Abstract

The paper deals with the study on conservative C-Bochner curvature tensor in K-contact and Kenmotsu manifolds admitting semisymmetric metric connection, and it is shown that these manifolds are η-Einstein with respect to Levi-Civita connection, and the results are illustrated with examples.

1. Introduction

In 1924, Friedmann and Schouten [1] introduced the idea of semisymmetric linear connection on a differentiable manifold. In 1932, Hayden [2] introduced the idea of metric connection with torsion on a Riemannian manifold. A systematic study of the semisymmetric metric connection on a Riemannian manifold was published by Yano [3] in 1970. After that the properties of semisymmetric metric connection have been studied by many authors like Amur and Pujar [4], Bagewadi [5], Sharfuddin and Hussain [6], De and Pathak [7], and so forth.

A K-contact manifold is a differentiable manifold with a contact metric structure such that 𝜉 is a Killing vector field ([8, 9]). These are studied by many authors like ([811]). The notion of Kenmotsu manifolds was defined by Kenmotsu [12]. Kenmotsu proved that a locally Kenmotsu manifold is a warped product 𝐼×𝑓𝑁 of an interval 𝐼 and a Kaehler manifold 𝑁 with warping function 𝑓(𝑡)=𝑠𝑒𝑡, where 𝑠 is a nonzero constant. For example it is hyperbolic space (1). Kenmotsu manifolds were studied by many authors such as Binh et al. [13], Bagewadi and Venkatesha [14].

In this paper we study conservative C-Bochner curvature tensor in K-contact and Kenmotsu manifolds admitting semisymmetric metric connection and obtain results on K-contact and Kenmotsu manifolds with respect to Levi-Civita connection.

2. Preliminaries

An 𝑛-dimensional differential manifold 𝑀 is said to have an almost contact structure (𝜙,𝜉,𝜂) if it carries a tensor field 𝜙 of type (1,1), a vector field 𝜉, and 1-form 𝜂 on 𝑀, respectively, such that𝜙2=𝐼+𝜂𝜉,𝜂(𝜉)=1,𝜂𝜙=0,𝜙𝜉=0.(2.1)

Thus a manifold 𝑀 equipped with this structure is called an almost contact manifold [9] and is denoted by (𝑀,𝜙,𝜉,𝜂). If 𝑔 is a Riemannian metric on an almost contact manifold 𝑀 such that,𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝜙𝑌)=𝑔(𝑋,𝑌)𝜂(𝑋)𝜂(𝑌),𝑔(𝑋,𝜉)=𝜂(𝑋),(2.2) where 𝑋 and 𝑌 are vector fields defined on 𝑀, then 𝑀 is said to have an almost contact metric structure (𝜙,𝜉,𝜂,𝑔) and 𝑀 with this structure is called an almost contact metric manifold and is denoted by (𝑀,𝜙,𝜉,𝜂,𝑔).

If on (𝑀,𝜙,𝜉,𝜂,𝑔) the exterior derivative of 1-form 𝜂 satisfies,𝑑𝜂(𝑋,𝑌)=𝑔(𝑋,𝜙𝑌),(2.3) then (𝜙,𝜉,𝜂,𝑔) is said to be a contact metric structure and 𝑀 equipped with a contact metric structure is called contact metric manifold.

If moreover 𝜉 is Killing vector field, then 𝑀 is called a K-contact manifold [8, 9]. A K-contact manifold is called Sasakian [9], if the relation𝑋𝜙𝑌=𝑔(𝑋,𝑌)𝜉𝜂(𝑌)𝑋(2.4) holds, where denotes the operator of covariant connection with respect to 𝑔.

An almost contact metric manifold, which satisfies the following conditions,𝑋𝜙𝑌=𝜂(𝑌)𝜙𝑋𝑔(𝑋,𝜙𝑌)𝜉,𝑋𝜉=𝑋𝜂(𝑋)𝜉,(2.5) where denotes the Riemannian connection of 𝑔 hold, (𝑀,𝜙,𝜉,𝜂,𝑔) is called a Kenmotsu manifold.

