Research Article

Risk Perceptions of Environmental Hazards and Human Reproduction: A Community-Based Survey

Table 2

Percentages of sample who ranked each hazard as harmful or very harmful to human reproduction.

SamplePesticidesHousehold chemicals & paintsRadiation (e.g., pylons, microwaves, and phone masts)Cosmetics and hair coloursAnimal-borne diseases
(%)(%)(%)(%)(%)%

Total sample ( ๐‘› = 1 2 6 1 )โ€”84.568.853.426.362.5
Gender ( ๐‘› = 1 2 6 1 )
โ€ƒMale50.480.060.048.228.853.4
โ€ƒFemale49.689.177.858.631.971.7
Age group ( ๐‘› = 1 2 5 1 )
โ€ƒ18โ€“3413.270.560.245.820.563.3
โ€ƒ35โ€“4417.387.673.454.126.662.4
โ€ƒ45โ€“5423.188.071.157.027.165.3
โ€ƒ55โ€“6422.487.672.457.630.464.3
โ€ƒ65+24.083.864.749.524.857.8
Place of residence ( ๐‘› = 1 2 5 7 )
โ€ƒCity52.084.168.451.225.262.5
โ€ƒTown25.584.168.853.327.763.2
โ€ƒRural22.286.169.658.627.962.1
Children in the household ( ๐‘› = 1 2 5 8 )
โ€ƒNo64.683.468.253.827.362.2
โ€ƒYes35.286.770.352.724.563.3

Note. No response given to age ๐‘› = 1 0 (0.8%), place or residence ๐‘› = 4 (0.3%), and children in the household ๐‘› = 3 (0.2%).