International Scholarly Research Notices

International Scholarly Research Notices / 2012 / Article

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2012 |Article ID 823875 |

Sara Iozzi, Rosaria Remelli, Barbara Lelli, Daniela Diamanti, Silvia Pileri, Luisa Bracci, Renza Roncarati, Andrea Caricasole, Simonetta Bernocco, "Functional Characterization of a Small-Molecule Inhibitor of the DKK1-LRP6 Interaction", International Scholarly Research Notices, vol. 2012, Article ID 823875, 9 pages, 2012.

Functional Characterization of a Small-Molecule Inhibitor of the DKK1-LRP6 Interaction

Academic Editor: D. Christophe
Received13 Sep 2011
Accepted04 Oct 2011
Published30 Jan 2012


Background. DKK1 antagonizes canonical Wnt signalling through high-affinity binding to LRP5/6, an essential component of the Wnt receptor complex responsible for mediating downstream canonical Wnt signalling. DKK1 overexpression is known for its pathological implications in osteoporosis, cancer, and neurodegeneration, suggesting the interaction with LRP5/6 as a potential therapeutic target. Results. We show that the small-molecule NCI8642 can efficiently displace DKK1 from LRP6 and block DKK1 inhibitory activity on canonical Wnt signalling, as shown in binding and cellular assays, respectively. We further characterize NCI8642 binding activity on LRP6 by Surface Plasmon Resonance (SPR) technology. Conclusions. This study demonstrates that the DKK1-LRP6 interaction can be the target of small molecules and unlocks the possibility of new therapeutic tools for diseases associated with DKK1 dysregulation.

1. Background

DKK1 is a 29 KDa secreted protein belonging to the Dickkopf (DKK) family [1], which comprises four main glycoproteins in vertebrates (DKK1-4) [2]. DKK1 has been identified as a potent inhibitor of the canonical Wnt signaling due to its ability to bind to the Wnt coreceptor LRP5/6, thus blocking the canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway [3].

Canonical Wnt pathway activation is initiated by the direct binding of the Wnt glycoprotein to Frizzled (Fz) membrane receptor and to the LRP5/6 coreceptor [46]. In the absence of Wnt, β-catenin undergoes phosphorylation-dependent ubiquitination and degradation [7, 8]. Wnt-mediated assembly of the activated Fz-LRP5/6 receptor complex is followed by the recruitment of the axin-GSK3β to the plasma membrane, resulting in the reduction of the phosphorylation and degradation of β-catenin [9, 10]. Stabilized β-catenin accumulates in the cytoplasm and translocates to the nucleus, where it interacts with DNA-bound TCF-LEF proteins and activates the transcription of target genes [11].

The Wnt pathway is involved in many stages of invertebrate and vertebrate development and in adult tissue homeostasis [8, 12]. Dysfunction within the Wnt/β-catenin signaling cascade has been associated with many human pathologies [8, 13], such as cancer [1417] and bone disease [18, 19]. LRP5-activating mutations are mainly associated with high-bone mass, while loss-of-function mutations on LRP5 are linked to bone degeneration and osteoporosis [20, 21]. The inhibition of Wnt signaling by DKK1 has been related to bone degeneration processes and reduced bone mass [22].

In the central nervous system, DKK1 has been associated with the pathophysiology of neuronal degeneration in Alzheimer disease (AD) [2326]. DKK1 expression is increased in cortical neurons exposed to β-amyloid peptide (β-AP), where its aberrant expression is responsible for hyperphosphorylation of tau in neurons challenged with β-AP. Moreover, increased DKK1 expression was also observed in degenerating neurons in brain samples of AD patients [27]. DKK1 was shown to be neurotoxic when locally infused into brain regions where neurodegenerative processes associated with brain ischemia or AD normally take place [28]. Moreover, DKK1 is also associated with neuronal death in cellular and animal models of excitotoxic/ischemic neuronal death [29], and the treatment of ischemic animals with DKK1 antisense oligonucleotides protects hippocampal neurons against ischemic damage and cultured cortical neurons against NMDA toxicity. For these reasons, the DKK1-LRP6 interaction can be considered as a potentially interesting therapeutic intervention point and DKK1 a potential drug target for the treatment of bone and neurodegenerative disorders.

