Table of Contents
ISRN Rehabilitation
Volume 2013 (2013), Article ID 278025, 10 pages
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/278025
Research Article

An Exploratory Study of the Elements of Successful Service Dog Partnerships in the Workplace

West Virginia University, P.O. Box 6122, 502 Allen Hall, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA

Received 16 September 2013; Accepted 1 November 2013

Academic Editors: J. McDougall and C. Zwingmann

Copyright © 2013 Margaret K. Glenn. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Linked References

  1. D. H. Rintala, R. Matamoros, and L. L. Seitz, “Effects of assistance dogs on persons with mobility or hearing impairments: a pilot study,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 489–504, 2008. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  2. E. Eames, “Reasonable accommodation and assistance dogs in the workplace,” CPER No. 189, 2008, http://www.iaadp.org/work_access6.html.
  3. Assistance Dogs International (n.d.), “Types of assistance dogs,” 2013, http://www.assistancedogsinternational.org/about-us/types-of-assistance-dogs/.
  4. J. Hay, “Fake service dogs anger owners of trained pets,” The Press Democrat, 2013, http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20130807/articles/130809625#page=1.
  5. V. J. Caracelli and J. C. Greene, “Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs,” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 15, pp. 195–207, 1993. View at Google Scholar
  6. W. Trochim, “Concept mapping: soft science or hard art?” in A Special Issue of Evaluation and Program Planning, W. Trochim, Ed., vol. 12, pp. 87–110, 1989. View at Google Scholar
  7. W. Trochim and R. Linton, “Conceptualization for evaluation and planning,” Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 9, pp. 289–308, 1986. View at Google Scholar
  8. W. M. K. Trochim, “Concept mapping. Soft science or hard art?” Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 87–110, 1989. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  9. W. Trochim, “The reliability of concept mapping. Working document for paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association, Dallas, Texas,” 1993, http://www.socialresearchmethods.net/research/Reliable/reliable.htm.
  10. D. Truscott, B. L. Paulson, and R. D. Everall, “Studying participants' experiences using concept mapping,” The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 320–323, 1999. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  11. K. M. Jackson and W. M. K. Trochim, “Concept mapping as an alternative approach for the analysis of open-ended survey responses,” Organizational Research Methods, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 307–336, 2002. View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  12. L. F. Fitzgerald and L. J. Hubert, “Multidimensional scaling: some possibilities for counseling psychology,” Journal of Counseling Psychology, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 469–480, 1987. View at Publisher · View at Google Scholar · View at Scopus
  13. “Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice. (n.d.). Information and technical assistance on the Americans with Disabilities Act,” 2013, http://www.ada.gov/ada_title_I.htm.
  14. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), “EEOC enforcement guidance: reasonable accommodation and undue hardship under the Americans with Disabilities ActEEOC Notice Number 915.002,” 2013, http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/accommodation.html>.
  15. L. C. Bastiste, “Accommodation and compliance series: service animals in the workplace, Job Accommodation Network Accommodation Ideas,” 2013, http://askjan.org/media/servanim.html.