The Transaxial Orientation Is Superior to Both the Short Axis and Horizontal Long Axis Orientations for Determining Right Ventricular Volume and Ejection Fraction Using Simpson's Method with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

<table class="table-group" id="tab3"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td align="left">Axis</td><td align="center">EDV</td><td align="center">ESV</td><td align="center">EF</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="4"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td align="left">RV-SA</td><td align="center">0.5 (−6.0 to 7.5)</td><td align="center">10.5 (0.1 to 21.9)</td><td align="center">—</td></tr><tr><td align="left">RV-TA</td><td align="center">−2.6 (−8.2 to 3.3)</td><td align="center">−5.9 (−15.2 to 4.5)</td><td align="center">1.7 (−1.5 to 4.9)</td></tr><tr><td align="left">RV-HLA</td><td align="center">−9.8 (−16.6 to −2.4)</td><td align="center">−8.9 (−18.5 to 1.8)</td><td align="center">−0.7 (−3.8 to 2.5)</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="4"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr><tr class="table-fn"><td>Values are in percent. 95% confidence intervals are given in parentheses. EDV: end-diastolic volume, EF: ejection fraction, ESV: end-systolic volume, HLA: horizontal long axis, LV: left ventricle, RV: right ventricle, SA: short axis, and TA: transaxial. Mean EF for RV-SA was not determined due to the poor interrater reliability.<br/></td></tr></table>

Percent difference of mean data with PSSS method.

International Scholarly Research Notices

tab3

Table 3

Table 3: The Transaxial Orientation Is Superior to Both the Short Axis and Horizontal Long Axis Orientations for Determining Right Ventricular Volume and Ejection Fraction Using Simpson's Method with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance 

Table 3 | The Transaxial Orientation Is Superior to Both the Short Axis and Horizontal Long Axis Orientations for Determining Right Ventricular Volume and Ejection Fraction Using Simpson's Method with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance 