Research Article
Nonconvex Compressed Sampling of Natural Images and Applications to Compressed MR Imaging
Table 3
Results on natural images in Figure
1 by three methods (SR = 21.59%,
,
).
| Image no. | Method | Exp. result | SNR | Rel. err. | Iter |
| Figure 1(a) | FPC [10] | 18.5257 | 5.51% | 53 | TVCMRI [11] | 21.1391 | 0.71% | 62 | HQRCSparET | | | 65 | Figure 1(b) | FPC [10] | 20.0902 | 3.14% | 53 | TVCMRI [11] | 22.3289 | 0.60% | 65 | HQRCSparET | | | 64 | Figure 1(c) | FPC [10] | 16.5973 | 4.89% | 53 | TVCMRI [11] | 18.3677 | 0.73% | 62 | HQRCSparET | | | 65 | Figure 1(d) | FPC [10] | 13.8952 | 7.54% | 53 | TVCMRI [11] | 15.4621 | 1.74% | 67 | HQRCSparET | | | 64 | Figure 1(e) | FPC [10] | 17.6930 | 4.88% | 53 | TVCMRI [11] | 20.5017 | 0.64% | 64 | HQRCSparET | | | 64 | Figure 1(f) | FPC [10] | 19.8630 | 3.38% | 53 | TVCMRI [11] | 22.2937 | 0.98% | 67 | HQRCSparET | | | 62 |
|
|