Table of Contents
ISRN High Energy Physics
Volume 2012, Article ID 903106, 31 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/903106
Research Article

Supersymmetry Breaking in a Minimal Anomalous Extension of the MSSM

1Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Università di Roma “Tor Vergata”, INFN Roma Tor Vergata, Via della Ricerca Scientifica, 00133 Roma, Italy
2National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics, Ravala 10, 10143 Tallinn, Estonia

Received 20 April 2012; Accepted 4 June 2012

Academic Editors: J. R. Espinosa and A. Koshelev

Copyright © 2012 A. Lionetto and A. Racioppi. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. A. Sagnotti, “Open strings and their symmetry groups,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0208020.
  2. G. Pradisi and A. Sagnotti, “Open string orbifolds,” Physics Letters B, vol. 216, no. 1-2, pp. 59–67, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  3. M. Bianchi and A. Sagnotti, “On the systematics of open-string theories,” Physics Letters B, vol. 247, no. 4, pp. 517–524, 1990. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  4. M. Bianchi and A. Sagnotti, “Twist symmetry and open-string Wilson lines,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 361, no. 2, pp. 519–538, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  5. M. Bianchi, G. Pradisi, and A. Sagnotti, “Planar duality in the discrete series,” Physics Letters B, vol. 273, no. 4, pp. 389–398, 1991. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  6. M. Bianchi, G. Pradisi, and A. Sagnotti, “Toroidal compactification and symmetry breaking in open-string theories,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 376, no. 2, pp. 365–386, 1992. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  7. G. Pradisi, A. Sagnotti, and Ya. S. Stanev, “Planar duality in SU(2) WZW models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 354, no. 3-4, pp. 279–286, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  8. G. Pradisi, A. Sagnotti, and Ya. S. Stanev, “The open descendants of non-diagonal SU(2) WZW models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 356, no. 2-3, pp. 230–238, 1995. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. G. Pradisi, A. Sagnotti, and Ya. S. Stanev, “Completeness conditions for boundary operators in 2D conformal field theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 381, no. 1–3, pp. 97–104, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  10. C. Angelantonj, M. Bianchi, G. Pradisi, A. Sagnotti, and Ya. S. Stanev, “Chiral asymmetry in four-dimensional open-string vacua,” Physics Letters B, vol. 385, no. 1–4, pp. 96–102, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. C. Angelantonj, M. Bianchi, G. Pradisi, A. Sagnotti, and Y. S. Stanev, “Comments on Gepner models and type I vacua in string theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 387, no. 4, pp. 743–749, 1996. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. C. Angelantonja and A. Sagnottib, “Open strings,” Physics Reports, vol. 371, no. 1-2, pp. 1–50, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  13. E. Dudas, “Theory and phenomenology of type I strings and m-theory,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 17, no. 22, pp. R41–R116, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  14. M. Bianchi and J. F. Morales, “Anomalies & tadpoles,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 3, article 030, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  15. M. Bianchi and E. Kiritsis, “Non-perturbative and flux superpotentials for type I strings on the Z 3 orbifold,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 782, no. 1-2, pp. 26–50, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  16. M. Bianchi, F. Fucito, and J. F. Morales, “D-brane instantons on the T6/3 orientifold,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 7, article 038, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  17. M. Bianchi and J. F. Morales, “Unoriented D-brane instantons vs heterotic worldsheet instantons,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2, article 073, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  18. G. Aldazabal, A. Font, L. E. Ibáñez, and G. Violero, “D = 4, N = 1, type IIB orientifolds,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 536, no. 1-2, pp. 29–68, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  19. L. E. Ibáñez, R. Rabadán, and A. M. Uranga, “Anomalous U (1)'s in Type I and Type IIB D = 4, N = 1 string vacua,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 542, no. 1-2, pp. 112–138, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  20. G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L. E. Ibáñez, R. Rabadán, and A. M. Uranga, “D = 4 chiral string compactifications from intersecting branes,” Journal of Mathematical Physics, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 3103–3126, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  21. G. Aldazabal, S. Franco, L. E. Ibanez, R. Rabadan, and A. M. Uranga, “Intersecting brane worlds,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 2, article 047, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  22. G. Aldazabal, L. E. Ibáñez, F. Quevedo, and A. M. Uranga, “D-branes at singularities: a bottom-up approach to the string embedding of the standard model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 8, article 002, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  23. L. E. Ibänez, F. Marchesano, and P. Rabadan, “Getting just the standard model at intersecting branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 11, article 002, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  24. F. G. Marchesano, “Progress in D-brane model building,” Fortschritte der Physik, vol. 55, no. 5–7, pp. 491–518, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  25. R. Blumenhagen, B. Körs, D. Lüst, and T. Ott, “The standard model from stable intersecting brane world orbifolds,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 616, no. 1-2, pp. 3–33, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  26. R. Blumenhagen, B. Körs, D. Lüst, and T. Ott, “Intersecting brane worlds on tori and orbifolds,” Fortschritte der Physik, vol. 50, no. 8-9, pp. 843–850, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  27. D. Lüst, “Intersecting brane worlds—a path to the standard model?” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 21, no. 10, pp. S1399–S1424, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  28. M. Cvetič, P. Langacker, and G. Shiu, “Phenomenology of a three-family standardlike string model,” Physical Review D, vol. 66, no. 6, Article ID 066004, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  29. M. Cvetic, G. Shiu, and A. M. Uranga, “Three-family supersymmetric standardlike models from intersecting brane worlds,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 87, no. 20, Article ID 201801, 4 pages, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  30. M. Cvetič, T. Li, and T. Liu, “Supersymmetric Pati-Salam models from intersecting D6-branes: a road to the standard model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 698, no. 1-2, pp. 163–201, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  31. R. Blumenhagen, M. Cvetič, P. Langacker, and G. Shiu, “Toward realistic intersecting D-brane models,” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol. 55, pp. 71–139, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  32. F. Gmeiner, “Standard model statistics of a type II orientifold,” Fortschritte der Physik, vol. 54, no. 5-6, pp. 391–398, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  33. F. Gmeiner, “Gauge sector statistics of intersecting D-brane models,” Fortschritte der Physik, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 111–160, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  34. F. Gmeiner, “Statistics in the landscape of intersecting brane models,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 461–465, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  35. D. Bailin, G. V. Kraniotis, and A. Love, “Supersymmetric standard models on D-branes,” Physics Letters B, vol. 502, no. 1–4, pp. 209–215, 2001. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  36. D. Bailin, G. V. Kraniotis, and A. Love, “New standard-like models from intersecting D4-branes,” Physics Letters B, vol. 547, no. 1-2, pp. 43–50, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  37. D. Bailin, G. V. Kraniotis, and A. Love, “Standard-like models from intersecting D5-branes,” Physics Letters B, vol. 553, no. 1-2, pp. 79–86, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  38. C. Kokorelis, “GUT model hierarchies from intersecting branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 8, article 018, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  39. C. Kokorelis, “New standard model vacua from intersecting branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 9, article 029, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  40. E. Floratos and C. Kokorelis, “MSSM GUT string vacua, split supersymmetry and fluxes,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0607217.
  41. G. K. Leontaris and J. Rizos, “A D-brane inspired Trinification model,” Journal of Physics, vol. 53, no. 1, Article ID 046, pp. 722–730, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  42. D. V. Gioutsos, G. K. Leontaris, and A. Psallidas, “D-brane standard model variants and split supersymmetry: Unification and fermion mass predictions,” Physical Review D, vol. 74, no. 7, Article ID 075007, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  43. G. K. Leontaris, N. D. Tracas, N. D. Vlachos, and O. Korakianitis, “Towards realistic standard model from D-brane configurations,” Physical Review D, vol. 76, no. 11, Article ID 115009, 13 pages, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  44. I. Antoniadis, E. Kiritsis, and T. N. Tomaras, “A D-brane alternative to unification,” Physics Letters B, vol. 486, no. 1-2, pp. 186–193, 2000. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  45. I. Antoniadis, E. Kiritsis, and T. Tomaras, “D-brane standard model,” Fortschritte der Physik, vol. 49, no. 4–6, pp. 573–580, 2001. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  46. I. Antoniadis, E. Kiritsis, J. Rizos, and T. N. Tomaras, “D-branes and the standard model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 660, no. 1-2, pp. 81–115, 2003. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  47. T. P. T. Dijkstra, L. R. Huiszoon, and A. N. Schellekens, “Chiral supersymmetric standard model spectra from orientifolds of Gepner models,” Physics Letters B, vol. 609, no. 3-4, pp. 408–417, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  48. T. P. T. Dijkstra, L. R. Huiszoon, and A. N. Schellekens, “Supersymmetric standard model spectra from RCFT orientifolds,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 710, no. 1-2, pp. 3–57, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  49. B. Gato-Rivera and A. N. Schellekens, “Remarks on global anomalies in RCFT orientifolds,” Physics Letters B, vol. 632, no. 5-6, pp. 728–732, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  50. A. N. Schellekens, “The landscape ‘avant la lettre’,” http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0604134.
  51. P. Anastasopoulos, T. Dijkstra, E. Kiritsis, and B. Schellekens, “Orientifolds, hypercharge embeddings and the standard model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 759, no. 1-2, pp. 83–146, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  52. L. E. Ibáñez, B. Schellekens, and A. M. Uranga, “Instanton induced neutrino Majorana masses in CFT orientifolds with MSSM-like spectra,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 6, article 011, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  53. E. Dudas and C. Timirgaziu, “Internal magnetic fields and supersymmetry in orientifolds,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 716, no. 1-2, pp. 65–87, 2005. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  54. S. Förste, I. Zavala, and C. Timirgaziu, “Orientifold's landscape: non-factorisable six-tori,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 10, article 025, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  55. D. Berenstein, R. Martínez, F. Ochoa, and S. Pinansky, “Z' boson detection in the minimal quiver standard model,” Physical Review D, vol. 79, no. 9, Article ID 095005, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  56. Y. Y. Komachenko and M. Khlopov, “On manifestation of z-prime boson of heterotic string in exclusive neutrino N,” Soviet Journal of Nuclear Physics, vol. 51, p. 692, 1990, Yadernaya Fizika, vol. 51, p. 1081. View at Google Scholar
  57. E. Kiritsis, String Theory in a Nutshell, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2007.
  58. P. Anastasopoulos, F. Fucito, A. Lionetto, G. Pradisi, A. Racioppi, and Y. S. Stanev, “Minimal anomalous U(1)' extension of the MSSM,” Physical Review D, vol. 78, no. 8, Article ID 085014, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  59. C. Corianò, N. Irges, and E. Kiritsis, “On the effective theory of low-scale orientifold string vacua,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 746, no. 1-2, pp. 77–135, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  60. C. Corianò, N. Irges, and S. Morelli, “Stückelberg axions and the effective action of anomalous abelian models 1. A unitarity analysis of the Higgs-axion mixing,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 7, article 008, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  61. C. Corianò, N. Irges, and S. Morelli, “Stückelberg axions and the effective action of anomalous Abelian models. A SU(3)C × SU(2)W × U(1)Y × U(1)B model and its signature at the LHC,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 789, no. 1-2, pp. 133–174, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  62. R. Armillis, C. Coriano, and M. Guzzi, “Trilinear anomalous gauge interactions from intersecting branes and the neutral currents sector,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 5, article 015, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  63. C. Corianò, M. Guzzi, and S. Morelli, “Unitarity bounds for gauged axionic interactions and the Green-Schwarz mechanism,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 629–652, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  64. R. Armillis, C. Corianò, M. Guzzi, and S. Morelli, “Axions and anomaly-mediated interactions: the Green-Schwarz and Wess-Zumino vertices at higher orders and g-2 of the muon,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 10, article 034, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  65. R. Armillis, C. Corianò, M. Guzzi, and S. Morelli, “An anomalous extra Z prime from intersecting branes with Drell-Yan and direct photons at the LHC,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 814, no. 1-2, pp. 156–179, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  66. C. Corianò and M. Guzzi, “Axions from intersecting branes and decoupled chiral fermions at the Large Hadron Collider,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 826, no. 1, pp. 87–147, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  67. C. Corianò, M. Guzzi, G. Lazarides, and A. Mariano, “Cosmological properties of a gauged axion,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 6, Article ID 065013, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  68. C. Corianò, M. Guzzi, N. Irges, and A. Mariano, “Axion and neutralinos from supersymmetric extensions of the standard model with anomalous U(1)'s,” Physics Letters B, vol. 671, no. 1, pp. 87–90, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  69. C. Corianò, M. Guzzi, A. Mariano, and S. Morelli, “Light supersymmetric axion in an anomalous Abelian extension of the standard model,” Physical Review D, vol. 80, no. 3, Article ID 035006, 28 pages, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  70. C. Corianò, M. Guzzi, and A. Mariano, “Relic densities of dark matter in the U(1)-extended NMSSM and the gauged axion supermultiplet,” Physical Review D, vol. 85, no. 9, Article ID 095008, 26 pages, 2012. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  71. C. Corianò, M. Guzzi, and A. Mariano, “Relic densities of gauged axions and supersymmetry,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 217, no. 1, pp. 75–77, 2011. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  72. M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, “Anomaly cancellations in supersymmetric D = 10 gauge theory and superstring theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 149, no. 1–3, pp. 117–122, 1984. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  73. M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, “Infinity cancellations in SO(32) superstring theory,” Physics Letters B, vol. 151, no. 1, pp. 21–25, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  74. M. B. Green and J. H. Schwarz, “The hexagon gauge anomaly in type 1 superstring theory,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 255, pp. 93–114, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  75. L. E. Ibáñez and F. Quevedo, “Anomalous U(1)'s and proton stability in brane models,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 11–17, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  76. E. Kiritsis and P. Anastasopoulos, “The anomalous magnetic moment of the muon in the D-brane realization of the standard model,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 5, article 054, 2002. View at Google Scholar
  77. D. Ghilencea, L. E. Ibáñez, N. Irges, and F. Quevedo, “TeV-scale Z' bosons from D-branes,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 6, no. 8, pp. 303–347, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  78. B. de Wit, P. G. Lauwers, and A. Van Proeyen, “Lagrangians of N = 2 supergravity-matter systems,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 255, pp. 569–608, 1985. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  79. L. Andrianopoli, S. Ferrara, and M. A. Lledó, “Axion gauge symmetries and generalized Chern-Simons terms in N = 1 supersymmetric theories,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 4, article 005, 2004. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  80. P. Anastasopoulos, M. Bianchi, E. Dudas, and E. Kiritsis, “Anomalies, anomalous U(1)'s and generalized Chern-Simons terms,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 11, article 057, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  81. P. Anastasopoulos, “Anomalies, Chern-Simons terms and the standard model,” Journal of Physics, vol. 53, no. 1, Article ID 047, pp. 731–745, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  82. P. Anastasopoulos, “Anomalous U(1)'s, Chern-Simons couplings and the standard model,” Fortschritte der Physik, vol. 55, no. 5–7, pp. 633–638, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  83. I. Antoniadis, A. Boyarsky, and O. Ruchayskiy, “Axion alternatives,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0606306.
  84. I. Antoniadis, A. Boyarsky, and O. Ruchayskiy, “Anomaly induced effects in a magnetic field,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 793, no. 1-2, pp. 246–259, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  85. J. De Rydt, J. Rosseel, T. T. Schmidt, A. Van Proeyen, and M. Zagermann, “Symplectic structure of N = 1 supergravity with anomalies and Chern-Simons terms,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 24, no. 20, pp. 5201–5220, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  86. L. Girardello and M. T. Grisaru, “Soft breaking of supersymmetry,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 194, no. 1, pp. 65–76, 1982. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  87. F. Fucito, A. Lionetto, J. F. Morales, and R. Richter, “Dynamical supersymmetry breaking in intersecting brane models,” Journal of High Energy Physics, vol. 11, article 024, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  88. R. Blumenhagen, M. Cvetic, S. Kachru, and T. Weigand, “D-brane instantons in type II string theory,” Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol. 59, pp. 269–296, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  89. G. Dvali and A. Pomarol, “Anomalous U(1) as a mediator of supersymmetry breaking,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 77, no. 18, pp. 3728–3731, 1996. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  90. R. Blumenhagen, B. Körs, D. Lüst, and S. Stieberger, “Four-dimensional string compactifications with D-branes, orientifolds and fluxes,” Physics Reports, vol. 445, no. 1–6, pp. 1–193, 2007. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  91. M. Bianchi and M. Samsonyan, “Notes on unoriented D-brane instantons,” International Journal of Modern Physics A, vol. 24, no. 31, pp. 5737–5763, 2009. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  92. E. Poppitz, “On the one-loop Fayet-Iliopoulos term in chiral four-dimensional type I orbifolds,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 542, no. 1-2, pp. 31–44, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  93. S. P. Martin, “A supersymmetry primer,” http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/9709356.
  94. K. Inoue, A. Kakuto, H. Komatsu, and S. Takeshita, “Low energy parameters and particle masses in a supersymmetric grand unified model,” Progress of Theoretical Physics, vol. 67, no. 6, pp. 1889–1898, 1982. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  95. R. A. Flores and M. Sher, “Higgs masses in the standard, multi-Higgs and supersymmetric models,” Annals of Physics, vol. 148, no. 1, pp. 95–134, 1983. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  96. S. Schael, R. Barate, R. Bruneliére et al., “Search for neutral MSSM Higgs bosons at LEP,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 47, no. 3, pp. 547–587, 2006. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  97. F. Fucito, A. Lionetto, A. Mammarella, and A. Racioppi, “Stückelino dark matter in anomalous U(1)' models,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 455–465, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  98. A. Lionetto and A. Racioppi, “Gaugino radiative decay in an anomalous U(1)' model,” Nuclear Physics B, vol. 831, no. 1-2, pp. 329–343, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  99. F. Fucito, A. Lionetto, A. Racioppi, and D. R. Pacifici, “Phenomenological study on the wino radiative decay in anomalous $U(1)′$ models,” Physical Review D, vol. 82, no. 11, Article ID 115004, 2010. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  100. N. Arkani-Hamed, M. Dine, and S. P. Martin, “Dynamical supersymmetry breaking in models with a Green-Schwarz mechanism,” Physics Letters B, vol. 431, no. 3-4, pp. 329–338, 1998. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  101. ALEPH Collaboration, DELPHI Collaboration, L3 Collaboration et al., “Precision electroweak measurements on the Z resonance,” Physics Reports, vol. 427, no. 5-6, pp. 257–454, 2006. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  102. http://www-cdf.fnal.gov/physics/exotic/r2a/20100527.zprime_mumu/conference_note.pdf.
  103. The ATLAS Collaboration, “Combination of higgs Boson searches with up to 4.9 fb−1 of pp collision data taken at s=7 TeV with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC,” ATLAS-CONF 2011-163, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  104. The CMS Collaborations, “Combination of CMS searches for a standard model higgs boson,” CMS-PAS-HIG 11-032, 2011. View at Google Scholar
  105. A. Heister, S. Schael, R. Barate et al., “Absolute lower limits on the masses of selectrons and sneutrinos in the MSSM,” Physics Letters B, vol. 544, no. 1-2, pp. 73–88, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  106. A. Heister, S. Schael, R. Barate et al., “Search for squarks and gluinos in events with jets and missing transverse energy using 2.1 fb−1 of pp¯ collision data at s=1.96 TeV,” Physics Letters B, vol. 660, no. 5, pp. 449–457, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  107. G. Aad, B. Abbott, and J. Abdallah, “Search for squarks and gluinos using final states with jets and missing transverse momentum with the Atlas detector in s = 7 TeV proton-proton collisions,” Physics Letters B, vol. 710, no. 1, pp. 67–85. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  108. S. Chatrchyan, V. Khachatryan, and A. M. Sirunyan, “Search for supersymmetry at the LHC in events with jets and missing transverse energy,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 107, no. 22, Article ID 221804. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar
  109. S. Schael, R. Barate, R. Bruneliére et al., “Search for charged Higgs bosons in e+e- collisions at energies up to s=209 GeV,” Physics Letters B, vol. 543, no. 1-2, pp. 1–13, 2002. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  110. B. C. Allanach, M. Battaglia, and G.A. Blair, “The snowmass points and slopes: benchmarks for SUSY searches,” in Proceedings of the APS / DPF / DPB Summer Study on the Future of Particle Physics (Snowmass '01), N. Graf, Ed., Snowmass, Colo, USA, June 2001.
  111. B. C. Allanach, M. Battaglia, G. A. Blair et al., “The snowmass points and slopes: benchmarks for SUSY searches,” European Physical Journal C, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 113–123, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus