Moreno, “Biofouling of crypts of historical and architectural interest at La Plata cemetery (Argentina),” Journal of Cultural Heritage, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 339–344, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  23. G. S. Rautela and E. B. Cowling, “Simple culture test for relative cellulolytic activity of fungi,” Applied Microbiology, vol. 14, no. 6, pp. 892–898, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  24. C. Abrusci, A. Martín-González, A. Del Amo, F. Catalina, J. Collado, and G. Platas, “Isolation and identification of bacteria and fungi from cinematographic films,” International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 58–68, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  25. T. Reponen, S. A. Grinshpun, K. L. Conwell, J. Wiest, and M. Anderson, “Aerodynamic versus physical size of spores: measurement and implication for respiratory deposition,” Grana, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 119–125, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. F. Radler de Aquino and L. F. de Góes, “Guidelines for indoor air quality in offices in Brazil,” Proceedings of Healthy Buildings, vol. 4, pp. 549–553, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  27. F. Cappitelli, P. Fermo, R. Vecchi et al., “Chemical-physical and microbiological measurements for indoor air quality assessment at the ca' granda historical archive, Milan (Italy),” Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, vol. 201, no. 1–4, pp. 109–120, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. F. Cappitelli and C. Sorlini, “Paper and manuscripts,” in Cultural Heritage Microbiology: Studies in Conservation Science, R. Mitchell and C. J. McNamara, Eds., pp. 45–59, ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  29. S. Borrego and I. Perdomo, “Aerobiological investigations inside repositories of the National Archive of the Republic of Cuba,” Aerobiologia, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 303–316, 2012. View at: Google Scholar
  30. C. Abrusci, D. Marquina, A. Del Amo, and F. Catalina, “Biodegradation of cinematographic gelatin emulsion by bacteria and filamentous fungi using indirect impedance technique,” International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 137–143, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  31. H. Rintala, M. Pitkäranta, M. Toivola, L. Paulin, and A. Nevalainen, “Diversity and seasonal dynamics of bacterial community in indoor environment,” BMC Microbiology, vol. 8, article 56, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. D. Pangallo, A. Šimonovičová, K. Chovanová, and P. Ferianc, “Wooden art objects and the museum environment: identification and biodegradative characteristics of isolated microflora,” Letters in Applied Microbiology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 87–94, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. H. Zhu, P. E. Phelan, T. Duan, G. B. Raupp, H. J. S. Fernando, and F. Che, “Experimental study of indoor and outdoor airborne bacterial concentrations in Tempe, Arizona, USA,” Aerobiologia, vol. 19, no. 3-4, pp. 201–211, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. F. C. Tsai and J. M. Macher, “Concentrations of airborne culturable bacteria in 100 large US office buildings from the BASE study,” Indoor Air, vol. 15, supplement 9, pp. 71–81, 2005. View at: Google Scholar
  35. P. Garside, “Textiles,” in Cultural Heritage Microbiology: Fundamental Studies in Conservation Science, R. Mitchell and C. J. McNamara, Eds., pp. 97–110, ASM Press, Washington, DC, USA, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  36. G. E. Aktuganov, N. F. Galimzyanova, A. I. Melent'ev, and L. Y. Kuz'mina, “Extracellular hydrolases of strain Bacillus sp. 739 and their involvement in the lysis of micromycete cell walls,” Microbiology, vol. 76, no. 4, pp. 413–420, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. E. Strzelczyk, K. Gorlach, and H. Rózycki, “Chitinolytic and proteolytic activity of streptomycetes isolated from root-free soil, rhizosphere and mycorrhizosphere of pine (Pinus sylvestris L.),” Biology and Fertility of Soils, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 268–272, 1990. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. Morales De La Vega, J. E. Barboza-Corona, M. G. Aguilar-Uscanga, and M. Ramírez-Lepe, “Purification and characterization of an exochitinase from Bacillus thuringiensis subsp. aizawai and its action against phytopathogenic fungi,” Canadian Journal of Microbiology, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 651–657, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. E. Ágoston-Szabó, M. Dinka, L. Némedi, and G. Horváth, “Decomposition of Phragmites australis rhizome in a shallow lake,” Aquatic Botany, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 309–316, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. F. L. Stickley, “The biodegradation of gelatin and its problems in the photographic industry,” The Journal of Photographic Science, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 111–112, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  41. E. De Clerck and P. De Vos, “Study of the bacterial load in a gelatine production process focussed on Bacillus and related endosporeforming genera,” Systematic and Applied Microbiology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 611–617, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  42. E. De Clerck, T. Vanhoutte, T. Hebb, J. Geerinck, J. Devos, and P. De Vos, “Isolation, characterization, and identification of bacterial contaminants in semifinal gelatin extracts,” Applied and Environmental Microbiology, vol. 70, no. 6, pp. 3664–3672, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  43. M. R. De Paolis and D. Lippi, “Use of metabolic and molecular methods for the identification of a Bacillus strain isolated from paper affected by foxing,” Microbiological Research, vol. 163, no. 2, pp. 121–131, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  44. R. Chandra, S. Singh, M. M. K. Reddy, D. K. Patel, H. J. Purohit, and A. Kapley, “Isolation and characterization of bacterial strains Paenibacillus sp. and Bacillus sp. for kraft lignin decolorization from pulp paper mill waste,” Journal of General and Applied Microbiology, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 399–407, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  45. A. M. Pourcher, L. Sutra, I. Hébé et al., “Enumeration and characterization of cellulolytic bacteria from refuse of a landfill,” FEMS Microbiology Ecology, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 229–241, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  46. H. König, “Bacillus species in the intestine of termites and other soil invertebrates,” Journal of Applied Microbiology, vol. 101, no. 3, pp. 620–627, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  47. L. T. A. S. Semêdo, R. C. Gomes, A. A. Linhares et al., “Streptomyces drozdowiczii sp. nov., a novel cellulolytic streptomycete from soil in Brazil,” International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 1323–1328, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  48. M. Zotti, A. Ferroni, and P. Calvini, “Microfungal biodeterioration of historic paper: preliminary FTIR and microbiological analyses,” International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 186–194, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  49. T. V. Ojumu, B. O. Solomon, E. Betiku, S. K. Layokun, and B. Amigun, “Cellulase production by Aspergillus flavus Linn Isolate NSPR 101 fermented in sawdust, bagasse and corncob,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 150–152, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  50. K. B. R. Krogh, A. Mørkeberg, H. Jørgensen, J. C. Frisvad, and O. Lisbeth, “Screening genus Penicillium for producers of cellulolytic and xylanolytic enzymes,” Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology A, vol. 114, no. 1–3, pp. 389–401, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Sofía Borrego et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder
Views4921
Downloads1553
Citations

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. Review articles are excluded from this waiver policy. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.