In a K-contact manifold 𝑀, the following properties hold:𝑋𝜉=𝜙𝑋,(2.6)𝑔(𝑅(𝜉,𝑋)𝑌,𝜉)=𝑔(𝑋,𝑌)𝜂(𝑋)𝜂(𝑌),(2.7)𝑅(𝜉,𝑋)𝜉=𝑋+𝜂(𝑋)𝜉,(2.8)𝑆(𝑋,𝜉)=(𝑛1)𝜂(𝑋),(2.9) where 𝑅 is the Riemannian curvature tensor, 𝑆 is the Ricci tensor and 𝑄 is the Ricci operator of 𝑀, respectively.

In a Kenmotsu manifold 𝑀, the following properties hold [12]: 𝑋𝜉=𝑋𝜂(𝑋)𝜉,(2.10)𝑅(𝑋,𝑌)𝜉=𝜂(𝑋)𝑌𝜂(𝑌)𝑋,(2.11)𝑆(𝑋,𝜉)=(𝑛1)𝜂(𝑋),(2.12)𝑄𝜉=(𝑛1)𝜉,(2.13) where 𝑅 is the Riemannian curvature tensor, 𝑆 is the Ricci tensor, and 𝑄 is the Ricci operator of 𝑀, respectively.

Let 𝑀 be an 𝑛-dimensional Riemannian manifold of class 𝐶 with metric tensor 𝑔 and let be the Levi-Civita connection on 𝑀. A linear connection in an almost contact metric manifold 𝑀 is said to be a semisymmetric connection if the torsion tensor 𝑇 of the connection satisfies𝑇(𝑋,𝑌)=𝜋(𝑌)𝑋𝜋(𝑋)𝑌,(2.14) where 𝜋 is a 1-form on 𝑀 with 𝜌 as associated vector field, that is, 𝜋(𝑋)=𝑔(𝑋,𝜌) for any differentiable vector field 𝑋 on 𝑀.

A semisymmetric connection is called semisymmetric metric connection if it further satisfies 𝑔=0.

In an almost contact manifold semisymmetric metric connection is defined by identifying the 1-form of (2.14) with the contact-form 𝜂, that is,𝑇(𝑋,𝑌)=𝜂(𝑌)𝑋𝜂(𝑋)𝑌,(2.15) with 𝜉 as associated vector field, that is, 𝑔(𝑋,𝜉)=𝜂(𝑋).

The relation between the semisymmetric metric connection and the Levi-Civita connection of 𝑀 has been obtained by Yano [3], which is given by𝑋𝑌=𝑋𝑌+𝜂(𝑌)𝑋𝑔(𝑋,𝑌)𝜉.(2.16) The above condition satisfies K-contact and Kenmotsu manifolds also.

We denote 𝑅, 𝑆, and 𝑟 by curvature tensor, Ricci tensor, and scalar curvature with respect to Levi-Civita connection and correspondingly 𝑅, 𝑆, and ̃𝑟 with respect to semisymmetric metric connection. If 𝐵 denotes C-Bochner curvature tensor [15] with respect to Levi-Civita connection 𝐵 with respect to semisymmetric metric connection is given by1𝐵(𝑋,𝑌)𝑍=𝑅(𝑋,𝑌)𝑍+×𝑔𝑆𝑆𝑛+3(𝑋,𝑍)𝑄𝑌(𝑌,𝑍)𝑋𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)𝑄𝑋+(𝑋,𝑍)𝑌+𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝑍)𝑄𝜙𝑌𝑆(𝜙𝑌,𝑍)𝜙𝑋𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝑍)𝑄𝜙𝑋+𝑆(𝜙𝑋,𝑍)𝜙𝑌+2𝑆(𝜙𝑋,𝑌)𝜙𝑍+2𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝑌)𝑄𝜙𝑍+𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍)𝑄𝑋𝜂(𝑌)𝑆(𝑋,𝑍)𝜉+𝜂(𝑋)𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)𝜉𝜂(𝑋)𝜂(𝑍)𝑄𝑌𝐷+𝑛1[]+𝐷𝑛+3𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝑍)𝜙𝑌𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝑍)𝜙𝑋+2𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝑌)𝜙𝑍[]𝑛+3𝜂(𝑌)𝑔(𝑋,𝑍)𝜉𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍)𝑋+𝜂(𝑋)𝜂(𝑍)𝑌𝜂(𝑋)𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)𝜉𝐷4[],𝑛+3𝑔(𝑋,𝑍)𝑌𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)𝑋(2.17) where 𝐷=(𝑛1+̃𝑟)/(𝑛+1).

