International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 757503 | 5 pages | https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/757503

Photoproduction of Hydrogen under Different Cultural Conditions by Alginate Immobilized Rhodopsedomonas palustris KU003

Academic Editor: E. R. Bandala
Received09 Oct 2011
Accepted13 Nov 2011
Published01 Feb 2012

Abstract

Rhodopsedomonas palustris KU003 was immobilized in alginate and its hydrogen producing abilities were assessed. Maximum hydrogen production took place between 120 and 144 hrs in most carbon sources. Alginate immobilization induced higher amount of hydrogen in malate-, lactate-, and succinate-containing medium in Rps. palustris. Incubation period of 120 hrs was optimum for production of hydrogen. pH 7 . 0 ± 0 . 4 was optimum for production of hydrogen. L-glutamic acid was a good nitrogen source for production of hydrogen. Glucose and sorbitol were poorer substrates as they induced only limited amount of hydrogen. Anaerobic light induced comparatively more amount of hydrogen in the bacteria under investigation than in anaerobic dark. Thiourea was a poor nitrogen source for the production of hydrogen by Rps. palustris. Results of the above are discussed in the light of existing literature in this communication.

1. Introduction

Purple nonsulphur phototrophic bacteria are very well known for their hydrogen producing capabilities and bioremediation abilities [14]. They are also known to produce polyhydroxy butyrate which can be used as bioplastic [1, 5]. The unique ability of phototrophic bacteria to produce hydrogen is being tried to use as an alternative energy source compared to nonconventional energy sources like solar, wind, ocean, and waves, thermal, geothermal, and thermonuclear [6]. Enhancement and stabilization of hydrogen production could be achieved by immobilization as it protects the cells from inhibitory effect of oxygen, nitrogen, and osmotic stress and pH. Various immobilization techniques are being used to enhance and stabilize photoproduction of hydrogen by photosynthetic bacteria [7, 8]. von Felton et al. (1985) [9] used agar, agarose, alginate, pectin, and k-carrageenan for hydrogen production by Rhodospirillum rubrum. Cationic polyelectrolyte was used to entrap anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria for enhanced hydrogen production [10]. Hydrogen production by photoreactive nonporous latex coatings of Rhodopseudomonas palsutris CGA 009 was investigated by Gosse et al. (2007) [11]. In the present study, effect of immobilization on production of hydrogen by Rps. palustris was investigated and discussed.

2. Material and Methods

The phototrophic bacteria were isolated from the effluent samples by enrichment techniques by inoculating into the medium and incubated anaerobically in the light (2000 lux). Bacteria thus isolated were identified with the help of cultural characteristics (colour, size, and shape), carbon and nitrogen requirement, vitamin requirements, absorption spectra analysis, bacteriochlorophylls, and carotenoids. Identification keys provided in Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology (1989) [12] was adopted. Growing cells were used in this study based on our earlier observation [4]. Preparation of growing cells was done as follows. Logarithmic cultures of Rps. palustris were inoculated (1% v/v) into basal medium containing different carbon sources (1%) along with ammonium chloride (0.5%) as nitrogen source. When different nitrogen sources were tested, acetate was used as a source of carbon. Similar conditions were maintained devoid of light for investigations under anaerobic dark conditions.

Bacteria were separated by centrifugation at 5000 rpm at 4°C for 10 min. The cells were washed and resuspended in sterile saline. The alginate entrapments of cells were performed according to the method of Johansen and Flink (1986) [13]. Sodium alginate solution (3%) was prepared by dissolving 3 g of sodium alginate in 100 mL boiling water and autoclaved at 121°C for 15 minutes. It was allowed to cool and both alginate and cell suspension were mixed and stirred manually for 10 min to get a uniform mixture. The slurry was taken in a sterile syringe and added drop wise into ice-cold 0.2 M CaCl2 solution from 5 cm height and kept for curing at 4°C for four hours. The cured beads were washed with sterile distilled water 3 to 4 times. When the beads were not being used, they were preserved in 0.9% sodium chloride solution and stored in a refrigerator.

The basic techniques used in the hydrogen production were those established by Vincenzini et al. (1986) [14]. Five mL of bacterial culture was harvested by centrifugation at 1 0 , 0 0 0 × g for 10 min, washed thrice with 0.3% saline, and the cells were suspended in the basal medium devoid of electron donor and nitrogen source at a pH of 7 . 0 ± 0 . 4 . Depending on the experimental conditions, different electron donors and nitrogen sources were added at required concentrations. To test the hydrogen production activity, the washed cell suspension was inoculated into 8 mL of the medium in 15 mL capacity rimless test tubes sealed with subaseals and anaerobic conditions were created by evacuating and flushing with nitrogen (100%).

Hydrogen produced was measured by injecting 0.5 mL of the gas phase from the reaction vessels with an airtight syringe into a gas chromatograph (Mak Analytica make) fitted with a molecular sieve 5 A column (2 m × 1/8′′ ODSS) to a thermal conductivity detector (TCD). Gas analysis was done with oven temperature at 60°C with argon as carrier gas (flow rate 30 mL/min), 120 mA detector current. Integrator and recorder were used at highest sensitivity. Before withdrawing each sample, 0.5 mL of nitrogen was injected in the vessel to maintain positive pressure. The amount of hydrogen liberated by the photosynthetic bacterium was calculated from the peak height of the recorder with reference to calibration curve prepared using ultra-pure hydrogen.

3. Results and Discussion

Perusal of Table 1 reveals that maximum hydrogen production took place between 120 and 144 hrs in most carbon sources. There were variations in the initial pH and final pH but the variations were minute and not greater than 0.38 (±). Hence, they were not presented in the table. Alginate immobilization induced higher amount of hydrogen in malate followed by lactate and succinate. Glucose and sorbitol were poorer substrates as they induced only limited amount of hydrogen. There was a difference in the production of maximal hydrogen rates varying between 120 and 144 hrs. Response of immobilized cells of phototrophic bacteria towards nitrogen sources under different conditions was studied and the results are depicted in Table 2.


Carbon sourceIncubation period (in hrs)
24487296120144 166192

Fructose0.26 ± 0.020.48 ± 0.100.98 ± 0.081.68 ± 0.061.86 ± 0.182.34 ± 0.281.22 ± 0.160.66 ± 0.08
Glucose0.28 ± 0.060.48 ± 0.120.98 ± 0.201.54 ± 0.221.68 ± 0.121.14 ± 0.040.74 ± 0.28
Maltose0.42 ± 0.040.64 ± 0.081.22 ± 0.261.88 ± 0.122.42 ± 0.062.88 ± 0.142.08 ± 0.181.48 ± 0.02
Sucrose0.32 ± 0.140.54 ± 0.061.56 ± 0.141.94 ± 0.102.32 ± 0.242.56 ± 0.201.86 ± 0.140.66 ± 0.22
Mannitol0.22 ± 0.160.76 ± 0.121.86 ± 0.204.2 ± 0.123.52 ± 0.163.1 ± 0.142.8 ± 0.221.78 ± 0.16
Lactate0.24 ± 0.020.96 ± 0.081.64 ± 0.124.44 ± 0.566.14 ± 0.345.8 ± 0.223.88 ± 0.182.66 ± 0.12
Malate1.86 ± 0.043.84 ± 0.064.68 ± 0.105.34 ± 0.126.72 ± 0.084.28 ± 0.242.78 ± 0.161.64 ± 0.28
Succinate0.84 ± 0.141.44 ± 0.362.88 ± 0.043.78 ± 0.064.14 ± 0.124.56 ± 0.183.36 ± 0.062.54 ± 0.16
Lactose0.42 ± 0.060.68 ± 0.161.12 ± 0.261.88 ± 0.342.62 ± 0.223.58 ± 0.282.24 ± 0.441.78 ± 0.38
Sorbitol0.22 ± 0.060.44 ± 0.160.92 ± 0.241.48 ± 0.321.88 ± 0.281.24 ± 0.340.72 ± 0.28

—No hydrogen.