A small molecule (NCI8642) has been described as an inhibitor of the interaction between DKK1 and one of its receptors (LRP5), as well as an inhibitor of DKK1 activity in reducing Wnt/β-catenin signaling activation [30]. In this study, we sought to further characterise NCI8642 activity, using biochemical and biophysical approaches, and to extend its characterization in relation to LRP6, given the prominent expression in brain of LRP6 and its relevance to the neurodegenerative diseases field.

2. Methods

2.1. Cell Culture, Chemicals, Antibodies, and Plasmids

Human Embryonic Kidney cells (HEK293) were obtained from the German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures. Wnt3a L-cells and parental L-cells were obtained from ATCC. All cell lines were cultured in DMEM supplemented with FBS and Glutamax (Gibco). NCI8642 (gallocyanine) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Passive Lysis Buffer and the AttoPhos substrate were purchased from Promega. The monoclonal antibody against β-catenin was obtained from BD Biosciences, the polyclonal goat anti-DKK1 antibody from R&D, while the fluorescently conjugated secondary antibodies were all from Invitrogen. Commercial purified recombinant human DKK1 and LRP6-Fc were purchased from R&D.

2.2. Plasmids and Recombinant Cell Lines

The DNA encoding the full-length human LRP6 sequence was cloned into the pCDNA3.1/Zeo(+) expression vector (Invitrogen). The DNA encoding the human DKK1 sequence was cloned into pCDNA6.2/cLumio-DEST (Invitrogen). The sequence encoding the secreted alkaline phosphatase from Clontech was amplified by PCR and inserted at the C-terminus of DKK1 sequence into the pCDNA6.2/cLumio-DEST-DKK1 plasmid. The luciferase reporter plasmid p4TCF-Luc comprises four copies of a TCF-responsive element upstream of a TATA element luciferase coding sequence transcriptional unit [31]. All cell lines were cultured in DMEM supplied with 10% FBS, 2 mM Glutamax, 100 units/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and the appropriate selection antibiotic (50 and 100 μg/mL Zeocine for PC12-TcfLuc and HEK293-LRP6, resp., 10 μg/mL blasticidine for HEK293-DKK1, 0.4 mg/mL G418 for Wnt3a L-cells, 20 μg/mL HEK293-AP-DKK1). For the generation of the stable cell lines, HEK293 or PC12 cells were transfected with Fugene 6 (Roche) and subjected to antibiotic selection 24 hours after transfection. Clone picking was done by ring cloning or dilution cloning. Clones were selected using immunofluorescence (HEK293-DKK1, HEK293-LRP6), AP enzymatic assay on the culture medium (HEK293-AP-DKK1), or measurement of luciferase activity upon stimulation with Wnt3a CM (PC12-TCF-Luc).

2.3. Production of Conditioned Media

For the production of DKK1 and AP-DKK1 conditioned media (CM), HEK293 cells stably expressing the appropriate construct were seeded into a 150-cm2 flasks at half confluence. The day after, the culture medium was replaced with Optimem. Media were collected 96 h after seeding, sterile filtered, and stored at −20°C in aliquots. The control conditioned Optimem was obtained in the same way using the parental HEK293 cells. Wnt3a CM and its control medium were produced as described [32]. For the functional studies (β-catenin translocation and TCF-Luc reporter assay), Wnt3a CM was used at a 1 : 2 dilution. Each batch of DKK1 CM was functionally titrated in order to determine the volume of CM that gives about 50% inhibition of Wnt signaling. From dot blot analysis (data not shown), the concentration of DKK1 in the DKK1 CM was estimated to be about 1 μg/mL. For the quantitative AP-DKK1 binding assay, AP-DKK1 CM was diluted to obtain a phosphatase activity of 20 mU/mL.