Differentiate (2.17) covariantly with respect to and then contracting we get𝐵=Div𝑛+2𝑛+3𝑋𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)𝑌𝑆+1(𝑋,𝑍)×𝑛+3𝜙𝑌𝑆(𝜙𝑋,𝑍)𝜙𝑋𝑆(𝜙𝑌,𝑍)+2𝜙𝑍𝑆(𝜙𝑋,𝑌)𝜉𝑆(𝑋,𝑍)𝜂(𝑌)𝑆(𝑋,𝑍)𝜉𝜂(𝑌)𝜉𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)𝜂(𝑋)+𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)𝜉𝜂+(𝑋)(𝑛1)2(𝑛+1)(𝑛+3)𝑌̃𝑟𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝜙𝑍)𝑋+𝑛̃𝑟𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝜙𝑍)(𝑛+1)(𝑛+3)𝜙𝑌̃𝑟𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝑍)𝜙𝑋̃𝑟𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝑍)+2𝜙𝑍̃𝑟𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝑌)̃𝑟+(𝑛1)(𝑛+2)𝜂(𝑛+1)(𝑛+3)𝜙𝑋𝜉𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝑍)𝜂𝜙𝑌𝜉𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝑍)2𝜂𝜙𝑍𝜉+𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝑌)̃𝑟+(𝑛1)(𝑛+1)(𝑛+3)𝜉𝜂(𝑌)𝑔(𝑋,𝑍)𝜉𝜂(𝑋)𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)+𝑌𝜂(𝑍)𝜂(𝑋)𝑋𝜂(𝑍)𝜂(𝑌)+𝑌𝜂(𝑋)𝑋𝜂+(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍)𝜉̃𝑟[].(𝑛+1)(𝑛+3)𝑔(𝑋,𝑍)𝜂(𝑌)𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)𝜂(𝑋)(2.18)

3. Relation between 𝑅, 𝑆, 𝑟and 𝑅, 𝑆, ̃𝑟 in a K-Contact Manifold

A relation between the curvature tensor 𝑅 and 𝑅 of type (1,3) of the connections and by using (2.16) is given by𝑅[𝑔]+[𝑔]+[]+[](𝑋,𝑌)𝑍=𝑅(𝑋,𝑌)𝑍+(𝜙𝑌,𝑍)𝑋𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝑍)𝑌(𝑌,𝑍)𝜙𝑋𝑔(𝑋,𝑍)𝜙𝑌𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝜙𝑍)𝑌𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝜙𝑍)𝑋𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)𝜂(𝑋)𝑔(𝑋,𝑍)𝜂(𝑌)𝜉.(3.1) From (3.1), it follows that𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)+(𝑛2)𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝑍)(𝑛2)𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)+(𝑛2)𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍),(3.2) where 𝑆 denotes the Ricci tensor with respect to semisymmetric metric connection and 𝑆 denotes the Ricci tensor. On contacting (3.2), we get̃𝑟=𝑟(𝑛1)(𝑛2),(3.3) where ̃𝑟 and 𝑟 are scalar curvatures with respect to semisymmetric metric connection and Levi-Civita connection.

