Review Article | Open Access
Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Hypermobility Type: An Underdiagnosed Hereditary Connective Tissue Disorder with Mucocutaneous, Articular, and Systemic Manifestations
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type, constituting a phenotypic continuum with or, perhaps, corresponding to the joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS/EDS-HT), is likely the most common, though the least recognized, heritable connective tissue disorder. Known for decades as a hereditary condition with predominant rheumatologic manifestations, it is now emerging as a multisystemic disorder with widespread manifestations. Nevertheless, the practitioners’ awareness of this condition is generally poor and most patients await years or, perhaps, decades before reaching the correct diagnosis. Among the various sites of disease manifestations, skin and mucosae represent a neglected organ where the dermatologist can easily spot diagnostic clues, which consistently integrate joint hypermobility and other orthopedic/neurologic manifestations at physical examination. In this paper, actual knowledge on JHS/EDS-HT is summarized in various sections. Particular attention has been posed on overlooked manifestations, including cutaneous, mucosal, and oropharyngeal features, and early diagnosis techniques, as a major point of interest for the practicing dermatologist. Actual research progresses on JH/EDS-HT envisage an unexpected link between heritable dysfunctions of the connective tissue and a wide range of functional somatic syndromes, most of them commonly diagnosed in the office of various specialists, comprising dermatologists.
Ehlers-Danlos syndrome (EDS) was first recognized in the first decade of the twentieth century as a hereditary disorder with typical skin manifestations (Figure 1) [1, 2]. Over the decades, EDS emerged as a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorders, including an increasing number of variants (Table 1) which share the variable combination of dermal fragility, internal organ and vessel ruptures, and joint hypermobility (JHM) . After many years of nosologic confusion, a group of experts, who met in Villefranche in 1997, identified six major EDS subtypes, namely, classic, hypermobility (i.e., Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type—EDS-HT), vascular, kyphoscoliotic, arthrochalasis, and dermatosparaxis, recognized by specific diagnostic criteria . Among them, EDS-HT is the most difficult to recognize due to the lack of clinical diagnostic handles and confirmatory laboratory/molecular tests. Nevertheless, EDS-HT is now considered the commonest EDS variant  with an unexpectedly high disability potential .
|AD: autosomal dominant, AR: autosomal recessive, EDS/OI: Ehlers-Danlos syndrome/osteogenesis imperfect, JHS: joint hypermobility syndrome, XLD: X-linked dominant.|
While EDS-HT is characterized by the “absence” of the typical cutaneous manifestations observed in many other EDS subtypes, skin and mucosae represent common sites of disease manifestation with a plethora of minor anomalies, whose detection still has an invaluable role in suspecting such a creeping condition. Moreover, given the protean constellation of additional features of EDS-HT, mastering the broad spectrum of subtle findings detectable at inspection is crucial for early diagnosis and management of potentially disabling complications.
EDS-HT is a hereditary connective tissue disorder (HCTD) defined by the association of generalized JHM, joint instability complications, widespread musculoskeletal pain, and (minor) skin features . Table 2 summarizes the Villefranche diagnostic criteria for the six best known variants, including EDS-HT. EDS-HT shows a significant phenotypic overlap with the joint hypermobility syndrome (JHS), a rheumatologic disorder with a high disability potential  and strong familial aggregation. Whether such similarities reflect etiological identity remains to be established. However, many researchers are used to consider EDS-HT and JHS one and the same (i.e., JHS/EDS-HT) , while others do not completely agrees with this assumption . In parallel with EDS-HT, JHS is actually recognized by the revised Brighton criteria (Table 3) . Based on literature data and personal experience, the author of this paper agrees with the concept of considering EDS-HT and JHS the same condition.
|Adapted from .|
Note 1: no clear indication for using these criteria in the establishment of a firm clinical suspect of a specific Ehlers-Danlos syndrome subtype is specified. However, the presence of at least 1 major and 1 minor criteria is usually necessary for proceeding in molecular confirmation of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome subtypes with a known, prevalent molecular cause. The presence of at least two major criteria is strongly indicative for a definite diagnosis of the specific EDS subtype.
|Adapted from .|
Note 1: criteria major 1 and minor 1 are mutually exclusive as are major 2 and minor 2.
Note 2: for the diagnosis of the joint hypermobility syndrome: both major, or 1 major and 2 minor, or 4 minor criteria, or 2 minor criteria and one or more first-degree affected relative(s).
Note 3: diagnosis of joint hypermobility syndrome needs previous (clinical/molecular) exclusion of other overlapping heritable connective tissue disorders, such as Marfan syndrome and other Ehlers-Danlos syndrome subtypes.
Besides skin manifestations that are relatively unspecific in both sets of diagnostic criteria, (generalized) JHM is the most clinically relevant feature of JHS/EDS-HT. The term “joint hypermobility” refers to the ability of one or more joints to actively and/or passively move beyond normal limits. It may affect a few joints (i.e., monoarticular or localized JHM) or present in multiple body sites (i.e., generalized or general JHM). JHM is a sign, not a disease, and its occurrence varies by age, sex, and ethnicity. In fact, loose joints are more common among females and children than males and older people . By ethnicity, JHM is observed in up to 35–57% Africans , while it shows a much lower rate (6% in females, 2% in males) among Caucasians . In addition, various acquired/environmental factors, such as traumas, surgery, and regular training, may contribute in increasing range of motion at one or more joints.
Interpretation of generalized JHM is not always straightforward and needs a holistic perspective. In fact, JHM is often experienced as an asset for some occupational and sport activities, such as ballet, gymnastics, and playing instruments . At the same time, generalized JHM is the physical marker of various HCTDs. Distinguishing between benign, asymptomatic JHM and an HCTD is of utmost importance for preventing potential life-threatening complications and/or early detecting and managing long-term disabilities.
The early literature fixed to 1/5,000 the frequency of EDS as a whole , with EDS-HT accounting for approximately half of all registered cases. However, as JHS/EDS-HT is a neglected HCTD, its frequency is likely underestimated. Accordingly, based on registered data on the frequency of generalized JHM in various populations and the assumption of an ~10% chance of developing symptoms according to the Brighton criteria for “double-jointed” people , a presumed frequency of 0.75–2% has been proposed for JHS . As general JHM is rarer among Caucasians compared to other populations such as Africans , a frequency of 0.2–0.6%, with the lowest value better fitting for men and the highest for females, appears more realistic in Europe and USA. However, no systematic study accurately investigating the real incidence of JHS/EDS-HT has been performed to date.
4.1. Inheritance Pattern
Actually, JHS/EDS-HT is considered an autosomal dominant trait with complete penetrance . Accordingly, an affected individual may transmit the disease to his/her children with a 50% chance, irrespectively to sex. Nevertheless, such an assumption is not always confirmed by practice. In fact, the Brighton and, perhaps, Villefranche criteria for JHS/EDS-HT are met more commonly by females with a markedly skewed sex ratio . This implies that females are more commonly and, possibly, severely affected than males, and, in familial cases, the disease is more frequently transmitted by an affected mother. In addition, extended family study often shows the coexistence of different members with a clinical diagnosis of JHS, EDS-HT, or asymptomatic JHM (either present or historical), as well as asymptomatic nonhypermobile “carriers” in the same pedigree (Castori, unpublished data). Therefore, JHS/EDS-HT should be better defined as an autosomal dominant trait with incomplete penetrance, variable expressivity, and influenced by sex. On a reproductive perspective, while the “mutated gene” is transmitted from an affected parent to the conceptus with a 50% chance, the likelihood of developing the disease seems to be higher in a female fetus.
Recently, it has been introduced that in JHS/EDS-HT families asymptomatic JHM could be the core inherited trait, which eventually evolves in JHS/EDS-HT in those members in whom other independent factors converge. Among them, there are both “intrinsic” and environmental/acquired contributors, such as sex, age, somatotype/weight, sport habits, traumas, surgery, diet, and pain cognitions . Therefore, what we actually call “JHS/EDS-HT” could represent the tip of an iceberg with still unclear relationships with physiology (e.g., generalized, asymptomatic JHM) and organ/tissue-specific functional somatic syndromes possibly linked to an underlying connective tissue disorder (see Section 9).
4.2. Molecular Basis of EDSs
Most EDS subtypes are caused by mutations in gene encoding collagen chains or proteins involved in their biogenesis. Biomechanical consequences of an altered collagen fiber in the expressing tissues and differential expression of the various affected collagen subtypes in the tissues are the major determinants for clinical distinction among EDS variants. Most classic EDS (EDS type I and II of the earlier classification) patients harbor heterozygous mutations in the genes encoding for two of the three chains constituting the ubiquitous collagen type V (COL5A1 and COL5A2) . Conversely, >95% of the cases of vascular EDS are due to mutations in the gene encoding collagen type III (COL3A1) , which is markedly expressed in vessels. Four EDS variants (i.e., arthrochalasia, classic with vascular rupture, cardiac-valvular, and EDS/osteogenesis imperfecta overlap) are caused by dominant or recessive mutations in genes encoding the two chains of collagen type I (COL1A1 and COL1A2) [22–25].
Some EDS variants are caused by mutations in proteins/enzymes involved in collagen I biogenesis. Dermatosparaxis EDS is due to abnormalities in ADAMTS2 , which encodes for an N-proteinase involved in the ablation of N-propeptides whose cleavage is essential for complete maturation of collagen I. Hydroxylation of lysine residues of collagens I and II depends on lysyl hydroxylase 1, encoded by PLOD1, which mutated causes kyphoscoliotic EDS .
In patients with the rare tenascin X-deficient EDS due to mutations in TNXB , immunostaining on muscle biopsies shows mildly reduced expression of collagen VI. Studies on tenascin X null mice show that deficiency of this protein decreases mRNA expression of COL6A1, COL6A2 and COL6A3 . Mutations in these genes, in turn, cause the Bethlem myopathy and Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy, which are inherited muscle disorders sharing some features, such as atrophic scars and JHM, with EDSs .
Finally, some rare EDS subtypes, including the progeroid and musculocontractural EDSs, are caused by mutations in genes coding for enzymes involved in the biosynthesis of proteoglycans, which are components of the CT extracellular matrix, exhibiting tight relationships with collagen fibers [31, 32]. The same cellular mechanism may be involved in the novel kyphoscoliotic EDS due to recessive mutations in FKBP14. In fact, this gene encodes for a FK506-binding peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase, which may act as a chaperone altering the assembly of the extracellular matrix .
4.3. Molecular Basis of JHS/EDS-HT
In contrast to the other EDS variants, the genetic defect underlying JHS/EDS-HT remains unknown. In the past, a handful of papers tried to clarify the conundrum. In particular, some molecular investigations suggested that TNXB heterozygous or homozygous mutations can be identified in ~5% of the EDS-HT patients [34, 35]. Subsequently, EDS patients harboring mutations in TNXB have been classified in a different EDS subtype (i.e., TNXB-deficient EDS) due to an apparently distinct phenotype . A single family considered affected by EDS-HT was found with a mutation in the COL3A1 gene, which, in turn, is typically mutated in the vascular EDS . No subsequent study confirmed this preliminary finding. Therefore, neither TNXB nor COL3A1 can be at the moment considered “the gene” of JHS/EDS-HT. Future studies are urgently needed in order to clarify this point and shed more light on the nosologic distinction between JHS and EDS-HT .
