Table of Contents
ISRN Psychiatry
Volume 2012, Article ID 937582, 9 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/937582
Research Article

Posttraumatic Growth Inventory: Factor Structure in the Context of DSM-IV Traumatic Events

1Department of Psychology, Saint Louis University, 211 North Grand Boulevard, Shannon Hall, St. Louis, MO 63103, USA
2Center for Health Quality, Outcomes & Economic Research (CHQOER), Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital, 200 Springs Road (152), Bedford, MA 01730, USA
3Department of Health Policy & Management, Boston University School of Public Health, 715 Albany Street, Boston, MA 02118, USA

Received 26 September 2011; Accepted 27 October 2011

Academic Editors: D. J. Castle, Z. Kronfol, V. Sar, and D. Wolde-Giorgis

Copyright © 2012 Princess E. Osei-Bonsu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Studies examining the dimensionality of the Posttraumatic Growth Inventory (PTGI) have yielded varying results. To date, no study has investigated the measure's factor structure in the context of DSM-defined traumatic events. The present study examined the structure in an undergraduate student sample ( 𝑁 = 3 7 9 ) reporting DSM-IV Criterion-A potentially traumatic events. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) did not support the original five-factor structure. Follow-up exploratory factor analysis and CFA on random halves of the sample showed poor model fit for 1-, 3-, and 7-factor models. Results suggest that the PTGI factor structure is unclear amongst individuals with DSM-IV traumatic events, and continued use of the total score is most appropriate. Future directions including the utility of the PTGI factors are discussed.