In a Riemannian manifold 𝑀, 𝜉 is a Killing vector field in K-contact manifold, that is, 𝑆 and 𝑟 are invariant under it, that is,𝐿𝜉𝑔(𝑋,𝑌)=𝑔𝑋𝜉,𝑌+𝑔𝑋,𝑌𝜉𝐿=0,(3.4)𝜉𝑆𝐿(𝑋,𝑌)=𝜉𝑔𝐿(𝑄𝑋,𝑌)=0,(3.5)𝜉𝑟=0,(3.6) where 𝐿 is Lie-derivative. We know that𝜉𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=𝜉𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)𝑆𝜉𝑌,𝑍𝑆𝑌,𝜉𝑍=𝐿𝜉𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)𝑆𝑌𝜉,𝑍𝑆𝑌,𝑍𝜉,(3.7) by using (3.5) in (3.7) and by virtue of (2.6), we have𝜉𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=0.(3.8) Now in a K-contact manifold 𝐿, 𝑆, and ̃𝑟 are with respect to semisymmetric metric connection, that is,𝐿𝜉𝑔[]𝐿(𝑋,𝑌)=2𝑔(𝑋,𝑌)𝜂(𝑋)𝜂(𝑌)0,𝜉𝑆𝐿(𝑋,𝑌)=2(𝑛2)𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝑌)+2𝑔(𝑋,𝑌)2𝜂(𝑋)𝜂(𝑌)0,𝜉̃𝑟0.(3.9) This shows that it is not K-contact with respect to a semisymmetric metric connection.

Now from (3.2), we have𝑊𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=𝑊𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)+2(𝑛2)𝑔(𝑌,𝑊)𝜂(𝑍)2(𝑛2)𝜂(𝑌)𝑔(𝑍,𝜙𝑊)2(𝑛2)𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍)𝜂(𝑊)𝜂(𝑌)𝑆(𝑊,𝑍)𝜂(𝑍)𝑆(𝑌,𝑊)+(𝑛1)𝑔(𝑊,𝑌)𝜂(𝑍)+(𝑛1)𝑔(𝑊,𝑍)𝜂(𝑌).(3.10) Put 𝑊=𝜉 in (3.10), we have𝜉𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=𝜉𝑆(𝑌,𝑍),𝜉=̃𝑟𝜉𝑟.(3.11) But𝜉𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=0𝜉𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=0,(3.12)𝜉𝑟=0𝜉̃𝑟=0.(3.13) Put 𝑍=𝜉 in (3.10), we have𝑊𝑆(𝑌,𝜉)=𝑆(𝑌,𝜙W)𝑆(𝑌,𝑊)+(𝑛1)𝑔(𝑌,𝑊)(𝑛1)𝑔(𝑌,𝜙𝑊)+2(𝑛2)𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝜙𝑊).(3.14)

4. K-Contact Manifold Admitting Semisymmetric Metric Connection withDiv𝐵=0

Considering Div𝐵=0 in (2.18) and putting 𝑋=𝜉 in the equation; using (3.2), (3.3), (3.12), (3.13), and (3.14) and by virtue of (2.1), (2.6), and (2.16), we get𝑛+2[]𝑛+3𝑆(𝜙𝑌,𝑍)+(3𝑛5)𝑔(𝑍,𝜙𝑌)+𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)(𝑛1)𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)(𝑛1)2(𝑛+1)(𝑛+3)𝜉𝑟+𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝜙𝑍)𝑟(𝑛1)(𝑛3)[]+(𝑛+1)(𝑛+3)𝑔(𝑌,𝜙𝑍)+𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍)𝜉𝑟[](𝑛+1)(𝑛+3)𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍)𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)=0.(4.1) In a K-contact manifold, 𝜉[𝑟]=0, that is, 𝜉𝑟=0 then the above equation reduces to𝑛+2[]+𝑛+3𝑆(𝜙𝑌,𝑍)+(3𝑛5)𝑔(𝑍,𝜙𝑌)+𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)(𝑛1)𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)𝑟(𝑛1)(𝑛3)[](𝑛+1)(𝑛+3)𝑔(𝑌,𝜙𝑍)+𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍)=0.(4.2) Interchanging 𝑌 and 𝑍 in the above equation then we have𝑛+2[]+𝑛+3𝑆(𝜙𝑍,𝑌)+(3𝑛5)𝑔(𝑌,𝜙𝑍)+𝑆(𝑍,𝑌)(𝑛1)𝑔(𝑍,𝑌)𝑟(𝑛1)(𝑛3)[](𝑛+1)(𝑛+3)𝑔(𝑍,𝜙𝑌)+𝑔(𝑍,𝑌)𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍)=0.(4.3) Adding these equation (4.2) and (4.3), we have𝑛𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=(𝑛1)2+4𝑛1𝑟(𝑛+1)(𝑛+2)𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)+𝑟(𝑛1)(𝑛3)(𝑛+1)(𝑛+2)𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍).(4.4) Then the above equation is written as 𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=𝛼𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)+𝛽𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍), where𝑛𝛼=(𝑛1)2+4𝑛1𝑟(𝑛+1)(𝑛+2),𝛽=𝑟(𝑛1)(𝑛3)(𝑛+1)(𝑛+2).(4.5) On contracting (4.4), we get𝑅1=𝑛𝑛(𝑛1)2+4𝑛1𝑟(𝑛3).(𝑛+1)(𝑛+2)(4.6) Hence we state the following theorem.

Theorem 4.1. If in a K-contact manifold the C-Bochner curvature tensor with respect to semisymmetric metric connection is conservative, then the manifold is 𝜂-Einstein with respect to Levi-Civita connection and the scalar curvature of such a manifold is given in (4.6).

5. Example for K-Contact Manifold

Consider the 3-dimensional manifold 𝑀={(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)𝑅3}, where (𝑥,𝑦,𝑧) are the standard coordinates in 𝑅3. Let (𝐸1,𝐸2,𝐸3) be linearly independent at each point of 𝑀𝐸1=𝜕𝜕𝜕𝑥+𝑦𝜕𝑧,𝐸2=𝜕𝜕𝜕𝑦𝑥𝜕𝑧,𝐸3=𝜕.𝜕𝑧(5.1) Let 𝑔 be the Riemannian metric defined by𝑔𝐸1,𝐸2𝐸=𝑔2,𝐸3𝐸=𝑔1,𝐸3𝑔𝐸=0,1,𝐸1𝐸=𝑔2,𝐸2𝐸=𝑔3,𝐸3=1,(5.2) where 𝑔 is given by 𝑔=[(1𝑦2)𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑥+(1𝑥2)𝑑𝑦𝑑𝑦+𝑑𝑧𝑑𝑧]. Let 𝜉 be the vector field, 𝜂 be the 1-form, and 𝜙 be the (1,1) tensor field defined by𝜕𝜉=𝜕𝑧,𝜂=𝑑𝑧+𝑥𝑑𝑦𝑦𝑑𝑥,𝜙𝐸1=𝐸2,𝜙𝐸2=𝐸1,𝜙𝐸3=0.(5.3) The linearity property of 𝜙 and 𝑔 yields that𝜂𝐸3=1,𝜙2𝑈=𝑈+𝜂(𝑈)𝐸3,𝑔(𝜙𝑈,𝜙𝑊)=𝑔(𝑈,𝑊)𝜂(𝑈)𝜂(𝑊),(5.4) for any vector fields 𝑈, 𝑊 on 𝑀. Thus for 𝐸3=𝜉. The structure (𝜙,𝜉,𝜂,𝑔) defines on 𝑀. By definition of Lie bracket, we have𝐸1,𝐸2=2𝐸3,𝐸1,𝐸3=𝐸2,𝐸3=0.(5.5) Let be Levi-Civita connection with respect to the above metric 𝑔 given by Koszul formula, that is2𝑔𝑋[][][]𝑌,𝑍=𝑋(𝑔(𝑌,𝑍))+𝑌(𝑔(𝑍,𝑋))𝑍(𝑔(𝑋,𝑌))𝑔(𝑋,𝑌,𝑍)𝑔(𝑌,𝑋,𝑍)+𝑔(𝑍,𝑋,𝑌).(5.6) Then by Koszula formula, we have𝐸1𝐸1=0,𝐸2𝐸2=0,𝐸3𝐸3=0,𝐸1𝐸2=𝐸3,𝐸2𝐸1=𝐸3,𝐸2𝐸3=𝐸1,𝐸1𝐸3=𝐸2,𝐸3𝐸1=𝐸2,𝐸3𝐸2=𝐸1.(5.7) Clearly one can see that (𝜙,𝜉,𝜂,𝑔) is a K-contact structure.