5. Clinical Manifestations
JHS/EDS-HT differs from other EDS variants due to the apparent paucity and nonspecificity of clinical findings. This reflects only in part the apparently minor involvement of cutaneous and musculoskeletal connective tissue in this EDS subtype. In fact, the scarcity of descriptive manifestations of JHS/EDS-HT in the medical literature lays on the actual lack of shared knowledge and general unawareness of the practitioners on the multifaceted manifestations of JHS/EDS-HT. The conundrum is further complicated by the increasing number of studies highlighting (generalized) JHM as a possible predisposing factor and/or noncasually associated features for a series of extra-articular disorders (Table 4) [38–64]. At the moment, whether these complaints belong to the wider picture of the JHS/EDS-HT or rather represent nonsyndromic associations needs further investigations.
5.1. Cutaneous Features (Figure 2)
Skin hyperextensibility is certainly the best known cutaneous feature of the various EDSs. In JHS/EDS-HT, it may be appreciated in many patients but usually in a much minor extent compared with classic EDS. Skin hyperextensibility defines the ability of the skin to be stretched beyond normal limits and immediately returning to its original state without forming transient redundant folds. Rapid returning to the original state after traction (i.e., resilience) differentiates skin hyperelasticity from cutis laxa, which can equally be noted with an increased rate in older patients with various EDSs, including JHS/EDS-HT. Cutis laxa is indeed a late consequence of premature elastolysis due to reduced dermal resistance to extreme soft-tissue distensions, such as pregnancy and repeated gains and losses of weight. Premature blepharoptosis/chalasia and chubby checks are typical localized manifestations of cutis laxa and may represent relevant aesthetic complaints in middle-aged women. Impaired stiffness of the dermis caused by defective collagen fibrils can also facilitate the development of striae rubrae and striae distensae/atrophicae. Similarly, piezogenic papules (i.e., small spontaneous subcutaneous fat herniations through a defective dermis without appreciable dermal atrophy) may also develop on heels in orthostatism and at wrists after compression. Reduced connective tissue stiffness at abdominal fascia facilitates formation of inguinal, crural, umbilical, and epigastric hernias, especially in conjunction with increased intra-abdominal pressure (e.g., obesity, pregnancy). More rarely, small muscle herniations may form at sites of discrete areas of incontinent perimysium and be equally visible at examination. Velvety and soft skin is a further common skin texture change. Skin fragility causes increased tendency to skin lesions and lacerations, but such a feature is rarely of concern in JHS/EDS-HT. Keratosis pilaris seems more common in JHS/EDS-HT, but no systematic study assessing such an association has been carried out.
Minor wound healing defects and capillary fragility are further common features in JHS/EDS-HT. The former may present as atrophic, nonpapyraceous scars, compared to the “cigarette-paper” and crumpled scars observed in other EDSs. They are the consequence of minimally delayed wound repair combined with skin fragility at sites exposed to repeated traumas, such as knees and elbows. The dystrophic nature of such scars may be easily demonstrated by gentle squeezing between observer’s fingers. Occasionally, defective wound healing after surgery or extensive/profound traumas may hesitate in full thickness dermal atrophy with consequent subcutaneous fat herniations with anetoderma-like features (i.e., incisional hernia). Capillary fragility causes increased tendency to and delayed resolution of ecchymoses. Spontaneous subcutaneous and intramuscular hematomas are possible rare complications of deep vessels fragility. Finally, many patients suffer from perturbed perspiration in form of diaphoresis or hypohidrosis . In my experience, palmoplantar hyperhidrosis with body hypohidrosis is the most common presentation of exocrine dysregulation. This phenomenon may be neurogenic in origin and relate to the underlying dysautonomia (see Section 5.6).
5.2. Mucosal and Oropharyngeal Features (Figure 2)
Mucosal involvement is common in JHS/EDS-HT. Xerostomia, xerophthalmia, and vaginal dryness are frequent accompanying complaints. Together with hypohidrosis, mucosal xerosis could be a remote consequence of autonomic dysregulation [65, 66]. Blue sclerae are overrepresented among JHS/EDS-HT patients and are likely caused by more visible uveal blood vessels through thinner sclerae . Focal blue-purple discolorations of the oral mucosa are not uncommon in JHS/EDS-HT, and their origin may parallel blue sclerae. Minor pigmentation anomalies of the enamel can be observed in JHS/EDS-HT, also in the absence of environmental causes (e.g., smoking).
Increased mucosal fragility can lead to spontaneous epistaxis and, more commonly, gingival bleeding, which is often elicited by teeth brushing. Repeated gingival damage due to increased mucosal fragility may progressively cause recurrent gingival inflammations/infections, gingival retractions, and, eventually (although rarely), true parodontopathy with premature tooth loss . Impaired oral cleanliness related to increased gingival bleeding and restraint of wrist and finger mobility may be the cause of the higher rate of caries in JHS/EDS-HT .
In the last decade, attention has been posed on the absence of the lingual and inferior labial frenulum in EDSs . Subsequent reports offered contrasting results [69–72]. More recently, a functional origin for the apparent agenesis/absence of the lingual frenulum in JHS/EDS-HT has been emphasized. In fact, this feature is likely the results of multiple contributors, such as primitive (developmental) hypoplasia of the frenulum and uncoordinated tongue movements due to concomitant orofacial dyspraxia . Although still unsupported by evidence-based investigations, oropharyngeal dysphagia seems common in JHS/EDS-HT and, in rare instances, may impede feeding with consequent excessive weight loss, exacerbation of fatigue, and, in children, failure to thrive.
Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) dysfunction is reported in >70% of JHS/EDS-HT patients [74, 75]. It is partly determined by TMJ hypermobility, as documented by increased mouth opening (i.e., mandibular depression over 50 mm in adults) and voluntary subluxations in asymptomatic subjects. Over the years, TMJ hypermobility becomes complicated by clicks, arthralgias, myofascial pain, masticatory dysfunction, and, eventually, articular locks. Similarly to other joints, it is likely that a primary lack of coordination (dyspraxia) of the masticatory muscles may cooperate with JHM in determining dysfunction.
5.3. Orthopedic Features (Figure 3)
Congenital capsulo-ligamentous laxity (CLL) is the primary articular feature of JHS/EDS-HT. In both physiologic and pathologic conditions, it may determine excessive joint motion. JHM is the clinical consequence of increased joint mobility along physiologic axis(es) and may be measured by comparison with standards. Meanwhile, joint instability is used to define the capacity of a lax joint to move along nonphysiologic axes. Both contribute in generating the various EDS orthopedic complications, which comprise increased tendency to (sub)luxations, sprains, and soft-tissue lesions (e.g., bursitis, tendonitis, synovitis, tenosynovitis, and fasciitis) . While, in some patients, repeated dislocations/sprains may further weaken capsuloligamentous resistance and, thus, worsen joint instability, in others, progressive joint stiffness may progressively limit such a phenomenon.
Generalized CLL also influences the late stage of morphogenesis, which starts during fetal life and extends much beyond birth. Mechanical stimuli, such as gravity, uterine constraint, and muscle contractions, on growth and molding of the skeleton are likely more effective in a body with lax joints. For this reason, a series of orthopedic dysmorphisms and minor variants usually converge in the JHS/EDS-HT patient and often depict a recognizable pattern (Table 5).
1Intoeing, kissing rotulae, and “W” position of the lower limbs at sitting.|
Precocious osteoarthritis, spondylosis, and lower bone mass are potential degenerative complications of generalized CLL, and all are commonly encountered in JHS/EDS-HT. However, at the moment, there are some concerns on the protective rather than predisposing factor for osteoarthritis of JHM , while some preliminary studies pointed out the possibility of a higher rate of osteopenia and osteoporosis among JHS/EDS-HT patients [77, 78]. Further studies urge in order to better define such relationships and identify more reliable assessment and therapeutic protocols.
Noncanonic interpretation of the effects of generalized JHM on heath and disease anticipates the existence of a wide variety of functional, developmental, and degenerative consequences, which show unexpectedly intimate and multidimensional relationships with disability and quality of life.
5.4. Neurologic Features
Neurologic implications of JHS/EDS-HT have been largely ignored in the past. More recently, much attention has been posed on nervous system involvement, as it has been recognized as a major contributor to disability in EDS . In 2009, Voermans and colleagues pointed out a possible JHS/EDS-HT neurologic phenotype characterized by a high rate of myopathic electrophysiologic findings possibly combined with reduced sensation and muscle weakness, increased muscle echo intensity, and myopathic changes at biopsy . Previous studies highlighted an association with neuropathies [80–82] and myalgias with cramps .
Chronic/recurrent pain and fatigue are, by far, the most common neurologic complaints, being reported in many EDS patients and in, perhaps, all adults with JHS/EDS-HT [84, 85]. Pain manifestations are widespread and involve the musculoskeletal system, as well as the nervous system and internal organs (Table 6) [19, 47, 53, 54, 67, 75, 84, 86–93]. Their origin is largely obscure except for a statistical association between limb/joint pain and (i) regular analgesic use, (ii) JHM, (iii) dislocations, and (iv) previous surgery . Multiple studies demonstrated that chronic fatigue is a major contributor to disability in JHS/EDS-HT [85, 94, 95]. Associated complaints include muscle weakness , sleep disturbance , and other features of chronic fatigue syndrome .
Headache is a highly disabling form of pain in EDS [87, 90]. In JHS/EDS-HT, migraine seems the most common form of headache . However, JHM, especially in form of cervical spine instability, is a possible trigger for other headache disorders, including new daily persistent headache , cervicogenic headache , and neck-tongue syndrome . Headache attributed to spontaneous (idiopathic) cerebrospinal fluid leakage is a further form of headache possibly facilitated by connective tissue laxity and then associated with JHM . Recently, postsurgical recurrence of Chiari I malformation and associated symptoms, also comprising headache, emerged as a predictor for an underlying heritable connective tissue disorder . Taken together, these evidences may explain the extreme clinical heterogeneity, treatment resistance, and high impact on quality of life of headache in JHS/EDS-HT.
Consolidated evidence indicates that JHS associates with impaired proprioception at various joints, such as proximal interphalangeal joints  and knee , with consequent poorer joint kinesthesia and position sense . Such a lack of proprioception, that likely affects multiple body segments, impairs balance and posture [104–107]. Clumsiness, tendency to falls, and fear of falling are direct consequences of this phenomenon . The likely congenital nature of such a proprioception impairment may contribute to delayed autonomous walking, tip-toe walking, lack of crawling, clumsiness, and, possibly, dyspraxia, which are frequently reported in infancy and childhood by JHS/EDS-HT patients . For this reason, a noncasual association between JHS/EDS-HT and developmental coordination disorder has been recently proposed .
5.5. Psychiatric Features
While emotional/behavioral distress is quite common in various EDSs and significantly contribute to disability, the relevance of psychologic/psychiatric features and their likely relationships with the underlying pathophysiology are generally overlooked in the management of these patients. By studying 48 EDS patients (including eleven with a clinical diagnosis of EDS-HT and five with JHS), Lumley et al. detected a high rate of anxiety, depression, anger, and interpersonal concerns . Interestingly, access to psychiatric services was registered in ~2/3 patients. A considerable excess of emotional symptoms  and psychological distress and somatosensory amplification  are noted in JHS/EDS-HT patients. More specifically, JHS/EDS-HT is more common among patients suffering from anxiety and panic disorders and, in turn, these complaints are frequently reported in JHS/EDS-HT [112, 113]. Although psychological difficulties may be secondary to chronic pain and disability, ostracism, and avoidance of relationships, a primary (i.e., pleiotropic) and/or organic contributor may coexist. Accordingly, Eccles et al. described greater amygdale volumes in reportedly hypermobile compared with nonhypermobile subjects . Additional findings included decreased volume of anterior cingulate and parietal lobe. Volumetrically abnormal regions are implicated in cognitive control of pain and negative emotions . It is well known that behavior is influenced by the environment, via neural afferents, as an adaptive reply to the homeostatic need. Reactive behavior changes induce, in turn, autonomic arousal states which translate in action such a reply. Therefore, in JHS/EDS-HT, it is possible that, in the future, some behavioral/psychological characteristics could be unexpectedly linked to specific functional features, such as dysautonomia and lack of proprioception.
