Evaluation of the Periodontal Status in Acromegalic Patients: A Comparative Study

Table 3

Linear or logistic regression evaluating mean clinical attachment loss, mean probing depth, or high tooth loss (dependent variables) in acromegalic patients compared to SHIP-1 controls.

Model	𝐵 (95% CI)	𝑃
Mean clinical attachment loss
M0	0.43 (−0.29; 1.15)	0.24
M1	0.44 (−0.18; 1.05)	0.17
M2	0.39 (−0.21; 0.99)	0.20
M3	0.51 (−0.14; 1.17)	0.12
Mean probing depth
M0	0.23 (−0.04; 0.50)	0.09
M1	0.23 (−0.02; 0.49)	0.07
M2	0.22 (−0.04; 0.48)	0.09
M3	0.28 (−0.00; 0.56)	0.05
Missing teeth ≥10	OR (95% CI)
M0	0.89 (0.38; 2.11)	0.80
M1	0.88 (0.35; 2.19)	0.78
M2	0.81 (0.31; 2.14)	0.68
M3	0.59 (0.19; 1.82)	0.36

𝑁: number.
M0: crude model; M1: adjusted for age (cont.) and gender; M2: adjusted for age (cont.), gender, education, and smoking; M3: adjusted for age (cont.), gender, education, smoking, presence of metabolic syndrome, and medication with sexual hormones.