Table of Contents
ISRN Civil Engineering
Volume 2012, Article ID 871467, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/871467
Research Article

Interpretation of Falling-Head Tests in Presence of Random Measurement Error

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculté d'Ingénierie, Univeristé de Moncton, Moncton, NB, Canada E1A 3E9

Received 9 February 2012; Accepted 28 February 2012

Academic Editors: H.-L. Luo and S. Pantazopoulou

Copyright © 2012 Paul Chiasson. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. ASTM, “D2434-68(2006) Standard test method for permeability of granular soils (constant head),” in ASTM Annual Book of Standards, vol. 4.08, 2011, West Conshohocken, Pa, USA. View at Google Scholar
  2. ASTM, “D6391-06. Standard test method for field measurement of hydraulic conductivity limits of porous materials using two stages of infiltration from a borehole,” in ASTM Annual Book of Standards, vol. 4.08, 2011, West Conshohocken, Pa, USA. View at Google Scholar
  3. R. P. Chapuis, K. Baass, and L. Davenne, “Granular soils in rigid-wall permeameters: method for determining the degree of saturation,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 71–79, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. CAN/BNQ, “Soils—determination of permeability at the end of a casing,” CAN/BNQ 2501-130-M88, Canadian Standards Association and Bureau de normalisation du Québec, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  5. CAN/BNQ, “Soils—determination of permeability by the Lefranc method,” CAN/BNQ 2501-135-M88, Canadian Standards Association and Bureau de normalisation du Québec, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  6. R. P. Chapuis, Guide des Essais de Pompage et Leurs Interprétations, Les publications du Québec, Québec, Canada, 1999.
  7. R. P. Chapuis, J. J. Paré, and J. G. Lavallée, “Essais de perméabilité à niveau variable,” in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 401–406, Stockholm, Sweden, 1981.
  8. R. P. Chapuis, “Overdamped slug test in monitoring wells: review of interpretation methods with mathematical, physical, and numerical analysis of storativity influence,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 697–719, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. H. H. Cooper Jr., J. D. Bredehoeft, and I. S. Papadopulos, “Response of a finite-diameter well to an instantaneous charge of water,” Water Resources Research, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 263–269, 1967. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  10. R. P. Chapuis and D. Chenaf, “Slug tests in a confined aquifer: Experimental results in a large soil tank and numerical modeling,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 14–21, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  11. R. P. Chapuis and D. Cazaux, “Pressure-pulse test for field hydraulic conductivity of soils: is the usual interpretation method adequate?” in Evaluation and Remediation of Low Permeability and Dual Porosity Environments, N. N. Sara and L. G. Everett, Eds., vol. 1415 of ASTM STP, pp. 66–82, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, Pa, USA, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  12. M. J. Hvorslev, Time-Lag and Soil Permeability in Ground Water Observations, Bulletin, no. 36, U.S. Army Engineering Waterways Experimental Station, Vicksburg, Miss, USA, 1951.
  13. R. P. Chapuis, “Borehole variable-head permeability tests in compacted clay liners and covers,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 39–51, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. P. Chiasson, “Methods of interpretation of borehole falling-head tests performed in compacted clay liners,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 79–90, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. P. Chiasson, “Measuring low hydraulic conductivities by falling-head tests,” in Proceedings of the 60th Canadian Geotechnical Conference, p. 8, Ottawa, Canada, 2007.
  16. G. Schneebeli, “La mesure in situ de la perméabilité d'un terrain,” Comptes-rendus des 3ièmes jounées d'hydraulique, Alger, Algeria, pp. 270-279.
  17. R. P. Chapuis, “Fracturing pressure of soil ground by viscous materials: discussion,” Soils and Foundations, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 174–175, 1992. View at Google Scholar
  18. R. P. Chapuis, “Determining whether wells and piezometers give water levels or piezometric levels,” in Ground Water Determination: Field Methods, 963, pp. 162–171, American Society for Testing and Materials, Special Technical Publication, 1988. View at Google Scholar
  19. R. P. Chapuis and G. Wendling, “Monitoring wells: measurement of permeability with minimal modification of groundwater,” Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 871–875, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. R. P. Chapuis, “Using a leaky swimming pool for a huge falling-head permeability test,” Engineering Geology, vol. 114, no. 1-2, pp. 65–70, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. R. P. Chapuis, “Interpreting slug tests with large data sets,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 139–146, 2009. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  22. G. W. Snedecor and W. G. Cochran, Statistical Methods, University of Iowa Press, Iowa city, Iowa, USA, 8th edition, 1989.