The Ricci tensor 𝑆(𝑋,𝑌) is given by𝑆(𝑋,𝑌)=3𝑖=1𝑔𝑅𝑋,𝐸𝑖𝐸𝑖𝑅,𝑌=𝑔𝑋,𝐸1𝐸1𝑅,𝑌+𝑔𝑋,𝐸2𝐸2𝑅,𝑌+𝑔𝑋,𝐸3𝐸3.,𝑌(5.8) The nonzero components of 𝑅(𝑋,𝐸𝑖)𝐸𝑖, where 𝑖=1, 2, 3, and by virtue of (5.7) we have𝑅𝐸2,𝐸1𝐸1=3𝐸2𝐸,𝑅3,𝐸1𝐸1=𝐸3,𝑅𝐸1,𝐸2𝐸2=3𝐸1𝐸,𝑅3,𝐸2𝐸2=𝐸3,𝑅𝐸1,𝐸3𝐸3=𝐸1𝐸,𝑅2,𝐸3𝐸3=𝐸2.(5.9) Using these in (5.8), we have𝑆(𝑋,𝑌)=2𝑔(𝑋,𝑌)+4𝜂(𝑋)𝜂(𝑌).(5.10) This shows that 𝑅3 is an 𝜂-Einstein. This is an example of K-contact manifold which is an 𝜂-Einstein.

If 𝑋=𝑌=𝑍=𝐸𝑖, in (2.18) and by virtue of (3.2), we obtain (Div𝐵)=0. Thus Theorem 4.1 holds true.

However, if 𝑋𝑌𝑍=𝐸𝑖, in (2.18) and by virtue of (3.2), we obtain (Div𝐵)0. Hence in general, if 𝑋=3𝑖=1𝑎𝑖𝐸𝑖,  𝑌=3𝑖=1𝑏𝑖𝐸𝑖 and 𝑍=3𝑖=1𝑐𝑖𝐸𝑖, then (Div𝐵)(𝑋,𝑌)Z0. In this case the converse of Theorem 4.1 does not hold true.

6. Relation between 𝑅, 𝑆, 𝑟and𝑅, 𝑆, ̃𝑟 in a Kenmotsu Manifold

A relation between the curvature tensor 𝑅 and 𝑅 of type (1,3) of the connections and by using (2.16) is given by𝑅[𝑔][𝑔][](𝑋,𝑌)𝑍=𝑅(𝑋,𝑌)𝑍+(𝑋,𝑍)𝑌𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)𝑋+2(𝜙𝑋,𝜙𝑍)𝑌𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝜙𝑍)𝑋+2𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)𝜂(𝑋)𝑔(𝑋,𝑍)𝜂(𝑌)𝜉.(6.1) From (6.1), it follows that𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)(𝑛1)𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)2(𝑛2)𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝜙𝑍),(6.2) where 𝑆 denotes the Ricci tensor with respect to semisymmetric metric connection and 𝑆 denotes the Ricci tensor. On contacting (6.2), we get̃𝑟=𝑟(𝑛1)(3𝑛4),(6.3) where ̃𝑟 and 𝑟 are scalar curvatures with respect to semisymmetric metric connection and Levi-Civita connection.

