Review Article

The (Real) Neurogenic/Gliogenic Potential of the Postnatal and Adult Brain Parenchyma

Box 1

Major pitfalls and misunderstandings in adult neurogenesis concepts and terminology.
Adulthood: the definition of postnatal, young, adult, old animals is quite different among
scientists, also because of substantial lack of precise terms of comparison between different
species [29]; this point is important since postnatal/adult neurogenesis is heavily affected
by age; an attempt to equate the neurodevelopmental literature across species with
differences in gestation and maturation of various species has been reported [30].
Identity of neural progenitors: progenitors are indicated as neuronal/glial either on the basis
of their nature (e.g., SVZ astrocytes are glial progenitors since they express GFAP) or
referring to their ultimate fate (e.g., SVZ astrocytes are neuronal progenitors since they lead
to the production of new neuroblast/neurons); parenchymal progenitors are even more
undefined both in their nature and fate [17, 31].
Cell proliferation, cell genesis, and neurogenesis: many reports on adult neurogenesis
describe processes of cell proliferation without providing substantial proof on the outcome
of the proiliferative event; in the adult mammalian brain, complete neurogenesis occurs
only in the SVZ and SGZ neurogenic sites; this process is sustained by bona fide stem cells
harboured within stem cell niches which persist from primitive embryonic germinal layers
[9]; most neurogenesis in nonneurogenic regions, both in physiological and lesion-induced
conditions, seems to be incomplete, since newly born elements not only barely survive, but also
they do not functionally integrate, their ultimate fate remaining undiscovered [32].
Protracted (postnatal) versus persistent (adult) neurogenesis: the end of developmental
neurogenesis is highly heterogeneous in the mammalian species concerning both
topographical and temporal variations within the same brain region; a distinction should be
done between “protracted” neurogenesis (a transitory extension of developmental
neurogenesis for some periods after birth) and “persistent” neurogenesis (namely, a
constitutive/physiological neurogenic process that can decrease in intensity but does not
cease during life time) [3234]; protracted neurogenesis can involve both transient
germinal layers [35] and parenchymal neurogenesis [18].
Conclusions driven from animal models: results obtained from some transgenic animal
models are highly controversial; in the text an example is given concerning the hypothetical
genesis of neurons from polydendrocytes in the piriform cortex; a discussion of this issue
can be found in [36].
Conclusions driven from in vivo versus in vitro experiments: many in vitro conditions are able
to induce multipotency in progenitor cells which do not manifest the same differentiative
plasticity in vivo, especially within the CNS parenchyma [37, 38].
Brain regeneration/repair: regeneration is a process which restores the interrupted
continuity of a missing organ mass, yielding new fully functional tissue; repair is an
adaptation to loss of normal tissue through its restoration by scarring; thus, regeneration
restores the normal structure and function of the organ, whereas repair does not [39]; a
further distinction can be made between physiological (maintenance) and pathological
(reparative) regenerative processes.
Relationship between adult neurogenesis and brain repair: the fact that adult neurogenesis
actually occurs in the CNS of all vertebrates challenges the view of a simple relationship
between maintenance of neurogenic regions in the adult CNS and regenerative capability
[40, 41]; indeed, not all vertebrates are capable of CNS regeneration, and the occurrence of
neurogenesis is not always associated with regeneration [41].