2.4. AP-DKK1 Binding Assay

For the immunofluorescence detection of cell-bound DKK1, LRP6-293 cells were seeded onto poly-D-lysine-coated coverslips 24 hours before the experiment and incubated with DKK1 or AP-DKK1 CM diluted in cell culture medium for 2 hours at 4°C. When indicated, 100 μM NCI8642 (or 1% DMSO) was added alongside DKK1 CM. After washing, the cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde (15 min, room temperature), blocked with PBS/0.1% BSA, and incubated with the primary goat-anti-DKK1 antibody, and fluorescent secondary antibody diluted into blocking solution. Cell nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 dye. Images were collected using a Zeiss LSM 510 Meta confocal microscope. For the quantitative AP-DKK1 binding assay, the protocol was adapted from Zhang et al. [33]. The AP activity in the cell lysate was measured with Attophos AP fluorescent substrate, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

2.5. SPR Assay

SPR was performed using a Biacore T100 (GE Healthcare). Where not specified, experiments were conducted at 25°C. Bia T100 Evaluation Software Version 2.0.3 was used to analyze data. Kinetic constants were calculated by nonlinear fitting to the association and dissociation curves according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Apparent equilibrium dissociation constants ( K D ) were then calculated as the ratio of k d / k a .

All immobilization steps were performed at a flow rate of 5 μL/min using HBS-EP+ buffer (10 mM HEPES buffer, pH 7.4, containing 0.15 M NaCl, 3 mM EDTA, and 0.05% (v/v) P20 surfactant). Full-length human LRP6-Fc tagged (R&D Systems) was immobilized via amine coupling on a flow cell of a CM3 sensor chip. 3000 Resonance Units (RUs) were measured at the end of the immobilization procedure.

For the indirect capture of LRP6, Protein A was covalently coupled via amine immobilization on CM3 chip. LRP6-Fc capture on Protein A coated surface was performed by injecting the protein for 180 sec at the concentration of 0.5 μg/mL in HBS-EP+ with a flow rate of 10 μL/min.

Control sensorgrams, obtained on an empty flow cell where the coupling reaction had been conducted in the presence of coupling buffer alone, were always subtracted from binding responses. This allowed subtraction of nonspecific binding, which might be generated by residual charged negative groups, which had not been neutralized by the coupling procedure. Bovine Serum Albumine (BSA) was immobilized via standard amine coupling procedures on a flow cell of a CM3 sensor chip to obtain the nonrelated control flow cell.

For binding and kinetic assays, DKK1 (R&D Systems), diluted in HBS-EP+ at concentration ranging from 3 to 54 nM, was injected for 180 sec at the flow rate of 20 μL/min over LRP6 either directly immobilized or captured via Protein A as described before. For NCI8642 binding and kinetic assays, the compound was diluted in HBS-EP+ buffer at concentration ranging from 3 to 50 μM and injected over LRP6 surface for 60 sec at the flow rate of 30 μL/min. HBS-EP+ Buffer pH 7.4 0.2% DMSO was used as running buffer. 0.2% DMSO was added to HBS-EP+ when performing the experiments with NCI8642 compound, and DMSO correction module of the software was used to compensate for refractive index change induced by DMSO.

For inhibition analysis, DKK1 (54 nM, diluted in HBS-EP+ Buffer pH 7.4) was incubated with NCI8642 at concentration from 5 to 20 μM. After 1 hour at 25°C, DKK1 was injected over immobilized LRP6 for 240 s at the flow rate of 10 μL/min.

2.6. TCF-Luciferase Reporter Assay

PC12-TCF-Luc cells were seeded at the density of 100,000 cells/well into black-walled clear-bottom 96-well plates. After 24 hours, culture medium was replaced with 50 μL DKK1 CM diluted as appropriate in Optimem. Either DMSO or NCI8642 was added at the indicated final concentration. After one-hour incubation (37°C), the cells were stimulated by adding 50 μL of Wnt3a CM (50% of the final volume) and supplemented with either DMSO or NCI8642 at the indicated final concentration (final DMSO concentration 1%). After 24 hours of incubation, the luciferase activity was measured with Steady Lite substrate (Perkin-Elmer), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each condition 3, replicates were averaged.