5.6. Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Features
Cardiovascular involvement is a feature of many HCTDs, including JHS/EDS-HT. Mild mitral, tricuspid, and aortic valve regurgitation is observed in ~25% patients with classic EDS or EDS-HT . However, true mitral valve prolapse occurs in ~6% patients only [120, 121], and this incidence does not seem significantly higher than controls . Early investigations pointed out a high rate of aortic root dilatation in EDS-HT with risk of possible life-threatening complications . A subsequent study on 252 patients with classic EDS and EDS-HT fixed to 10.8% the overall incidence of aortic root dilatation in these conditions, with the latter showing the highest risk (12%) . Of note, at variance with other HCTDs with reduced life span, in all but one patient aortic dilatation did not show any progression in adulthood.
Besides such minor structural heart anomalies, dysautonomia is, by far, the most clinically relevant cardiovascular feature in JHS/EDS-HT. Rowe et al. described 12 EDS patients (six with classic EDS, six with JHS/EDS-HT) with orthostatic intolerance demonstrated by orthostatic stress test . Subsequent clinical and experimental studies drew attention to dysautonomia as a likely underlying mechanism for various visceral complaints in JHS/EDS-HT [91, 124]. More recently, postural tachycardia syndrome has been defined as the most specific form of cardiovascular autonomic dysfunction in JHS/EDS-HT .
Morgan et al. found an increased rate of asthmatic symptoms and atopy associated with increased lung volumes, impaired gas exchange, and an increased tendency of both the lower and upper airways to collapse in JHS/EDS-HT . Soyucen and Esen postulated that JHS/EDS-HT may predispose to asthma . In fact, JHS/EDS-HT may lead to persistent childhood wheezing by causing airway collapse through a connective tissue defect affecting airways structure . Further studies are needed to confirm this hypothesis.
5.7. Ocular Features
As previously described, blepharochalasis, antimongoloid palpebral slant, and blue sclerae are relatively common findings in JHS/EDS-HT [65, 127]. Further, though less common features include myopia, unilateral ptosis, and tilted optic disc . A recent survey on 22 patients defined the JHS/EDS-HT phenotype as mostly consisting in xerophthalmia (i.e., positive BUT and Schirmer I tests), steeper corneas, pathologic myopia, and minor lens opacities and vitreal abnormalities . Overall, ocular complaints are usually mild to moderate in JHS/EDS-HT and only a minority of them (i.e., xerophthalmia, and pathologic myopia) need treatment and monitoring, which, at the moment, can be carried out following standard procedures. As some of these features are quantitative and less influenced by age compared to JHM, it is expected that a more accurate ophthalmologic assessment will be included in a revised version of JHS/EDS-HT diagnostic criteria.
5.8. Gastrointestinal Features
Although not included in the Villefranche and Brighton criteria, gastrointestinal involvement is common in JHS/EDS-HT. Indirect evidence comes from several studies demonstrating a high incidence of JHS or (generalized) JHM among patients suffering from chronic (slow transit) constipation [41–43], hiatus hernia , Crohn’s disease , faecal incontinence , rectal evacuatory dysfunction , and functional gastrointestinal disorder . Typical gastrointestinal features include gastroesophageal reflux (74%) with or without hiatus hernia, chronic/recurrent gastritis (48%), symptoms of delayed gastric emptying, recurrent abdominal pain (68%), and constipation/diarrhea (72%) . However, the range of bowel involvement may extend much beyond to include a wide variety of functional gastrointestinal disorders according to the Rome III classification .
The mechanisms underlying such a severe visceral involvement are obscure. Possible contributing factors may comprise (i) reduced fixation to adjacent structures causing visceroptosis and hernias, (ii) gut hypotonia/hypomotility, and (iii) structural anomalies (e.g., dolichocolon). A recent study demonstrating an increased rate of celiac disease in JHS/EDS-HT  adds complexity to the study of connections between connective tissue and bowel function, which appear also mediated by an abnormally functioning immune system. The apparent underdiagnosis of visceroptosis in JHS/EDS-HT has been recently pointed out . Accordingly, while literature data concerning such a disease manifestation is scarce, clinical practice often reveals abnormal downward displacement of the gastrointestinal tract and kidneys (Figure 4). The impact of such anatomic features, as well as gut motility and length, in symptom development needs further clarification.
5.9. Gynecologic Features
Gynecologic aspects of JHS/EDS-HT have been largely ignored in the past. However, it is now clear that women with JHS/EDS-HT commonly suffer from irregular menses, meno/metrorrhagias, and severe dysmenorrhea . The latter may only occasionally be related to an underlying gynecologic disorder, such as endometriosis, and, therefore, displays a (dys)functional origin in most cases. Fertility and pregnancy are usually unaffected by JHS/EDS-HT, although more attention should be posed on obstetric and anesthetic interventions in order to prevent some potentially life-threatening or disabling complications. Among them there are (i) the risk of anesthesia-induced hypotension facilitated by dysautonomia, (ii) meningeal fragility complicating in cerebrospinal fluid hypotension in case of epi/peridural anesthesia, (iii) proneness to pelvic prolapse after episiotomy, and (iv) an apparently increased rate of suture dehiscence and minor hemorrhages after surgery. Although, in the past, previous case reports or case series gathering data from different EDS forms suggested prudence in counseling pregnancy in this condition [131–140], recent data are more reassuring. Associated symptoms are influenced by pregnancy. But, while symptoms worsen in many cases, in other women they remain unchanged or improve during pregnancy .
Pelvic prolapse is the most debilitating gynecologic feature of JHS/EDS-HT, and, accordingly, it was comprised in the revised Brighton criteria . Clinical manifestations mainly include urinary stress incontinence , uterine prolapse, and faecal incontinence . Although prolapses may occur in the nullipara , they are most often facilitated by episiotomy and vaginal tears .
6. Disease Evolution
As recently outlined, JHS/EDS-HT displays marked phenotypic metatropism with extreme variability at various ages [19, 141]. A series of mechanisms may explain such a phenomenon. Firstly, excessive joint motion is not always detrimental and it often precedes by some years or decades of musculoskeletal pain. At the same time, JHM naturally decreases with age also in the prospectively symptomatic patient. This implies that many patients refer to the general practitioner or specialists when JHM is no more visible, at least, at Beighton score calculation. Secondly, as introduced by the Brighton criteria  and the modified Villefranche criteria , JHS/EDS-HT manifestations extend much beyond the musculoskeletal system and many disabling features progress uncoupled with joint motion. Thirdly, many patients develop a series of avoiding strategies, such as kinesiophobia, with the false hope of reducing disability. The consequence of such maladaptive cognitions is a progressive limitation of daily activity with aggravation of muscle deconditioning, and, eventually, musculoskeletal pain and fatigue . The understanding of these processes allows to identify at least three distinct disease phases, whose knowledge may help physicians in suspecting JHS/EDS-HT at various ages. For details on the disease progress and phases delineation, see .
In addition to the postnatal progression of the disease, connective tissue fragility may also affect resilience of the membranes and cervix, as well as late fetal development. The neonatal presentation of JHS/EDS-HT may comprise slightly preterm birth, precipitous delivery, congenital dislocations at shoulders and clavicles, congenital hip dislocation (usually, unilateral), clubfoot, and, possibly, positional plagiocephaly. Presence of multiple features at birth should lead to investigate JHS/EDS-HT or apparently asymptomatic JHM (either visible or historical) in one of the parents, who may have transmitted the trait. Conversely, neonatal hypotonia, congenital scoliosis, dislocations at unusual sites (e.g., knee or occipitoatlantoaxial junction), fractures, and skin lacerations are never been reported in JHS/EDS-HT and are more typical of other HCTDs.
To date, the diagnosis of JHS/EDS-HT is clinical in essence and based on the agreement of largely accepted diagnostic criteria together with the exclusion of other, partially overlapping HCTDs. Assessment of JHS/EDS-HT lays exclusively on accurate clinical history taking and extensive physical examination, including dermatologic, oral cavity, orthopedic, and neurologic evaluations (see Section 5). However, skin and joint motion assessment deserves annotations.
7.1. Skin Extensibility
Skin extensibility is difficult to assess due to the lack of standardized methodologies. Over the years, a series of tools have been proposed [143–145] but none of them is used in the clinical practice. More recently, skin extensibility measurement by using a suction cup has been proposed as a reproducible method . However, a the moment, skin extensibility evaluation is largely left to the practitioner’s experience. As a rule of thumb, skin is considered “hyperextensible” in an adult if it can be stretched by ≥1.5–2 cm at the dorsum of the hand (fourth metacarpal), and/or volar aspect of the forearm. Testing in areas of natural skin redundancy (i.e., extensor surfaces) should be avoided. Similar parameters are not available for measuring velvety/smooth skin. Assessing skin consistency and texture is harder in toddlers and infants due to their inherent softness of tissues.
7.2. Joint Mobility
In most joints, evaluation of range of motion is obtained by manipulation and is more accurate if supported by an anatomic (universal) goniometer, a ruler and/or a flexible tape (Figure 5). Various systems are available for identifying subjects with generalized JHM, and the Beighton score is the most widely accepted one (Table 7) . Application of this score is not ideal in all situations. Firstly, specific subpopulations, such as females and pre-pubertal individuals, are inherently more “lax” than others. Secondly, many joints and groups of joints are not considered in the computation. Thirdly, JHM naturally decreases with age also in the affected/symptomatic individuals. Therefore, specific and/or disabling symptoms may set up or worsen when JHM is no further appreciable. In order to investigate JHM in joints other than those included in the Beighton score, standards are available for adult (i.e., ≥16 years of age) subjects (Table 8) . Similarly, a set of specific questions has been outlined for detecting historical JHM in subjects who lost their double jointedness (Table 9) . Similarly to skin extensibility, objective evaluation of variability in joint motion is difficult in toddlers and infants, as the Beighton score is nearly useless in these subjects and alternative screening tools are not yet available.
|Adapted from .|
Note: the Beighton score ranges from 0 to 9. Generalized joint hypermobility is fixed for a total score of 5/9 or above for the Villefranche criteria and 4/9 or above for the Brighton criteria. Unstandardized modifications for specific population subgroups, such as children (increasing by 1 point these limits) and males (reducing by 1 point these limits), are reasonable. For noncollaborative subjects, a modified Beighton score lacking the spinal bending maneuver and a maximum score of 8 may be applied.
1The lower and the upper end fits better for men and women, respectively. |
280° in supination and 90° in pronation from mid-position.
3From the tip of the chin to the lateral aspect of the acromion process.
