Research Article
Choosing the Right Spatial Weighting Matrix in a Quantile Regression Model
Table 12
Estimation results at the 0.9th quantile.
| | LSA | Full path | SCAD | | Coefficient | P value | Coefficient | P value | Coefficient | P value |
| Intercept |
3.804
|
0.000
|
2.374
|
0.000
|
1.608
|
0.017
| CRIM | −0.010 |
0.000
| −0.002 |
0.789
| −0.010 |
0.000
| ZN | | | −0.001 |
0.048
|
0.000
|
0.975
| INDUS | | |
0.001
|
0.716
| −0.002 |
0.300
| CHAS | | | | |
0.068
|
0.286
| NOX2 | −0.818 |
0.000
| | | | | RM2 |
0.007
|
0.000
|
0.008
|
0.001
|
0.012
|
0.000
| AGE | | | | | | | log (DIS) | −0.248 |
0.000
| | | −0.069 |
0.164
| log (RAD) |
0.068
|
0.000
| | |
0.050
|
0.014
| TAX | | | | | | | PTRATIO | −0.029 |
0.000
| −0.012 |
0.158
|
0.000
|
0.995
| B | −0.279 |
0.000
| | | | | log (LSTAT) | | | −0.263 |
0.000
| −0.168 |
0.000
| n2w0.5 | | | −0.098 |
0.549
|
0.152
|
0.140
| n7w0.4 | | |
0.026
|
0.920
|
0.329
|
0.024
| n8w2.6 | | |
0.517
|
0.069
| | | n10w2.5 |
0.260
|
0.000
| | | | |
|
|