Nitrogen sourceIncubation period (in hrs)
24487296120144166192

Potassium nitrate0.26 ± 0.160.48 ± 0.280.92 ± 0.181.48 ± 0.360.76 ± 0.240.52 ± 0.020.34 ± 0.06
Sodium nitrate0.48 ± 0.041.10 ± 0.181.66 ± 0.142.2 ± 0.381.46 ± 0.220.78 ± 0.160.36 ± 0.18
Ammonium chloride
Urea0.38 ± 0.020.66 ± 0.061.14 ± 0.340.78 ± 0.180.54 ± 0.240.24 ± 0.14
Thiourea0.26 ± 0.020.38 ± 0.180.78 ± 0.100.82 ± 0.080.66 ± 0.260.34 ± 0.12
Glycine0.16 ± 0.060.64 ± 0.100.82 ± 0.081.86 ± 0.221.46 ± 0.041.18 ± 0.080.94 ± 0.18
L-asparagine0.36 ± 0.060.68 ± 0.180.98 ± 0.121.78 ± 0.182.26 ± 0.261.64 ± 0.101.12 ± 0.16
L-aspartic acid0.40 ± 0.080.76 ± 0.121.48 ± 0.182.4 ± 0.201.24 ± 0.320.84 ± 0.160.64 ± 0.10
L-glutamic acid0.34 ± 0.060.66 ± 0.180.96 ± 0.161.74 ± 0.102.62 ± 0.481.44 ± 0.240.68 ± 0.14
L-glutamine0.28 ± 0.100.46 ± 0.080.72 ± 0.241.82 ± 0.381.36 ± 0.160.64 ± 0.02
L-tyrosine0.16 ± 0.060.64 ± 0.020.82 ± 0.081.86 ± 0.322.48 ± 0.161.18 ± 0.180.94 ± 0.26
L-cystine0.28 ± 0.040.46 ± 0.140.88 ± 0.281.46 ± 0.462.12 ± 0.221.76 ± 0.141.12 ± 0.08
L-methionine0.4 ± 0.020.68 ± 0.180.88 ± 0.201.52 ± 0.101.1 ± 0.080.74 ± 0.10
Nitrogen gas0.42 ± 0.140.74 ± 0.221.34 ± 0.220.88 ± 0.160.38 ± 0.12

—No hydrogen.

L-glutamic acid induced more production of hydrogen than other nitrogen sources. Rps. palustris produced more hydrogen in tyrosine-, aspartic-acid-, and asparagines-containing media. Similarly, thiourea was poor nitrogen source for the production of hydrogen by Rps. palustris. Highest production of hydrogen was observed by 144 hrs in L-glutamic acid containing medium. Anaerobic light induced comparatively more amount of hydrogen in the bacteria under investigation than in anaerobic dark (Table 3). Results of the study from Tables 3 and 4 clearly show that similar trends of preference towards carbon and nitrogen sources were seen except the production rate of hydrogen was less compared to anaerobic light. Figure 1 gives a comparison between hydrogen production between 120 and 144 hrs by Immobilized and Suspension cultures (unpublished data) of the same organism.


Carbon sourceIncubation period (in hrs)
24487296120144 166192

Fructose0.22 ± 0.220.44 ± 0.100.78 ± 0.181.12 ± 0.080.86 ± 0.240.56 ± 0.18
Glucose0.34 ± 0.040.56 ± 0.120.84 ± 0.280.48 ± 0.140.26 ± 0.08
Maltose0.36 ± 0.080.56 ± 0.060.96 ± 0.101.54 ± 0.281.12 ± 0.380.78 ± 0.22
Sucrose0.28± 0.060.68 ± 0.161.18 ± 0.161.62 ± 0.380.78 ± 0.240.38 ± 0.22
Mannitol0.22 ± 0.020.46 ± 0.080.78 ± 0.120.98 ± 0.321.12 ± 0.460.84 ± 0.180.46 ± 0.06
Lactate0.36 ± 0.020.66 ± 0.181.10 ± 0.441.78 ± 0.101.38 ± 0.140.96 ± 0.12
Malate0.38 ± 0.040.66 ± 0.021.28 ± 0.141.76 ± 0.422.12 ± 0.341.54 ± 0.100.78 ± 0.14
Succinate0.38 ± 0.180.56 ± 0.120.98 ± 0.061.48 ± 0.220.78 ± 0.180.44 ± 0.12
Lactose0.24 ± 0.060.46 ± 0.080.64 ± 0.160.94 ± 0.201.92 ± 0.141.34 ± 0.180.96 ± 0.38
Sorbitol0.44 ± 0.060.68 ± 0.020.74 ± 0.100.94 ± 0.121.24 ± 0.140.64 ± 0.140.32 ± 0.28

—No hydrogen.

Nitrogen sourceIncubation period (in hrs)
24487296120144166192

Potassium nitrate0.32 ± 0.020.56 ± 0.041.10 ± 0.180.78 ± 0.100.56 ± 0.080.38 ± 0.16
Sodium nitrate0.28 ± 0.040.44 ± 0.080.78 ± 0.120.36 ± 0.100.24 ± 0.16
Ammonium chloride
Urea0.20 ± 0.020.42 ± 0.080.62 ± 0.100.38 ± 0.08
Thiourea0.34 ± 0.14
Glycine0.28 ± 0.060.52 ± 0.080.98 ± 0.020.64 ± 0.060.38 ± 0.180.24 ± 0.16
L-asparagine0.34 ± 0.040.56 ± 0.020.86 ± 0.181.24 ± 0.160.78 ± 0.200.42 ± 0.140.24 ± 0.18
L-aspartic acid0.48 ± 0.140.68 ± 0.220.94 ± 0.161.44 ± 0.220.76 ± 0.100.44 ± 0.16
L-glutamic acid0.26 ± 0.160.48 ± 0.141.94 ± 0.281.24 ± 0.100.94 ± 0.140.56 ± 0.18
L-glutamine0.36 ± 0.030.54 ± 0.160.78 ± 0.141.34 ± 0.380.62 ± 0.160.34 ± 0.18
L-tyrosine0.28 ± 0.080.48 ± 0.080.86 ± 0.240.54 ± 0.080.22 ± 0.14
L-cystine0.22 ± 0.120.48 ± 0.180.78 ± 0.140.52 ± 0.180.26 ± 0.16
L-methionine0.20 ± 0.060.46 ± 0.120.76 ± 0.181.18 ± 0.120.84 ± 0.160.58 ± 0.280.26 ± 0.16
Nitrogen gas0.38 ± 0.080.58 ± 0.060.24 ± 0.22

—No hydrogen.

Carbon sources are known to influence hydrogen production through nitrogenase enzyme by causing variation in electron donation capabilities of the cofactor compounds to nitrogenase [15]. Hence, differences in hydrogen production rates with different carbon sources was observed. In our study, organic nitrogen sources produced more amounts of hydrogen compared to inorganic nitrogen sources. Inorganic nitrogen compounds like nitrite, nitrate, and ammonia have been reported to inhibit nitrogenase enzyme thus influencing hydrogen production. Organic nitrogen sources are directly incorporated into proteins or transformed into other cellular nitrogenous constituents [16]. Enhancement using immobilized cells of phototrophic bacteria was also reported by Singh et al. (1994) [17], Zhu et al. (1999) [10], Yokoi et al. (1997) [18], Lozinsky et al. (2003) [19], and many other workers. Immobilized, sulfur-deprived algal cultures of Chlamyodomonas reinhardtii could photoproduce hydrogen for longer periods of time [20, 21]. Nitrogen limitation can be used to increase the hydrogen productivity in purple nonsulphur bacteria [22]. Present studies on this organism are in agreement with that of the earlier studies where there was an increment in the hydrogen production of the organism. Investigations are on to find out more suitable and cheaper carbon and nitrogen sources for hydrogen production. Further, the organism is also being investigated using various immobilization matrices which could be useful for continuous production of hydrogen for longer periods of time.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank OU-DST-PURSE Program of Osmania University, India, for providing necessary financial assistance.

References

  1. C. Sasikala and C. V. Ramana, “Biotechnological potentials of anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria. I. Production of single-cell protein, vitamins, ubiquinones, hormones, and enzymes and use in waste treatment,” Advances in Applied Microbiology, vol. 41, pp. 173–226, 1995. View at: Google Scholar
  2. T. Katsuda, N. Fujii, N. Takata, H. Ooshima, and S. Katoh, “Light attenuation in suspension of the purple bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus and the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii,” Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 428–435, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  3. R. Merugu, M. S. K. Prasad, D. Vasavi, S. Girisham, and S. M. Reddy, “Bioremediation of waste water by two anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria,” National Academy Science Letters, vol. 30, no. 7-8, pp. 223–227, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  4. R. Merugu, S. Girisham, and S. M. Reddy, “Bioproduction of hydrogen by Rhodobacter capsulatus KU002 isolated from leather industry effluents,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 35, no. 18, pp. 9591–9597, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. R. Merugu, S. Girisham, and S. M. Reddy, “Production of PHB (polyhydroxybutyrate) by Rhodopseudomonas palustris KU003 under nitrogen limitation,” International Journal of Applied Biology and Pharmaceutical Technology, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 686–688, 2010. View at: Google Scholar
  6. G. Najafpour, K. S. K. Ismail, H. Younesi, A. R. Mohamed, and A. H. Kamaruddin, “Hydrogen as clean fuel via continuous fermentation by anaerobic photosynthetic bacteria, Rhodospirillum rubrum,” African Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 503–507, 2004. View at: Google Scholar
  7. D. Das, “Advances in biohydrogen production: an approach towards commercialization,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 34, p. 54, 2009. View at: Google Scholar
  8. O. Mizuno, R. Dinsdale, F. R. Hawkes, D. L. Hawkes, and T. Noike, “Enhancement of hydrogen production from glucose by nitrogen gas sparging,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 59–65, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. P. von Felton, H. Zurrrer, and R. Bachofen, “Production of molecular hydrogen with immobilized cells of Rhodospirllum rubrum,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 23, pp. 15–20, 1985. View at: Google Scholar
  10. H. Zhu, T. Suzuki, A. A. Tsygankov, Y. Asada, and J. Miyake, “Hydrogen production from tofu wastewater by Rhodobacter sphaeroides immobilized in agar gels,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 305–310, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. J. l. Gosse, B. J. Engel, F. E. Rey, C. S. Harwood, L. E. Seriven, and M. C. Flickenger, “Hydrogen production by photoreactive nonporous latex coatings of nong rowing Rhodopseudomonas palsutris CGA 009,” Biotechnology Progress, vol. 23, pp. 124–130, 2007. View at: Google Scholar
  12. “Enrichment and isolation of purple non sulphur photosynthetic bacteria,” in Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, J. T. Stanley, M. P. Byrant, N. Pfennig, and J. C. Holt, Eds., 1989. View at: Google Scholar
  13. A. Johansen and J. M. Flink, “Influence of alginate properties and gel reinforcement on fermentation characteristics of immobilized yeast cells,” Enzyme and Microbial Technology, vol. 8, no. 12, pp. 737–748, 1986. View at: Google Scholar
  14. M. Vincenzini, R. Materassi, M. R. Tredici, and G. Florenzano, “Hydrogen production by immobilized cells-I. light dependent dissimilation of organic substances by Rhodopseudomonas palustris,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 231–236, 1982. View at: Google Scholar
  15. M. Datta, G. Nikki, and V. Shah, “Cyanobacterial hydrogen production,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 16, pp. 8–9, 2000. View at: Google Scholar
  16. M. Ferchichi, E. Crabbe, W. Hintz, G. H. Gil, and A. Almadidy, “Influence of culture parameters on biological hydrogen production by Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum ATCC 27021,” World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 21, no. 6-7, pp. 855–862, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. S. P. Singh, S. C. Srivastava, V. K. Singh, and D. L. Block, “Hydrogen energy progress X,” in Proceedings of the 10th World Hydrogen Energy Conference, T. N. Veziroglu, Ed., vol. 2, pp. 959–963, Cocoa beach, Fla, USA, June 1994. View at: Google Scholar
  18. H. Yokoi, T. Tokushige, J. Hirose, S. Hayashi, and Y. Takasaki, “Hydrogen production by immobilized cells of aciduric Enterobacter aerogenes strain HO-39,” Journal of Fermentation and Bioengineering, vol. 83, no. 5, pp. 481–484, 1997. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. V. I. Lozinsky, I. Y. Galaev, F. M. Plieva, I. N. Savina, H. Jungvid, and B. Mattiasson, “Polymeric cryogels as promising materials of biotechnological interest,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. 445–451, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. J. P. Kim, C. D. Kang, T. H. Park, M. S. Kim, and S. J. Sim, “Enhanced hydrogen production by controlling light intensity in sulfur-deprived Chlamydomonas reinhardtii culture,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 1585–1590, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. T. V. Laurinavichene, S. N. Kosourov, M. L. Ghirardi, M. Seibert, and A. A. Tsygankov, “Prolongation of H2 photoproduction by immobilized, sulfur-limited Chlamydomonas reinhardtii cultures,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 134, no. 3-4, pp. 275–277, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. I. Eroglu, K. Aslan, U. Gunduz, M. Yucel, and L. Turker, “Biological hydrogen production from olive mill wastewater with two-stage processes,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 70, pp. 103–113, 2006. View at: Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Ramchander Merugu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


More related articles

1074 Views | 537 Downloads | 3 Citations
 PDF  Download Citation  Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

We are committed to sharing findings related to COVID-19 as quickly and safely as possible. Any author submitting a COVID-19 paper should notify us at help@hindawi.com to ensure their research is fast-tracked and made available on a preprint server as soon as possible. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted articles related to COVID-19. Sign up here as a reviewer to help fast-track new submissions.