DIP: distal interphalangeal, MCP: metacarpophalangeal, MTP: metatarsophalangeal, PIP: proximal interphalangeal, ROM: range of motion.
|Adapted from .|
7.3. Ultrastructural and Molecular Findings
At the moment, ultrastructural and molecular abnormalities are only occasionally identified in JHS/EDS-HT and no finding is pathognomonic of this condition. Therefore, skin biopsy and molecular testing do not take part to the standard diagnostic schedule in JHS/EDS-HT. In the past, the ultrastructural features of EDS-HT have been studied and their knowledge may be relevant, as such investigations can be performed for the differential in doubtful cases. In particular, early studies showed that single collagen fibers of the reticular dermis may present an enlarged and irregular section, but usually without coalescing in the typical “cauliflower-like” fibers observed in classic EDS . Molecular analysis of TNXB and COL3A1 is not confirmatory for JHS/EDS-HT, although it may be considered for differential diagnosis in case of partial overlap with the vascular and Tenascin X-deficient forms of EDS.
7.4. Diagnostic Criteria
JHS/EDS-HT is an exclusion diagnosis based on published diagnostic criteria. Actually, two distinct sets of diagnostic criteria exist: the Villefranche criteria for EDS-HT  and the Brighton criteria for JHS . The Villefranche criteria emerged from the activities of an international group of experts mainly comprising pediatricians and clinical/medical geneticists and are typically used to evaluate children and young adults. Independently, JHS, alternatively termed hypermobility syndrome, generalized joint hypermobility syndrome, or benign joint hypermobility syndrome (the latter is now in disuse as JHS should be no longer considered a “benign” condition), has been studied by the rheumatologic community. The Brighton criteria consider the natural progressive loss of joint mobility by age and, therefore, are more adequate to assess adults. Consequently, in order to be considered affected by JHS/EDS-HT, a patient must meet either the Villefranche or the Brighton criteria. A further set of diagnostic criteria was proposed by Levy and was derived from the Villefranche criteria for EDS-HT . It includes additional common features not previously considered, such as functional bowel disorder and cardiovascular dysautonomia, and, then, seems more inclusive. However, it has not yet been validated by the scientific community. In light of the recent discoveries concerning the protean manifestations of JHS/EDS-HT, the need of extensively revising and unifying available diagnostic criteria for this condition is urgent .
7.5. Differential Diagnosis
The extreme clinical variability of JHS/EDS-HT identifies a great number of partially overlapping (acquired and genetic) disorders showing the variable association of mucocutaneous fragility, JHM, chronic musculoskeletal pain and fatigue. Among them, there are other HCTDs with JHM, the “battered child” syndrome, bleeding disorders, and various rheumatologic conditions with chronic musculoskeletal pain, such as ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia. The association of apparently unexplained features (see “clinical features”) and severe physical disability observed in JHS/EDS-HT broadens the spectrum of the differential to include some neurologic disorders, including multiple sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, hereditary and acquired sensory-motor and/or autonomic polyneuropathies, and chronic fatigue syndrome, as well as myopathies featuring JHM . Accordingly, the number of possibly useful investigations is myriads. Their use should be wisely evaluated case by case, as no standardized guidelines are available up to date. In the clinical practice, many JHS/EDS-HT patients reach the correct diagnosis after dozens of consultations, as well as costly and invasive/ineffective diagnostic procedures. Doubtful clinical pictures could be comprehensively investigated by screening for peripheral polyarthralgias (i.e., hands/feet X-rays, HLA-B27 testing, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and rheumatoid factor, and C-reactive protein dosage) , chronic fatigue syndrome panel screening , serum creatine kinase and lactate dehydrogenase dosage, and electroneurography/electromyography.
Among the various HCTDs sharing some musculoskeletal features with JHS/EDS-HT, there are other EDSs, as well as the Loeys-Dietz and arterial tortuosity syndromes. Historical and physical clues for suspecting such conditions include papyraceous/hemosiderotic scars, molluscoid pseudotumors, subcutaneous spheroids, markedly visible subcutaneous vessels, triangular face with sunken eyes, early-onset cutis laxa and premature ageing, bifid uvula/cleft soft palate, hypertelorism, dolichocephaly, vascular complications, history of osteochondritis dissecans, and sudden death in close relatives. Persistence of the suspect of vascular EDS, Loeys-Dietz, or arterial tortuosity syndromes should be further investigated by extensive vascular imaging (i.e., whole-body angio-MRI; or brain angio-MRI plus thoracic and abdominal angio-TC; or heart, abdominal aorta, epiaortic and limb vessels Doppler ultrasound) followed by molecular testing (COL3A1, TGFBR1, TGFBR2, SMAD3, TGFB2, and SLC2A10) in specialized laboratories. Rapid detection of such rarer HCTDs is crucial for prognosis establishment due to their high risk of vascular accidents, a complication never reported in JHS/EDS-HT. Occasionally, differential diagnosis with classic EDS may need COL5A1 and COL5A2 molecular testing.
8. Principles of Management
Guidelines for managing JHS/EDS-HT are still lacking. General indications for the broader group of EDSs have been recently revised and proposed , but no program is available for JHS/EDS-HT up to date. Levy presented some suggestions specifically addressed to JHS/EDS-HT . Here, previously published and author’s personal experiences are summarized in order to present a structure for approaching treatment and prevention strategies in JHS/EDS-HT. It has not been emphasized enough that, at the moment, the long-term treatment of JHS/EDS-HT is largely unsuccessful in terms of amelioration of symptoms. In fact, after years of treatment cycles and follow-up evaluations, many patients still refer the complaints reported at first evaluation. This anticipates that, actually, the best result of all practitioners’ efforts is to stabilize symptoms with short periods of complete/partial relief. It should be taken in mind that most of the following indications are not yet been confirmed by evidence.
8.1. Treatment of Pain: An Overview
Musculoskeletal pain is a major determinant for deterioration of quality of life in JHS/EDS-HT. Although it usually starts as occasional/recurrent joint pain facilitated/triggered by joint instability (e.g., dislocations and sprains), subsequently it becomes pathogenically heterogeneous usually manifesting in form of widespread myalgias and arthralgias and often with neuropathic features. Pain chronicization and resistance to treatment are the most relevant features influencing prognosis. The best management program should include drugs, physical therapy [88, 153, 154], cognitive-behavioral therapy , and adherence to a series of lifestyle recommendations . For this reason, while occasional and low-to-moderate recurrent pain may be treated in an outpatient setting by the reference specialist (e.g., clinical geneticist, rheumatologist, physiatrist, or general practitioner), management of chronic or highly disabling recurrent musculoskeletal pain in JHS/EDS-HT usually needs a multidisciplinary approach.
8.2. Treatment of Pain: Medications
In my experience, drugs monotherapy is successful for treating occasional/recurrent pain of low-moderate intensity. The following alternatives are of potential use in the otherwise healthy adult with JHS/EDS-HT (adjustments are needed for children and nonhealthy subjects) and can be well managed by the general practitioner: (1)ibuprofen 200–1,800 mg/day (mean: 1,200 mg/day) in one to three divided doses with a maximum of single dose of 600 mg;(2)naproxen 1,000 mg/day in two divided doses;(3)paracetamol 1,000–3,000 mg/day in up to three divided doses of 500–1,000 mg each; paracetamol can be administered in association with codeine phosphate (with a ratio of 30 mg codeine phosphate per 500 mg paracetamol) for a maximum daily dose of 3,000 mg for the former and 180 mg for the latter.
In case of inefficacy of monotherapy, other drugs may be used in alternative of or association with the above-mentioned medications:(1)tramadol up to 400 mg/day in one of two divided doses with a maximum single dose of 200 mg; association of codeine phosphate and tramadol must be avoided;(2)Cox-2 inhibitor (celecoxib) 200–400 mg in one or two divided doses in presence of documented osteoarthritis;(3)pain modulator drugs, including tricyclic antidepressants and serotonin/norepinephrine receptor inhibitors, in presence of documented or presumed neuropathic pain; among them, amytriptyline is actually considered the best choice  with an initial daily dose of 10 mg with an increase of 10 mg/week (up to 100/day) after careful monitoring of pain relief and side effects (the preferred dose is usually 30–50 mg/day); duloxetine is a further promising drug; benefits from these drugs also include treatment of other satellite symptoms, such as depression, sleep disturbances, and irritable bowel disease;(4)opioids (other than tramadol and codeine) may be effective for treating chronic musculoskeletal pain of moderate-to-high intensity, and their management usually needs specialist consultation; although the use of such drugs is usually successful in the short terms, many chronic JHS/EDS-HT users of opioids still suffer from intense and debilitating pain.
8.3. Treatment of Pain: Nonpharmacologic Resources
In addition to drugs, alternative interventions could be considered in isolation or combined with medications and lifestyle modifications (see “Section 8.6”). They include the following.(1)Referral to a physical therapy specialist is expected for all JHS-EDS-HT patients in order to identify the need for specialized intervention, choose the best suited sport/fitness activity, and educate the patient to “joint” health; extensive information for the physical therapist is summarized in Hakim et al. .(2)Cognitive-behavioral therapy is beneficial in all forms of chronic pain, including musculoskeletal and visceral pain as well as headache; therefore, cognitive-behavioral therapy is indicated in patients with debilitating pain not adequately treated by standard care (i.e., probably most painful sensations other than those related to dislocations and sprains).(3)Application of braces for short periods may improve joint stability in case of recurrent sprains and their use needs specialistic consultation;(4)Soft neck collars, waterbeds, adjustable air mattresses, and viscoelastic foam mattresses and/or pillows may improve quality of life related to headache and sleep quality.(5)Crutches, canes, walkers, wheelchairs, and scooters may improve residual mobility in the most disable patients; while their use allows the patient to perform some activities easier, it is not free of side effects, such as joint traumas to the upper limbs and increased deconditioning of the lower limbs.(6)Occupational therapist consultation is usually indicated for pain conditions influencing daily activity and, then, constricting life of the affected individual; it is needed in presence of loss of autonomy and disability at home, work, and school.(7)JHS/EDS-HT pelvic pain is best managed with a multispecialist approach but a specific schedule is lacking; general recommendations are well summarized in Nelson et al. .(8)Pain related to gastrointestinal functional disorder can be managed following available standards [157, 158].(9)Topical lidocaine (cream or patch), local injections of anesthetic and steroids, and anesthetic nerve blocks are possible non- or mini-invasive procedures that prevent systemic assumption of drugs and, consequently, the risk of side effects; no systematic study is available, but their use seems of very limited success (see Section 8.7).(10)Recently, prolotherapy with 10% dextrose was demonstrated successful in reducing pressure-induced pain at the TMJ in the hypermobile subject ; with caution, its use may be considered in other joints also.(11)Although considered at risk of causing dislocation, chiropractic with application of low-force adjusting techniques may be successful in JHS/EDS-HT .(12)Heat and hydrotherapy, acupuncture, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (i.e., TENS) are possible alternatives without overt contraindications in JHS/EDS-HT; their effectiveness remains untested.
8.4. Treatment of Pain: Points of Concern
Some therapeutic options display documented/presumed severe side effects or hopeless inefficacy and, then, should be considered most cautiously. Among them there are the following.(1)Most of the orthopedic surgical interventions aimed at stabilizing joints, such as arthroscopic debridement, tendon relocations, capsulorrhaphy and arthroplasty, and reducing annulus hernias (e.g., high risk for recurrence, abnormal wound healing, adhesion formation, and pain amplification); surgery should be always postponed to more conservative approaches; when it is firmly requested, meticulous planning and communication to the patient of the low rate of success of this approach are mandatory.(2)Generous prescription of periods of inactivity and abstention from regular sport activity (i.e., muscle deconditioning of rapid onset). (3)Use of myorelaxants (i.e., amplification of joint instability with multiple dislocations with consequent exacerbation of pain and fatigue).(4)Chronic local and systemic use of steroids (i.e., steroid-induced connective tissue damage on soft-tissues and bone).(5)Use of antiplatelet drugs, for example, as acetylsalicylic acid (i.e., increased tendency to mucosal hemorrhages and ecchymoses).(6)Use of antiepileptic drugs (i.e., exacerbation of dysautonomic symptoms).
8.5. Treatment of Fatigue
In JHS/EDS-HT chronic fatigue is likely multifactorial and pathogenic heterogeneous . Although various contributors, such as muscle weakness, cardiovascular dysautonomia, sleep disturbance, malabsorption, respiratory dysfunction, and analgesic overuse, may be clinically identified and, possibly, managed, no study has been performed to systematically investigate these factors weighting their role isolatedly and possible treatments. The above-mentioned factors may influence the general wellness of affected individuals and all or most of them should be properly investigated in any JHS/EDS-HT patient displaying a disabling fatigue. Distinguishing between physiologic fatigue after physical activity or due to unhealthy lifestyle and pathologic fatigue may be difficult. However, the coexistence of persistent exertional dyspnea, unrefreshing sleep, postexertional malaise, and reduced stamina, combined with major limitations of the daily activities, likely indicates pathologic fatigue. Common comorbidities, most of which concurring by chance, should be properly investigated and treated . Sleep hygiene, gastroenterologist and pneumologist consultation, and drug therapy adjustments are strategies which may alleviate fatigue-related disability. Nevertheless, cardiovascular dysautonomia seems the most relevant contributor to fatigue in JHS/EDS-HT .
Management of chronic fatigue and cardiovascular dysautonomia is firstly nonpharmacological, and life-style recommendations are summarized here, in part (see Section 8.6), and in Mathias et al. . In patients in whom these procedures are ineffective, drug use could be considered. Fludrocortisone in a daily dose of no more than 300 μg is the first-line drug. Vasoconstrictors, mainly midodrine (at an initial dose of 2.5 mg/die which may be weekly raised up to 30 mg/day), are second-line alternatives and could represent a preferred choice in JHS/EDS-HT in consideration of the increased risk of osteopenia/porosis. Both fludrocortisone and vasoconstrictors are contraindicated in patients with systemic hypertension. In this case, β-blockers or clonidine may improve both the blood pressure and heart rate. β-blockers should be avoided in patients with asthma, a feature with a possibly increased rate in JHS/EDS-HT . In patients with marked postprandial tiredness, octreotide at low dose (25–50 μg in three administrations before the principal meals) is a therapeutic option. Recently, Kanjwal et al.  identified modafinil as a possible therapeutic resource for managing chronic fatigue in orthostatic intolerance. For more details on management of pain and fatigue in JHS/EDS-HT, refer to .
8.6. Lifestyle and Nutritional Recommendations
In consideration of the chronic and progressive nature of JHS/EDS-HT and the nonexistence of decisive treatments, adherence to specific behavioral guidelines for preventing symptom onset and/or deterioration appears, at the moment, the most cost- and time-effective solution. Major limits still exist in appropriately selecting and testing reasonable recommendations. This lays down the still too fragmented knowledge on the pathophysiology of JHS/EDS-HT. Nevertheless, a list of likely harmless and potentially effective lifestyle recommendations can be identified (Table 10) . Such suggestions are drawn based on general recommendations for preventing complications related to some common phenotype components of JHS/EDS-HT, such as proneness to joint damage and cardiovascular dysautonomia.
|Adapted from . |
Note: these recommendations must be intended as flexible indications for ameliorating quality of life and do not represent lifesaving solutions.
In addition to behavior modifications, adequate nutritional supplementations may be of some help in preventing/treating some features of JHS/EDS-HT. Although specific studies are still lacking, suggestions have been recently proposed [62, 162, 163]. In particular, dysautonomia-related fatigue may be partly managed by (i) generous daily water/liquid intake (2–2.5 lts) preferring isotonic solutions, (ii) high salt intake (to avoid in case of arterial hypertension), and (iii) daily assumption of carnitine (250 mg) and/or coenzyme Q10 (100 mg). Capillary/small vessels fragility may be improved by daily assumption of ascorbic acid, a cofactor of prolyl and lysyl hydroxylases, which are enzymes involved in the biogenesis of collagens. Approximately 8–50 times the 60 mg recommended daily intake for adults is indicated as the dose for maximal improvement of such biological functions. In case of osteopenia, daily intake of therapeutic doses of vitamin D (usually 880 IU/day in adults) and calcium (usually 1,000 mg/day in adults) is indicated for lowering the risk of fracture. Vitamin D is present in a few foods, and many people, especially in USA and Europe, may not get enough sunlight, which is essential for endogenous production of vitamin D from cholesterol. Therefore, a daily supplementation of 200 mg or 400 mg vitamin D, for adults and children, respectively, may be recommended also in the nonosteopenic individual. A 1–5 mg daily intake of melatonin is considered a resource for improving sleepiness in various functional somatic syndromes, such as fibromyalgia. Similarly, melatonin may be effective in JHS/EDS-HT. Other nutraceuticals which have been thought beneficial, though still without evidence, in JHS/EDS-HT comprise vitamin E, vitamin B complex, vitamin K, glucosamine, chondroitin, γ-linolenic acid, pycnogenol, magnesium, zinc, methyl sulfonyl methane and silica.
8.7. Surgical and Anesthetic Issues
Major surgical complications, such as organ or vascular rupture, are typical of other EDS subtypes and have never been reported in JHS-HT. Nevertheless, there are some minor weaknesses in JHS/EDS-HT, such as cervical spine and TMJ instability/laxity, delayed wound repair, cardiovascular dysautonomia, and slight vascular fragility, that may be of concern in case of minor or major surgery. Accordingly, some red flags are identified for healthcare professionals approaching surgery in JHS/EDS-HT. (1)Although surgery is not contraindicated in JHS/EDS-HT, the increased time requested for soft-tissue repair and the related risk of possibly unsatisfactory results and muscle deconditioning due to postsurgical recovery entail to pay more attention in planning invasive interventions.(2)The mild soft-tissue fragility and delayed wound healing may be counteracted by doubling the waiting time before suture stitches removal.(3)In case of local/minor surgery, consider the frequently reported resistance to intradermal lidocaine infiltrations and topical EMLA cream in JHS/EDS-HT [164, 165]; a double dose of anesthetic by intradermal injection as the first choice may be effective.(4)Although evidence is lacking, local anesthetic resistance could manifest also in case of epidural anesthesia.(5)Intubation should be performed with care due to TMJ and cervical spine instability and minor mucosal fragility; in adult patients with severe TMJ dysfunction, limited mouth opening may request the use of pediatric devices.(6)Peridural anesthesia administration may request extra time due to premature spondylosis; meningeal fragility may associate with an increased risk of intracranial hypotension due to cerebrospinal fluid leakage.(7)In case of total anesthesia, the coexistence of cardiovascular dysautonomia may increase the risk of hemodynamic changes; prophylactic early fluid loading and phenylephrine infusion should be considered .(8)Although postsurgical hemorrhages are usually mild, their occurrence, especially in older subjects and toddlers as well as in case of concurrent chronic diseases, may expose the patient to unreasonable risks; prophylactic use of desmopressin (DDAVP) may be considered to reduce the chance of excessive bleeding.
8.8. Obstetric Issues
Besides the risk of disease transmission as previously discussed (see Section 4), the diagnosis of JHS/EDS-HT also has obstetric implications. While fertility does not appear affected by JHS/EDS-HT, particular attention should be posed on delivery planning for both operative and anesthetic implications (see Section 8.7). In addition, in order to minimize the risk of pelvic prolapses, Cesarean section should be considered the first choice when vaginal delivery without episiotomy cannot be anticipated . Slightly preterm delivery due to premature rupture of the membranes or cervical insufficiency and precipitous delivery occur in ~10% and ~30% of cases, respectively, and should be carefully considered.
9. Conclusion: Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome, Hypermobility Type as a Model for Studying Functional Somatic Syndromes
Since its early definition as an HCTD with predominant rheumatologic manifestations, JHS/EDS-HT is emerging as a widespread disorder with reverberations in practically all organs and systems. Although most complications are not life-threatening and many patients have a nearly intact life-span, the pervasive nature of the disorder often makes their life poor and restricted by worsening disability . The spectrum of clinical implications of lax joints even outside rare and well-defined HCTDs seems to be wider than previously expected, in contrast to the quaint adage of considering JHM a benign, asymptomatic trait. Accordingly, Table 4 well illustrates the range of complaints/disorders linked to JHM. Although most studies are based on statistical analysis testing the occurrence of JHM among patients suffering from specific “common” afflictions, these preliminary observations may hide under a common milieau. The existence of such a correlation is foreshadowed by the convergence of most of these complaints in JHS/EDS-HT patients, who often “migrate” from one specialist to another referring every time a different complaint. Accordingly, an underlying disorder of the connective tissue may represent the missing link between JHM and the extra-articular dysfunctions capturing the practitioner’s attention also in patients not satisfying the different sets of diagnostic criteria for JHS/EDS-HT.
Such an interpretation extends the horizons of the study of heritable anomalies of the connective tissues to a series of bridging phenotypes filling the gap between true HCTDs and (apparently isolated) functional somatic syndromes, such as fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome, and functional gastrointestinal disorder(s). In this perspective, JHS/EDS-HT may represent the prototype for testing the complex pathogenic correlations between a primary defect of the connective tissue and disorders of tissues other than skin, joints, and vessels. In fact, clinical practice anticipates a continuum among patients with the full-blown JHS/EDS-HT characteristics and others showing incomplete systemic manifestations (the so-called “overlap” or “borderline” phenotypes) or single organ dysfunctions constituting the JHS/EDS-HT extended phenotype (Figure 6). In this context, the unveiling of JHS/EDS-HT molecular basis and the related pathophysiology could have unexpected effects in understanding and, hopefully, better treating a wide variety of common functional disorders, which actually represent a great challenge for the healthcare system of most industrial countries.
The author wishes to thank the many colleagues, including Filippo Camerota (physiatrist), Claudia Celletti (physiatrist), Mauro Celli (pediatrician), Magda Gharbyia (ophthalmologist), Marina Colombi (biologist), among others, who, in the last 4 years, supported and shared his efforts in improving diagnostic accuracy and therapeutic approaches to congenital joint hypermobility and related conditions.
- E. Ehlers and L. Cutis, “Neigung zu Haemorhagien in der Haut, Lockerung mehrerer Artikulationen,” Dermatologische Zeitschrift, vol. 8, pp. 173–174, 1901.
- H. A. Danlos, “Un cas de cutis laxa avec tumeurs par contusion chronique des coudes et des genoux (xanthome juvenile pseudo-diabétique de MM, Halloepau et Macé de Lépinay),” Bulletin de la Société Française de Dermatologie et de Syphiligraphie, vol. 39, pp. 1252–1256, 1908.
- B. Callewaert, F. Malfait, B. Loeys, and A. De Paepe, “Ehlers-Danlos syndromes and Marfan syndrome,” Best Practice and Research: Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 165–189, 2008.
- P. Beighton, A. De Paepe, B. Steinmann, P. Tsipouras, and R. J. Wenstrup, “Ehlers-Danlos syndromes: revised nosology, villefranche, 1997. Ehlers-Danlos National Foundation (USA) and Ehlers-Danlos Support Group (UK),” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 77, pp. 31–37, 1998.
- A. De Paepe and F. Malfait, “The Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, a disorder with many faces,” Clinical Genetics, vol. 82, pp. 1–11, 2012.
- N. C. Voermans and H. Knoop, “Both pain and fatigue are important possible determinants of disability in patients with the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 706–707, 2011.
- C. Celletti, M. Castori, P. Grammatico, and F. Camerota, “Evaluation of lower limb disability in joint hypermobility syndrome,” Rheumatology International, vol. 32, pp. 2577–2581, 2012.
- B. T. Tinkle, H. A. Bird, R. Grahame, M. Lavallee, H. P. Levy, and D. Sillence, “The lack of clinical distinction between the hypermobility type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and the joint hypermobility syndrome (a.k.a. hypermobility syndrome),” American Journal of Medical Genetics A, vol. 149, no. 11, pp. 2368–2370, 2009.
- R. Grahame, H. A. Bird, A. Child et al., “The revised (Brighton 1998) criteria for the diagnosis of benign joint hypermobility syndrome (BJHS),” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 27, no. 7, pp. 1777–1779, 2000.
- P. Beighton, L. Solomon, and C. L. Soskolne, “Articular mobility in an African population,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 413–418, 1973.
- F. N. Birrell, A. O. Adebajo, B. L. Hazleman, and A. J. Silman, “High prevalence of joint laxity in West Africans,” British Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 56–59, 1994.
- P. Klemp, S. M. Williams, and S. A. Stansfield, “Articular mobility in Maori and European New Zealanders,” Rheumatology, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 554–557, 2002.
- P. Beighton, R. Grahame, and H. A. Bird, Hypermobility of Joints, Springer, London, UK, 4th edition, 2012.
- B. Steinmann, P. M. Royce, and A. Superti-Furga, “The Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” in Connective Tissue and Its Heritable Disorders, P. M. Royce and B. Steinmann, Eds., pp. 431–524, Wiley-Liss, New York, NY, USA, 2nd edition, 2002.
- A. J. Hakim and A. Sahota, “Joint hypermobility and skin elasticity: the hereditary disorders of connective tissue,” Clinics in Dermatology, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 521–533, 2006.
- L. Remvig, D. V. Jensen, and R. C. Ward, “Epidemiology of general joint hypermobility and basis for the proposed criteria for benign joint hypermobility syndrome: review of the literature,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 804–809, 2007.
- H. P. Levy, “Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type,” in GeneReviews, R. A. Pagon, T. D. Bird, C. R. Dolan, K. Stephens, and M. P. Adam, Eds., University of Washington, Seattle, Wash, USA, 2010.
- M. Castori, F. Camerota, C. Celletti, P. Grammatico, and L. Padua, “Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type and the excess of affected females: possible mechanisms and perspectives,” American Journal of Medical Genetics A, vol. 152, no. 9, pp. 2406–2408, 2010.
- M. Castori, I. Sperduti, C. Celletti, F. Camerota, and P. Grammatico, “Symptom and joint mobility progression in the joint hypermobility syndrome (Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type),” Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology, vol. 29, pp. 998–1005, 2011.
- S. Symoens, D. Syx, F. Malfait et al., “Comprehensive molecular analysis demonstrates type V collagen mutations in over 90% of patients with classic EDS and allows to refine diagnostic criteria,” Human Mutation, vol. 33, no. 10, pp. 1485–1493, 2012.
- M. Pepin, U. Schwarze, A. Superti-Furga, and P. H. Byers, “Clinical and genetic features of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type IV, the vascular type,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 342, no. 10, pp. 673–680, 2000.
- D. Weil, M. D'Alessio, F. Ramirez et al., “A base substitution in the exon of a collagen gene causes alternative splicing and generates a structurally abnormal polypeptide in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Type VII,” EMBO Journal, vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1705–1710, 1989.
- U. Schwarze, R. I. Hata, V. A. McKusick et al., “Rare autosomal recessive cardiac valvular form of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome results from mutations in the COL1A2 gene that activate the nonsense-mediated RNA decay pathway,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 917–930, 2004.
- W. A. Cabral, E. Makareeva, A. Colige et al., “Mutations near amino end of α1(I) collagen cause combined osteogenesis imperfecta/Ehlers-Danlos syndrome by interference with N-propeptide processing,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 19, pp. 19259–19269, 2005.
- F. Malfait, S. Symoens, J. De Backer et al., “Three arginine to cysteine substitutions in the pro-alpha (I)-collagen chain cause Ehlers-Danlos syndrome with a propensity to arterial rupture in early adulthood,” Human Mutation, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 387–395, 2007.
- A. Colige, A. L. Sieron, S. W. Li et al., “Human ehlers-danlos syndrome type VII C and bovine dermatosparaxis are caused by mutations in the procollagen I N-proteinase gene,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 65, no. 2, pp. 308–317, 1999.
- T. Hautala, J. Heikkinen, K. I. Kivirikko, and R. Myllyla, “A large duplication in the gene for lysyl hydroxylase accounts for the type VI variant of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome in two siblings,” Genomics, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 399–404, 1993.
- G. H. Burch, Y. Gong, W. Liu et al., “Tenascin-X deficiency is associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Nature Genetics, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 104–108, 1997.
- T. Minamitani, H. Ariga, and K. I. Matsumoto, “Deficiency of tenascin-X causes a decrease in the level of expression of type VI collagen,” Experimental Cell Research, vol. 297, no. 1, pp. 49–60, 2004.
- N. C. Voermans, C. G. Bonnemann, B. C. J. Hamel, H. Jungbluth, and B. G. Van Engelen, “Joint hypermobility as a distinctive feature in the differential diagnosis of myopathies,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 256, no. 1, pp. 13–27, 2009.
- T. Okajima, S. Fukumoto, K. Furukawat, T. Urano, and K. Furukawa, “Molecular basis for the progeroid variant of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. Identification and characterization of two mutations in galactosyltransferase I gene,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 274, no. 41, pp. 28841–28844, 1999.
- N. Miyake, T. Kosho, S. Mizumoto et al., “Loss-of-function mutations of CHST14 in a new type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Human Mutation, vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 966–974, 2010.
- M. Baumann, C. Giunta, B. Krabichler et al., “Mutations in FKBP14 cause a variant of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome with progressive kyphoscoliosis, myopathy, and hearing loss,” The American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 90, pp. 201–206, 2012.
- J. Schalkwijk, M. C. Zweers, P. M. Steijlen et al., “A recessive form of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome caused by tenascin-X deficiency,” The New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 345, no. 16, pp. 1167–1175, 2001.
- M. C. Zweers, J. Bristow, P. M. Steijlen et al., “Haploinsufficiency of TNXB is associated with hypermobility type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” American Journal of Human Genetics, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 214–217, 2003.
- A. G. Hendriks, N. C. Voermans, J. Schalkwijk, B. C. Hamel, and M. M. van Rossum, “. Well-defined clinical presentation of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome in patients with tenascin-X deficiency: a report of four cases,” Clinical Dysmorphology, vol. 21, pp. 15–18, 2012.
- P. Narcisi, A. J. Richards, S. D. Ferguson, and F. M. Pope, “A family with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type III/articular hypermobility syndrome has a glycine 637 to serine substitution in type III collagen,” Human Molecular Genetics, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 1617–1620, 1994.
- C. Baeza-Velasco, M. C. Gely-Nargeot, A. B. Vilarrasa, C. Fenetrier, and J. F. Bravo, “Association between psychopathological factors and joint hypermobility syndrome in a group of undergraduates from a French university,” International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 187–201, 2011.
- I. Aktas, D. Ofluoglu, and T. Albay, “The relationship between benign joint hypermobility syndrome and carpal tunnel syndrome,” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 1283–1287, 2008.
- T. H. Milhorat, P. A. Bolognese, M. Misao Nishikawa, N. B. McDonnell, and C. A. Francomano, “Syndrome of occipitoatlantoaxial hypermobility, cranial settling, and Chiari malformation Type I in patients with hereditary disorders of connective tissue,” Journal of Neurosurgery, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 601–609, 2007.
- L. M. O. De Kort, J. A. P. M. Verhulst, R. H. H. Engelbert, C. S. P. M. Uiterwaal, and T. P. V. M. De Jong, “Lower urinary tract dysfunction in children with generalized hypermobility of joints,” Journal of Urology, vol. 170, no. 5, pp. 1971–1974, 2003.
- J. Manning, A. Korda, C. Benness, and M. Solomon, “The association of obstructive defecation, lower urinary tract dysfunction and the benign joint hypermobility syndrome: a case-control study,” International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 128–132, 2003.
- D. J. Reilly, J. W. Chase, J. M. Hutson et al., “Connective tissue disorder-a new subgroup of boys with slow transit constipation?” Journal of Pediatric Surgery, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1111–1114, 2008.
- D. F. Barron, B. A. Cohen, M. T. Geraghty, R. Violand, and P. C. Rowe, “Joint hypermobility is more common in children with chronic fatigue syndrome than in healthy controls,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 421–425, 2002.
- J. Nijs, A. Aerts, and K. De Meirleir, “Generalized joint hypermobility is more common in chronic fatigue syndrome than in healthy control subjects,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 32–39, 2006.
- J. Nijs, K. De Meirleir, and S. Truyen, “Hypermobility in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: preliminary observations,” Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 9–17, 2004.
- J. M. Stoler and A. L. Oaklander, “Patients with Ehlers Danlos syndrome and CRPS: a possible association?” Pain, vol. 123, no. 1-2, pp. 204–209, 2006.
- E. Efremidou, P. Vounotrypidis, P. Zezos et al., “Prevalence of joint hypermobility and patterns of articular manifestations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease,” Gastroenterology Research and Practice, vol. 2009, Article ID 924138, 5 pages, 2009.
- A. Kirby and R. Davies, “Developmental coordination disorder and joint Hypermobility syndrome—overlapping disorders? Implications for research and clinical practice,” Child: Care, Health and Development, vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 513–519, 2007.
- A. S. Arunkalaivanan, A. Morrison, S. Jha, and A. Blann, “Prevalence of urinary and faecal incontinence among female members of the Hypermobility Syndrome Association (HMSA),” Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 126–128, 2009.
- J. A. Goldman, “Hypermobility and deconditioning: important links to fibromyalgia/fibrositis,” Southern Medical Journal, vol. 84, no. 10, pp. 1192–1196, 1991.
- A. Gedalia, J. Press, M. Klein, and D. Buskila, “Joint hypermobility and fibromyalgia in schoolchildren,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 52, no. 7, pp. 494–496, 1993.
- D. Ofluoglu, O. H. Gunduz, E. Kul-Panza, and Z. Guven, “Hypermobility in women with fibromyalgia syndrome,” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 291–293, 2006.
- O. F. Sendur, G. Gurer, and G. T. Bozbas, “The frequency of hypermobility and its relationship with clinical findings of fibromyalgia patients,” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 485–487, 2007.
- P. Kassavetis, A. Batla, I. Pareés et al., “Joint hypermobility syndrome: a risk factor for fixed dystonia?” Movement Disorders, vol. 27, no. 8, p. 1070, 2012.
- N. Zarate, A. D. Farmer, R. Grahame et al., “Unexplained gastrointestinal symptoms and joint hypermobility: is connective tissue the missing link?” Neurogastroenterology and Motility, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. e252–e278, 2010.