2.7. β-Catenin Translocation Assay

L-cells were seeded into black-walled clear-bottom 96-well plates at a density of 10,000 cells/well. After 24 hours, culture medium was replaced with 50 μL DKK1 CM diluted as appropriate in Optimem. Either DMSO or NCI8642 was added at the indicated final concentration. After one-hour incubation (37°C), the cells were stimulated by adding 50 μL Wnt3a CM supplemented with either DMSO or NCI8642 at the indicated final concentration (final DMSO concentration 1%). After two-hour stimulation (37°C), the cells were fixed in 3% paraformaldehyde (10 min, room temperature), permeabilized (0.2% Triton X-100 in PBS, 10 min, room temperature), and blocked with 0.1% BSA in PBS. The cells were then incubated for 2 hours at room temperature with the primary anti-β-catenin antibody (1 : 500), followed by the secondary AlexaFluor 555 goat-anti-mouse antibody (1 : 1000). Cell nuclei were counterstained with Hoechst 33342 dye. Images were captured with the BD Pathway 435 Imaging system (20x magnification). Each condition was tested in triplicates (nine fields per well). Images were analysed using BD Attovision software. The ratio of the nuclear and cytoplasmic intensity of β-catenin staining was calculated for each cell and averaged within the well.

3. Results

3.1. NCI8642 Inhibits DKK1 Binding to LRP6 at the Cell Surface

NCI8642 was originally characterized as an inhibitor of the LRP5/DKK1 interaction [30]. In order to determine if NCI8642 was also able to disrupt the binding of DKK1 to LRP6, a recombinant HEK293 cell line stably expressing LRP6 was generated (HEK293-LRP6). An additional recombinant HEK293 cell line was established for the production of human recombinant DKK1 fused to the V5 tag at the C-terminus (HEK293-DKK1). When conditioned medium (CM) containing DKK1 was incubated on cells expressing LRP6 and the cell-bound DKK1 was detected by immunofluorescence, a strong membrane signal was observed in HEK293-LRP6 cells (Figure 1 ( A ) , panel b), while it was almost absent on the parental HEK293 cells (Figure 1 ( A ) , panel a). When DKK1 CM was supplemented with 100 μM NCI8642, the binding of DKK1 (Figure 1 ( A ) , panel d) was reduced compared to the DMSO-treated control (Figure 1 ( A ) , panel c). In order to obtain a quantitative measure of the DKK1/LRP6 interaction, a construct coding for human DKK1 fused to a secreted domain of alkaline phosphatase was generated (AP-DKK1) and used to establish a stable HEK293 cell line secreting AP-DKK1 in the culture medium. The AP tag at the C-terminus does not impair DKK1 binding to LRP6, as shown by immunofluorescence of cell-bound AP-DKK1 on HEK293-LRP6 (Figure 1 ( A ) , panels e and f). The binding of AP-DKK1 to HEK293-LRP6, quantified by enzymatic AP assay, was reduced when AP-DKK1 was incubated in the presence of increasing concentrations of NCI8642. The binding of DKK1 was reduced in a concentration-dependent manner compared to DMSO sample (Figure 1 ( B ) ). The calculated IC50 was 14.6 μM (pIC50 = 4.8, STDev 0.2, 𝑛 = 1 0 independent experiments).

3.2. NCI8642 Binds to LRP6 and Inhibits DKK1-LRP6 Binding

The LRP6-DKK1 interaction was observed using surface plasmon resonance technology (SPR). When flowed over the surface of the sensor chip coated with recombinant LRP6-Fc, DKK1 bound to immobilized receptor both specifically and in a concentration-dependent manner (Figure 2(a), k o n 5.3 106 M−1 s−1, k o f f 1.8 10−3 s−1). Indirect capturing of LRP6-Fc on recombinant Protein A and direct LRP6-Fc covalent coupling via amine groups produced similar interaction with recombinant human DKK1 (KD of 8.4 and 3.5 10−10 M, resp.), demonstrating that the covalent coupling of the receptor to the chip surface does not influence its binding site. The interaction constants obtained are in agreement with the literature data [1, 34, 35]. The LRP6-DKK1 interaction was also verified using recombinant DKK1 CM instead of commercial recombinant DKK1 (Figure 2(b)).

When we investigated whether NCI8642 was able to bind to the LRP6 receptor, we observed a consistent and effective binding signal that is not present in the control flow cell. The kinetic analysis of the interaction by injection of an NCI8642 dilution series (from 3 μM to 50 μM; Figure 2(c)) allowed the determination of a KD of 4.7 10−7 M for NCI8642 on LRP6.

