International Scholarly Research Notices / 2013 / Article / Tab 16 / Review Article
Sexually Transmitted Infections and Male Circumcision: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Table 16 Sensitivity analysis of high-risk and general populations of studies of the association between circumcision status and various sexually transmitted infections.
Random-effects odds ratio 95% confidence interval Heterogeneity chi-square (df) Genital discharge syndrome High-risk populations 1.18 1.11–1.25 2.14 (3)
General populations 0.77 0.59–0.99 16.78 (5)
NSU High-risk populations 0.95 0.73–1.55 13.90 (6)
General populations 0.61 0.48–0.76 11.76 (4)
Chlamydia High-risk populations 1.02 0.83–1.26 9.49 (6)
General populations 0.77 0.46–1.31 22.40 (6)
Gonorrhea High-risk populations 1.09 0.86–1.40 77.07 (15)
General populations 1.02 0.88–1.18 11.12 (10)
GUD High-risk populations 1.91 1.50–2.43 15.63 (6)
General populations 1.34 1.13–1.59 3.78 (4)
Syphilis High-risk populations 1.40 1.06–1.85 39.45 (12)
General populations 1.22 1.00–1.49 27.96(15)
Herpes simplex High-risk populations 1.20 0.99–1.46 23.15 (14)
General population 1.06 0.78–1.45 124.28 (17)
Genital warts High-risk populations 0.91 0.58–1.44 28.16 (7)
General populations 0.78 0.63–0.96 8.61 (6)
Any HPV High-risk populations 1.24 0.85–1.82 14.13 (8)
General populations 1.23 0.97–1.55 24.10 (15)
High-risk HPV High-risk populations 1.08 0.72–1.63 15.82 (8)
General populations 1.21 0.92–1.58 28.65 (15)
Any STD High-risk populations 0.96 0.79–1.17 6.29(4)
General populations 0.84 0.69–1.02 296.71 (20)
General populations; no Langerin 0.79 0.69–0.90 43.59 (19)