- W. I. Schievink, O. K. Gordon, J. Tourje et al., “Connective tissue disorders with spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid leaks and intracranial hypotension: a Prospective Study,” Neurosurgery, vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 65–71, 2004.
- Z. S. Al-Rawi, K. Y. Al-Dubaikel, and H. Al-Sikafi, “Joint mobility in people with hiatus hernia,” Rheumatology, vol. 43, no. 5, pp. 574–576, 2004.
- M. Yazici, S. Ataoglu, S. Makarc et al., “The relationship between echocardiographic features of mitral valve and elastic proporties of aortic wall and Beighton hypermobility score in patients with mitral valve prolapse,” Japanese Heart Journal, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 447–460, 2004.
- T. D. Rozen, J. M. Roth, and N. Denenberg, “Cervical spine joint hypermobility: a possible predisposing factor for new daily persistent headache,” Cephalalgia, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 1182–1185, 2006.
- K. Lammers, S. L. Lince, M. A. Spath et al., “Pelvic organ prolapse and collagen-associated disorders,” International Urogynecology Journal, vol. 23, pp. 313–319, 2012.
- C. J. Mathias, D. A. Low, V. Iodice, A. P. Owens, M. Kirbis, and R. Grahame, “Postural tachycardia syndrome—current experience and concepts,” Nature Reviews Neurology, vol. 8, pp. 22–34, 2011.
- S. D. Mohammed, P. J. Lunniss, N. Zarate et al., “Joint hypermobility and rectal evacuatory dysfunction: an etiological link in abnormal connective tissue?” Neurogastroenterology and Motility, vol. 22, no. 10, pp. e1085–e1283, 2010.
- A. Karan, M. Isikoglu, B. Aksac, E. Attar, N. Eskiyurt, and O. Yalcin, “Hypermobility syndrome in 105 women with pure urinary stress incontinence and in 105 controls,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 269, no. 2, pp. 89–90, 2004.
- J. F. Bravo and C. Wolff, “Clinical study of hereditary disorders of connective tissues in a chilean population: joint hypermobility syndrome and vascular Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 515–523, 2006.
- M. Gharbiya, A. Moramarco, M. Castori et al., “Ocular features in joint hypermobility Syndrome/Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type: a clinical and in vivo Confocal Microscopy Study,” American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 154, no. 3, pp. 593–600, 2012.
- P. J. De Coster, L. C. Martens, and A. De Paepe, “Oral health in prevalent types of Ehlers-Danlos syndromes,” Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 298–307, 2005.
- C. De Felice, P. Toti, G. Di Maggio, S. Parrini, and F. Bagnoli, “Absence of the inferior labial and lingual frenula in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Lancet, vol. 357, no. 9267, pp. 1500–1502, 2001.
- S. Böhm, A. Martinez-Schramm, J. Gille et al., “Missing inferior labial and lingual frenula in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Lancet, vol. 358, no. 9293, pp. 1647–1648, 2001.
- S. Shankar, E. Shirley, and N. P. Burrows, “Absence of inferior labial or lingual frenula is not a useful clinical marker for Ehlers-Danlos syndrome in the UK,” Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 1383–1384, 2006.
- A. Perrinaud, M. Matos, A. Maruani, K. Mondon, and L. Machet, “Absence of inferior labial or lingual frenula in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a new diagnostic criterion?” Annales de Dermatologie et de Vénéréologie, vol. 134, no. 11, pp. 859–862, 2007.
- L. MacHet, B. Hüttenberger, G. Georgesco et al., “Absence of inferior labial and lingual frenula in ehlers-danlos syndrome: a minor diagnostic criterion in french patients,” American Journal of Clinical Dermatology, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 269–273, 2010.
- C. Celletti, M. Castori, G. La Torre, P. Grammatico, G. Morico, and F. Camerota, “Reassessment of oral frenula in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a study of 32 patients with the hypermobility type,” American Journal of Medical Genetics A, vol. 155, pp. 3157–3159, 2011.
- P. J. De Coster, L. C. Martens, and L. Van den Berghe, “Prevalence of temporomandibular joint dysfunction in Ehlers-Danlos syndromes.,” Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 237–241, 2004.
- P. J. De Coster, L. I. Van Den Berghe, and L. C. Martens, “Generalized joint hypermobility and temperomandibular disorders: Inherited connective tissue disease as a model with maximum expression,” Journal of Orofacial Pain, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 47–57, 2005.
- A. L. Dolan, D. J. Hart, D. V. Doyle, R. Grahame, and T. D. Spector, “The relationship of joint hypermobility, bone mineral density, and osteoarthritis in the general population: The Chingford Study,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 799–803, 2003.
- A. L. Dolan, N. K. Arden, R. Grahame, and T. D. Spector, “Assessment of bone in Ehlers Danlos syndrome by ultrasound and densitometry,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 630–633, 1998.
- S. Gulbahar, E. Şahin, M. Baydar et al., “Hypermobility syndrome increases the risk for low bone mass,” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 511–514, 2006.
- N. C. Voermans, N. Van Alfen, S. Pillen et al., “Neuromuscular involvement in various types of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Annals of Neurology, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 687–697, 2009.
- K. M. Bell and J. Chalmers, “Recurrent common peroneal palsy in association with the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a case report,” Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, vol. 62, no. 6, pp. 612–613, 1991.
- E. Galan and B. G. Kousseff, “Peripheral neuropathy in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Pediatric Neurology, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 242–245, 1995.
- N. C. Voermans, G. Drost, A. Van Kampen et al., “Recurrent neuropathy associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Journal of Neurology, vol. 253, no. 5, pp. 670–671, 2006.
- P. Beighton and F. Horan, “Orthopaedic aspects of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery B, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 444–453, 1969.
- N. C. Voermans, H. Knoop, G. Bleijenberg, and B. G. Van Engelen, “Pain in Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome is common, severe, and associated with functional impairment,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 370–378, 2010.
- N. C. Voermans, H. Knoop, N. van de Kamp, B. C. Hamel, G. Bleijenberg, and B. G. van Engelen, “Fatigue is a frequent and clinically relevant problem in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 267–274, 2010.
- N. Hudson, M. A. Fitzcharles, M. Cohen, M. R. Starr, and J. M. Esdaile, “The association of soft-tissue rheumatism and hypermobility,” British Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 382–386, 1998.
- A. Sacheti, J. Szemere, B. Bernstein, T. Tafas, N. Schechter, and P. Tsipouras, “Chronic pain is a manifestation of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 88–93, 1997.
- J. V. Simmonds and R. J. Keer, “Hypermobility and the hypermobility syndrome—part 2: assessment and management of hypermobility syndrome: illustrated via case studies,” Manual Therapy, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. e1–e11, 2008.
- N. C. Voermans, H. Knoop, and B. G. Van Engelen, “High frequency of neuropathic pain in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: an association with axonal polyneuropathy and compression neuropathy?” Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. e4–e6, 2011.
- D. E. Jacome, “Headache in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Cephalalgia, vol. 19, no. 9, pp. 791–796, 1999.
- A. J. Hakim and R. Grahame, “Non-musculoskeletal symptoms in joint hypermobility syndrome. Indirect evidence for autonomic dysfunction?” Rheumatology, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1194–1195, 2004.
- M. Castori, S. Morlino, C. Dordoni et al., “Gynecologic and obstetric implications of the joint hypermobility syndrome (a.k.a. Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome Hypermobility Type) in 82 Italian Patients,” American Journal of Medical Genetics A, vol. 158, pp. 2176–2182, 2012.
- L. J. McIntosh, V. T. Mallett, J. D. Frahm, D. A. Richardson, and M. I. Evans, “Gynecologic disorders in women with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Journal of the Society for Gynecologic Investigation, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 559–564, 1995.
- L. Rombaut, F. Malfait, A. Cools, A. De Paepe, and P. Calders, “Musculoskeletal complaints, physical activity and health-related quality of life among patients with the EhlersDanlos syndrome hypermobility type,” Disability and Rehabilitation, vol. 32, no. 16, pp. 1339–1345, 2010.
- C. Danese, M. Castori, C. Celletti et al., “Screening for celiac disease in the joint hypermobility syndrome/Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type,” American Journal of Medical Genetics A, vol. 155, no. 9, pp. 2314–2316, 2011.
- N. C. Voermans, H. Knoop, G. Bleijenberg, and B. G. van Engelen, “Fatigue is associated with muscle weakness in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: an explorative study,” Physiotherapy, vol. 97, no. 2, pp. 170–174, 2011.
- J. Verbraecken, A. Declerck, P. Van De Heyning, W. De Backer, and E. F. M. Wouters, “Evaluation for sleep apnea in patients with Ehlers—Danlos syndrome and Marfan: a questionnaire study,” Clinical Genetics, vol. 60, no. 5, pp. 360–365, 2001.
- E. M. Bendik, B. T. Tinkle, E. Al-Shuik et al., “Joint hypermobility syndrome: a common clinical disorder associated with migraine in women,” Cephalalgia, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 603–613, 2011.
- T. Hall, K. Briffa, and D. Hopper, “Clinical evaluation of cervicogenic headache: a clinical perspective,” Journal of Manual and Manipulative Therapy, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 73–80, 2008.
- O. Sjaastad and L. S. Bakketeig, “Neck-tongue syndrome and related (?) conditions,” Cephalalgia, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 233–240, 2006.
- A. K. Mallik, W. R. Ferrell, A. G. McDonald, and R. D. Sturrock, “Impaired proprioceptive acuity at the proximal interphalangeal joint in patients with the hypermobility syndrome,” British Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 631–637, 1994.
- M. G. Hall, W. R. Ferrell, R. D. Sturrock, D. L. Hamblen, and R. H. Baxendale, “The effect of the hypermobility syndrome on knee joint proprioception,” British Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 121–125, 1995.
- F. Fatoye, S. Palmer, F. Macmillan, P. Rowe, and M. van der Linden, “Proprioception and muscle torque deficits in children with hypermobility syndrome,” Rheumatology, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 152–157, 2009.
- C. Mebes, A. Amstutz, G. Luder et al., “Isometric rate of force development, maximum voluntary contraction, and balance in women with and without joint hypermobility,” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 1665–1669, 2008.
- L. Rombaut, A. De Paepe, F. Malfait, A. Cools, and P. Calders, “Joint position sense and vibratory perception sense in patients with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type III (hypermobility type),” Clinical Rheumatology, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 289–295, 2010.
- D. S. Booshanam, B. Cherian, C. P. A. R. Joseph, J. Mathew, and R. Thomas, “Evaluation of posture and pain in persons with benign joint hypermobility syndrome,” Rheumatology International, vol. 31, pp. 1561–1565, 2011.
- C. Celletti, M. Castori, M. Galli et al., “Evaluation of balance and improvement of proprioception by repetitive muscle vibration in a 15-year-old girl with joint hypermobility syndrome,” Arthritis Care and Research, vol. 63, no. 5, pp. 775–779, 2011.
- L. Rombaut, F. Malfait, I. De Wandele et al., “Balance, gait, falls, and fear of falling in women with the hypermobility type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Arthritis Care & Research, vol. 63, pp. 1432–1439, 2011.
- N. Adib, K. Davies, R. Grahame, P. Woo, and K. J. Murray, “Joint hypermobility syndrome in childhood. A not so benign multisystem disorder?” Rheumatology, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 744–750, 2005.
- M. A. Lumley, M. Jordan, R. Rubenstein, P. Tsipouras, and M. I. Evans, “Psychosocial functioning in the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 53, no. 2, pp. 149–152, 1994.
- M. Ercolani, M. Galvani, C. Franchini, F. Baracchini, and R. Chattat, “Benign joint hypermobility syndrome: psychological features and psychopathological symptoms in a sample pain-free at evaluation,” Perceptual and Motor Skills, vol. 107, no. 1, pp. 246–256, 2008.
- J. García Campayo, E. Asso, M. Alda, E. M. Andres, and N. Sobradiel, “Association between joint hypermobility syndrome and panic disorder: a case-control study,” Psychosomatics, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 55–61, 2010.
- J. Garcia-Campayo, E. Asso, and M. Alda, “Joint hypermobility and anxiety: the state of the art,” Current Psychiatry Reports, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 18–25, 2011.
- J. A. Eccles, F. D. Beacher, M. A. Gray et al., “Brain structure and joint hypermobility: relevance to the expression of psychiatric symptoms,” The British Journal of Psychiatry, vol. 200, pp. 508–509, 2012.
- H. D. Critchley, “Psychophysiology of neural, cognitive and affective integration: fMRI and autonomic indicants,” International Journal of Psychophysiology, vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 88–94, 2009.
- A. Bulbena, A. Agulló, G. Pailhez et al., “Is joint hypermobility related to anxiety in a nonclinical population also?” Psychosomatics, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 432–437, 2004.
- A. J. Hakim and R. Grahame, “A simple questionnaire to detect hypermobility: an adjunct to the assessment of patients with diffuse musculoskeletal pain,” International Journal of Clinical Practice, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 163–166, 2003.
- M. Castori, S. Morlino, C. Celletti et al., “Management of pain and fatigue in the joint hypermobility syndrome (a.k.a. Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, hypermobility type): principles and proposal for a multidisciplinary approach,” American Journal of Medical Genetics A, vol. 158, pp. 2055–2070, 2012.
- N. B. McDonnell, B. L. Gorman, K. W. Mandel et al., “Echocardiographic findings in classical and hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndromes,” American Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 140, no. 2, pp. 129–136, 2006.
- A. L. Dolan, M. B. Mishra, J. B. Chambers, and R. Grahame, “Clinical and echocardiographic survey of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” British Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 459–462, 1997.
- C. L. Atzinger, R. A. Meyer, P. R. Khoury, Z. Gao, and B. T. Tinkle, “Cross-sectional and longitudinal assessment of aortic root dilation and valvular anomalies in hypermobile and classic Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 158, no. 5, pp. 826.e1–830.e1, 2011.
- R. J. Wenstrup, R. A. Meyer, J. S. Lyle et al., “Prevalence of aortic root dilation in the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Genetics in Medicine, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 112–117, 2002.
- P. C. Rowe, D. F. Barron, H. Calkins, I. H. Maumenee, P. Y. Tong, and M. T. Geraghty, “Orthostatic intolerance and chronic fatigue syndrome associated with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Journal of Pediatrics, vol. 135, no. 4, pp. 494–499, 1999.
- Y. Gazit, A. M. Nahir, R. Grahame, and G. Jacob, “Dysautonomia in the joint hypermobility syndrome,” American Journal of Medicine, vol. 115, no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2003.
- A. W. Morgan, S. B. Pearson, S. Davies, H. C. Gooi, and H. A. Bird, “Asthma and airways collapse in two heritable disorders of connective tissue,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 66, no. 10, pp. 1369–1373, 2007.
- E. Soyucen and F. Esen, “Benign joint hypermobility syndrome: a cause of childhood asthma?” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 74, no. 5, pp. 823–824, 2010.
- M. B. Mishra, P. Ryan, P. Atkinson et al., “Extra-articular features of benign joint hypermobility syndrome,” British Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 861–866, 1996.
- D. A. Drossman, “The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process,” Gastroenterology, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 1377–1390, 2006.
- C. Danese, M. Castori, C. Celletti et al., “Screening for celiac disease in the joint hypermobility syndrome/Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type,” American Journal of Medical Genetics A, vol. 155, pp. 2314–2316, 2011.
- E. Reinstein, M. Pimentel, M. Pariani, S. Nemec, T. Sokol, and D. L. Rimoin, “Visceroptosis of the bowel in the hypermobility type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: presentation of a rare manifestation and review of the literature,” European Journal of Medical Genetics, vol. 55, no. 10, pp. 548–551, 2012.
- A. Atalla and I. Page, “Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type III in pregnancy,” Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 508–509, 1988.
- J. G. Thornton, J. Hill, and H. A. Bird, “Complications of pregnancy and benign familial joint hyperlaxity,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 228–231, 1988.
- B. Rochelson, R. Caruso, D. Davenport, and A. Kaelber, “The use of prophylactic desmopressin (DDAVP) in labor to prevent hemorrhage in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” New York State Journal of Medicine, vol. 91, no. 6, pp. 268–269, 1991.
- E. P. Sakala and M. D. Harding, “Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type III and pregnancy: a case report,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 622–624, 1991.
- Y. Sorokin, M. P. Johnson, N. Rogowski, D. A. Richardson, and M. I. Evans, “Obstetric and gynecologic dysfunction in the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 281–284, 1994.
- J. Morales-Roselló, J. Hernandez-Yago, and M. Pope, “Type III Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and pregnancy,” Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, vol. 261, no. 1, pp. 39–43, 1997.
- M. De Vos, L. Nuytinck, C. Verellen, and A. De Paepe, “Preterm premature rupture of membranes in a patient with the hypermobility type of the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome. A case report,” Fetal Diagnosis and Therapy, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 244–247, 1999.
- J. Lind and H. C. S. Wallenburg, “Pregnancy and the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a retrospective study in a Dutch population,” Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 293–300, 2002.
- T. L. Jones and C. Ng, “Anaesthesia for caesarean section in a patient with Ehlers-Danlos syndrome associated with postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome,” International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 365–369, 2008.
- I. Dutta, H. Wilson, and O. Oteri, “Pregnancy and delivery in ehlers-danlos syndrome (hypermobility type): review of the literature,” Obstetrics and Gynecology International, vol. 2011, Article ID 306413, 2011.
- M. Castori, F. Camerota, C. Celletti et al., “Natural history and manifestations of the hypermobility type Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a pilot study on 21 patients,” American Journal of Medical Genetics A, vol. 152, no. 3, pp. 556–564, 2010.
- R. Grahame, “Joint hypermobility syndrome pain,” Current Pain and Headache Reports, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 427–433, 2009.
- R. Grahame and P. Beighton, “Physical properties of the skin in the Ehlers-Danlos syndrome,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 246–251, 1969.
- R. Grahame, “A method for measuring human skin elasticity in vivo with observations of the effects of age, sex and pregnancy,” Clinical Science, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 223–229, 1970.
- S. Silverman, L. Constine, W. Harvey, and R. Grahame, “Survey of joint mobility and in vivo skin elasticity in London schoolchildren,” Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, vol. 34, no. 2, pp. 177–180, 1975.
- L. Remvig, P. H. Duhn, S. Ullman et al., “Skin signs in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: clinical tests and para-clinical methods,” Scandinavian Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 511–517, 2010.
- H. M. Clarkson, Musculoskeletal Assessment: Joint Motion and Muscle Testing, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 3rd edition, 2012.
- I. Hausser and I. Anton-Lamprecht, “Differential ultrastructural aberrations of collagen fibrils in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome types I-IV as a means of diagnostics and classification,” Human Genetics, vol. 93, no. 4, pp. 394–407, 1994.
- L. Remvig, R. H. Engelbert, B. Berglund et al., “Need for a consensus on the methods by which to measure joint mobility and the definition of norms for hypermobility that reflect age, gender and ethnic-dependent variation: is revision of criteria for joint hypermobility syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos syndrome hypermobility type indicated?” Rheumatology, vol. 50, pp. 1169–1171, 2011.
- E. Villeneuve, B. Kuriya, and C. Bombardier, “Patients considered as having undifferentiated peripheral inflammatory arthritis: a systematic review,” Journal of Rheumatology, vol. 38, no. 87, pp. 3–9, 2011.
- R. Baker and E. J. Shaw, “Guidelines: diagnosis and management of chronic fatigue syndrome or myalgic encephalomyelitis (or encephalopathy): summary of NICE guidance,” British Medical Journal, vol. 335, no. 7617, pp. 446–448, 2007.
- B. T. Tinkle and C. L. Atzinger, “Ehlers-Danlos syndromes,” in Management of Genetic Syndromes, S. B. Cassidy and J. E. Allanson, Eds., pp. 337–362, Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, NJ, USA, 3rd edition, 2010.
- J. V. Simmonds and R. J. Keer, “Hypermobility and the hypermobility syndrome,” Manual Therapy, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 298–309, 2007.
- R. Keer and J. Simmonds, “Joint protection and physical rehabilitation of the adult with hypermobility syndrome,” Current Opinion in Rheumatology, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 131–136, 2011.
- A. J. Hakim, R. J. Keer, and R. Grahame, Hypermobility, Fibromyalgia and Chronic Pain, Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier, Edinburgh, UK, 2010.
- P. Nelson, G. Apte, R. Justiz, J. M. Brismeé, G. Dedrick, and P. S. Sizer, “Chronic female pelvic pain—part 2: differential diagnosis and management,” Pain Practice, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 111–141, 2012.
- M. Camilleri, L. Bueno, F. de Ponti, J. Fioramonti, R. B. Lydiard, and J. Tack, “Pharmacological and pharmacokinetic aspects of functional gastrointestinal disorders,” Gastroenterology, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 1421–1434, 2006.
- R. L. Levy, K. W. Olden, B. D. Naliboff et al., “Psychosocial aspects of the functional gastrointestinal disorders,” Gastroenterology, vol. 130, no. 5, pp. 1447–1458, 2006.
- H. Refai, O. Altahhan, and R. Elsharkawy, “The efficacy of dextrose prolotherapy for temporomandibular joint hypermobility: a preliminary prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial,” Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, vol. 69, no. 12, pp. 2962–2970, 2011.
- C. J. Colloca and B. S. Polkinghom, “Chiropractic management of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome: a report of two cases,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 448–459, 2003.
- K. Kanjwal, B. Saeed, B. Karabin, Y. Kanjwal, and B. P. Grubb, “Preliminary observations suggesting that treatment with modafinil improves fatigue in patients with orthostatic intolerance,” American Journal of Therapeutics, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 449–452, 2011.
- D. Mantle, R. M. Wilkins, and V. Preedy, “A novel therapeutic strategy for Ehlers-Danlos syndrome based on nutritional supplements,” Medical Hypotheses, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 279–283, 2005.
- B. T. Tinkle, H. A. Bird, R. Grahame, M. Lavallee, H. P. Levy, and D. Sillence, “The lack of clinical distinction between the hypermobility type of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and the joint hypermobility syndrome (a.k.a. hypermobility syndrome),” American Journal of Medical Genetics A, vol. 149, no. 11, pp. 2368–2370, 2009.
- L. Arendt-Nielsen, S. Kaalund, P. Bjerring, and B. Hogsaa, “Insufficient effect of local analgesics in Ehlers Danlos type III patients (connective tissue disorder),” Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, vol. 34, no. 5, pp. 358–361, 1990.
- A. J. Hakim, R. Grahame, P. Norris, and C. Hopper, “Local anaesthetic failure in joint hypermobility syndrome,” Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, vol. 98, no. 2, pp. 84–85, 2005.
- S. Gurley-Green, “Living with the hypermobility syndrome,” Rheumatology, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 487–489, 2001.
Copyright © 2012 Marco Castori. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.