We also analyzed the effect of NCI8642 on the binding of DKK1 to LRP6, to determine whether the compound could interfere with the interaction between DKK1 and LRP6. We injected DKK1 and NCI8642 over LRP6 previously immobilized. When DKK1 was injected together with NCI8642 after 1-hour incubation at 25°C, we observed a consistent reduction of DKK1 binding on LRP6 with 5 μM and 10 μM compound, and even a complete binding inhibition at the concentration of 20 μM (Figures 2(d) and 2(e)-upper panel). On the contrary, sequential injections of 20 μM NCI8642 and 54 nM DKK1 did not inhibit the DKK1-LRP6 interaction. NCI8642 was not able to displace DKK1 when injected after it and DKK1 could still bind to LRP6 when injected after NCI8642 at the concentration of 20 μM (Figure 2(e)-middle and lower panels).

3.3. NCI8642 Reverts DKK1-Mediated Inhibition of Wnt Signalling

To investigate the functional activity of NCI8642, we tested the compound in a TCF reporter-based assay in PC12 cells (neural crest-derived rat pheochromocytoma cells). TCF, similarly to LEF-1, is a downstream target transcription factor of the canonical Wnt-signaling pathway. A stable PC12 cell line expressing a TCF-dependent luciferase reporter was established (PC12-TCF-Luc). Wnt3a-mediated response was reverted by DKK1 CM in concentration-dependent manner (Figure 3(a)). For the purpose of compound testing, the dilution factor of DKK1 CM was chosen in order to have about 50% inhibition of Wnt signaling (Figure 3(b), open symbols). In the presence of exogenously added DKK1, NCI8642 was able to revert the DKK1-mediated inhibition. The effect was concentration-dependent and was reproducibly and significantly different from DMSO treatment at 25 μM and 50 μM, although higher concentrations of the compound were toxic to the cells and an IC50 value could not, therefore, be calculated.

NCI8642 was also tested in an assay measuring the modulation of β-catenin intracellular accumulation and nuclear translocation. The assay was performed in L-cells, an established model system for studying Wnt signaling [36]. Upon treatment of L-cells with Wnt3a CM, the intracellular amount of β-catenin increases, with an enrichment in the nuclear compartment and a concomitant increase in the nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio of β-catenin intensity. In the sample treated with control CM, β-catenin is hardly detectable, with a nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio close to one. The Wnt3a-mediated effect is reverted by DKK1 CM in a concentration-dependent manner (Figures 4 ( A ) and 4 ( B ) ). When NCI8642 was added to the cells together with DKK1, and then the cells were stimulated with Wnt3a, the effect of DKK1 was blocked. The measured IC50 of the compound is 12.6 μM (pIC50 = 4.9 STDev 0.2, 𝑛 = 5 independent measurements), in good agreement with the binding data and the reporter assay (Figures 5 ( A ) and 5 ( B ) ).

4. Discussion

NCI8642 is a small molecule that has been recently identified as a specific inhibitor of LRP5-DKK1 interaction. Given the role of the Wnt signaling in many pathophysiological contexts, modulation of the Wnt pathway has become a valuable target in drug discovery [37]. The modulation of the pathway at the level of the cell surface poses the problem of targeting a protein-protein interaction, which might be challenging [38]. Recently, the LRP5-DKK1 interaction has been targeted with monoclonal anti-DKK1 antibodies [39, 40]. These antibodies were effective in increasing bone density in vivo, both in naïve normal growing female mice and in a model of postmenopausal osteoporosis. However, the lack of blood-brain penetration of the antibodies limits their application to peripheral indications such as osteoporosis. On the contrary, a small molecule blocking DKK1 inhibition would have the advantage of being potentially useful also for the treatment of CNS pathologies, such as neurodegeneration. Our study confirmed that NCI8642 acts as a DKK1 inhibitor, and we extended the finding to the interaction of DKK1 to LRP6. In fact, the small molecule caused the displacement of DKK1 from LRP6 overexpressed in HEK293 cells, as shown both by immunofluorescence and quantitative enzymatic assay. The displacement was also demonstrated in a cell-free context by using SPR technology, where NCI8642 blocks the binding of DKK1 to the immobilized LRP6. Interestingly, the compound was able to block DKK1 binding only when injected together with DKK1, and not when injected sequentially after DKK1, which is probably due to the high affinity of DKK1 for LRP6 compared with the micromolar affinity of NCI8642 for LPR6 (Figures 2(c) and 2(e)).

