Research Article
Choosing the Right Spatial Weighting Matrix in a Quantile Regression Model
Table 11
Estimation results at the 0.8th quantile.
| | LSA | Full path | SCAD | | Coefficient | P value | Coefficient | P value | Coefficient | P value |
| Intercept |
3.456
|
0.000
|
3.404
|
0.000
|
1.573
|
0.022
| CRIM | −0.010 |
0.000
| −0.010 |
0.000
| −0.009 |
0.000
| ZN | | |
0.000
|
0.926
|
0.000
|
0.492
| INDUS | | | −0.002 |
0.284
| −0.003 |
0.208
| CHAS |
0.084
|
0.073
|
0.083
|
0.075
|
0.098
|
0.156
| NOX2 | −0.506 |
0.000
| −0.475 |
0.000
|
0.270
|
0.353
| RM2 |
0.010
|
0.000
|
0.010
|
0.000
|
0.012
|
0.000
| AGE | −0.001 |
0.187
| −0.001 |
0.167
| −0.001 |
0.191
| log (DIS) | −0.217 |
0.000
| −0.232 |
0.000
| −0.081 |
0.119
| log (RAD) |
0.042
|
0.007
|
0.044
|
0.006
|
0.008
|
0.713
| TAX | | | | | | | PTRATIO | −0.026 |
0.000
| −0.024 |
0.000
| −0.002 |
0.829
| B | | | | | | | log (LSTAT) | −0.257 |
0.000
| −0.253 |
0.000
| −0.189 |
0.000
| n6w1.1 |
0.236
|
0.000
|
0.252
|
0.000
|
0.573
|
0.027
| n9w3.9 | | | | | −0.051 |
0.817
|
|
|