In a Kenmotsu manifold 𝑀, 𝜉 is a unit vector field in Kenmotsu manifold, then the following properties hold𝐿𝜉𝑔[𝑔],𝐿(𝑋,𝑌)=2(𝑋,𝑌)𝜂(𝑋)𝜂(𝑌)𝜉𝑆[],𝐿(𝑋,𝑌)=2𝑆(𝑋,𝑌)+(𝑛1)𝜂(𝑋)𝜂(𝑌)𝜉𝑟=(Div𝜉)𝑟,(6.4) where 𝐿 is a Lie derivative. We know that𝜉𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=𝜉𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)𝑆𝜉𝑌,𝑍𝑆𝑌,𝜉𝑍=𝐿𝜉𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)𝑆𝑌𝜉,𝑍𝑆𝑌,𝑍𝜉.(6.5) By using (6.4) in (6.5) and by virtue of (2.10) we have 𝜉𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=0,(6.6)𝜉𝑟=0.(6.7) Now in a Kenmotsu manifold 𝐿, 𝑆, and ̃𝑟 are with respect to semisymmetric metric connection, then we define the properties like𝐿𝜉𝑔[],𝐿(𝑋,𝑌)=4𝑔(𝑋,𝑌)𝜂(𝑋)𝜂(𝑌)𝜉𝑆[],𝐿(𝑋,𝑌)=4𝑆(𝑋,𝑌)(𝑛1)𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝜙𝑌)2(𝑛2)𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝜙𝑌)+(𝑛1)𝜂(𝑋)𝜂(𝑌)𝜉̃𝜉̃𝑟=Diṽ𝑟.(6.8) Now from (6.2), we have𝑋𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=𝑋𝑆[][]×[].(𝑌,𝑍)(𝑛1)𝑔(𝑋,𝑌)𝜂(𝑍)+𝑔(𝑋,𝑍)𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑌)𝑆(𝑋,𝑍)+𝜂(𝑍)𝑆(𝑋,𝑌)+4(𝑛2)𝜂(𝑌)𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝜙𝑍)+𝑔(𝜙𝑋,𝜙𝑌)𝜂(𝑍)(6.9) Putting 𝑋=𝜉 in the above equation and by virtue of (6.6) then we have 𝜉𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=0,(6.10)𝜉̃𝑟=0.(6.11) Again putting 𝑍=𝜉 in (6.9), we have𝑋𝑆(𝑌,𝜉)=2𝑆(𝑌,𝑋)2(𝑛1)𝑔(𝑌,𝑋)+4(𝑛2)𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝜙𝑋).(6.12)

7. Kenmotsu Manifold Admitting Semisymmetric Metric Connection withDiv𝐵=0

Considering Div𝐵=0 in (2.18) and putting 𝑋=𝜉 in the equation; using (6.2), (6.3), (6.10), and (6.12) and by virtue of (2.10), (2.16) and on simplification we get𝑛+2[]𝑛+32𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)+2(𝑛1)𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)4(𝑛2)𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝜙𝑍)(𝑛1)2(𝑛+1)(𝑛+3)𝜉𝑟+𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝜙𝑍)𝑟(𝑛1)(3𝑛4)+(𝑛1)×[](𝑛+1)(𝑛+3)2𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)2𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍)𝜉𝑟[](𝑛+1)(𝑛+3)𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝜙𝑍)=0.(7.1) In a Kenmotsu manifold 𝑀, 𝜉𝑟=0 then the above equation reduces to𝑛+2[]+𝑛+32𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)+2(𝑛1)𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)4(𝑛2)𝑔(𝜙𝑌,𝜙𝑍)𝑟(𝑛1)(3𝑛5)([]𝑛+1)(𝑛+3)2𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)2𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍)=0.(7.2) On simplifying the above equation we get𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=(𝑛3)𝑟(𝑛1)(3𝑛5)+(𝑛+1)(𝑛+2)𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)2(𝑛2)+𝑟(𝑛1)(3𝑛5)(𝑛+1)(𝑛+2)𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍).(7.3) Then the above equation is written as 𝑆(𝑌,𝑍)=𝛼𝑔(𝑌,𝑍)+𝛽𝜂(𝑌)𝜂(𝑍), where𝛼=(𝑛3)𝑟(𝑛1)(3𝑛5)(𝑛+1)(𝑛+2),𝛽=2(𝑛2)+𝑟(𝑛1)(3𝑛5)(𝑛+1)(𝑛+2).(7.4) On contracting (7.3), we get𝑟1=[](𝑛4)(𝑛1)(𝑛1)𝑟(𝑛1)(3𝑛5)(𝑛+1)(𝑛+2).(7.5) Hence we state the following theorem.

Theorem 7.1. If in a Kenmotsu manifold the C-Bochner curvature tensor with respect to semisymmetric metric connection is conservative, then the manifold is 𝜂-Einstein with respect to Levi-Civita connection, and the scalar curvature of such a manifold is given in (7.5).

8. Example for Kenmotsu Manifold

Let 𝑀={(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)𝑅3}. Let (𝐸1,𝐸2,𝐸3) be linearly independent vector fields given by𝐸1=𝑒𝑧𝜕+𝜕𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦,𝐸2=𝑒𝑧𝜕+𝜕𝜕𝑥𝜕𝑦,𝐸3=𝜕𝜕𝑧.(8.1) Let 𝑔 be the Riemannian metric defined by𝑔𝐸1,𝐸2𝐸=𝑔2,𝐸3𝐸=𝑔1,𝐸3𝑔𝐸=0,1,𝐸1𝐸=𝑔2,𝐸2𝐸=𝑔3,𝐸3=1,(8.2) where 𝑔 is given by 𝑔=(𝑒2𝑧/2)(𝑑𝑥𝑑𝑥+𝑑𝑦𝑑𝑦)+𝑑𝑧𝑑𝑧. Let 𝜉 be the vector field, 𝜂 be the 1-form, and 𝜙 be the (1,1) tensor field defined by𝜂=𝑑𝑧,𝜉=𝐸3=𝜕,𝜕𝑧𝜙𝐸1=𝐸2,𝜙𝐸2=𝐸1,𝜙𝐸3=0.(8.3) The linearity property of 𝜙 and 𝑔 yields that𝜂𝐸3=1,𝜙2𝑈=𝑈+𝜂(𝑈)𝐸3,𝑔(𝜙𝑈,𝜙𝑊)=𝑔(𝑈,𝑊)𝜂(𝑈)𝜂(𝑊),(8.4) for any vector fields 𝑈, 𝑊 on 𝑀. By definition of Lie bracket, we have𝐸1,𝐸2𝐸=0,2,𝐸3=𝐸2,𝐸1,𝐸3=𝐸1.(8.5) Let be the Levi-Civita connection with respect to above metric 𝑔 which is given by Koszula formula (5.6), and by virtue of it we have𝐸1𝐸3=𝐸1,𝐸2𝐸3=𝐸2,𝐸3𝐸3=0,𝐸1𝐸2=0,𝐸2𝐸2=𝐸3,𝐸3𝐸2=0,𝐸1𝐸1=𝐸3,𝐸2𝐸1=0,𝐸3𝐸1=0.(8.6) Clearly one can see that (𝜙,𝜉,𝜂,𝑔) is a Kenmotsu structure.

The nonzero components of 𝑅(𝑋,𝐸𝑖)𝐸𝑖, where 𝑖=1, 2, 3, and by virtue of (8.6) we have𝑅𝐸1,𝐸2𝐸2=𝐸1𝐸,𝑅1,𝐸3𝐸3=𝐸1,𝑅𝐸2,𝐸1𝐸1=𝐸2𝐸,𝑅2,𝐸3𝐸3=𝐸2,𝑅𝐸3,𝐸1𝐸1=𝐸3𝐸,𝑅3,𝐸2𝐸2=𝐸3.(8.7) The Ricci tensor 𝑆(𝑋,𝑌) is given in (5.8) by virtue of (8.7), and we have𝑆(𝑋,𝑌)=2𝑔(𝑋,𝑌)+0𝜂(𝑋)𝜂(𝑌).(8.8) This shows that 𝑅3 is an 𝜂-Einstein. This is an example of Kenmotsu manifold which is an 𝜂-Einstein.

If 𝑋=𝑌=𝑍=𝐸𝑖, in (2.18) and by virtue of (6.2), we obtain (Div𝐵)=0. Thus Theorem 7.1 holds true.

However, if 𝑋𝑌𝑍=𝐸𝑖, in (2.18) and by virtue of (6.2), we obtain (Div𝐵)0. Hence in general, if 𝑋=3𝑖=1𝑎𝑖𝐸𝑖, 𝑌=3𝑖=1𝑏𝑖𝐸𝑖 and 𝑍=3𝑖=1𝑐𝑖𝐸𝑖, then (Div𝐵)(𝑋,𝑌)𝑍0. In this case the converse of Theorem 7.1 does not hold true.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to DST (Department of Science and Technology), Government of India for providing financial assistance under major Research Project (No. SR/S4/MS: 482/07). They are grateful to referees for revising the paper.