SPR technology also showed that NCI8642 interacts with the immobilized LRP6 with a reproducible and concentration-dependent binding in the absence of DKK1 (KD 4.7 10−7 M). The interaction between NCI8642-LRP6 is highly specific, because no significant binding was observed on two control flow cells. When immobilized on the sensor chip, DKK1 lost the ability to bind LRP6, suggesting that the immobilization caused a modification of DKK1 structure-function, thus the direct interaction of NCI8642 to DKK1 was not measured.

NCI8642 is also functionally active in the inhibition of DKK1 activity on Wnt signaling mediated by LRP5/6 as demonstrated by the TCF-Luc and β-catenin assays in two different cellular backgrounds. The compound IC50 measured in the TCF-Luc and β-catenin assays, where LRP5/6 is expressed at endogenous, physiological levels, is comparable with the one obtained in the binding assay on the overexpressed LRP6. In the TCF-Luc assay, we observed a slight increase of the Wnt3a-mediated activation of the reporter gene, even in the absence of DKK1. The hypothesis that it could be due to the presence of endogenous DKK1 in these cells was not confirmed, since we could not detect it by western blot or by quantitative RT-PCR (data not shown). Nevertheless, this was not observed in the β-catenin translocation assay (data not shown), suggesting that it could be an artifact of the reporter assay, or a cell-line-specific effect. Although NCI8642 has been reported as a DKK1/LRP5 inhibitor, our data suggest that it is also effective on DKK1/LRP6 interaction. In fact, NCI8642 blocked DKK1 binding on LRP6, both in LRP6 overexpressing cells and in SPR analysis. This was also confirmed by functional studies, since only LRP6, but not LRP5, is expressed in PC12-TCF-Luc cell line [41], and LRP6 mRNA concentration is about 7 times that of LRP5 in L-cells, as assessed by qPCR (data not shown).

Our results suggest that it is possible to antagonize the DKK1-LRP6 interaction with a small molecule, and this leads to an enhancement of the Wnt signaling pathway. Although NCI8642 micromolar potency might be too low for its application in in vivo experiments, this compound can be considered as a reference small molecule for further drug development aiming at the inhibition of this therapeutically important protein-protein interaction.


LRP5/6:Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 5 or 6
DKK1:Dickkopf 1
GSK3β:Glycogen synthase kinase beta
TCF/LEF:T-cell factor/lymphoid enhancer factor
SPR:Surface plasmon resonance
FU:Fluorescence units
RLU:Relative luminescence units
RU:Resonance units
AP-DKK1:Alkaline phosphatase-DKK1.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contribution

Sara Iozzi and Rosaria Remelli contributed equally to this work.


The authors thank Raffaello Lorenzini, Valentina Porcari, and Dr. Magdalena Otrocka for the generation of the stable cell lines.


  1. M. V. Semënov, K. Tamai, B. K. Brott, M. Kühl, S. Sokol, and X. He, “Head inducer dickkopf-1 is a ligand for Wnt coreceptor LRP6,” Current Biology, vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 951–961, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  2. C. Niehrs, “Function and biological roles of the Dickkopf family of Wnt modulators,” Oncogene, vol. 25, no. 57, pp. 7469–7481, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  3. A. Glinka, W. Wu, H. Delius, A. P. Monaghan, C. Blumenstock, and C. Niehrs, “Dickkopf-1 is a member of a new family of secreted proteins and functions in head induction,” Nature, vol. 391, no. 6665, pp. 357–362, 1998. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  4. X. He, M. Semenov, K. Tamai, and X. Zeng, “LDL receptor-related proteins 5 and 6 in Wnt/β-catenin signaling: arrows point the way,” Development, vol. 131, no. 8, pp. 1663–1677, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  5. K. I. Pinson, J. Brennan, S. Monkley, B. J. Avery, and W. C. Skarnes, “An LDL-receptor-related protein mediates Wnt signalling in mice,” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6803, pp. 535–538, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  6. K. Tamai, M. Semenov, Y. Kato et al., “LDL-receptor-related proteins in Wnt signal transduction,” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6803, pp. 530–535, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  7. C. Y. Logan and R. Nusse, “The Wnt signaling pathway in development and disease,” Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, vol. 20, pp. 781–810, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  8. H. Clevers, “Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and disease,” Cell, vol. 127, no. 3, pp. 469–480, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  9. X. Zeng, H. Huang, K. Tamai et al., “Initiation of Wnt signaling: control of Wnt coreceptor Lrp6 phosphorylation/activation via frizzled, dishevelled and axin functions,” Development, vol. 135, no. 2, pp. 367–375, 2008. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  10. J. Bilić, Y. L. Huang, G. Davidson et al., “Wnt induces LRP6 signalosomes and promotes dishevelled-dependent LRP6 phosphorylation,” Science, vol. 316, no. 5831, pp. 1619–1622, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  11. D. L. Daniels and W. I. Weis, “β-catenin directly displaces Groucho/TLE repressors from Tcf/Lef in Wnt-mediated transcription activation,” Nature Structural and Molecular Biology, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 364–371, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  12. P. May and J. Herz, “LDL receptor-related proteins in neurodevelopment,” Traffic, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 291–301, 2003. View at: Google Scholar
  13. R. T. Moon, A. D. Kohn, G. V. De Ferrari, and A. Kaykas, “WNT and β-catenin signalling: diseases and therapies,” Nature Reviews Genetics, vol. 5, no. 9, pp. 691–701, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  14. B. Rubinfeld, I. Albert, E. Porfiri, C. Fiol, S. Munemitsu, and P. Polakis, “Binding of GSK3β to the APC-β-catenin complex and regulation of complex assembly,” Science, vol. 272, no. 5264, pp. 1023–1026, 1996. View at: Google Scholar
  15. M. Van de Wetering, E. Sancho, C. Verweij et al., “The β-catenin/TCF-4 complex imposes a crypt progenitor phenotype on colorectal cancer cells,” Cell, vol. 111, no. 2, pp. 241–250, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  16. H. Takeda, S. Lyle, A. J. F. Lazar, C. C. Zouboulis, I. Smyth, and F. M. Watt, “Human sebaceous tumors harbor inactivating mutations in LEF1,” Nature Medicine, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 395–397, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  17. C. H. M. Jamieson, L. E. Ailles, S. J. Dylla et al., “Granulocyte-macrophage progenitors as candidate leukemic stem cells in blast-crisis CML,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 351, no. 7, pp. 657–667, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  18. M. Kato, M. S. Patel, R. Levasseur et al., “Cbfa1-independent decrease in osteoblast proliferation, osteopenia, and persistent embryonic eye vascularization in mice deficient in Lrp5, a Wnt coreceptor,” Journal of Cell Biology, vol. 157, no. 2, pp. 303–314, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  19. M. Semënov, K. Tamai, and X. He, “SOST is a ligand for LRP5/LRP6 and a Wnt signaling inhibitor,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 280, no. 29, pp. 26770–26775, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  20. S. I. Harada and G. A. Rodan, “Control of osteoblast function and regulation of bone mass,” Nature, vol. 423, no. 6937, pp. 349–355, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  21. L. M. Boyden, J. Mao, J. Belsky et al., “High bone density due to a mutation in LDL-receptor-related protein 5,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 346, no. 20, pp. 1513–1521, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  22. B. T. MacDonald, D. M. Joiner, S. M. Oyserman et al., “Bone mass is inversely proportional to Dkk1 levels in mice,” Bone, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 331–339, 2007. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  23. G. V. De Ferrari and N. C. Inestrosa, “Wnt signaling function in Alzheimer's disease,” Brain Research Reviews, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2000. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  24. J. L. Garrido, J. A. Godoy, A. Alvarez, M. Bronfman, and N. C. Inestrosa, “Protein kinase C inhibits amyloid beta peptide neurotoxicity by acting on members of the Wnt pathway,” The FASEB Journal, vol. 16, no. 14, pp. 1982–1984, 2002. View at: Google Scholar
  25. N. C. Inestrosa, G. V. De Ferrari, J. L. Garrido et al., “Wnt signaling involvement in β-amyloid-dependent neurodegeneration,” Neurochemistry International, vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 341–344, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  26. G. V. De Ferrari, M. A. Chacón, M. I. Barría et al., “Activation of Wnt signaling rescues neurodegeneration and behavioral impairments induced by β-amyloid fibrils,” Molecular Psychiatry, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 195–208, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  27. A. Caricasole, A. Copani, F. Caraci et al., “Induction of Dickkopf-1, a negative modulator of the Wnt pathway, is associated with neuronal degeneration in Alzheimer's brain,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 24, no. 26, pp. 6021–6027, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  28. C. Scali, F. Caraci, M. Gianfriddo et al., “Inhibition of Wnt signaling, modulation of Tau phosphorylation and induction of neuronal cell death by DKK1,” Neurobiology of Disease, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 254–265, 2006. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  29. I. Cappuccio, A. Calderone, C. L. Busceti et al., “Induction of Dickkopf-1, a negative modulator of the Wnt pathway, is required for the development of ischemic neuronal death,” Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 2647–2657, 2005. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  30. D. Wu, Y. Zhang, P. Liu et al., “Compositions and methods for bone formation and remodeling,” US Patent application 2005/0196349 A1. View at: Google Scholar
  31. E. Bettini, E. Magnani, and G. C. Terstappen, “Lithium induces gene expression through lymphoid enhancer-binding factor/T-cell factor responsive element in rat PC12 cells,” Neuroscience Letters, vol. 317, no. 1, pp. 50–52, 2002. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  32. K. Willert, J. D. Brown, E. Danenberg et al., “Wnt proteins are lipid-modified and can act as stem cell growth factors,” Nature, vol. 423, no. 6938, pp. 448–452, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  33. Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, X. Li et al., “The LRP5 high-bone-mass G171V mutation disrupts LRP5 interaction with Mesd,” Molecular and Cellular Biology, vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 4677–4684, 2004. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  34. A. Bafico, G. Liu, A. Yaniv, A. Gazit, and S. A. Aaronson, “Novel mechanism of Wnt signalling inhibition mediated by Dickkopf-1 interaction with LRP6/Arrow,” Nature Cell Biology, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 683–686, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  35. J. Mao, J. Wang, B. Liu et al., “Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-5 binds to Axin and regulates the canonical Wnt signaling pathway,” Molecular Cell, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 801–809, 2001. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  36. M. Kishida, S. Koyama, S. Kishida et al., “Axin prevents Wnt-3a-induced accumulation of β-catenin,” Oncogene, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 979–985, 1999. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  37. J. Zhao, K. A. Kim, and A. Abo, “Tipping the balance: modulating the Wnt pathway for tissue repair,” Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 131–136, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  38. L. L. Blazer and R. R. Neubig, “Small molecule protein-protein interaction inhibitors as CNS therapeutic agents: Current progress and future hurdles,” Neuropsychopharmacology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 126–141, 2009. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  39. H. Glantschnig, K. Scott, R. Hampton et al., “A rate-limiting role for Dickkopf-1 in bone formation and the remediation of bone loss in mouse and primate models of postmenopausal osteoporosis by an experimental therapeutic antibody,” Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, vol. 338, no. 2, pp. 568–569, 2011. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  40. H. Glantschnig, R. A. Hampton, P. Lu et al., “Generation and selection of novel fully human monoclonal antibodies that neutralize Dickkopf-1 (DKK1) inhibitory function in vitro and increase bone mass in vivo,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 285, no. 51, pp. 40135–40147, 2010. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
  41. A. Caricasole, T. Ferraro, L. Iacovelli et al., “Functional characterization of WNT7A signaling in PC12 cells: interaction with a FZD5-LRP6 receptor complex and modulation by Dickkopf proteins,” Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 278, no. 39, pp. 37024–37031, 2003. View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright © 2012 Sara Iozzi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

More related articles

 PDF Download Citation Citation
 Download other formatsMore
 Order printed copiesOrder

Related articles

Article of the Year Award: Outstanding research contributions of 2020, as selected by our Chief Editors. Read the winning articles.